Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Waterstones experience with disabled child

276 replies

Reasonswhy · 30/10/2025 23:35

My child has a regressive neurological condition that makes her enjoy things much younger than her
age (9). We went to Waterstones today after a difficult medical appointment for a nice treat. The shop was deserted so it was calm and pleasant and my daughter headed for her favourite section, the young children’s books. She was enjoying looking at them when a staff member came up and said loudly “you’re far
too old to be reading them” and my daughter’s face just fell. I was so shocked, I wear a sunflower lanyard to alert people to a hidden disability, but even if she hadn’t seen that, surely it’s not right to comment on what anyone chooses to read? We just left
as my daughter was upset and I didn’t want to add to that by taking on the ignorance of the staff member in front of her and explaining the condition, but I’m hurting for her as it was meant to be a nice treat after a horrible blood test snd she walked away feeling judged.

OP posts:
Jellycatspyjamas · 31/10/2025 10:16

Reasonswhy · 31/10/2025 10:05

Disciplined? No.
Educated in SEN so another child doesn’t feel badly about themselves after coming into that shop? Yes.

But you’ve just said that irrespective of disability no one should comment on what someone else is reading (which I agree with). I think sometimes it’s easier to fight some external wrong than to know your child will always struggle with certain things.

I have rule that I either address things there and then or I let it go - otherwise it lives in my head and feels bigger than it actually is.

MrMucker · 31/10/2025 10:22

You keep going on about disability.
Are you saying the comment is fine for those without a disability?
Of course not. If the comment is off (not that I think it particularly is) , then it's off for everybody, in which case you have zero cause to mention any disability.

Yet that is 100% the focus here.
You are seriously othering your child, which in itself will have a far greater impact on their esteem and confidence than anybody just passing random comments in the course of doing their job.

Ddakji · 31/10/2025 10:23

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 31/10/2025 09:41

Why take it to social media? There is no evidence of a systemic issue. This is a single issue with a single staff member. That staff member needs to be addressed, not the company as a whole.

I said if she gets no joy from making a complaint to Waterstones.

Ddakji · 31/10/2025 10:25

Jellycatspyjamas · 31/10/2025 09:47

The lanyard doesn’t actually do anything other than indicate there’s a hidden disability - it says nothing about what that particular person might need so it still falls in the person or their carer to explain what those needs might be.

In all honesty if I saw a 9 year old child in reins and the accompanying adult wearing a lanyard, I’d assume it was the adult who had the invisible disability, because the child is visibly in need of additional support.

But that would still be irrelevant to what the Waterstones person said to this child.

Reasonswhy · 31/10/2025 10:26

MrMucker · 31/10/2025 10:22

You keep going on about disability.
Are you saying the comment is fine for those without a disability?
Of course not. If the comment is off (not that I think it particularly is) , then it's off for everybody, in which case you have zero cause to mention any disability.

Yet that is 100% the focus here.
You are seriously othering your child, which in itself will have a far greater impact on their esteem and confidence than anybody just passing random comments in the course of doing their job.

I don’t think I keep going on about anything other than the thread, in which case please feel free to scroll on by.
Her condition is absolutely relevant to this because the books she looked at, and was judged for, are related to the regressive nature of her illness/disability.

OP posts:
latetothefisting · 31/10/2025 10:26

I'm usually on the staff member's side but in this situation I would absolutely raise it. Bookstore staff should be encouraging people to read, full stop. Doesn't matter what it is. And from a consumerist point of view, should be doing anything possible to make a sale, of anything, not make people want to leave!

You'd have to be completely ignorant to not be aware of learning disabilities, children whose first language isn't English, children who want to read comfort books for whatever reason, let alone the most obvious interpretation of buying a gift for someone else.

What if the employee acts the same way to adults who are learning to read, etc. It could put them back off for life.

CoffeeAndCakeBringMeJoy · 31/10/2025 10:30

I’m sorry this happened to you, OP and hope you and your DD are okay. There’s no excuse for this - it should have been very clear to the member of staff why your DD was looking at those books, and even if it wasn’t, it should be human nature and a Simon act of kindness to not pass such a comment. A simple, “Hello, are you okay, would you like any help choosing a book?” would be more than enough.

