Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Labour increase benefits bill. AIBU To think what’s the point in working?

1000 replies

topicalaffair · 03/02/2026 08:10

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15520831/Labours-push-lift-two-child-benefits-cap-hand-25-000-windfalls-thousands-Britains-biggest-jobless-families.html#

‘Official estimates suggest the cost of scrapping the cap will total £13.6 billion over the next five years.

The Tories said families currently affected by the cap are in line to receive windfalls worth an average £25,000 each over that period.

But the biggest families will gain far more. Thousands of families with five children will receive around £10,900 a year while those with six children will get an extra £16,600 a year.
Almost half of the families involved have no one in work.‘

Labour benefits plan 'will hand £25,000' to biggest jobless families

Ministers will bring forward legislation on Tuesday to lift the limit on benefit payments which was imposed in 2017.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15520831/Labours-push-lift-two-child-benefits-cap-hand-25-000-windfalls-thousands-Britains-biggest-jobless-families.html#

OP posts:
Bilster · 03/02/2026 20:56

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 03/02/2026 20:50

Unless you can provide a source for this all you’re showing is your embarrassing stupidity and prejudices rather than actual facts.

I honestly thought the benefit bashing to this level was a thing of the past and we all silently agreed that it was only the slope skulled half wits of the world who thought that benefit claimants were living wealthy lifestyles?!

People living in poverty are 3 x more likely to be smokers, so fags yeh. And I’ll bet tattoos are more common in that income level too.

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 20:56

@XenoBitchI've got enough of them myself! To the point the doctor said he’d sign me off work for three months! But instead I found ways to cope - more healthy habits, reading, exercise, working a job I enjoy etc etc! Sometimes you’ve got to want to help yourself too!

Mapleleaf114 · 03/02/2026 20:56

TheThinkingEconomist · 03/02/2026 20:55

You are confusing child benefit with UC.

Second time so far.

17pw is child benefit?

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 20:56

Bilster · 03/02/2026 20:53

Yup. I was totally naive to the PIP fraud until there was an autistic person on the BBC who said she used the PIP money for everyday bills. The comparison with a person trying to get by on benefits without blagging a disability was stark.

What was this on the BBC? Please post a link.
Many people on PIP use it for everyday bills because they are struggling financially, because UC is not enough.
But you can spend PIP on bills, can spend it on a wheelchair... you can spend it on crack cocaine.... all are ok because you can spend PIP on what you like.

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 20:57

Kendodd · 03/02/2026 20:54

And the solution to this is not more benefits, its more council housing.

I agree with that. We need more social housing!

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 20:59

@Mapleleaf114yes but on UC you get a seperate UC payment for your child which can be £500 per child a month approx. Two separate things!

Starzinsky · 03/02/2026 20:59

The trouble is I do think there are people on benefits receiving far more than decent working salaries for example some in london with london rents covered then add pip which is not means tested, childcare support from non resident patent which is not included as income, working income you keep a proportion on top of benefits and the rest you keep 55% off. So genuinely some benefit recipients are not on the poverty line, whilst others are struggling to live. I do think there needs to be reform to ensure the money goes where it is needed and the trouble is if you take people out of poverty you take away the incentive to work and make responsibile decisions, but I don't know the solution to that.

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 21:00

Starzinsky · 03/02/2026 20:59

The trouble is I do think there are people on benefits receiving far more than decent working salaries for example some in london with london rents covered then add pip which is not means tested, childcare support from non resident patent which is not included as income, working income you keep a proportion on top of benefits and the rest you keep 55% off. So genuinely some benefit recipients are not on the poverty line, whilst others are struggling to live. I do think there needs to be reform to ensure the money goes where it is needed and the trouble is if you take people out of poverty you take away the incentive to work and make responsibile decisions, but I don't know the solution to that.

If someone is on PIP, they have a disability. You can not compare them to someone who does not have one and is working.
Appels and oranges.

