Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder if past trauma was a factor in the Renee Nicole Good murder and that, while not absolving agent, it shows ICE should select agents more carefully?

1000 replies

Carla786 · 11/01/2026 20:58

Reading this from the BBC, I wonder if the agent was suffering from previous trauma. They had earlier been in the Iraq War and then had huge number of stitches after being dragged by a car while arresting apparently a 'child sex offender' illicit migrant last March.

Thus I wonder if, because Renee Good clipped them with the car earlier(as The Times indicates), shooting at her car as she drove past was less a rational decision borne from evil and more an instinctive reaction from recent trauma with cars on the job?

This is NOT an excuse. But I wonder if it also shows that ICE are selecting traumatised agents who are too dangerous, due to this, to be in that position?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx4qd4d16no

Person wearing tactical vest leans toward a car with shattered rear window, broken glass visible, trees and houses in background.

ICE agent in Minnesota shooting was dragged by car in June

The officer was injured in a separate case that also involved a car pulling away during an investigation.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx4qd4d16no

OP posts:
Thread gallery
57
Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 19:20

Carla786 · 12/01/2026 19:18

Renee Nicole Good - not 'the woman' - was not killed because she drove into someone.

Her car did clip him. But he actually shot when she was driving away.

This woman did drive into him and had no care for his safety. She could have seriously hurt him. Hopefully this will be a harsh lesson for all thinking about hurting government agents.

Divebar2021 · 12/01/2026 19:23

Gloriia · 12/01/2026 19:07

'but getting her out the car at this stage ( “ get out the car - get out the fucking car” ) is an illogical step'

Illogical to an alleged retired met officer but those were the very clear instructions nonetheless.

You also posted an offensive comment someone had posted on your LinkedIn contacts for some reason. Did you block/remove them?

Did I block the commenter on LinkedIn? No they weren’t in my network. I went to see what they were saying about the incident ( because the majority of my network are firearms officers) and I found a ton of offensive comments by men primarily in the whole FAFO vein. They were primarily in the US I believe. I have to be honest I was pretty shocked that they would make comments like that attached to their business profiles. Anyway I decided to make a post to try and clarify some of the misinformation I was seeing. I haven’t changed my mind about it.

Carla786 · 12/01/2026 19:23

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 19:20

This woman did drive into him and had no care for his safety. She could have seriously hurt him. Hopefully this will be a harsh lesson for all thinking about hurting government agents.

You haven't addressed my point: that he shot 3 times while she was driving away.

OP posts:
Carla786 · 12/01/2026 19:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Deserved it?

What a horrible comment

Do you think he should have shot 3 times as she drove away, then?

OP posts:
Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 19:27

Carla786 · 12/01/2026 19:23

You haven't addressed my point: that he shot 3 times while she was driving away.

Maybe he shot because he thought she was going to run over other agents too? She didn't care about hitting him with a deadly weapon so it might be fair to say he though she was a danger to others. Maybe a statement will be released to clarify that but the fact still remains that she attacked him first and could have killed him.

Teanbiscuits33 · 12/01/2026 19:27

Playingvideogames · 11/01/2026 21:05

It’s difficult because soft, sensitive, left leaning men simply couldn’t do this job. They wouldn’t be able to deal with hardened gangsters and drug lords. They would be too scared to engage them.

So that leaves the tougher, stronger types but they are prone to being trigger happy or too enthusiastic to engage.

Ultimately it’s a totally different landscape to here, where the public have guns, cities are addicted to fentanyl, and vast swathes of cities are controlled by gangs. But you’ll get the well meaning types saying ‘they should do what our police do/our police aren’t aggressive’ etc

Violent men who can’t regulate their emotions ARE sensitive, which is the entire reason they are violent in the first place. They can’t handle being confronted and emasculated by anybody (especially women, or people they think are below them). They have massively fragile but inflated egos, it’s exactly why they behave the way they do, and exactly the type of people who are right wing, punch down on others and join up to organisations like ICE.

