Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Labour increase benefits bill. AIBU To think what’s the point in working?

1000 replies

topicalaffair · 03/02/2026 08:10

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15520831/Labours-push-lift-two-child-benefits-cap-hand-25-000-windfalls-thousands-Britains-biggest-jobless-families.html#

‘Official estimates suggest the cost of scrapping the cap will total £13.6 billion over the next five years.

The Tories said families currently affected by the cap are in line to receive windfalls worth an average £25,000 each over that period.

But the biggest families will gain far more. Thousands of families with five children will receive around £10,900 a year while those with six children will get an extra £16,600 a year.
Almost half of the families involved have no one in work.‘

Labour benefits plan 'will hand £25,000' to biggest jobless families

Ministers will bring forward legislation on Tuesday to lift the limit on benefit payments which was imposed in 2017.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15520831/Labours-push-lift-two-child-benefits-cap-hand-25-000-windfalls-thousands-Britains-biggest-jobless-families.html#

OP posts:
DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 03/02/2026 18:51

Julen7 · 03/02/2026 18:45

Posters will come up with the usual. Extra heating. Food because they can only eat x, y, z. Therapy.

"People will give correct and reasonable answers".

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 18:51

Julen7 · 03/02/2026 18:45

Posters will come up with the usual. Extra heating. Food because they can only eat x, y, z. Therapy.

This sort of thing is literally what benefits, especially PIP, is for.

EasternStandard · 03/02/2026 18:52

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 18:44

Um, do you know who CAMHS is for? Not for people who are of working age.
Catch the problem early on. Treat it.

"Just get young people working" does not help when there are no jobs for them to go to. The job market out there is fucking awful right now.

Well obviously given my posts on Labour’s policies impacting jobs. It’s their terrible approach. So yes they should go and a better approach to job creation should be a priority.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 03/02/2026 18:53

Fearfulsaints · 03/02/2026 18:46

Who do you think was living in the housing, using the nhs, going to the schools, claiming the new pensions, sickness benefits and unemployment benefits . just one individual with a sob story

Something like 12,000 veterans got a pension for shell shock.

A whole heap of disability laws were introduced to encourage employment for disabled people. There was a huge labour shortage unlike now.

They 'just got on with it' by creating the welfare state and using it. They wanted better.

People might hace been private about it and had a sense of shame attached but they did use it.

It may need reform and improvement but what did they do after ww2 is a silly comment in relation to welfare.

OK let's look at it another way which may be helpful (its the attitude of the population that Im interested in as its relevant today).

What if we found out the Russians were planning on carrying out a land invasion in a years time, having rearmed and are supported by China. And our nuclear subs having not been tested for years malfunctioned. Not beyond the realms of possibility.

What would happen? Our money would switch from benefits to arms. And young people would be conscripted and most would end up wanting to at least be able to defend themselves and their families. We would end up just getting on with it. And no phobias or anxiety or depression would stop this conscription. And no benefits would be paid. And we would just have to get on with it. And it would be shit of course. But we would just have to do it. Europe can no longer spend 65% of the benefits in the world .

TheThinkingEconomist · 03/02/2026 18:53

Frequency · 03/02/2026 18:48

Higher food bills due to a severely restricted diet. Higher heating bills due to being chronically cold. Taxis to and from everywhere because you have no energy to walk/take public transport. Supportive seat cushions so you don't have to sit on the bones of your arse. Vitamin supplements. Specialist skincare due to how dry/flaking sore your skin is.

I could go on.

Anorexia is not a cheap disease to live with.

The fact you think your views are economically reasonable is quite amazing to a professional economist like myself.

The sheer level of entitlement above and beyond what a safety net should be for is quite impressive.

Society does not owe you the same standard of living as someone who works. This does not exist anywhere on the planet because it creates perverse economic incentives.

NorthXNorthWest · 03/02/2026 18:53

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 18:44

Um, do you know who CAMHS is for? Not for people who are of working age.
Catch the problem early on. Treat it.

"Just get young people working" does not help when there are no jobs for them to go to. The job market out there is fucking awful right now.

Catch the problem early on. Treat it.

The problem often starts with the parent(s). No amount of throwing money at it will overcome that hurdle.

Frequency · 03/02/2026 18:54

TheThinkingEconomist · 03/02/2026 18:53

The fact you think your views are economically reasonable is quite amazing to a professional economist like myself.

The sheer level of entitlement above and beyond what a safety net should be for is quite impressive.

Society does not owe you the same standard of living as someone who works. This does not exist anywhere on the planet because it creates perverse economic incentives.

Who said I don't work? I've never said that.

Julen7 · 03/02/2026 18:55

LadyKenya · 03/02/2026 18:50

All of these things, and more. It costs money, does it not?

I had anorexia in my early 20s and the answer is no. For me it cost nothing more.

NorthXNorthWest · 03/02/2026 18:55

Frequency · 03/02/2026 18:54

Who said I don't work? I've never said that.

If you work you should be able to fund all those things yourself.

Winter2020 · 03/02/2026 18:56

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 18:28

I think it is disregarded as it is not a reliable source of income, and some shitty fathers will withhold paying if they knew it would fuck up their ex's UC.

I am not sure what the solution is to that.

That is why (if a resident parent claims benefits) it needs to be paid direct to the state not the parent. That way if they don't pay it is the state's problem rather than the resident parent's problem. It could be treated like paying tax to HMRC.

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 03/02/2026 18:57

knitnerd90 · 03/02/2026 08:25

Yes because there’s hordes of families with six children on benefits and not giving them enough money for food will definitely reduce that number after the fact.

Birth rate is 1.4. I don't think you should be worrying about hordes of people having six children to get more benefits, a better thing to worry about is who is going to be working to pay the pensions of current working age adults.

Bilster · 03/02/2026 18:57

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 18:51

This sort of thing is literally what benefits, especially PIP, is for.

Food cause they can only eat x y z is quite frankly ridiculous. You have to feed your child regardless of what they eat. Do they only eat smoked salmon? Caviar? Come on!

Countrysidepicnic · 03/02/2026 18:57

Pineneedlesincarpet · 03/02/2026 18:53

OK let's look at it another way which may be helpful (its the attitude of the population that Im interested in as its relevant today).

What if we found out the Russians were planning on carrying out a land invasion in a years time, having rearmed and are supported by China. And our nuclear subs having not been tested for years malfunctioned. Not beyond the realms of possibility.

What would happen? Our money would switch from benefits to arms. And young people would be conscripted and most would end up wanting to at least be able to defend themselves and their families. We would end up just getting on with it. And no phobias or anxiety or depression would stop this conscription. And no benefits would be paid. And we would just have to get on with it. And it would be shit of course. But we would just have to do it. Europe can no longer spend 65% of the benefits in the world .

Interesting post. It would certainly be a reality check.

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 03/02/2026 18:57

TheThinkingEconomist · 03/02/2026 18:53

The fact you think your views are economically reasonable is quite amazing to a professional economist like myself.

The sheer level of entitlement above and beyond what a safety net should be for is quite impressive.

Society does not owe you the same standard of living as someone who works. This does not exist anywhere on the planet because it creates perverse economic incentives.

I could claim to be a professional lion tamer on the internet, doesn't give my views on zoos any more credence than anyone else's.

You think it's entitlement to need skincare to prevent infections in flaking skin and heating to prevent hypothermia?

LadyKenya · 03/02/2026 18:58

Julen7 · 03/02/2026 18:55

I had anorexia in my early 20s and the answer is no. For me it cost nothing more.

So you would have had no need to apply for benefits relating to that then. Other people suffering from the same disease may have different situations relating to their health.

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 18:59

Frequency · 03/02/2026 18:48

Higher food bills due to a severely restricted diet. Higher heating bills due to being chronically cold. Taxis to and from everywhere because you have no energy to walk/take public transport. Supportive seat cushions so you don't have to sit on the bones of your arse. Vitamin supplements. Specialist skincare due to how dry/flaking sore your skin is.

I could go on.

Anorexia is not a cheap disease to live with.

Yep, it is a devastating illness. I have known many people with anorexia over the years and most are dead now... gone in their 20s and 30s, and a couple in their 40s. Most really wanted to get better but the illness is so strong.
It is the only MH illness that has the offer of palliative care. That should say something really. It can genuinely be terminal illness once it gets to a certain point, and there are posters on here wailing about anorexics getting benefits 🙄

TheThinkingEconomist · 03/02/2026 18:59

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 03/02/2026 18:57

I could claim to be a professional lion tamer on the internet, doesn't give my views on zoos any more credence than anyone else's.

You think it's entitlement to need skincare to prevent infections in flaking skin and heating to prevent hypothermia?

The concept of personal responsibility seems to be alien to you.

That in itself indicates a serious problem.

Pineneedlesincarpet · 03/02/2026 19:00

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 03/02/2026 18:57

I could claim to be a professional lion tamer on the internet, doesn't give my views on zoos any more credence than anyone else's.

You think it's entitlement to need skincare to prevent infections in flaking skin and heating to prevent hypothermia?

Why would you not pay for those yourself though? If you work?

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 19:00

Bilster · 03/02/2026 18:57

Food cause they can only eat x y z is quite frankly ridiculous. You have to feed your child regardless of what they eat. Do they only eat smoked salmon? Caviar? Come on!

PIP is awarded based on care needs. Money does not come into it at all.

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 03/02/2026 19:00

These threads always boil down to:

"These aren't emotional decisions, they're financial"

"But people will literally die"

"Stop emotionally blackmailing is, this is financial"

"Right but these people will die"

"DON'T BE EMOTIONAL IT'S FINANCIAL".

Julen7 · 03/02/2026 19:01

LadyKenya · 03/02/2026 18:58

So you would have had no need to apply for benefits relating to that then. Other people suffering from the same disease may have different situations relating to their health.

Anorexia is anorexia, can’t really see how costs would vary very much.

Countrysidepicnic · 03/02/2026 19:01

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 03/02/2026 18:57

Birth rate is 1.4. I don't think you should be worrying about hordes of people having six children to get more benefits, a better thing to worry about is who is going to be working to pay the pensions of current working age adults.

The problem is if both parents have not worked and rely on benefits and have 6 kids there is a greater chance their kids will replicate their lifestyle. We will be in a bigger mess.

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 03/02/2026 19:01

TheThinkingEconomist · 03/02/2026 18:59

The concept of personal responsibility seems to be alien to you.

That in itself indicates a serious problem.

Yeah, worked from when I was 12 until I physically couldn't any more, personal responsibility is a totally alien concept 🙄

Pineneedlesincarpet · 03/02/2026 19:02

DontGoJasonWaterfalls · 03/02/2026 19:00

These threads always boil down to:

"These aren't emotional decisions, they're financial"

"But people will literally die"

"Stop emotionally blackmailing is, this is financial"

"Right but these people will die"

"DON'T BE EMOTIONAL IT'S FINANCIAL".

Who will die of ADHD?

XenoBitch · 03/02/2026 19:02

Julen7 · 03/02/2026 19:01

Anorexia is anorexia, can’t really see how costs would vary very much.

Please read up on it. It is an utterly devastiting illness.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.