Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

That DSS’s mum losing her house isn’t our problem.

463 replies

heavenknow · 22/11/2025 12:42

DSS is 20, graduating uni in 6 months. DH has paid a generous maintenance throughout. The agreement they had in place was financial support ended in Dec 25. (Due to lump sum payments requested by ex)
She has now said if we can’t continue the payments for a minimum of 6-12 months then she will lose her house. She currently works for herself. AIBU to think this isn’t our problem?

OP posts:
BruFord · 27/11/2025 00:38

@FancyBiscuitsLevel It would’ve made more sense to have downsized this year tbh if she knew that she wouldn’t be able to afford her current property without the maintenance. It’s all very odd.

Selttan · 27/11/2025 04:45

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 26/11/2025 22:06

Or there’s another option. The norm round us is when maintenance stops at end of year 13, if the child is then going to uni, the maintenance amount is then paid directly to the child to support themselves at uni.

normally, the child has gone away to uni, but would the OPs DH consider that option?

But the ‘maintenance’ amount till end of uni has already been paid as part of the lump sum payment. It’s not like she’s being shortchanged what she’s owed.

Perhaps if things are so dire and needs to consider getting a 2nd job. It’s not like she needs to work around her son.

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 27/11/2025 07:19

But this goes back to the dad and step mums bad decision- they knew the lump sum was for the mother’s business debts, not maintenance. They knew it wouldn’t be spent on DSS yet they agreed to it, knowing DSS would still be in full time education and needing support at the point the money ran out.

knowing the lump sum was to prop up a failing business and still allowing it to be classed as maintenance was a shockingly shit decision by the dad. Knowing it would push this crunch to the last key months of his son’s education yet agreeing to it was super shit. Yes the mother agreed to this, the father has to own the fact he went along with it.

thepariscrimefiles · 27/11/2025 07:32

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 27/11/2025 07:19

But this goes back to the dad and step mums bad decision- they knew the lump sum was for the mother’s business debts, not maintenance. They knew it wouldn’t be spent on DSS yet they agreed to it, knowing DSS would still be in full time education and needing support at the point the money ran out.

knowing the lump sum was to prop up a failing business and still allowing it to be classed as maintenance was a shockingly shit decision by the dad. Knowing it would push this crunch to the last key months of his son’s education yet agreeing to it was super shit. Yes the mother agreed to this, the father has to own the fact he went along with it.

OP's DH gave DSS's mum a generous lump sum that he legally didn't need to do. It was entirely at her discretion what she spent the money on. If he gives her more money, she could spend it on something else and keep coming back for more money.

As she is renting and obviously now has no income, I don't understand why she hasn't applied for UC and help with her rent. If she hasn't done this, what is she living on? She has obviously become accustomed to being supported financially by her son's father and has made no provision re her finances for what happens when this arrangement ends. I think that if OP's DH gives her this money now, she will keep coming back for more.

whitewinefriday · 27/11/2025 09:18

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 26/11/2025 21:09

The person responsible for this will be his mother.

Absolutely. And I imagine DSS will realise this

TrippingOverMyAssets · 27/11/2025 09:36

SoftBalletShoes · 24/11/2025 21:53

It's the kind of thing I'd do if I was wealthy. I don't care what the circumstances are, no one should be evicted in the winter.

Only on MN do people think that everyone can magick up a job and a rental at the drop of a hat, when both are scarce. She might have been trying to get a job and a cheaper rental for ages.

Great. I’ll give you my account details right away!

TunnocksOrDeath · 27/11/2025 09:43

If DSS is still basically living at his Mum's, i.e. most of his stuff is there and he just takes the basics up to uni for term-time, then maybe not putting an extra load of stress on him in the run up to his finals would be best for him - yes it's annoying as the agreement was only until December, but is it worth the risk of screwing up his final degree classification, considering the amount of money that's already been invested in his education?

40YearOldDad · 27/11/2025 09:43

Lots of people here saying, pay it for another 6-9 months etc, as it's morally the right thing to do - I'm sure the OP will pass on bank details for anyone so generous.

TrippingOverMyAssets · 27/11/2025 10:32

40YearOldDad · 27/11/2025 09:43

Lots of people here saying, pay it for another 6-9 months etc, as it's morally the right thing to do - I'm sure the OP will pass on bank details for anyone so generous.

And obviously all the people saying that would be happy to pay their exes rent for years because it’s morally the right thing to do. Honestly some people on here are so full of it and they think people actually believe them too.

nomas · 27/11/2025 10:57

phantomofthepopera · 22/11/2025 14:11

It will be your problem when your husband’s child is homeless.

How could he be homeless when his dad's home is his home too?

Or do you think only the mum's home is home?

nomas · 27/11/2025 11:05

tomorrowtoblerone · 25/11/2025 11:47

By the OPs account, the father here left either a pregnant woman or a baby and got together with OP. Two years later he and OP were having the son half the time but giving the mother of his child plenty of money to live off. If that were the case, which I don't buy, why the angst over handing over money for the very final six months of the period when the son is in education? just doesn't stack up. The OP's husband might as well continue his unexplained generosity until the son graduates.

As for some of the comments on here, makes me wonder if it's been linked to some kind of bitter divorced dads pile on. FWIW I know several single mums and they are incredible. A couple of them do get a bit of financial assistance but that's as it should be given the pay gap and the demands of bringing up children and all the rest of it. Equal doesn't mean men get to walk away, earn money, and not contribute to their children financially.

makes me wonder if it's been linked to some kind of bitter divorced dads pile on.

That's ridiculous as a bitter bio mum pile on.

OP's DH has done everything right, paid 50/50 child support even though they have DS 50/50.

Of course the arrangement should end by the end date.

When your mortgage ends, will you give the bank an extra 6 months of payments?

whynotwhatknot · 27/11/2025 12:33

so hiss dad paid maintence even though he had him half the time and posters are saying he shoujld carry on paying

ridiculous

whitewinefriday · 27/11/2025 13:05

I'm still not convinced that DSS is going to get a reduced degree classification due to his mother's situation, especially not if he can move in with his father and the OP. Its not like he's 12 ....

New posts on this thread. Refresh page