Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is there anyone on here who voted Labour who is genuinely happy with how things are going

461 replies

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 01/12/2025 08:14

I didn’t vote Labour, but was actually quite excited. We needed change, now I dint think that at all and although Tories weren’t great in many respects, this shit show feels worse! I’m so tired of our politicians just not doing what is best for the country and having to curtail to babk benchers/unions, lining their own pockets and wardrobes and generally just being untrustworthy.
i have no doubt Farage will get in next time, and it will be Keir’s fault.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
HectorPlasm · 01/12/2025 11:50

"I remember the utter disgust over Kier's wife's free clothes, and yet all quiet on the billions worth of money and corruption under the tories"

That is so utterly not true - the papers and media properly went after Boris. And I say that despite thinking he was a useless nobhead!

EasternStandard · 01/12/2025 11:51

droopytreealready · 01/12/2025 11:49

Well yes, except that then the British public will need to accept that a drop in birthdates does mean that immigration is needed.

The pp said incentivise in that post. Plus things will look different in twenty odd years with the workforce.

Bumblebee72 · 01/12/2025 11:51

Annoyeddd · 01/12/2025 11:49

So anyone who finds they are expecting a third child should be expected to kill it (accidents happen particularly as contraceptive services have been cut right back), what about twins, triplets?
What about if you are a two parent family with three children and an accident, illness, redundancy or death happens.
Yes the feckless will always be with us but I would hope they are few and far between.
And don't forget the 30 free hours for childcare - I know of families where both parents are working and are subsidised by £4000 per month as government pays a big chunk of their nursery fees.

The vast majority of children who are born into poverty are done so at the parent choice. Don't use edge cases to obfuscate the core problem.

randomchap · 01/12/2025 11:52

TempleOfLove · 01/12/2025 11:40

On this I agree. Not enough spotlight is put upon timsons work - the man absolutely deserves a knighthood. I don't know any other millionaires entrepreneurs who does as much for ex offenders him.not a Labour achievement though, he's been doing his work for decades unrecognised and undervalued.

But they've given him a ministerial post so that he's got more powers to carry on his good work. How is that not a labour thing?

Bumblebee72 · 01/12/2025 11:54

EasternStandard · 01/12/2025 11:51

The pp said incentivise in that post. Plus things will look different in twenty odd years with the workforce.

Agree - we need less people into the future with the development of technology not more.

Octavia64 · 01/12/2025 11:56

Kleeneze · 01/12/2025 11:24

I think Reform will get in. I won’t vote for them but plenty will. Labour needs to address the soaring health / disability bill and ditch the triple lock before anyone can take them remotely seriously as a party. And they’re too scared of their not-very-bright’rebel’ MPs to do this.

This is actually really interesting.

i think we are in a time of (potential) realignment.

the tories are in the wilderness. Nobody went to their conference. It’s going to take the electorate a long time to forget Boris and Truss/Kwarteng. Many people who had relatives die during covid hold Boris and the tories pretty personally responsible (see: let the bodies pile high).

some people are voting for them anyway.

reform are taking a lot of what was the working class Tory vote. The anti-immigration, things are shit let’s roll the dice type people. That’s a pretty big vote segment but it’s not enough on its own to gain power in parliament (fine for running referendums though).

a lot of the more left leaning people are looking at Zack Polanski and the greens.

starmer is not stupid. The unpleasant stuff is being front loaded into this parliament so that as it gets closer to the next election he can have successes. It’s stupid to do it the other way round - have your successes in the first couple of years and then look shit just before the election.

for what it’s worth my prediction is that the next parliament will be more fractured. Some reform, some green, some Lib Dem and less Tory and Labour. It’ll then be a question of coalition.

EasternStandard · 01/12/2025 12:02

Octavia64 · 01/12/2025 11:56

This is actually really interesting.

i think we are in a time of (potential) realignment.

the tories are in the wilderness. Nobody went to their conference. It’s going to take the electorate a long time to forget Boris and Truss/Kwarteng. Many people who had relatives die during covid hold Boris and the tories pretty personally responsible (see: let the bodies pile high).

some people are voting for them anyway.

reform are taking a lot of what was the working class Tory vote. The anti-immigration, things are shit let’s roll the dice type people. That’s a pretty big vote segment but it’s not enough on its own to gain power in parliament (fine for running referendums though).

a lot of the more left leaning people are looking at Zack Polanski and the greens.

starmer is not stupid. The unpleasant stuff is being front loaded into this parliament so that as it gets closer to the next election he can have successes. It’s stupid to do it the other way round - have your successes in the first couple of years and then look shit just before the election.

for what it’s worth my prediction is that the next parliament will be more fractured. Some reform, some green, some Lib Dem and less Tory and Labour. It’ll then be a question of coalition.

Labour are dropping behind conservatives and greens in some polls. So the wilderness thing could be them.

GlitteringBauble · 01/12/2025 12:08

PandoraSocks · 01/12/2025 11:48

We do actually need people to have children.

Yes, we need people to have kids who are positive role models... so working, or working where possible, striving, educating yourself, learning skills, being contributors to society. What we don't want are more children from parents who are bringing up children to believe sitting on your backside and screwing the benefits system for all it's worth is the way to go.
What we are actually doing is discouraging the former and encouraging the latter.

catspyjamas1 · 01/12/2025 12:10

Sasssquatch · 01/12/2025 09:03

I don’t think they’re doing a terrible job. It’ll take a while to correct the shit show of the last 15 years. What we need more than anything is stability. And for the press to back off and let the changes take effect and to stop stirring up discontent and division.

The press is holding the government to account, as it should.

IcyPuddles · 01/12/2025 12:12

Reform won’t get in because of the scale of tactical voting.

