Honestly I think we're in the grip of a psychological war first and foremost. I think 9/11 was the first real push towards global destabilisation, and there's been a steady push since then. The pandemic sped things up.
Historically there's a theory that every 80 - 100 years there's a major global disruption, so we're bang on timeline for that, be it economic crash or conflict, and the latter tends to follow on the heels of the former.
Thing is, I don't understand the rhetoric that implies a conflict would be a boots on the ground scenario on massive scale, because technology means that our infrastructure could be disabled very fast, and we also have the means for remote warfare.
Actual land invasion for the UK seems highly unlikely, so fighting on home turf is difficult to imagine, and I have doubts that many would willingly go overseas to do it.
So I agree the sabre rattling is concerning, because honestly none of it makes sense. I have no idea what the end game is supposed to be, and I'm too old and tired to worry about it much.
I've said for years that I don't think the end of the world will be apocalyptic in the fiery sense, I think it will be due to collective nervous breakdown. And of course the media joyfully pushes our buttons and clucks and revenue seal our fate.
So I shall feed my cats, have a cuppa and choose which tinfoil hat suits todays political zeitgeist, and wish you well OP.
Strange and interesting times.....