Your comment is hilarious, it’s the exact opposite of reality 🤣🤣🤣

Alexandra2001 · 12/01/2026 19:30

Carla786 · 12/01/2026 18:30

'I get the illegal migrants stuff but many of these people have been in the states for years, they do the jobs you lot wont do, they pay taxes, married US citizens, have children... you have by default made them "Citizens".'

  • these migrants are in a terrible situation. But a country can't continue allowing illicit immigration. Do you think the UK should also let all illegal migrants here to stay? Many of them are in terrible situations too. But we don't have the resources to stem all their pain by taking them in, and I don't think the US does either.

ICE are dealing with migrants already in the USA, not ones coming, which if Trump is to be believed, has not reduced to a trickle.

As you quoted a sentence, at least have the sense to read it.....

Quine0nline · 12/01/2026 19:31

There are countless excerpts of the incident. There does not appear to be specific beyond reasonable doubt footage. There are a lot of people using footage sympathetic to Thier line of ICE, on immigration policy, removal.of undocumented immigrants and use of past child abuse by a partner, sexual predilection, and removal of people who may have links with corruption.

Were there protests about the shooting of an unarmed woman in Minnesota by a migrant serving in the police department when she reported a burglary?

Alexandra2001 · 12/01/2026 19:34

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 19:27

Maybe he shot because he thought she was going to run over other agents too? She didn't care about hitting him with a deadly weapon so it might be fair to say he though she was a danger to others. Maybe a statement will be released to clarify that but the fact still remains that she attacked him first and could have killed him.

"Attacked him first" where have you seen that? has that been proven? its at best a highly controversial view, not born out by the path of the vehicle after he shot her, going to the right, he was standing to the left....

All the agents were behind/to the side of the vehicle, apart from him....

You're really clutching to come up with that one as an excuse.

deargen · 12/01/2026 19:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Reported

Carla786 · 12/01/2026 19:59

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 19:27

Maybe he shot because he thought she was going to run over other agents too? She didn't care about hitting him with a deadly weapon so it might be fair to say he though she was a danger to others. Maybe a statement will be released to clarify that but the fact still remains that she attacked him first and could have killed him.

I may be wrong but I thought that if someone shoots people in the US but then runs away, it's not legal to shoot them while they're running away.

If this is true, I suspect it would be similar in this case.

OP posts:
Carla786 · 12/01/2026 20:00

Alexandra2001 · 12/01/2026 19:30

ICE are dealing with migrants already in the USA, not ones coming, which if Trump is to be believed, has not reduced to a trickle.

As you quoted a sentence, at least have the sense to read it.....

I know they are already in the USA. I don't think the USA is able to support them & I do think they should be sent back. It's a horrible situation but I don't disagree with arrests. Imo it's ICE's tactics which are the problem

OP posts:
deargen · 12/01/2026 20:02

BorgQueen · 12/01/2026 15:28

I’m a Woman and I would have shot her in the head too.
Everyone, absolutely everyone, knows you don’t play stupid games with US law enforcement.

This normalises violence and normalises the use of violence against people who we don't agree with

LlttledrummergirI · 12/01/2026 20:03

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 19:20

This woman did drive into him and had no care for his safety. She could have seriously hurt him. Hopefully this will be a harsh lesson for all thinking about hurting government agents.

We went through this yesterday and the day before.
She was turning the wheel right as borne out by the trajectory of the car after her murderer shot her at point blank range.

Something you seem to think is OK in your country (although you never did reply to my polite question asking which one).

It doesn't matter how many times you lie, or how much you embellish your story, it doesn't make it fact.

Carla786 · 12/01/2026 20:07

Quine0nline · 12/01/2026 19:31

There are countless excerpts of the incident. There does not appear to be specific beyond reasonable doubt footage. There are a lot of people using footage sympathetic to Thier line of ICE, on immigration policy, removal.of undocumented immigrants and use of past child abuse by a partner, sexual predilection, and removal of people who may have links with corruption.

Were there protests about the shooting of an unarmed woman in Minnesota by a migrant serving in the police department when she reported a burglary?

