Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think current concerns over screen time is bordering hysteria

607 replies

Tiredboymum22 · 22/01/2026 13:31

I think it’s over the top.

If my kids didnt have screens, nothing would get done. I’m mostly solo parenting. Family can’t babysit, husband works late 6 days a week. Childcare costs are through the roof.

I have a 6-year-old with ASD and a very hyperactive toddler. Eldest is obsessed with numbers and Minecraft, uninterested in his little brother a lot of the time. Up at 4.30 am most mornings too. I give my toddler the tablet when I’m trying to cook or tidy up (once he’s done playing with his toys).

I am criticised by older members of my family and told I should let him “help me” cook. Sorry but no.

Now I’m seeing countless articles and comments about the harm of too much screen time, but I think people are missing a lot of nuance.

aibu?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/01/2026 16:46

Of course there are exceptions, kids with SEND using them for regulation come to mind

Though "they're regulating" has become something of a trope, opinions differ on this: https://thescreentimeconsultant.com/resources/essays/screensdonothelpchildrenregulate

Zanatdy · 22/01/2026 16:46

Isekaied · 22/01/2026 15:53

I think the world is different now than it was 18 or more years ago.

There's a difference between TV time and gaming time.

Compared to young kids even young than 1 years of age being brought up on YouTube and stuff like Cocomelon.

Cocomelon has been called Crack for kids.

The bright colours and quick changes in scene make it almost impossible for kids to turn away from the screen.

When your kids are young. Would they be sat at a restaurant with their faces in a tablet while eating??

Smartphones now, have access to so much social media- tiktok. YouTube.snapcbat etc.

Some kids just have their faces in a phone.

You don't say how long ago your kids applied to Oxford. But if its more than 5 years ago even for teens there has been a huge shift in how long they spend on their phones.

My daughter is 17, the world wasn’t that different, social media was created before her birth, and all social media existed when she became a teen. No they didn’t have a tablet, but definitely watched a lot of cartoons, though were at nursery in the week so probably as not as some kids. My son especially was in a dream world zoned out when watching cartoons, but now works up in the city in a professional role, no issues from his excessive screen time. He also had a laptop from 8, which he was on a lot and PS4 - more so than my youngest.

unbelievablybelievable · 22/01/2026 16:50

NewYearSameYou · 22/01/2026 16:31

Anyone who works in a state school will tell you that phones/tablets/gaming systems have been an absolute disaster for children's brains and their behaviour at school.

Absolutely. (Although private schools aren't absolved of the effects either, but less so).

Particularly when screens are used as babysitters like in the examples most people seem to think are an argument for screens. Screens can be great, but not the mindless scrolling on YouTube just to keep kids quiet. The damage of that is horrific.

Theolittle · 22/01/2026 16:52

I was a single parent of 2 with no screens. No SEND because it didn’t happen 20 years ago - but they had their own challenges. You have to teach your children to behave appropriately to allow you to get things done. If you just stick them on screens all the time how will they ever learn🤷‍♀️

it’s bloody hard being a single parent, easier with screens I’m sure but that doesn’t make it right

TellyOrNap · 22/01/2026 16:55

My approach is to ensure my child has enough going on his little life that screen time is naturally limited by everything else we do with him.
One thing that annoys me is the "either playing out unsupervised or inside on screens" rhetoric. It's not either/or

silverwrath · 22/01/2026 16:58

Couldn't disagree more.

Kids managed to entertain themselves in the past without screens.

Play, reading, watching some TV (kids programmes were only available between around 3.30 to 5pm). Go outside and touch grass.

No wonder there are so many people these days struggling with 'concentration' issues. It's screen time.

Redpeach · 22/01/2026 16:58

TellyOrNap · 22/01/2026 16:55

My approach is to ensure my child has enough going on his little life that screen time is naturally limited by everything else we do with him.
One thing that annoys me is the "either playing out unsupervised or inside on screens" rhetoric. It's not either/or

Agree, or claiming its screens or crying, like its a binary choice

letmebetheone · 22/01/2026 17:00

I work in a shop and day after day mums come in with babies in prams with phones or whatever in their little hands. No interaction from mum, no awareness of surroundings, just eyes fixed on a screen.

Mums brought up larger families than we have these days and not a screen in sight. Its no wonder children are growing up being unable to hold proper conversations or socialise properly.
Kids are starting school unable to spell their own names, count to ten or read and its all down to laziness from mums relying on screens to occupy children.

Give the children a screen then they throw a strop when it is removed because they are addicted. Then they often get labelled as ADHD when what they lack is proper parents giving them time and involving them rather than saying they would never get anything done if the kids did not have a screen. I had 4 children under 7 and no family support and yet managed.

