Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The reactions to the Bondi Beach terrorist attack has shown how racist many posters are here.

1000 replies

TheTamerShrew · 15/12/2025 09:24

I’m posting because I’m struggling with how racism against Jews is being talked about here following the recent terrorist attack in Australia. What I’ve seen, again and again, is minimisation: it wasn’t really about Jews, it was more complicated than that, let’s not jump to conclusions, other groups have it worse. All the familiar caveats come out remarkably quickly when the victims are Jewish.

I want to say clearly: racism against Jews is racism. Full stop. It doesn’t become less serious because it’s uncomfortable, politically inconvenient, or doesn’t fit neatly into how some people understand racism. And it doesn’t need to compete with other forms of racism to be real or worthy of being named.

What I find particularly painful is how often antisemitism is explained away rather than confronted. We would rightly challenge this pattern if it happened after an attack on almost any other minority group. Yet when Jews are targeted, there seems to be an urge to dilute, reframe, or downplay what’s happened.
I’d really ask people to pause and self-reflect on why that might be.

Why does naming antisemitism feel harder?
Why is there a rush to qualify it, contextualise it out of existence, or deny it altogether?
Why is Jewish fear so often treated as oversensitivity rather than a rational response to a long and very real history?

Acknowledging racism is not an accusation against everyone else. It’s the first, necessary step in confronting it. If we can’t even name antisemitism when it’s staring us in the face, we have no chance of challenging it, let alone preventing it.

We don’t make the world safer by minimising hatred. We make it safer by recognising it honestly, even when that recognition makes us uncomfortable.

I hope this can be read in the spirit it’s intended: not to shut down discussion, but to ask people to explore and self reflect.

See the attached photo: in order to become Anti-racist, one needs to first acknowledge racism

The reactions to the Bondi Beach terrorist attack has shown how racist many posters are here.
OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
NewNameforThisPost2025 · 16/12/2025 06:49

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

I think the media, social media, and the dark web offer community to racists, since they can all find each other.

Is it not a fact that anti-Semitism has increased since the Palestinian-Israeli war? To be very clear, I am NOT saying that the war has created more anti-Semites. I'm saying that sadly, it's made them feel safer to express the evil things that they already thought. At least, it seems that way. Unless there's another explanation. It's true that anti-Semitism was increasing well before Hamas went nuts on October 7.

9/11 emboldened racist people in America to express their negative thoughts about Muslims and Islam.

There was an uptick in outwardly-expressed racism and sexism in the States after Trump got elected, because the awful things he said made other bigots feel more entitled to say them too.

I thought it was generally accepted that certain events and conditions make bigotry that was already there more likely to come out in the open. I have certainly never thought that these events and conditions create bigots. They could never do that, if someone wasn't already bigoted.

Catbenign · 16/12/2025 06:51

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

KateShugakIsALegend · 16/12/2025 06:58

AbbaCadaBra · 15/12/2025 23:35

Is the thing “you felt was wrong” genocide? I have to know that before I answer the question. And even if it is you are asking the wrong person. I am not going to vent hatred on anyone but I can see where hate is enacted on both sides, which is my point. I don’t endorse it.

Let's imagine it is - like the Bosnian Serbs in the 1990s.

In the imaginary France scenario, would it in any way rational to kill French speakers in Canada?

In the real-life scenario, why weren't Bosnian Serb heritage people tracked down and murdered in other countries?

I think the reason you, and every other person I have asked, don't want to answer is that you would have to admit that killing people who live in Australia or England can only be explained by irrational hatred.

EasternStandard · 16/12/2025 07:12

CypressGrove · 16/12/2025 05:10

Well they definitely put an ISIS flag on their car when they parked it.. There is clear footage (shown on Australian TV) of the flag on the car visible as they murdered an older couple who tried to disarm them after they got out the car, before they went to the bridge to continue killing people. And it has now come out they spent a month in the Philippines right before they did this - notorious for ISIS training camps.

This is so awful. The same posters can’t excuse this.

NewNameforThisPost2025 · 16/12/2025 07:22

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Re. Trump - because the guy is always on Twitter saying dreadful things! And he does things like openly imitate and mock disabled people! And when it's the President of the United States saying these things, it makes evil racist people feel safe to say them aloud, too.

The election of Trump encouraged racists to be openly racist too, of course.

When I say October 7, it's shorthand for the other things you mention - Hamas and Islamic extremism. That's also what I mean when I mentioned the nutters.

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:23

IAmAHomewardBounder · 15/12/2025 22:39

@whymadam,

Now you're back would you explain why innocent Jewish people have to die because of Gaza please?

Innocent Jewish people don't have to die because of Gaza, or anything else! Don't you get it? 🙄

Catbenign · 16/12/2025 07:26

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

KateShugakIsALegend · 16/12/2025 07:27

AbbaCadaBra · 15/12/2025 13:02

It isn't that they are justified, it's that they are making the point that for every picture like this they can post at least 100 of a Palestinian child who is no longer with us.

Listen, some of us can't help making the connection. We just can't. Because of that I feel it is more respectful for me to not contribute to this thread anymore because I absolutely know where you are coming from and need to just let you and others express what you need to express.

Please can you spell out the connection you are making?

KateShugakIsALegend · 16/12/2025 07:32

Haemagoblin · 15/12/2025 15:12

I know and no-one's saying otherwise. But in this instance, the war in Gaza is a part of the puzzle. Hence why it's being mentioned.

How is the war in Gaza linked to yesterday's attack? Please explain.

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:37

IAmAHomewardBounder · 15/12/2025 23:55

Well, mainly because Hamas wouldn't give hostages back for over 2 years, hid the hostages in civilian areas, prioritised building tunnels and taking supplies for themselves rather than bomb shelters and feeding their citizens. As well as this, Hamas operated out of hospitals and schools, nullifying their protected statuses.

You can answer as well if you'd like.

Can you explain why innocent Jewish people have to die because of Gaza please.

I genuinely don't understand why some Australians enjoying a get together at the beach had to die because of Gaza unless it's because they were Jewish. That's racist and anti-Semitic, isn't it?

Tragically, it absolutely IS because they were Jewish, and it iS racist and anti-semitic. I think what people are trying to say on here is that the attack could be a retaliation for the genocide in Gaza.

KateShugakIsALegend · 16/12/2025 07:38

The fact is, for all the apologisers and excusers, that OUR neighbours and OUR colleagues are frightened to go about their daily lives because murderous people have decided to target them HERE.

What does everyone expect them to do to keep safe? They can't vote out the Israeli government because they live HERE.

Every time someone says 'but Gaza' in response to such attacks they are adding to the plight of Jews in this country and beyond.

I wouldn't want that on my conscience, I can't imagine why someone would.

KateShugakIsALegend · 16/12/2025 07:41

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:37

Tragically, it absolutely IS because they were Jewish, and it iS racist and anti-semitic. I think what people are trying to say on here is that the attack could be a retaliation for the genocide in Gaza.

How?????

What is the link?

There is no rational link which justifies 'retaliation'.

There is only irrational hatred for the Jewish people.

Which anyone in their right mind should abhor and resist, not explain and justify.

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:43

jeffgoldblum · 16/12/2025 00:03

Pardon me @IAmAHomewardBounder, but I would have answered… well because Hamas are their elected government , the fact that Hamas is a terrorist organisation is unfortunate but it is still the elected government of the state.

'Elected' - there have been no elections since 2006!

NewNameforThisPost2025 · 16/12/2025 07:45

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

“Short hand huh. Of course it is.”

Well, if you’re determined not to believe what I say, there’s not a lot I can do about that.

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:48

KateShugakIsALegend · 16/12/2025 07:41

How?????

What is the link?

There is no rational link which justifies 'retaliation'.

There is only irrational hatred for the Jewish people.

Which anyone in their right mind should abhor and resist, not explain and justify.

It's not a justification. People are looking for reasons. It is human nature.

KateShugakIsALegend · 16/12/2025 07:51

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:48

It's not a justification. People are looking for reasons. It is human nature.

What is the reason?

EasternStandard · 16/12/2025 07:51

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:48

It's not a justification. People are looking for reasons. It is human nature.

It’s heavily influenced, to the extent people believe a violent rampage on a beach in Australia is any kind of answer.

NorwegianinLondon1 · 16/12/2025 07:52

Of course it is a connection and that is not the same as saying it’s rational or justified. It’s weird to think that making that connection is somehow anti semitic.

KateShugakIsALegend · 16/12/2025 07:53

NorwegianinLondon1 · 16/12/2025 07:52

Of course it is a connection and that is not the same as saying it’s rational or justified. It’s weird to think that making that connection is somehow anti semitic.

This is the nub of it.

Please explain the connection.

IAmAHomewardBounder · 16/12/2025 07:56

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:43

'Elected' - there have been no elections since 2006!

@jeffgoldblum see this is what I was aiming to avoid. It gets whipped out every time you mention Hamas being elected.

EasternStandard · 16/12/2025 07:59

NorwegianinLondon1 · 16/12/2025 07:52

Of course it is a connection and that is not the same as saying it’s rational or justified. It’s weird to think that making that connection is somehow anti semitic.

I think the ideology promotes this idea of a connection. It’s not human nature nor weird to say separate Australians from Gaza.

Most people know shooting innocent people including a ten year old girl on a beach isn’t explained by some connection.

Catbenign · 16/12/2025 07:59

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

jeffgoldblum · 16/12/2025 08:01

IAmAHomewardBounder · 16/12/2025 07:56

@jeffgoldblum see this is what I was aiming to avoid. It gets whipped out every time you mention Hamas being elected.

Yes , you were correct! , but however long it’s been since, they were elected originally 🤷‍♀️ , these facts can’t be overlooked.

Amaizintacos · 16/12/2025 08:03

TheTamerShrew · 15/12/2025 09:24

I’m posting because I’m struggling with how racism against Jews is being talked about here following the recent terrorist attack in Australia. What I’ve seen, again and again, is minimisation: it wasn’t really about Jews, it was more complicated than that, let’s not jump to conclusions, other groups have it worse. All the familiar caveats come out remarkably quickly when the victims are Jewish.

I want to say clearly: racism against Jews is racism. Full stop. It doesn’t become less serious because it’s uncomfortable, politically inconvenient, or doesn’t fit neatly into how some people understand racism. And it doesn’t need to compete with other forms of racism to be real or worthy of being named.

What I find particularly painful is how often antisemitism is explained away rather than confronted. We would rightly challenge this pattern if it happened after an attack on almost any other minority group. Yet when Jews are targeted, there seems to be an urge to dilute, reframe, or downplay what’s happened.
I’d really ask people to pause and self-reflect on why that might be.

Why does naming antisemitism feel harder?
Why is there a rush to qualify it, contextualise it out of existence, or deny it altogether?
Why is Jewish fear so often treated as oversensitivity rather than a rational response to a long and very real history?

Acknowledging racism is not an accusation against everyone else. It’s the first, necessary step in confronting it. If we can’t even name antisemitism when it’s staring us in the face, we have no chance of challenging it, let alone preventing it.

We don’t make the world safer by minimising hatred. We make it safer by recognising it honestly, even when that recognition makes us uncomfortable.

I hope this can be read in the spirit it’s intended: not to shut down discussion, but to ask people to explore and self reflect.

See the attached photo: in order to become Anti-racist, one needs to first acknowledge racism

the Bondi attack was pure antisemitism, Islamism is a threat to the West generally and a direct threat to Jews globally through its proponents stated aim of death to Jews and the eradication of Israel.

I also reject the anti-racism diagram included , it is an Ibram Kendi/Robin DiAngelo-type hierarchy of victimhood and perceived power, divisise, moralising, white guilt pushing, critical theory, dangerous nonsense DEI tool, and is a whole other type of threat to the West that has infiltrated our institutions!

IAmAHomewardBounder · 16/12/2025 08:04

whymadam · 16/12/2025 07:37

Tragically, it absolutely IS because they were Jewish, and it iS racist and anti-semitic. I think what people are trying to say on here is that the attack could be a retaliation for the genocide in Gaza.

whymadam

"Innocent Jewish people don't have to die because of Gaza, or anything else! Don't you get it? 🙄."

Gaza has nothing to do with Australia. A ten year old gunned down on a beach has absolutely nothing to do with Gaza. Don't you see how problematic it is when you condone the motives of terrorists?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.