Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Liverpool attacker sentenced

343 replies

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 18:48

Paul Doyle, the Liverpool parade attacker, has been sentenced to twenty one years and six months in prison for his attack that injured 134 people.

That’s 258 months, or less than two months per person injured. He’ll be out in half, so 129 months served. Less than one month per person. Reading the victim impact statements was awful. One from a little boy, who is completely traumatised, stuck with me.

AIBU to think this is a farce?!

OP posts:
HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 16/12/2025 21:21

I listened to the judge explain the sentencing and thought it was pretty fair tbh. And I don’t often say that.

I’ve also been surprised at how many people were expressing sympathy prior to the court hearing when I thought it was as clear as day that he was just another entitled, violent male. The disclosure of his violent past didn’t come as a surprise.

HildegardP · 16/12/2025 21:21

CombatBarbie · 16/12/2025 21:11

But he has ptsd diagnosis yes??? And has form for violence, so that indicates something pretty awful in his past. And like many of us ex military have been let down by the system. Like I said, im not justifying what he done....at all!! I think 21yrs is a hefty sentence.

No active duty & racked up violent offences while in the Service, including violence against a superior officer. He was discharged "Services No Longer Required" after just 22 months in the Marines. He had an even briefer stint with the Royal Engineers before making it through selection for the Marines but again, no active service. If he has PTSD (rather than an amenable shrink) it does not appear to be the result of his time in the Armed Forces.

dannyufcfan · 16/12/2025 21:23

OP seems surprised by how british justice works.

Trust on this, if you're looking for a weak sentences in this country, go look up a million other cases.

This sentence seems appropriate for the crime. I can't see where you're coming from.

Netcurtainnelly · 16/12/2025 21:23

Absolute sheer nastiness. Now we've got to.pay for him for 21 years.
Wonder how he'd like his family mown down

JohnofWessex · 16/12/2025 21:24

There are sentencing guidelines judges quite rightly have to follow

There is an obvious issue of attempting to 'cross reference' them so that - for example death by dangerous driving and manslaughter have similar sentences

Not easy I know and potentially controversial but it needs doing

RainbowZebraWarrior · 16/12/2025 21:25

CheesecakeOnTheLanai · 16/12/2025 21:16

For those who may not have seen the full details of this case, it's worth clearing some things up.
He never saw active service and was discharged from the Marines after a number of infractions ranging from minor (dishonesty) to more serious (assault). He then later served a year in prison for biting part of a sailor's ear off in a drunken brawl.
He did not have PTSD as he never served in a war zone, he also didn't use this as part of his defence.
When first bundled into the police van after he was arrested, his first words were "I've ruined my life" - at this point there were still seriously injured people trapped under the wheels of his car.
In initial interviews with police he fabricated a story about being attacked by a fan holding a knife - police have said there's no evidence this ever happened, and believe it was entirely made up.
His own dash cam footage shows him jumping red lights long before he ever reaches the city centre, then shows him calling people "fucking pricks" including at the moment he hit a six month old baby in his pram, throwing him down the road.
I find it fascinating that people have tried so hard to excuse this man's behaviour, even now after it has emerged that he has a history of uncontrolled rage and violence.
I'm afraid this is a classic case of male violence and entitlement, and I would be interested to know what Mr Family Guy was really like behind closed doors.

All of this.

GrinchiestGrinch · 16/12/2025 21:26

Really? I was surprised how long it was. Im not convinced he really intended to harm anyone. Somehow I can't shake the feeling he panicked or had some sort of extreme stress response. I know that theory has apparently been debunked and the evidence points to just rage but what caused the rage? When I first saw the videos back when it happened I thought he had driven by accident into the wrong road ajd then couldn't find a way out and panicked when people got mad. I dont know. I can imagine myself making a mistake like that and I'd like to think that no matter how much I panicked I wouldn't plough into people but who knows. I do find it strange that not much info has been released about his motivation.

