Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Ice agent shoots a woman in the face part 3

1000 replies

Moontan · 09/01/2026 15:35

Donald Trump has now said its okay to murder a woman. Because they are doing it for people's 'safety'

It is interesting how far humans will let themselves be abused by bad people.

I was watching a documentary about jonestown the cult.

Some people left the cult

They said that the leader beat people, raped people, starved people. He made them do physical labour for many hours a day. He demanded that they give him all of their money.

And yet still hundreds of people followed him.

People seem to keep supporting a person and staying there. Rather than saying "maybe i was wrong and this guy is actually a bad person"

OP posts:
Thread gallery
35
TheDoubleDeuce · 09/01/2026 20:52

@Snowqueenie123- There is an investigation ongoing with evidence and accounts they have that Mumsnetters presumably do not have access to.

Usernamenotfound1 · 09/01/2026 20:52

Ladywinesalot · 09/01/2026 20:31

She was a paid protester that drove several hours to take part
she was not that innocent

Who is paying these protesters?

where are the funds coming from?

there’s ICE protests everywhere, they must have an enormous budget,

Usernamenotfound1 · 09/01/2026 20:53

TheDoubleDeuce · 09/01/2026 20:52

@Snowqueenie123- There is an investigation ongoing with evidence and accounts they have that Mumsnetters presumably do not have access to.

Nor does Minnesota Law Enforcement by all accounts.

the investigation is hardly going to be unbiased if they won’t let LE see said evidence.

xanthomelana · 09/01/2026 20:54

Frequency · 09/01/2026 20:50

The timing and sound of that "new" footage are completely off. We know he shot her at least three times before the car sped away. Why didn't we hear that?

The interaction was much shorter than the other three available clips, yet it starts and ends in the same way.

Was he hit or did he slip on the ice? Other clips show he slipped on the ice before shooting her. Either way, he got up immediately, didn't appear to hit the ground at all, and shot her in the head three fucking times, twice through the side window, after he was well clear of the car. I've yet to read any justification for that.

I want to know who released that footage? Who has the phone now? Who verified the footage had not been doctored/edited? Why do 47 seconds pass from him exiting his vehicle and Renee crashing in his clip, but the other clips are much longer? How does he have his phone in his hand the whole way through his clip, from his exiting his vehicle to Renee crashing, yet we clearly see him put it away to get his gun out in the other ones? In other words, I want to know what happened in the part that was edited out and why hide it from us if there is nothing to hide?

I want to know why she was so keen to drive off without her wife.

TheDoubleDeuce · 09/01/2026 20:58

@Usernamenotfound1- That's because it's a federal department not a state department. Just like The FBI don't share information with local law enforcement when carrying out operations and investigations.

Playingvideogames · 09/01/2026 21:00

Rejoining.

I will say what I said on the last thread: I think her killing was unjustified, an overreaction and a disproportionate use of force.

I don’t think however this is a very very clear cut case.

We now know Renee and her wife were protesting ICE in some form and trying to engage with/taunt them. That doesn’t justify her killing at all, but there was lots of talk of her going on the school run or to the supermarket and doubt over what she was doing at the time. It still isn’t 100% clear exactly what happened in the build up, but very apparent she disliked ICE and was trying to engage them in some way. From what I can see, the interaction was enough for the officers to know she opposed them or had a grievance against them.

We know the officer in question was involved in an incident last year where an arrest wrong and the suspect drove off, dragging him 100ft behind the car and seriously injuring him. I would be surprised if this didn’t play any role at all in his thinking/overreaction.

In terms of the ‘collision’ it’s hard to say, because the camera pans away before the crucial moment. The sound does sound like her car made contact with him but we can’t say for sure. I don’t think she was trying to run him over but I think she seemed reckless as to whether she made contact with him or not.

For everyone saying ‘he should’ve got out the way’, well the onus is on the driver not to drive if there is a person stood in front of their vehicle. Had the shoe been on the other foot and he had bumped her with his car, you would no doubt be saying ‘why on earth did he drive, he could see her stood right there’ etc. Plus he’s an arresting officer, apprehending people isn’t an exercise in running off if they do anything to escape, it’s literally the opposite.

