There were a depressingly large number of women in the UK in the early 20th century, willing to speak loudly against women being given the vote. Their traitorous arguments included:
- Women were intellectually and emotionally inferior to men
- Women were unable to understand political issues, and thus unable to make a rational decision as to who to vote for
- Women were physically weaker, and the people who made the Law needed male strength to enforce these laws
- Housework wouldn't be done, meals wouldn't be on the table, and children would be abandoned. Family life as the British knew it would end
- Marriages would break up when the wife voted Liberal and the husband was Conservative
- It would destablise the Commonwealth as non-white men would be very upset
This is a surprisingly lovely article published by the BBC in 2018, to celebrate a hundred years of women voting!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42704341.amp
It is fine, of course, for a British woman (or a Scandinavian woman!) to choose to not use her right to vote. She may possibly correctly believe that she (as an individual, not because she is female!) lacks the necessary critical thinking skills and is not rational. She may recognise that her opinions are largely based on blind clan loyalty or on religious indoctrination from birth.
At the same time, she has no right to deny the vote to other women in her country. And she is a self-hating fool if she tries to argue for this.
Women and girls have the right under UK law to be treated as full equals to men and boys. This includes access to Sports and Leisure activities, such as Fun Runs. Being primarily targeted at Muslim users/consumers does not exempt businesses or organisations (including charities) from the UK Equality Act 2010.
I very much hope to see a successful court case here. This isn't about you, it is about the rights of all British women and girls to full equality with males under UK Law.