The BBC should lose the license fee and be forced to operate like any other streaming service after the complete destruction of trust this week

[SingleSexSpacesInSchools]

Thats it really, the BBC lied to us, all of us.

They edited a Trump speech to make him look like he said something he did not.

They pushed one side of the transgender debate relentlessly, deliberately hiding negative stories on detransitioners, the US WPATH file and thousands of more cases

https://archive.ph/wWdMS

https://archive.ph/uiEKW

They have cancelled people for wrong-think at every opportunity, pushed drag queens over women, turned woman hours into mens hour, constantly attacked anyone who does not share their extreme liberal left wing views and kept them off the news cycle

They have utterly and completely lost all trust, they ARE biased they DON'T give balance in the news

Everyone thought it was a conspiracy, now we know it's actually true and we have PROOF

Today the BBC Director and News Director have both quit in absolute disgrace.

It is time the BBC was consigned to the dustbin because we are never getting back to the BBC I loved and trusted, the one that ran programmes to inform and entertain and educate, that BBC is long gone.

Replace it, completely.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt

Yes, and doing the most female act possible. Being pregnant. That therefore means they're women. They can't have their cake and eat it too. Either they want to be accepted as a man, and that automatically bars them from ever being pregnant, or they want to do the most female act possible. Either way, they can't have it both ways. If a trans man is pregnant, imo they've made their choice to be a woman and perform the most female act possible, and therefore forfeited the right to be referred to as a man.

It’s not damaged. It’s destroyed in way more people’s eyes than before. This is a final nail in the coffin of the licence fee.

but “women” doesn’t

Yes it does. Because being pregnant is the most womanly act there is possible.

They can't have it both ways.

This is so very good we should all read it twice.

Making a deliberate action to splice videos, is completely different from a non-verbal tic or reaction that you can't control.

That this even needs explaining stuns me.

Women get pregnant. Not men.

that’s the issue. Truth is the issue.

We know that. And it's because they are women.

I'm still angry about the BBC being the government's main weapon to "frighten the pants off the public" (their words, not mine) in 2020, with the completely one-sided reporting on all things to do with covid, knowing that many people trust it completely because it's the BBC, and saying exactly what the government bribed ordered them to say: no debate at all on the harms of lockdowns, blackout on the vast anti-lockdown protests which I myself attended, which I saw with my own eyes were easily hundreds of thousands of people: but all the BBC had to say was "a couple of hundred conspiracy theorists on Speaker's Corner". I abandoned Radio 4 when I had heard "corrrrrrronavirus" once too many.

You may not, but the BBC may have decided in their editorial policy that they do not wish to deliberately exclude any identity. And what’s with the phrase “some things should not be included”? That’s a bit dehumanising.

Transmen are women. Only women get pregnant. We don't need to change the wording.

And sometimes girls do. And teenagers. Not “women”.

I put bbc 'news' on this morning to see how they are reporting it. They are focusing on the Trump angle and ignoring all others again. Still unable to accurately report the story.

They scrubbed Kemi Badenoch’s specific response comments about their lack of coverage of sex and gender. That’s right. The UK opposition leader can’t even get a comment on sex and gender through.

Because the principle is a good one. They just need new / better management. They are being held to account, leadership changes, there we go.

Whilst I haven’t paid the license fee in years and haven’t watched BBC in years, every news org fucks up at some point.

Remember Cathy Newman of Channel 4 lying that she had been harassed by a group of Muslim men at a mosque until CCTV proved nothing of the sort happened and that they were polite and helpful?

'Woman' is a female of any age in the Equality Act and Sex Discrimination Act.

But they have been proven hundreds of times to not even approach let alone meet that very valid and needed principle

thy all must go. All of them

start again.

Also I think anyone who calls for us to do away with public service media is seriously deluded and naive about how things work with media that are funded by commercial/ shady corporate interests! Good luck finding transparency and impartiality there! Even so-called independents on YouTube, even those who are experienced reporters going independent, cannot completely escape the bias of their own online audience. There is always an angle somewhere and YouTube itself certainly has the power to change the algorithm so that some content is more or less visible. Public service media at least has an oversight and some degree of transparency and accountability. Doing away with it is the best way to speed up the oligarchy getting its teeth even deeper into what's left of our democracy.

You will absolutely regret it when that happens.

It isn't. Biases are clear, and fill me such rage that I'm only able to listen to the 0.01% of their output which isn't tainted yet. And standards have slipped, their news stories are littered with typos and phrases like "butt doctor".

Why?

But they HAVE excluded FACTS.

The BBC have decided in their editorial policy that they do indeed want to exclude many people, they make no attempt to mask their sneering contempt

You sound just like Elon Musk.

All the left clamouring to defend the BBC, why am I not surprised.