In short I my opinion at the moment is that she was quite reckless, and this triggered his overreaction as he had been injured by a vehicle before. I think the shooting was however unjustified and there were other ways to stop the vehicle without killing her, and I think this officer is unsuitable for duty.

I think it’s devastating her son has been left without his mum - just heartbreaking. Her wife’s tribute was just lovely, and I don’t think her actions in the car change this at all - as I said I don’t think she intended to drive at anybody at all.

It’s all very tragic.

Playingvideogames · 09/01/2026 21:02

xanthomelana · 09/01/2026 20:54

I want to know why she was so keen to drive off without her wife.

I think it was all just a panicked and not-thought-out moment. I doubt there’s any clear cut logic or thought process to this like many seem to believe.

HappyNewTaxYear · 09/01/2026 21:03

Teddleshon1 · 09/01/2026 20:51

Why would anyone go out of their way to insert themselves into a situation where armed officers are engaged in confronting potentially armed civilians? There’s plenty of footage of scenarios such as this which show how quickly things can escalate and how chaotic and highly charged these situations are. I just can’t imagine why a parent would do this.

Maybe they care about the way their country doesn’t seem to be The Land of the Free any more? You know, the country they’re bringing their children up in?

NotTerfNorCis · 09/01/2026 21:07

Watched this video. The wife is getting into the car. The driver turns the wheel. The ICE agent shoots just as the car starts to move. There had been aggravation beforehand but nothing to suggest the driver planned to run anyone over. In fact, the protesters talk about coming back later and the driver says 'I'm not mad, bro'. It's clear the ICE agent was in a rage. He shoots her and says 'fucking bitch' as her car crashes.

Usernamenotfound1 · 09/01/2026 21:10

TheDoubleDeuce · 09/01/2026 20:58

@Usernamenotfound1- That's because it's a federal department not a state department. Just like The FBI don't share information with local law enforcement when carrying out operations and investigations.

So why aren’t they allowing local Le to investigate? It’s a criminal offence on their territory, why aren’t they be kept away? Or at the very least not included in a joint investigation.

federal FBI investigating federal ICE does not seem impartial.

Alltheprettyseahorses · 09/01/2026 21:13

The new footage is incontrovertible. I know people need to cling to their faux-lefty credentials at all costs but she wasn't panicking in the slightest - the opposite frankly - and her wife was yelling at her to drive at the officer. She shouldn't be dead, these protesters are allowed to act with impunity and with no consequences, encouraged into a righteous frenzy by people who should know better, so it ends up like this. What a mess.

Usernamenotfound1 · 09/01/2026 21:13

Playingvideogames · 09/01/2026 21:00

Rejoining.

I will say what I said on the last thread: I think her killing was unjustified, an overreaction and a disproportionate use of force.

I don’t think however this is a very very clear cut case.

We now know Renee and her wife were protesting ICE in some form and trying to engage with/taunt them. That doesn’t justify her killing at all, but there was lots of talk of her going on the school run or to the supermarket and doubt over what she was doing at the time. It still isn’t 100% clear exactly what happened in the build up, but very apparent she disliked ICE and was trying to engage them in some way. From what I can see, the interaction was enough for the officers to know she opposed them or had a grievance against them.

We know the officer in question was involved in an incident last year where an arrest wrong and the suspect drove off, dragging him 100ft behind the car and seriously injuring him. I would be surprised if this didn’t play any role at all in his thinking/overreaction.

In terms of the ‘collision’ it’s hard to say, because the camera pans away before the crucial moment. The sound does sound like her car made contact with him but we can’t say for sure. I don’t think she was trying to run him over but I think she seemed reckless as to whether she made contact with him or not.

For everyone saying ‘he should’ve got out the way’, well the onus is on the driver not to drive if there is a person stood in front of their vehicle. Had the shoe been on the other foot and he had bumped her with his car, you would no doubt be saying ‘why on earth did he drive, he could see her stood right there’ etc. Plus he’s an arresting officer, apprehending people isn’t an exercise in running off if they do anything to escape, it’s literally the opposite.

In short I my opinion at the moment is that she was quite reckless, and this triggered his overreaction as he had been injured by a vehicle before. I think the shooting was however unjustified and there were other ways to stop the vehicle without killing her, and I think this officer is unsuitable for duty.

I think it’s devastating her son has been left without his mum - just heartbreaking. Her wife’s tribute was just lovely, and I don’t think her actions in the car change this at all - as I said I don’t think she intended to drive at anybody at all.

It’s all very tragic.

No the onus is on the law enforcement official to get out the way:

From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force:
"Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury ... and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle."
Also, placing oneself in the path of a moving vehicle constitutes officer-created jeopardy and undermines any claim that deadly force was necessary.

Alltheprettyseahorses · 09/01/2026 21:15

Usernamenotfound1 · 09/01/2026 21:13

No the onus is on the law enforcement official to get out the way:

From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force:
"Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury ... and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle."
Also, placing oneself in the path of a moving vehicle constitutes officer-created jeopardy and undermines any claim that deadly force was necessary.

No 2

'Drive baby, drive!'

BurntBroccoli · 09/01/2026 21:16

NotTerfNorCis · 09/01/2026 21:07

Watched this video. The wife is getting into the car. The driver turns the wheel. The ICE agent shoots just as the car starts to move. There had been aggravation beforehand but nothing to suggest the driver planned to run anyone over. In fact, the protesters talk about coming back later and the driver says 'I'm not mad, bro'. It's clear the ICE agent was in a rage. He shoots her and says 'fucking bitch' as her car crashes.

Why are people excusing this? They are the same people who excused Paul Doyle of ramming his car into the crowds in Liverpool.

It’s so dystopian.

researchers3 · 09/01/2026 21:17

Echobelly · 09/01/2026 17:39

Her wife has given a very moving and wise statement to a Minnesota news site

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/09/renee-goods-wife-releases-statement-about-ice-shooting

'First, I want to extend my gratitude to all the people who have reached out from across the country and around the world to support our family.
This kindness of strangers is the most fitting tribute because if you ever encountered my wife, Renee Nicole Macklin Good, you know that above all else, she was kind. In fact, kindness radiated out of her.
Renee sparkled. She literally sparkled. I mean, she didn’t wear glitter but I swear she had sparkles coming out of her pores. All the time. You might think it was just my love talking but her family said the same thing. Renee was made of sunshine.
Renee lived by an overarching belief: there is kindness in the world and we need to do everything we can to find it where it resides and nurture it where it needs to grow. Renee was a Christian who knew that all religions teach the same essential truth: we are here to love each other, care for each other, and keep each other safe and whole.
Like people have done across place and time, we moved to make a better life for ourselves. We chose Minnesota to make our home. Our whole extended road trip here, we held hands in the car while our son drew all over the windows to pass the time and the miles.
What we found when we got here was a vibrant and welcoming community, we made friends and spread joy. And while any place we were together was home, there was a strong shared sense here in Minneapolis that we were looking out for each other. Here, I had finally found peace and safe harbor. That has been taken from me forever.
We were raising our son to believe that no matter where you come from or what you look like, all of us deserve compassion and kindness. Renee lived this belief every day. She is pure love. She is pure joy. She is pure sunshine.
On Wednesday, January 7th, we stopped to support our neighbors. We had whistles. They had guns.
Renee leaves behind three extraordinary children; the youngest is just six years old and already lost his father. I am now left to raise our son and to continue teaching him, as Renee believed, that there are people building a better world for him. That the people who did this had fear and anger in their hearts, and we need to show them a better way.
We thank you for the privacy you are granting our family as we grieve. We thank you for ensuring that Renee’s legacy is one of kindness and love. We honor her memory by living her values: rejecting hate and choosing compassion, turning away from fear and pursuing peace, refusing division and knowing we must come together to build a world where we all come home safe to the people we love'

What a tremendous tribute.

They both sound absolutely incredible.

Her poor kids.