I’m a Labour voter in a Labour constituency where Reform aren’t challenging. However, if I lived in a constituency where it was a toss up between Reform and Conservatives for winner, I’d hold my nose and vote Conservative.

Happyjoe · 01/12/2025 12:17

EasternStandard · 01/12/2025 11:38

They’ve taxed people more after pledging not to and given some £500 or whatever it is that’s the issue for them.

So did the tories, they taxed people too, they pledged not to tax the richest, sigh.

Unfortunately tax is a dirty word in the UK, it's madness when the same people moan about nothing working.

TwilightZoneRose · 01/12/2025 12:19

They're a lot better than the Tories were

The Tories accidentally bumbled out of the single market, trashing the economy for years to come

Trashed state schools

Trashed the NHS and ambulance waiting times.

Absolutely useless.

EasternStandard · 01/12/2025 12:21

Happyjoe · 01/12/2025 12:17

So did the tories, they taxed people too, they pledged not to tax the richest, sigh.

Unfortunately tax is a dirty word in the UK, it's madness when the same people moan about nothing working.

Edited

Labour made a big deal of fully funded and fully costed at the GE and then they had a ‘one off’ tax hike last budget, then £26bn more again.

That’s a problem for them even if you are personally happy with higher taxes and welfare, you can see that in polling. And likely reflected in upcoming local elections.

TopPocketFind · 01/12/2025 12:23

GlitteringBauble · 01/12/2025 12:08

Yes, we need people to have kids who are positive role models... so working, or working where possible, striving, educating yourself, learning skills, being contributors to society. What we don't want are more children from parents who are bringing up children to believe sitting on your backside and screwing the benefits system for all it's worth is the way to go.
What we are actually doing is discouraging the former and encouraging the latter.

How do you suggest a country decides who should have children and who shouldn't?

TwilightZoneRose · 01/12/2025 12:23

TwilightZoneRose · 01/12/2025 12:19

They're a lot better than the Tories were

The Tories accidentally bumbled out of the single market, trashing the economy for years to come

Trashed state schools

Trashed the NHS and ambulance waiting times.

Absolutely useless.

There's a reason why no other European countries rushed to copy us and leave the EU. Because it was an idiotic and self destructive thing to do.

NancyBellaDonna · 01/12/2025 12:29

It takes a village to raise child.

You only get one childhood. If it is impaired by poverty and deprivation, many never recover. When so many lives are damaged in this way, the whole of society suffers.

And to those posters espousing that those women claiming benefits should not get pregnant (irrespective of the circumstances): Who the fuck are you to dictate who can and who can't have a child?

That way lies fascism.

Bumblebee72 · 01/12/2025 12:30

CreativeGreen · 01/12/2025 11:46

They did not pledge not to tax people 😂

They said they wouldn't raise taxes for normal working people and that they wouldn't raise Income Tax, VAT and Corporation Tax.

Not many of us interpreted normal working people as it just meaning Dave from Runcorn. Or that not raising income tax was just the headline rate but every single variable around would change.

Bumblebee72 · 01/12/2025 12:31

NancyBellaDonna · 01/12/2025 12:29

It takes a village to raise child.

You only get one childhood. If it is impaired by poverty and deprivation, many never recover. When so many lives are damaged in this way, the whole of society suffers.

And to those posters espousing that those women claiming benefits should not get pregnant (irrespective of the circumstances): Who the fuck are you to dictate who can and who can't have a child?

That way lies fascism.

Well, we're the ones who end up picking up the bill.

TopPocketFind · 01/12/2025 12:35

Bumblebee72 · 01/12/2025 12:31

Well, we're the ones who end up picking up the bill.

We all share society.

If you are happy to leave children in poverty, that is your outlook.

CurlewKate · 01/12/2025 12:35

I voted Labour. I’m not happy with everything they’re doing-I wouldn't expect to-but they are still the party that aligns closest to my political views and my personal philosophy.

Bumblebee72 · 01/12/2025 12:39

TopPocketFind · 01/12/2025 12:35

We all share society.

If you are happy to leave children in poverty, that is your outlook.

I'm not happy to leave children in poverty. I'm furious with the parents who decide to have children in poverty - it is one of the most selfish actions you can make - bring a child into the world that you know is going to poor life changes and will suffer. Imagine sitting deciding to have a baby that you can't afford to feed.

Christmascarrotjumper · 01/12/2025 12:42

TopPocketFind · 01/12/2025 12:35

We all share society.

If you are happy to leave children in poverty, that is your outlook.

We need to redefine poverty before we try and tackle it. Can't eradicate relative poverty. It's a meaningless, endless task as is.

TopPocketFind · 01/12/2025 12:45

Bumblebee72 · 01/12/2025 12:39

I'm not happy to leave children in poverty. I'm furious with the parents who decide to have children in poverty - it is one of the most selfish actions you can make - bring a child into the world that you know is going to poor life changes and will suffer. Imagine sitting deciding to have a baby that you can't afford to feed.

Being furious with the parents is not going to help those children. Lifting the cap does.

TopPocketFind · 01/12/2025 12:48

Christmascarrotjumper · 01/12/2025 12:42

We need to redefine poverty before we try and tackle it. Can't eradicate relative poverty. It's a meaningless, endless task as is.

We can help people in poverty regardless of the definition.

CurlewKate · 01/12/2025 12:50

Bumblebee72 · 01/12/2025 12:39

I'm not happy to leave children in poverty. I'm furious with the parents who decide to have children in poverty - it is one of the most selfish actions you can make - bring a child into the world that you know is going to poor life changes and will suffer. Imagine sitting deciding to have a baby that you can't afford to feed.

Being furious with parents isn’t actually gong to help. And, as an aside, if you go by Mumsnet, accidental pregnancies are incredibly common…..