I was in Waterstones with DD11 this week, who chose a couple of books, then ambled over to the toddler/pre-school section where we spent a happy couple of minutes spotting her favourites from when she was small. She outgrew those books years ago, but wasn’t doing anything wrong by simply being in that area for a couple of minutes (the shop was quiet).

MaurineWayBack · 31/10/2025 10:31

mzpq · 30/10/2025 23:41

Sounds like she was just doing her job as in not judging, but pointing out she's in the younger readers section.

Bit odd though, as I think most would've assumed she was buying a younger book as a gift, rather than for herself.

And that's if they thought anything at all.

Lol

Of course, just doing her job by pointing out the obvious is NOT judgemental at all. 😂😂😂

YourOliveBalonz · 31/10/2025 10:35

I think the lanyard is neither here nor there, she was shaming your child with her comment (it would be shaming regardless of disability) and it’s a very ableist approach. Why have the assumption that an older child will be of a certain reading age for a start? I think you should definitely complain because that staff member needs training.

MrMucker · 31/10/2025 10:36

Not every passing comment is a personal indictment.
You can find offense in anything if you enjoy painting yourself as a target.
There really are a number of ways in taking the shop workers comment.

BellissimoGecko · 31/10/2025 10:37

NattyKnitter116 · 30/10/2025 23:37

It’s probably worth contacting the store/head office to mention what happened and ask for the staff to be given some top up disability training as that’s frankly appalling behavior from the staff member. I’m impressed at your ability to walk away quietly, but I understand why you managed it. Don’t let it pass though.

This.

CoffeeAndCakeBringMeJoy · 31/10/2025 10:38

Sorry, just spotted a typo in my post - should have said “simple” instead of “Simon” - autocorrect’s fault, but I should have spotted it.

ForCraftyWriter · 31/10/2025 10:39

rainbowsandraspberrygin · 31/10/2025 08:29

Her comment was literal judgement though?

regardless of any Sen, anyone can read and look at what they want.

Impartially it wasn’t literal judgement though, even if you see it as that or OP saw it as that. It’s an observation about the child’s age and the book’s age, the staff in the children’s dept are supposed to help signpost children to the appropriate section. I’m sure that’s what the staff thought they were doing. There are more inclusive ways to have made the suggestion though and that’s where the feedback/complaint should lie.

CosySeason · 31/10/2025 10:39

I would complain. You could have been picking out a book for another child for all they know.

BellissimoGecko · 31/10/2025 10:40

MrMucker · 31/10/2025 10:36

Not every passing comment is a personal indictment.
You can find offense in anything if you enjoy painting yourself as a target.
There really are a number of ways in taking the shop workers comment.

The woman’s comment was offensive, judgemental and rude. There were lots of other things she could have said if she was just making conversation. But thanks for your input 🙄🙄

MaurineWayBack · 31/10/2025 10:40

MrMucker · 31/10/2025 10:36

Not every passing comment is a personal indictment.
You can find offense in anything if you enjoy painting yourself as a target.
There really are a number of ways in taking the shop workers comment.

Of course you can.

But then, when you end up being disabled yourself or your child has a disability, some stuff suddenly grate a hell of a lot more than when you were living in the ‘abled world’.

It’s not about ‘enjoying painting yourself as a target’, it’s actually BEING a target. And unsurprisingly, when you’ve been a target a few times, you react pretty strongly to it. Because it’s just not acceptable.

Tessisme · 31/10/2025 10:40

popcornandpotatoes · 31/10/2025 09:57

The lanyard is completely bloody irrelevant. Anyone can look at any books they choose in a book shop. In fact, staff in shops should not be offering up opinions unless someone has asked for help, or to comment positively on an item someone has chosen when they are paying for it.

In all honesty, I think it boils down to this. Staff have no business commenting on what people are browsing/reading. Training would certainly help to address that. If they’re keeping their traps shut, they can’t be rude.

Ddakji · 31/10/2025 10:41

Reasonswhy · 31/10/2025 10:26

I don’t think I keep going on about anything other than the thread, in which case please feel free to scroll on by.
Her condition is absolutely relevant to this because the books she looked at, and was judged for, are related to the regressive nature of her illness/disability.

I disagree in that the bookseller had zero business saying what she did to anyone, regardless of disability, and I say that as a former bookseller. The disability is a bit of a red herring regarding the bookseller’s comment, though obviously not regarding your daughter’s reaction.

ADHDHDHDHD · 31/10/2025 10:50

NattyKnitter116 · 30/10/2025 23:37

It’s probably worth contacting the store/head office to mention what happened and ask for the staff to be given some top up disability training as that’s frankly appalling behavior from the staff member. I’m impressed at your ability to walk away quietly, but I understand why you managed it. Don’t let it pass though.

I agree with this.
just another voice saying I totally get your disappointment. It’s hard to think on the spot when you feel so cross/ upset in a situation like that. I hope your daughter is able to put it behind her in some way?
hugs

EligibleTern · 31/10/2025 10:51

I am absolutely shocked that anyone is defending the member of staff here! On what planet is telling someone they're doing something wrong "making conversation"?! And for that matter, on what planet is telling potential customers they're looking at the wrong things "doing your job" if you work in a shop? I don't believe for a second that anyone saying either of these things actually thinks that - it's just spitefully having a go at the OP.

Edit: thinking about it, I don't think a member of staff in a shop has EVER commented to me on what I'm looking at, in any kind of shop or situation, at any age, in my life. I have occasionally been offered help finding something. This situation is totally abnormal, not to mention terrible customer service. Why are people pretending it's not?

purplecorkheart · 31/10/2025 11:02

I would complain. It was a thoughtless comment regardless, your daughter could have easily being excited to pick a book for an sibling etc.

I must say I did not know about the carer wearing the lanyard so thank you for educating me on that.

PurpleThistle7 · 31/10/2025 11:11

I don’t actually think anyone should see a lanyard before deciding not to say something stupid. It wouldn’t personally occur to me that the lanyard had anything to do with your child if you were wearing it, but I wouldn’t be stupid and judgemental anyway so it doesn’t matter.

I volunteer in my son’s school library and children have wildly different abilities, interests and relationships with books. My goal is to find them something they will enjoy - so that’s seek and find or comic books for children who might not be reading yet (or for anyone who likes them!) or books in another language for recent immigrants or challenging books for children reading at a higher level. Whatever. My daughter is autistic and finds familiar books really soothing so has always went for books (and movies) maybe pitched for younger kids but she hates violence love stories and surprises so doesn’t love the preteen section she’s ’supposed’ to be in. Magical unicorn dragon whatever’s for however long she wants!

well apparently I had a lot to say but I’m really invested in children finding enjoyment in books and reading as it opens up so much for them and making it harder is really unhelpful. I’d be straight back into the store personally.

HelloClouds · 31/10/2025 11:11

Surely this would be part of basic customer service training?
My DS aged 21 is nearly 6 ft but because of his autism and learning disability loves to sit quietly in the library and look at the picture books.
The librarians are so kind to him and never comment on our book choices!

PurpleThistle7 · 31/10/2025 11:13

Even stupider when you think about how many times people go to a bookstore to buy a book for someone else anyway. Should I stop buying baby books for my friends’ children as I personally read novels? Honestly getting more and more annoyed now. Where is this place? On my way…

Reasonswhy · 31/10/2025 11:13

ForCraftyWriter · 31/10/2025 10:39

Impartially it wasn’t literal judgement though, even if you see it as that or OP saw it as that. It’s an observation about the child’s age and the book’s age, the staff in the children’s dept are supposed to help signpost children to the appropriate section. I’m sure that’s what the staff thought they were doing. There are more inclusive ways to have made the suggestion though and that’s where the feedback/complaint should lie.

But there are already guidance signs above every section with suggested age groups. We didn’t ask for her input.
“You are too old to XYX” is literally a judgement. And an unnecessary, unhelpful and ignorant one at best.

OP posts: