Apart from anything else, it's so stupid to talk about womb transplants as if it was just a matter of getting hold of a womb and plumbing it in inside a male pelvis. We know how complicated pregnancy is! Any woman who's been through it can tell you how it affects her whole body. The complexity is mind-boggling. From conception on, female bodies have been built up to be capable of this. Obviously sometimes things go wrong and an individual woman can't become pregnant or give birth. But mostly human females can. Human males can't, in any circumstances. That's not how mammals have evolved.
We may have the biggest brains of any animal and the most complex social structures, but we are not exempt from biology and evolution.
@nauticant has been making the point below, very eloquently, for many years. This is the first post of hers I found using Advanced Search. It bears repetition.
nauticant · 03/02/2023 14:31
This is what I cut and paste whenever this gruesome subject comes up:
This business of uterine "transplants" into men appears to be about science but it is not. It's about getting the idea out there that men can give birth too, but not just yet, there are a few technical details to be sorted out first. So while we're waiting for the inevitable, let's get on with the social sciences side of things and accept that since men can give birth too (not yet, but soon, soon, it's bound to happen), then there are no real differences between men and women in terms of things that are material and significant, they're just bodies with an interchangeable set of parts. The actual significant differences are surface ones like the chosen forms of appearance.
It is about trying to change how people think by assuming a medical horror is a run-of-the-mill thing just round the corner. It's Overton Window stuff, not science.