TheDoubleDeuce · 09/01/2026 21:18

Because the incident involved a Federal law enforcement officer not a local state police officer. State police were not involved in the operation. It doesn't matter where it happened a federal department has jurisdiction. The FBI won't be the ones carrying out the investigation that is the job of an independent party.

SouthernFashionista · 09/01/2026 21:18

Really surprised at someone on the previous post comparing Renee to George Floyd. He was a criminal with a rap sheet as long as his arm. Renee was a Christian mother who was committing no crime.

Frequency · 09/01/2026 21:19

Alltheprettyseahorses · 09/01/2026 21:15

No 2

'Drive baby, drive!'

She told her to drive because armed men were trying to open the car doors. Given ICE's reputation for violence, most people would panic at that.

It wasn't said in the way people are trying to make out. She wanted her wife to escape the situation before harm came to her.

Stop taking things out of context to suit your twisted narrative.

Livelovebehappy · 09/01/2026 21:19

HappyNewTaxYear · 09/01/2026 21:03

Maybe they care about the way their country doesn’t seem to be The Land of the Free any more? You know, the country they’re bringing their children up in?

But if you’re a responsible parent, especially one where the father of the child is dead, then you make sure you don’t put yourself in a volatile situation which could end in you getting hurt or, in this case, killed. It’s just not worth the risk. So clearly wasn’t thinking of her child, or she wouldn’t have put herself in danger.

Livelovebehappy · 09/01/2026 21:20

Frequency · 09/01/2026 21:19

She told her to drive because armed men were trying to open the car doors. Given ICE's reputation for violence, most people would panic at that.

It wasn't said in the way people are trying to make out. She wanted her wife to escape the situation before harm came to her.

Stop taking things out of context to suit your twisted narrative.

But the footage tells a different story…..

SheilaFentiman · 09/01/2026 21:21

Frequency · 09/01/2026 21:19

She told her to drive because armed men were trying to open the car doors. Given ICE's reputation for violence, most people would panic at that.

It wasn't said in the way people are trying to make out. She wanted her wife to escape the situation before harm came to her.

Stop taking things out of context to suit your twisted narrative.

Exactly this - “drive, baby, drive” - to get away from the ICE agents.

Not “drive, baby, get him” or “drive over him, baby”

TheIrritatingGentleman · 09/01/2026 21:22

RingoJuice · 09/01/2026 18:58

He shot her after he was hit by an SUV. She knew exactly where he was. You can hear the audio. Sorry this isn’t gonna fly anymore.

So, if it was the other way about an ICE officer had to quickly leave and accidentally clipped a bystander because they were stupid enough to put themselves the way of a moving vehicle at the last minute, it would be okay for the officer to be shot?

I mean, the bystander would clearly be in fear of their life so it would be fine, yes?

The scariest thing about this is all the people saying 'do as your told or you will die' and not 'people shouldn't be allowed to go about killing others because they're annoyed'.

user1492538376 · 09/01/2026 21:22

The video shows her moving the Steering wheel AWAY not at him. She wasn’t trying to run him over. It was not self defense.

NorwayTruce · 09/01/2026 21:22

Still the endless banging on about how it was her FACE she was shot in as if that’s the only thing that’s relevant. Yes. We know what part of her body she was shot in. People don’t need to keep endlessly banging on about it. You can be shot anywhere and still die but you wouldn’t all be prattling on about how she was shot in her GROIN. It doesn’t matter what part of her body she was shot in so can we please just stop! She’s dead. Focus on THAT ffs!

Playingvideogames · 09/01/2026 21:25

Frequency · 09/01/2026 21:19

She told her to drive because armed men were trying to open the car doors. Given ICE's reputation for violence, most people would panic at that.

It wasn't said in the way people are trying to make out. She wanted her wife to escape the situation before harm came to her.

Stop taking things out of context to suit your twisted narrative.

I think a lot of that is being done on both sides.

To start with Renee was a damsel in distress on the school run, apprehended unwittingly by ICE.

Now we know she was trying to engage ICE and made her grievance against them clear.

None of the above means she deserved to die in any way, shape or form.

We’re all clamouring to give out interpretation of what was said. Only the people who actually said those things know what they meant.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread