Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To have expected him to make sure I got home ok?

1000 replies

Muffinmoo · 05/12/2025 15:08

First date last night with a guy who spent most of the evening telling me about how rich he was and all the companies he had owned and sold.

Left the restaurant, freezing outside. I am having trouble getting an uber. He is just standing there watching me struggle to try and book a cab. He suggests I get a black cab. Tell him I can’t really afford it. Eventually I give up and say I will walk to the tube which is about a 5-10 minute walk (I’m in heels). He walks with me part way before leaving me alone at gone midnight to go to his easiest tube stop. I have to walk to the tube in the dark by myself. He could have got the same tube line from the same station as me.
AIBU for expecting him to at least walk me to the tube if not help get me taxi??? Or is that too much these days?! 🙈

OP posts:
Shinyandnew1 · 06/12/2025 12:49

If you live and work in London and presumably use the tube all the time why wouldn't it occur to you to use the nearest tube station? Or use a black cab as far your preferred station? Why choose to walk alone somewhere you thought was dangerous?It makes no sense.

This.

What do you do when you go out with female friends? What would you do if you are dating a woman?

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/12/2025 12:50

HoneyParsnipSoup · 06/12/2025 12:36

In the interests of balance this isn’t my experience hence my earlier posting. It depends how they do it. If it’s a controlling, ‘I’m a man; I choose the date and pay, your job is to look nice and give me something at the end’ then yes, they’re likely a sexist pig.

If it’s more relaxed, ‘I’d like to pay as I asked you out’, with no strings attached, then I think it’s a generous gesture and indicative of somebody who doesn’t begrudge giving or see everything as purely transactional.

All the men I know who insisted on 50:50 and tracked what they spent down to the penny to ‘claim it back next time’, ended up being tight selfish husbands who bizarrely assume she is ‘only interested in the money’ and have been nightmares post divorce regarding child maintenance.

Yes, someone who is petty and stingy when dating - whether male or female - will likely stay petty and stingy for life. But that's not really what I'm talking about at all.

I'm talking about the difference between men who regard their dates as equals and those who feel obliged to act in a certain way because of heavily gendered expectations.

Blushingm · 06/12/2025 12:51

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 12:36

Should I have bought him some flowers too? 😂😂

Why not? Or chocolates?

Do you go out on your own most days??? Yes? Do you expect strangers to check you get home ok? Or does your boss check you got home? - I very much doubt it. Sounds like this guy has had a lucky escape

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 12:52

Blushingm · 06/12/2025 12:51

Why not? Or chocolates?

Do you go out on your own most days??? Yes? Do you expect strangers to check you get home ok? Or does your boss check you got home? - I very much doubt it. Sounds like this guy has had a lucky escape

What a ridiculous comment.

OP posts:
Franklyannoyed · 06/12/2025 12:53

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 12:47

There is a balance I think - being chivalrous doesn’t automatically mean seeing women as somehow incapable or less than. I also don’t think making sure someone gets home safe is a grand chivalrous gesture.

Men who expect ‘50:50’ tend to do so only when it suits them. They don’t risk their income capacity and health giving birth. There will always be an inherent inequality and I don’t think a bit of effort at the beginning is therefore too much to ask.

You seem to feel there is no expectation on you. It isn’t about the man wanting 50 50. It’s about the woman having enough self respect and independence to be able to pay her way. This man didn’t expect 50 50. The issue is you wanted 100 and zero.

Franklyannoyed · 06/12/2025 12:53

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/12/2025 12:50

Yes, someone who is petty and stingy when dating - whether male or female - will likely stay petty and stingy for life. But that's not really what I'm talking about at all.

I'm talking about the difference between men who regard their dates as equals and those who feel obliged to act in a certain way because of heavily gendered expectations.

And this applies to both men and women. There was only one person who was petty and stingy on this date.

ilovesooty · 06/12/2025 12:56

FieryA · 06/12/2025 11:52

You were booking an Uber but could not afford a black cab? Doesn't make sense. And as for him offering to pay and then you reimburse- why should he? I wouldn't offer to pay for a cab for a man on a first date.
And yes, it would have been kind if he had accompanied you to the tube station but for whatever reason he didn't want to. And if that is a dealbreaker for you, so be it. Just tell him. But I have gotten the bus late at night but never expected the guy to wait till I got onto it. Sometimes whose ever's bus/cab came earlier, went. You are definitely unreasonable for not being dressed up suitable for the weather. If you can't walk 10 mins in heels, then maybe don't wear them. You can look nice, even in flat footwear.

Of course she could afford a black cab. She didn't want to pay for it.

weisatted · 06/12/2025 12:57

BillieWiper · 05/12/2025 16:51

I've never met a multimillionaire who would boast about being one and then chooses to use the bus. If he wanted to show off he was rich that's the opposite of what he should've done.

I'm not saying he should've paid for her meal or cab though. He's a stranger practically.

This is nonsense, sorry.

My dad is a multi millionaire - he takes the bus often. Just because you have money doesn't mean you spend it on unnecessary things.

Same as he doesn't fly first class even though he could afford to - he doesn't personally value it so he doesn't

HoneyParsnipSoup · 06/12/2025 12:58

weisatted · 06/12/2025 12:57

This is nonsense, sorry.

My dad is a multi millionaire - he takes the bus often. Just because you have money doesn't mean you spend it on unnecessary things.

Same as he doesn't fly first class even though he could afford to - he doesn't personally value it so he doesn't

All the rich people I know love a bargain and shop at The Range etc

Blushingm · 06/12/2025 12:59

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 12:52

What a ridiculous comment.

Why is it ridiculous?

MNMNMN · 06/12/2025 13:00

Franklyannoyed · 06/12/2025 12:22

Yes it is amazing, I’m genuinely surprised.

so far you’ve posted :

you didn’t dress appropriately, even though likely been through many winters.
couldnt walk far due to your shoe choices.
were cold due to your clothing choices.
weew unhappy to walk even a couple of mins further on
couldnt book an uber but expected him to and would pay him back
didn’t want to wander round looking for a black cab, but expected him to pay for one for you
will be financially disadvantaged if you have children.
use dating to see if a man will look after you. Not see if you’re compatible. Not see if you get on, not see if you can be a partnership. But to see primarily if he will look after you financially and physically. On a first date with a stranger. Who bought you dinner and walked you part of the way.

so yes, it is amazing.

Good summary. The OP is stuck in the 1950s. Teetering around in heels, insisting on first dates buying her dinner and then expecting the men to hand out cash for a black cab (whilst pretending she would be ok paying it back). This isn’t high standards. It’s reinforcing women as weaker and dependent. Yuk.

dudsville · 06/12/2025 13:01

You chose to wear heels, you left the house without sufficient funds to get yourself home by taxi, and chose to leave the restaurant once it was too late for more convenient options. You set yourself up for this. Why would you rely on a man you'd just met, who clearly wasn't so taken with you for him to offer help?

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 13:02

MNMNMN · 06/12/2025 13:00

Good summary. The OP is stuck in the 1950s. Teetering around in heels, insisting on first dates buying her dinner and then expecting the men to hand out cash for a black cab (whilst pretending she would be ok paying it back). This isn’t high standards. It’s reinforcing women as weaker and dependent. Yuk.

No you’re right, we should continue to do everything for men despite there being completely unequal treatment in society as a whole including pay inequality, and the basic biological fact that it is only women who experience the financial and physical disadvantages of giving birth.

OP posts:
Calliopespa · 06/12/2025 13:02

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/12/2025 12:31

I think this is where my thinking diverges from yours, OP.

I completely agree that men don't magically change when you have kids. However, my view is that the men who are likely to be genuinely supportive partners, who will treat you as an equal and take on their fair share of the domestic load and parenting etc are not the ones who make grand "chivalrous" gestures while dating. On the contrary, those who insist on paying for everything and treat women as if they are delicate creatures that need to be looked after when dating are very likely to hold quite traditional views about gender roles within marriage and expect you to fall into line when children come along.

If you want a really traditional marriage where he is the provider with the big job and you're responsible for home and kids etc, then fair enough - but be aware that this model can work out really badly for some women. If you want a partner that genuinely treats you as an equal, then I would suggest that your current standards might need a bit of recalibration.

I completely agree with these words.

And even if you do want a marriage that looks traditional - and I am a strong believer in the idea that we shouldn't criticise or limit women in any way, which includes the the freedom to choose a life that may look very traditional - I think you want it to be a decision that is made from a position of strength and an ability to choose, not because it is expected of you or you have no other options.

MNMNMN · 06/12/2025 13:02

It gets dark by 1630 at the moment in London. I wonder if the OP is housebound.

HoneyParsnipSoup · 06/12/2025 13:03

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/12/2025 12:50

Yes, someone who is petty and stingy when dating - whether male or female - will likely stay petty and stingy for life. But that's not really what I'm talking about at all.

I'm talking about the difference between men who regard their dates as equals and those who feel obliged to act in a certain way because of heavily gendered expectations.

I don’t think it’s an equal comparison though.

Women are far more likely to be left as a single mother, so a stingy woman isn’t really a flight risk for men in the same way.

I needed to know money and splitting things down to the penny wasn’t a priority to the man I eventually settled with. I’m now disabled and on unpaid leave for a few months for various reasons, DH hasn’t even mentioned the money side and we share 1 account. My friend whose ex boyfriend had a ‘50/50’ obsession now earns £100,000 a year while she is on UC, but will text her to ask for half of a £1 toothbrush for their son. He never left the ‘we contribute equally or not at all’ mentality.

arethereanyleftatall · 06/12/2025 13:04

SooticaTheWitchesCat · 06/12/2025 11:13

Mumsnet is a funny place. On some posts everyone is screaming LTB at someone’s husband for some minor indiscretion and here we have a man who has spent the whole evening bragging about himself and his money but who hasn’t got the decency to walk his date to the tube in the middle of the night and everyone is sticking up for him 😹

people aren’t sticking up for him as such, they’re saying it simply indicates he doesn’t like her, and felt no need to conform to a ‘standard’ that he possibly would had he liked her. If his own boundaries are such that he does in fact like women who behave like this, then yes, obviously it was a silly thing not to invest two minutes in.

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 13:06

MNMNMN · 06/12/2025 13:02

It gets dark by 1630 at the moment in London. I wonder if the OP is housebound.

You’re so hilarious!

OP posts:
Alittlefrustrated · 06/12/2025 13:06

This thread is totally bizarre. He most definitely should of walked you to the station OP.
I particularly like the PP stating that they are "not the one going out dating strangers" 🤣🤣🤣
I'd probably of paid for a black cab, given I hadn't had to pay for my meal though.

MNMNMN · 06/12/2025 13:08

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 13:02

No you’re right, we should continue to do everything for men despite there being completely unequal treatment in society as a whole including pay inequality, and the basic biological fact that it is only women who experience the financial and physical disadvantages of giving birth.

I don’t do everything for men. Quite the opposite, as I have said.

Financially we pooled resources when I was on mat leave for nine months. I went back to my job full time so was not worse off at all. Physically I was lucky enough to be ok.

We are true equals.

I went out late last night to watch my son in a show in his university town. I had to come back at midnight alone in an unfamiliar place. I stuck to well-lit main roads which were busy. I was fine. It’s never 100% safe anywhere. But we have to get a grip and manage without relying on men for everything!

But you carry on playing the victim in your high heels with your hand out for taxi money. Some men are into that kind of thing. Hopefully you will find each other.

arethereanyleftatall · 06/12/2025 13:09

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 13:02

No you’re right, we should continue to do everything for men despite there being completely unequal treatment in society as a whole including pay inequality, and the basic biological fact that it is only women who experience the financial and physical disadvantages of giving birth.

How ON EARTH is any of this relevant to your original post?!?

MNMNMN · 06/12/2025 13:09

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 13:06

You’re so hilarious!

Well it’s not me crying about having to walk home ‘alone in the dark’!

Muffinmoo · 06/12/2025 13:10

arethereanyleftatall · 06/12/2025 13:09

How ON EARTH is any of this relevant to your original post?!?

No idea - I’m simply reacting to the posters who are telling me I’m ‘from the 1950s’ and I’m just pointing out not a huge amount has actually changed in terms of ‘equality’ except in ways that ironically benefit men.

OP posts:
weisatted · 06/12/2025 13:10

I actually think there is generally a Londoner thing going on. I am a Londoner and have been all my life - every single woman I know walks places on their own at night sometimes and wears clothing/shoes that makes that practical. Because that's just London life! You can't afford to take cabs everywhere and often your friends are going in opposite directions to you so you can't travel together.

I think that extends to date etiquette as well.

OP keeps saying it's about standards but I think it's more about values.

Some women want to be "taken care of" and have that vibe to their relationship. That's not about standards, that's just personal preferences.

I have very high standards - unlike many women, I have never put up with doing more housework, childcare, my career being considered secondary. But I don't feel any need to be paid for or walked places - just not important to me.

arethereanyleftatall · 06/12/2025 13:10

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 06/12/2025 12:31

I think this is where my thinking diverges from yours, OP.

I completely agree that men don't magically change when you have kids. However, my view is that the men who are likely to be genuinely supportive partners, who will treat you as an equal and take on their fair share of the domestic load and parenting etc are not the ones who make grand "chivalrous" gestures while dating. On the contrary, those who insist on paying for everything and treat women as if they are delicate creatures that need to be looked after when dating are very likely to hold quite traditional views about gender roles within marriage and expect you to fall into line when children come along.

If you want a really traditional marriage where he is the provider with the big job and you're responsible for home and kids etc, then fair enough - but be aware that this model can work out really badly for some women. If you want a partner that genuinely treats you as an equal, then I would suggest that your current standards might need a bit of recalibration.

Spot on.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.