There is such ignorance about this hugely complex and old-as-the-hills middle eastern crisis that it's difficult to know where to start. The starving and murder of Palestinian citizens is wrong. The way they are having to live behind the wall in the West Bank is also wrong. Yes, it is akin to an 'open prison', despite those words often being dismissed as an anti-semitic dogwhistle. However, unlike some who are making these claims I've been there. I've seen it. I've met, conversed with, received the wonderful hospitality of some of the warmest, most welcoming communities you could hope to meet - on both sides of the wall. I've also seen the social inequalities between these communities within Israel itself.
As to Hammas, their actions are as deplorable. They are using the population as human shields. Their wholesale capture, rape and brutal murder of civilians in the October attack is medieval in its barbarity. Compare the treatment of women under the Taliban - there is no great difference here. (There is still a male guardianship scheme in operation in both Palestine and Israel). There is no justifying the horrendous treatment on both sides of innocent civilians who all suffer as a result. No one side of this crisis consists of innocent victims and one undisputed aggressor. Yet Israel is the only community apparently not expected to fight back, and blaming Jews for this issue is exactly tantamount to the old post 9/11 rhetoric that 'all terrorists are Muslim'. We wouldn't tolerate the latter - so why the former?
To suggest that commemorating victims of Hammas' repellent attacks is 'condoning a genocide' is precisely the same stupid one-sidedness which assumes UK Jews are all complicit in the actions of the IDL, or that Israeli Jews are all pro-Netanyahu (they're not): exactly the kind of bigotry the newly rebranded 'Left' (who are not left) so love to rail against.
The woman who tore down the yellow ribbons is nothing other than a common, or garden-variety, racist.