BlueJuniper94 · 22/01/2026 17:06

Anothermanechange · 22/01/2026 16:22

How is it incompatible with modern life though? The issue is kids are so addicted to screens they don't know what to do with themselves when they are switched off, and now parents dont know what to do with their children either.
I don't allow screens on week days and my kids play together, they do homework or read or play a game or go on the trampoline. Sometimes they are wrestling upstairs and yes it's noisy but thats kids being kids.
I think it's so sad when you see siblings who don't play together because the older one is only interested in computer games or the TV and barely interacts with their sibling.

A lot of people work from home so noise levels are an issue, children don't have the freedom to go out and play in the physical world with their peers the way they once did, family size has shrunk rapidly in recent decades and often there is no sibling.

I agree, it's a tragedy so many children spend their time alone, sedentary and passive even when they do have other kids to play with. But it's a wider cultural issue too, birthday parties are full of kids on phones, if you arrange playdates kids expect to be on their phones for this time and really do not like being told to leave them by the door, and asking them to makes you a very unpopular playdate host!

It's great you are available to ensure they're not on screens but it's not an feasible option for many.

TinyHousemouse · 22/01/2026 17:07

Anothermanechange · 22/01/2026 16:36

You do realise there are huge swathes of the world where families can't afford electricity let alone a TV right? I never thought I'd hear people being called privileged for NOT using a TV!

My own mother in law was raised with no electricity and one of 8 kids! She must have been immensely privileged then!

Yes thank you I’m aware of that, and I think you know full well that this is not the point I’m making. I am talking about people who are in perfect health, plenty of family help, money to spend on activities and toys and nice houses with gardens etc etc preaching to parents who are, to give one example, incredibly sick and/or disabled and do use a screen occasionally as a result: “your 3 year old watches TV?! Mine’s never even SEEN one”

And yes people were sick etc before screens and they “managed”. People didn’t always live in centrally heated buildings, and they “managed”. Shall we all go and live outside?

TheRealMagic · 22/01/2026 17:10

Redpeach · 22/01/2026 16:58

Agree, or claiming its screens or crying, like its a binary choice

Yes, this bothers me too. 'Well, do you want me to give my toddler Peppa Pig on my phone at full volume or do you want them screaming in the middle of the cafe?!?!?!'. There are actually quite a lot of other options here...

Pluto46 · 22/01/2026 17:12

neverwakeasleepingbaby · 22/01/2026 14:29

It’s the type of screen time which is the crucial difference. There’s a huge difference between kids watching CBeebies on the family tv, and YouTube brain rot on their own tablet. It’s the swiping to change the short videos that ruins you by giving you small hits of dopamine.

I’m nearly 40, as a child I watched all of the cartoons that terrestrial tv had to offer from early Saturday morning until lunchtime. Then got dressed. I think I turned out ok! Got a decent career, happy family life etc.

My kids are allowed a couple of hours of TV in the evenings if it’s just on the family tv and they don’t constantly change the channel. I think that’s fine. My 4 year old has got into David Attenborough documentaries 😅 he likes learning about the animals

The Anxious Generation is a good book to read about the subject if anyone is interested

This! - gaming that involves proactive and reactive planning and strategy are completely different from mindless scrolling of You Tube shorts.

GoldenRosebee · 22/01/2026 17:13

Tiredboymum22 · 22/01/2026 13:31

I think it’s over the top.

If my kids didnt have screens, nothing would get done. I’m mostly solo parenting. Family can’t babysit, husband works late 6 days a week. Childcare costs are through the roof.

I have a 6-year-old with ASD and a very hyperactive toddler. Eldest is obsessed with numbers and Minecraft, uninterested in his little brother a lot of the time. Up at 4.30 am most mornings too. I give my toddler the tablet when I’m trying to cook or tidy up (once he’s done playing with his toys).

I am criticised by older members of my family and told I should let him “help me” cook. Sorry but no.

Now I’m seeing countless articles and comments about the harm of too much screen time, but I think people are missing a lot of nuance.

aibu?

If your kid is 6 year old, it don't need to be as bad as 1 year old on screen. If you're worried and you need downtime, let him explore cupboard with plastic containers. Children find it fascinating. Just child-proof cupboard.

PuppyMonkey · 22/01/2026 17:14

Yep, the only solution is to ban all the screens apart from the ones everyone on here is using to get on MN.