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:27

CheesecakeOnTheLanai · 16/12/2025 21:16

For those who may not have seen the full details of this case, it's worth clearing some things up.
He never saw active service and was discharged from the Marines after a number of infractions ranging from minor (dishonesty) to more serious (assault). He then later served a year in prison for biting part of a sailor's ear off in a drunken brawl.
He did not have PTSD as he never served in a war zone, he also didn't use this as part of his defence.
When first bundled into the police van after he was arrested, his first words were "I've ruined my life" - at this point there were still seriously injured people trapped under the wheels of his car.
In initial interviews with police he fabricated a story about being attacked by a fan holding a knife - police have said there's no evidence this ever happened, and believe it was entirely made up.
His own dash cam footage shows him jumping red lights long before he ever reaches the city centre, then shows him calling people "fucking pricks" including at the moment he hit a six month old baby in his pram, throwing him down the road.
I find it fascinating that people have tried so hard to excuse this man's behaviour, even now after it has emerged that he has a history of uncontrolled rage and violence.
I'm afraid this is a classic case of male violence and entitlement, and I would be interested to know what Mr Family Guy was really like behind closed doors.

He also said he ruined other peoples lives. Not excusing what he did but the arrest video is online and he clearly said that he has ruined other peoples lives

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:28

GrinchiestGrinch · 16/12/2025 21:26

Really? I was surprised how long it was. Im not convinced he really intended to harm anyone. Somehow I can't shake the feeling he panicked or had some sort of extreme stress response. I know that theory has apparently been debunked and the evidence points to just rage but what caused the rage? When I first saw the videos back when it happened I thought he had driven by accident into the wrong road ajd then couldn't find a way out and panicked when people got mad. I dont know. I can imagine myself making a mistake like that and I'd like to think that no matter how much I panicked I wouldn't plough into people but who knows. I do find it strange that not much info has been released about his motivation.

He hit 100 people in a two minute period - that's very serious

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:29

Driver crime normally get an easy time, I would have guessed at 14 years max. 21 years is a very long prison sentence for any crime committed in a car

ive seen 21 years for a driver purposely killing with a car.

i do think testing on people holding licenses to drive should be under consideration, along with sight tests and general health tests

Flowerslamp · 16/12/2025 21:30

NeverDropYourMooncup · 16/12/2025 19:18

I'd wonder whether this 'Pillar of the Community' and 'All Round Top Bloke' was still a vicious fucking bastard behind closed doors, tbh.

Yes. I'm not defending him in any way, I just find it fascinating. Usually there's lots of "I knew he was a wrong 'un".

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:32

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:29

Driver crime normally get an easy time, I would have guessed at 14 years max. 21 years is a very long prison sentence for any crime committed in a car

ive seen 21 years for a driver purposely killing with a car.

i do think testing on people holding licenses to drive should be under consideration, along with sight tests and general health tests

He hit 100 people in two minutes and left several people with life changing injuries

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:33

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:32

He hit 100 people in two minutes and left several people with life changing injuries

And your point?

GrinchiestGrinch · 16/12/2025 21:33

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:28

He hit 100 people in a two minute period - that's very serious

I know it's very serious and I guess it's only by sheer luck that no one actually died. I still wonder what possessed him to do that. It's hard to imagine it was just road rage.

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:34

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:33

And your point?

My point was that you suggested that it was a long sentence. It was clearly a long sentence for a reason - htfh

EnidSpyton · 16/12/2025 21:37

GrinchiestGrinch · 16/12/2025 21:26

Really? I was surprised how long it was. Im not convinced he really intended to harm anyone. Somehow I can't shake the feeling he panicked or had some sort of extreme stress response. I know that theory has apparently been debunked and the evidence points to just rage but what caused the rage? When I first saw the videos back when it happened I thought he had driven by accident into the wrong road ajd then couldn't find a way out and panicked when people got mad. I dont know. I can imagine myself making a mistake like that and I'd like to think that no matter how much I panicked I wouldn't plough into people but who knows. I do find it strange that not much info has been released about his motivation.

He did intend to harm people. He knew exactly what he was doing.

He is a man with a history of violent behaviour and uncontrolled anger.

He wasn't panicking. He was pissed off. And he couldn't control his rage, so he decided to hurt people.

I'm sure there is probably a back story of a chaotic childhood and childhood trauma - that is often the case with men like this. However, it doesn't excuse his behaviour, and no one should be trying to explain it away as a 'mistake' (you seriously can imagine yourself doing the same?!).

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:38

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:34

My point was that you suggested that it was a long sentence. It was clearly a long sentence for a reason - htfh

In the world of driver crime it is a longer sentence, far to many drivers walk away after killing with a suspended sentence

driver on the pavement kills child, they don’t go to prison 🤷‍♀️

driver not wear his glasses kills person, they don’t go to prison 🤷‍♀️

21 years in prison in comparison to other driver crimes is a long sentence

Thisisnotmyid · 16/12/2025 21:39

It’s one of the best sentencing’s given in ages. The courts are too soft

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:40

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:38

In the world of driver crime it is a longer sentence, far to many drivers walk away after killing with a suspended sentence

driver on the pavement kills child, they don’t go to prison 🤷‍♀️

driver not wear his glasses kills person, they don’t go to prison 🤷‍♀️

21 years in prison in comparison to other driver crimes is a long sentence

Obviously it's longer because of the scale of people involved

Eaglemom · 16/12/2025 21:41

Ebok1990 · 16/12/2025 20:08

It's hard to be certain about that. I'm not sure he woke up that morning intending to maim 134 people. It seems like a 'falling down' moment or a terrible series of dominoes. Toxic male rage and violence meets entitlement, frustration and prevention from doing what he wants, culminating in the red mist descending in the most appalling way.

Well thank God he's off the streets and behind bars then if he can get so riled by humans being in his way, in a place he had no right to be that day and plough them down not caring who he bloody kills or maims. Vile man.

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:43

I’ll add to that, why is someone who in anger bit someone allowed to hold a vehicle licence? I do believe there should be parameters on retaining a licence if behaviour is such it could lead to aggression with a vehicle

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:44

Roobarbtwo · 16/12/2025 21:40

Obviously it's longer because of the scale of people involved

Press coverage would be obvious

CheesecakeOnTheLanai · 16/12/2025 21:44

MikeRafone · 16/12/2025 21:43

I’ll add to that, why is someone who in anger bit someone allowed to hold a vehicle licence? I do believe there should be parameters on retaining a licence if behaviour is such it could lead to aggression with a vehicle

That's the bit I'm really struggling to understand. He's only been banned from driving for three years, although he will be required to resit an advanced driving test. This man should never be trusted behind the wheel of a car again in my opinion.

GrinchiestGrinch · 16/12/2025 21:45

EnidSpyton · 16/12/2025 21:37

He did intend to harm people. He knew exactly what he was doing.

He is a man with a history of violent behaviour and uncontrolled anger.

He wasn't panicking. He was pissed off. And he couldn't control his rage, so he decided to hurt people.

I'm sure there is probably a back story of a chaotic childhood and childhood trauma - that is often the case with men like this. However, it doesn't excuse his behaviour, and no one should be trying to explain it away as a 'mistake' (you seriously can imagine yourself doing the same?!).

My exact words were: I'd like to think that no matter how much I panicked I wouldn't plough into people but who knows.

I read another case of a young inexperienced driver accidently killing a motor biker through careless driving and she got a suspended sentence. Not saying she should have got more (and yes i can imagine that being me as well.. one of my worst nightmares) but I suppose intent is everything. It just seems like his intent hasn't really been established. What could possess someone to drive into a crowd of people unless there was some form of extreme stress going on?

Im not saying the sentence is wrong by the way but yeah I was surprised by how long it is. I do hope he gets some help in prison with whatever his issues are.

Notatallanamechange · 16/12/2025 21:47

ireallycantbelievethis · 16/12/2025 19:02

I care very little about his family, who will have looked past his clear anger issues for years. I care a lot more about the innocent men, women and children who were at the parade and who have been traumatised for life. Why aren’t you more angry about yet another act of male violence being excused and played down?

Do not talk for his family. How very dare you. You don’t know them, you don’t know how they are suffering. Nasty.

Swipe left for the next trending thread