I agree there's no footage we can be really sure of yet.

Can you link to that case? Terrible.

OP posts:
Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 20:08

LlttledrummergirI · 12/01/2026 20:03

We went through this yesterday and the day before.
She was turning the wheel right as borne out by the trajectory of the car after her murderer shot her at point blank range.

Something you seem to think is OK in your country (although you never did reply to my polite question asking which one).

It doesn't matter how many times you lie, or how much you embellish your story, it doesn't make it fact.

You believe whatever you like. It doesn't change the fact she was careless with the agents life and her actions mean she is now dead. It doesn't matter how much you repeat the same nonsense, he defended himself and has the support of the government and most people.

Serpentstooth · 12/01/2026 20:09

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 19:12

The woman was killed because she tried harming a agent by driving into him. It was her own actions that resulted in her death. Its awful and it's sad.

That's also A LIE.

ItWillWash · 12/01/2026 20:11

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 20:08

You believe whatever you like. It doesn't change the fact she was careless with the agents life and her actions mean she is now dead. It doesn't matter how much you repeat the same nonsense, he defended himself and has the support of the government and most people.

He has the support of a corrupt government who are blocking state law enforcement access to evidence.

I wonder why they wouldn't want anyone outside their immediate control to see the evidence?

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 20:14

ItWillWash · 12/01/2026 20:11

He has the support of a corrupt government who are blocking state law enforcement access to evidence.

I wonder why they wouldn't want anyone outside their immediate control to see the evidence?

Again, it really doesn't matter what you think. We've all seen the videos and it's clear to see what happened.

Serpentstooth · 12/01/2026 20:14

All apologists. Think harder. One day it could be you and people like you will minimise any official misdemeanour and blame you. Classic DARVO. DENY. ACCUSE. REVERSE VICTIM and OFFENDER. Shame on every single one of you, especially those who claim to be Christians.

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 20:15

Serpentstooth · 12/01/2026 20:09

That's also A LIE.

Not a lie. Its clear to see on the video.

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 20:16

I still don’t agree that revealing his identify was correct.

That was sheer incompetence by the administration. Referencing the previous incident where he was dragged made it easy for the press to look up court records and find a match.

@Divebar2021 in normal circumstances I would agree that trial by media should not happen. In the UK I would trust that both the force and the IOPC would investigate thoroughly, charging and prosecuting if appropriate.

However the regime have gone out of their way to prejudice an investigation, they've prevented the state from accessing evidence so that state charges could be brought, and in the very unlikely event that the Feds ever did prosecute and convict him then Trump would just pardon away. We've already seen evidence posted here that ICE in Minnesota now think that they are beyond the reach of the law. In the absence of legal consequences, I'm not going to raise an eyebrow if other consequences happen. At the very least I'd be glad if he has to spend every last waking minute looking over his shoulder.

I also feel sorry for his wife’s who’s had her picture plastered all over the internet.

I certainly wouldn't bring his wider family into this. He, and only he pulled the trigger.

DdraigGoch · 12/01/2026 20:18

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 19:12

The woman was killed because she tried harming a agent by driving into him. It was her own actions that resulted in her death. Its awful and it's sad.

Lies...

deargen · 12/01/2026 20:21

Serpentstooth · 12/01/2026 20:14

All apologists. Think harder. One day it could be you and people like you will minimise any official misdemeanour and blame you. Classic DARVO. DENY. ACCUSE. REVERSE VICTIM and OFFENDER. Shame on every single one of you, especially those who claim to be Christians.

This

Greenmouldycheese · 12/01/2026 20:21

Alexandra2001 · 12/01/2026 19:34

"Attacked him first" where have you seen that? has that been proven? its at best a highly controversial view, not born out by the path of the vehicle after he shot her, going to the right, he was standing to the left....

All the agents were behind/to the side of the vehicle, apart from him....

You're really clutching to come up with that one as an excuse.

When we learn to drive, we look all around before moving it as it's a deadly weapon and can seriously hurt someone. She was told to get out of the car and chose to drive forward instead.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.