BubblesandTiara · 22/01/2026 17:17

PuppyMonkey · 22/01/2026 17:14

Yep, the only solution is to ban all the screens apart from the ones everyone on here is using to get on MN.

for toddlers and young children? It would be a great solution, why do they need screens at all?

Northcoastmama · 22/01/2026 17:21

I’ve just gone back to work and am teaching a GCSE English class. I asked them to check their daily screen time last week. It ranged from 8 hours to 16 hours. Imagine what they could be achieving in that time. As it stands most of them will struggle to pass. The landscape has changed enormously even since I was last teaching five years ago

ByWarmShark · 22/01/2026 17:24

Laura95167 · 22/01/2026 16:30

In victorian times they worried people (particularly women) were reading to much. And we turned our fine. In the 90s it was telly..

This is a straw man though. It's like saying you don't need to worry about guns because knives already exist. Or you dont need to worry about nuclear weapons because bombs already exist. There is a huge amount of research now (proper peer reviewed evidence) that the addictive algorithms of the likes of YouTube are genuinely more harmful. Just being able to have the screens everywhere and take them with us is genuinely more harmful.

cramptramp · 22/01/2026 17:24

soupyspoon · 22/01/2026 16:12

Well in the very old days, kids had a tot of something in their bottle to keep them quiet, this is the equivalent.

It’s really not.

caniplaythevillain · 22/01/2026 17:27

cramptramp · 22/01/2026 17:24

It’s really not.

I do actually agree with @soupyspoon

It’s understandable, but there are undoubtedly parallels.

Brainstorm23 · 22/01/2026 17:27

TellyOrNap · 22/01/2026 16:55

My approach is to ensure my child has enough going on his little life that screen time is naturally limited by everything else we do with him.
One thing that annoys me is the "either playing out unsupervised or inside on screens" rhetoric. It's not either/or

I agree completely. My daughter is busy but she enjoys all her activities and they are good for her. Any screening time is generally educational (the likes of Storybots or Deadly 60) or we watch TV together and talk about it at bedtime. Tablets and games consoles are a different thing altogether than watching something educational or with a parent.

ByWarmShark · 22/01/2026 17:28

PuppyMonkey · 22/01/2026 17:14

Yep, the only solution is to ban all the screens apart from the ones everyone on here is using to get on MN.

Where has anyone said ban all screens? What about responsible use of screens to prevent damage to kids makes you so angry and defensive?

SiberFox · 22/01/2026 17:28

I have a very active 2 year old. Her helping me looks like mixing something in a bowl, mixing and ‘cooking’ vegetable peels, putting things from one bowl to another, pouring water from one container to another, spraying some water on the floor and wiping it off, randomly putting pegs on things, ‘chopping up’ some Velcro food toys on a board, rolling out some home cooked play dough and making ‘biscuits’. There are SO many things that will fascinate a toddler and be easy to arrange.

caniplaythevillain · 22/01/2026 17:29

Brainstorm23 · 22/01/2026 17:27

I agree completely. My daughter is busy but she enjoys all her activities and they are good for her. Any screening time is generally educational (the likes of Storybots or Deadly 60) or we watch TV together and talk about it at bedtime. Tablets and games consoles are a different thing altogether than watching something educational or with a parent.

But then we are criticised for micromanaging; why can’t kids just chill any more is a whine I see a lot on here.

I don’t agree with it, but I do see it.

ByWarmShark · 22/01/2026 17:30

Brainstorm23 · 22/01/2026 17:27

I agree completely. My daughter is busy but she enjoys all her activities and they are good for her. Any screening time is generally educational (the likes of Storybots or Deadly 60) or we watch TV together and talk about it at bedtime. Tablets and games consoles are a different thing altogether than watching something educational or with a parent.

This, i was told when mine were little to consider screens as wasted time. It's okay to waste a bit of time, but if you're wasting a lot of time then you're not splashing in puddles, or exploring woods, or learning about friendship, or reading exciting books, or enjoying lovely chats with mum or dad (or anyone else), or building lego or making up imaginary worlds.

Kidsgotothatschool · 22/01/2026 17:36

PuppyMonkey · 22/01/2026 17:14

Yep, the only solution is to ban all the screens apart from the ones everyone on here is using to get on MN.

Oh dear this is the shout back of my 14 year old when I’m limiting their access to them.

Our brains are developed that is the point. Children’s brains are not and screens are causing damage.

I work in education, it IS a huge problem and is a REAL concern. I have seen a huge shift in children’s concentration, ability to listen, engage and their mental health since we parent using screens.

I don’t believe in complete removal as they are growing up in this modern world but posters would be silly not to listen to the very real scientific research coming out and lived experiences of educators.,