Kendodd · 03/02/2026 21:00

topicalaffair · 03/02/2026 20:45

The fact is the adults shouldn’t have children they can’t afford. But they do.

Except they aren't. Birth rates are collapsing around the supposedly 'rich' world because young people can't afford them.

TheThinkingEconomist · 03/02/2026 21:00

Mapleleaf114 · 03/02/2026 20:56

17pw is child benefit?

Child benefit is capped from £60k to £80k (goes to zero)

UC element is now UN-CAPPED for 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th etc child.

We are talking about £300p/m on average for another child. The amount is a lot larger than CB.

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 21:01

@Starzinskyyou made the point much more eloquently than me! Thank you

Crochetandtea · 03/02/2026 21:01

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 03/02/2026 20:46

So the children are punished because of their parent’s actions? Is that ok?

What about children who in 2017 had two working parents who’ve since lost their jobs, become disabled etc? Should their parents have consulted their crystal balls more closely?

Ots not whatabboutery, it’s happening now and in huge numbers.

Any one of us can end up on welfare tomorrow. It’s there for all of us, but those more likely to be in welfare are those who lived in poverty as children. How about we stop benefit bashing and actually try and break the cycle?

We stop giving benefits to those who choose not to work. The two children living in 2017 will be protected should the parents become unable to support them because there are only two of them.
I disagree with our current system as it’s completely unsustainable. PiP for adhd and mild autism? Carers allowance for someone on sickness benefits to look after someone else also on sickness benefits. Too sick to work but can claim to look after another person. Possibly claiming to care for each other ? This would not surprise me.

So many couple not getting married because it’s easier to play the system if you give two separate addresses to the children’s schools to make it look like daddy lives with his parents. I’ve seen this first hand by couples who most definitely live together. Their children are the ones on fsm who also have the trips to Disney. I would be so embarrassed to claim benefits and send my children to school to get fed by the tax payer while I sat at home doing nothing.

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 21:02

@XenoBitchwhat happens if they aren’t on PIP but are still taking home much more than someone working full time?

Penelope23145 · 03/02/2026 21:02

Mapleleaf114 · 03/02/2026 20:43

Its 17pw per child- childs food costs more than this,where is the money for holiday there? Or maybe if you think child benefit is a goldmine,have 8 kids

How ridiculous that you think these families just get £17 a week child benefit. That is just the child benefit. They get hundreds more in Universal credit unless capped. Current UC child elements are £330 for eldest child and around £270 for subsequent children. many with older kids still get child elements for all of them and from April it will be for all kids again so if you have four kids we are talking about 1k per month just in child elements alone. This is in addition to amounts for the parents, for rent etc.

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 21:02

@Crochetandteasingle parents abuse the system! But you’re not allowed to say it out loud!

NorthXNorthWest · 03/02/2026 21:03

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 03/02/2026 20:40

It’s SO fucking outdated and ghoulish to say “Sorry poor people, no money to take your kids of poverty for you. You see you just can’t be trusted to spend it properly”

Many can't. Ask the teachers in primary schools in those areas how many children come in to school exhausted and hungry.

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 21:03

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 21:02

@XenoBitchwhat happens if they aren’t on PIP but are still taking home much more than someone working full time?

No one on benefits that does not have disabilities or kids is taking home more than someone working.
Stop drinking the Daily Mail Kool Aid.

Pistachiocake · 03/02/2026 21:03

topicalaffair · 03/02/2026 08:29

True. However it’s upsetting to know I’m (and others) are lining those pockets by working and paying tax. Which goes straight to other peoples benefits. I’m happy to pay benefits to people that need them, but so so many people don’t yet they claim. And we will now have the backfilling of children start again. It’s a thing - and the people who deny it are either ill informed or beneficiaries of such a generous payment scheme.

I worry about women being forced to have more children than they want, to the detriment of their health (yes, sometimes men are coerced too, but we are the ones going through the physical process). Please don't say this never happens.

