Reform voters may not be racist but they are at least dangerously naive

[ChocolateMagnum]

AIBU to accept that some Reform voters may not actually be racist, but to be pretty certain that, if they're not, they are at the very least dangerously naive?

I thought we all got taught at school about how fascism took over in 1939s Germany? And there's so much out there at the moment showing why we are at a dangerous turning point in history again.

Why is it that the so-called non-racist Reform voters not see that they are aligning themselves with a covertly racist and fascist-leaning party and that their support risks tipping the balance towards a fascist dictatorship in the UK?

That's not stopping people from applying for nursing degrees.

Just for you...

https://churchinparliament.org/2024/03/21/bishop-of-st-albans-asks-about-animal-welfare-prosecutions/

That someone took the trouble to make that, is rather pathetic, frankly.

And you think that makes a difference.

Too right. The conservatives screwed up Brexit, and labour are now digging us even deeper. We need a reform government.

At least the UK was able to define what a women is for itself. It mind that was worth leaving the EU for alone.

Good grief.

The Supreme Court judgment had nothing to do with Brexit.

Indefinite leave to remain is for legal immigrants.

And the reason Brexit is shit is because it was a shit idea.

Who will you blame next, after Reform fuck things up even more?

Thank you for sharing. I wonder how he thinks this ‘genetic test screening’ will work?

Is abortion totally acceptable in Islam or will the parents just know they are having a disabled child ahead of time?

This adds medical procedures to try and mitigate a problem that shouldn’t exist and adds further load to the NHS. Not to mention the ethics of knowingly creating children that have a greatly increased risk of disability and will need large amounts of lifelong care.

We all KNOW the answer but no one appears honest enough to answer this..!

Ha ha ha!

Pull the other one.

Bloody hell, they can't just answer a question can they?

More than 4 since 2019 then.

Well it wasn't the fault of the electorate that voted for it !

It was the politicians that had too many fingers in too many pies in Europe that kept voting various ideas down.

My dad is the same, nearly 79, dds and dgds, discoverer yesterday he watches GB news all day. We had to agree to disagree but pretty disappointing

I googled swan eating convictions only on this occasion.

As an aside, I do remember reading this poaching tale from Poland;

The mayor of a village in Poland is accused of poaching a bison, which is a protected species, and seeking to sell its head as a trophy

https://notesfrompoland.com/2021/03/19/polish-village-mayor-charged-with-killing-protected-bison-and-trying-to-sell-head-as-trophy/

Other interesting poaching tales are available.

Yes that’s why it hasn’t worked….

They defined it under a labour government.

Yes, they are all avoiding answering that question.

Apart from one person who was at least honest enough to say that if the person is no longer a net contributor then they should be kicked out, but didn't confirm whether that should also apply to people who have become ill or disabled, the spouses and parents of British citizens, or retired people.

You've summed up my entire feelings on this subject, I echo your views. Thank you.

This is relevant how?

It depends what you mean by "not worked" ?

Without Brexit the Supreme Court wouldn't have been the final arbiter and it would have gone to the European court. At best we would still be waiting for a decision, at worst it the ruling would have been overturned. Have you already forgotten how everything used to be applied to Europe. At the same time that our court clearly defined a women, the European courts made it mandatory to allow people to self id on docs.

No, it was the politicians SUCH AS FARAGE who lied to the electorate and sold them a dream of Brexit that was never going to be on offer.

And you know what?

Farage knew it was never going to be on offer. That wasn't the point. He and his friends got even richer from Brexit, and that was the point.

He's just a rabble rouser. He doesn't care about anything except his own personal gain, and he knows that tapping into people's discontentment is the best way to cause trouble.

We no right of appeal to the European Courts as in the past.

Now that Shabana Mahmood has also pledged to crack down on ILR, during her conference speech today, will she also face the same accusations Starmer made of Farage i.e. of being a ‘racist’ and ‘immoral?’

Or does the old two-tier again come out to play?

Anyone?

Give me a chance. I was cooking dinner!!