Thechaseison71 · 03/02/2026 21:04

Crochetandtea · 03/02/2026 21:01

We stop giving benefits to those who choose not to work. The two children living in 2017 will be protected should the parents become unable to support them because there are only two of them.
I disagree with our current system as it’s completely unsustainable. PiP for adhd and mild autism? Carers allowance for someone on sickness benefits to look after someone else also on sickness benefits. Too sick to work but can claim to look after another person. Possibly claiming to care for each other ? This would not surprise me.

So many couple not getting married because it’s easier to play the system if you give two separate addresses to the children’s schools to make it look like daddy lives with his parents. I’ve seen this first hand by couples who most definitely live together. Their children are the ones on fsm who also have the trips to Disney. I would be so embarrassed to claim benefits and send my children to school to get fed by the tax payer while I sat at home doing nothing.

Yeah I don't get that. If someone needs carers allowance to look after you then surely you are not in a fit state to be looking after someone else and therefore getting the money again

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 21:04

I think the irony is that most people defending those on UC (not PIP) genuinely don’t know anyone on UC - if they did they would know how unfair the system is!

Mapleleaf114 · 03/02/2026 21:05

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 20:59

@Mapleleaf114yes but on UC you get a seperate UC payment for your child which can be £500 per child a month approx. Two separate things!

No its not 500 its 292, the point remains- if gov knows this money is needed towards raising a child for first and second,how are 3rd or 4th child any different?

in case you havent noticed british people are on their way out with very low birth rates,if you think having kids is a goldmine do your country a favour and have 10

topicalaffair · 03/02/2026 21:06

NorthXNorthWest · 03/02/2026 21:03

Many can't. Ask the teachers in primary schools in those areas how many children come in to school exhausted and hungry.

And the sad thing is those same kids will still go into school hungry, not brushed teeth, dirty clothes. The increase in £ won’t go to them. But labour won’t look at that.

OP posts:
Julen7 · 03/02/2026 21:06

Crochetandtea · 03/02/2026 21:01

We stop giving benefits to those who choose not to work. The two children living in 2017 will be protected should the parents become unable to support them because there are only two of them.
I disagree with our current system as it’s completely unsustainable. PiP for adhd and mild autism? Carers allowance for someone on sickness benefits to look after someone else also on sickness benefits. Too sick to work but can claim to look after another person. Possibly claiming to care for each other ? This would not surprise me.

So many couple not getting married because it’s easier to play the system if you give two separate addresses to the children’s schools to make it look like daddy lives with his parents. I’ve seen this first hand by couples who most definitely live together. Their children are the ones on fsm who also have the trips to Disney. I would be so embarrassed to claim benefits and send my children to school to get fed by the tax payer while I sat at home doing nothing.

Yes couples can both be on sickness benefits and both can claim extra money for caring for each other. Crazy.

purpleflowergirl · 03/02/2026 21:06

@XenoBitchand this is where you are SO wrong! If you see my first post - a friend of mine takes home £3k more a year working less than me, earning less than me because she gets a shit load of benefits! Please don’t speak as if you have superior knowledge! Your ignorance to how unfair parts of the system are, are why drives this silly untrue rhetoric!

FMLGFastMovingLuxuryGoods · 03/02/2026 21:06

24kPalamino · 03/02/2026 20:43

No. When we know people are irresponsible, we shouldn’t hand over responsibility and trust them blindly. Support should come with conditions and monitoring, until those people know how to behave responsibly. Or if they don’t want to be monitored, they can always choose to go and get a job and pay for stuff themselves.

Why can’t we blindly trust people

We are not in a dictatorship or Orwellian country where people have to pass tests to be worthy of the basic necessities in life.

But indulge me - what tests SNOULD poor people pass before we entrust them with money?

Once again most UC claimants DO have jobs.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread