Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Reform voters may not be racist but they are at least dangerously naive

1000 replies

ChocolateMagnum · 29/09/2025 08:00

AIBU to accept that some Reform voters may not actually be racist, but to be pretty certain that, if they're not, they are at the very least dangerously naive?

I thought we all got taught at school about how fascism took over in 1939s Germany? And there's so much out there at the moment showing why we are at a dangerous turning point in history again.

Why is it that the so-called non-racist Reform voters not see that they are aligning themselves with a covertly racist and fascist-leaning party and that their support risks tipping the balance towards a fascist dictatorship in the UK?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 13:49

PandoraSocks · 29/09/2025 13:47

So it is piss taking if a person is a lower earner (the threshold to qualify for a visa will be £60k according to the Times) and has been working here for decades?

Edited

They had the opportunity to apply for citizenship if they’ve been working here for decades. If not - we have more than enough low earners.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:49

Toastandbutterand · 29/09/2025 13:47

And the people who have spent their entire working lives here who will have their pensions removed? You think that's ok?

Do you think, fundamentally, that thats a fair policy? Or do you just view the immigrants as slaves to the British economy?

Or someone who was earning £60k and paying taxes their whole working life and is now retired? Or disabled?

What about people who are married to and parents of British citizens? Fuck their right to a family life, right?

DoinFineIThink · 29/09/2025 13:50

Bumblebee72 · 29/09/2025 13:47

If you literally can't think of any - maybe you suffer from the fabled lack of critical thinking referred to in the thread above.

I'm genuinely interested in knowing what a positive one is as well? I'm honestly not just saying that, I can't think of what's come out of Brexit that's positive either.
What bit do you find positive? Genuine question

Cluborange666 · 29/09/2025 13:50

They voted for Brexit which made everything worse (they were warned). Now they want to vote for the same people who unleashed that shitshow. The on,y way that I’d say you are unreasonable, OP, is by saying that Reform voters aren’t racist when it is patently obvious that they are. The whole thing is a sickening mix of the foolish and the manipulative.

Bumblebee72 · 29/09/2025 13:50

PandoraSocks · 29/09/2025 13:47

So it is piss taking if a person is a lower earner (the threshold to qualify for a visa will be £60k according to the Times) and has been working here for decades?

Edited

£60k seems a sensible threshold.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:50

Bumblebee72 · 29/09/2025 13:50

£60k seems a sensible threshold.

Why?

Shakeoffyourchains · 29/09/2025 13:51

Just a quick reminder that Reform MPs Sarah Pochin, Lee Anderson, Richard Tice and James McMurdock all voted against:

Increasing protection for victims of stalking and harassment.

Strengthening laws against spiking.

Introducing new offences for taking intimate images without consent.

And what about dear old Nigel you might ask? Well, he didn't even bother to turn up for these votes.

Priorities and all that.

JaneEyre40 · 29/09/2025 13:51

So everyone should stay in the country they were born in? I left one of 'those' countries and I work in the public sector in a sector that has a huge staffing crisis. In my company, I can count on two hands the amount of white British staff, out of 200! So what do you propose?

Also, the irony of Britain having a Common Wealth cannot be lost on you surely?

@snughugs

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 13:51

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:49

Or someone who was earning £60k and paying taxes their whole working life and is now retired? Or disabled?

What about people who are married to and parents of British citizens? Fuck their right to a family life, right?

When I was an immigrant the first time around, and had to do all the various health testing, they sure as hell didn’t want me if I was ill or disabled. I would have been a drain on their resources, a financial liability. That seems perfectly fair and reasonable to me. If I had a problem with it - I could have gone somewhere else.

Toastandbutterand · 29/09/2025 13:51

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:49

Or someone who was earning £60k and paying taxes their whole working life and is now retired? Or disabled?

What about people who are married to and parents of British citizens? Fuck their right to a family life, right?

Suddenly the campaign for Brexit and the removal of human rights makes a lot more sense doesn't it?
Bloody horrible party.

JaneEyre40 · 29/09/2025 13:52

Bumblebee72 · 29/09/2025 13:50

£60k seems a sensible threshold.

Idiotic. So goodbye teachers and nurses yeah?

rwalker · 29/09/2025 13:52

PandoraSocks · 29/09/2025 13:44

A lot have them have no problem with official immigration professionals want to come and work here so there would no impact on nhs and public services

What impact do you think retrospectively rescinding ILR will have on the NHS and public services?

Again a lot have people have no problem with professionals coming to settle work and contribute to the uk
its uncontrollabled illegal immigration’s people want to stop not sending people back

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:52

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 13:51

When I was an immigrant the first time around, and had to do all the various health testing, they sure as hell didn’t want me if I was ill or disabled. I would have been a drain on their resources, a financial liability. That seems perfectly fair and reasonable to me. If I had a problem with it - I could have gone somewhere else.

I think not granting someone a visa in the first place is a very different kettle of fish to requiring them to leave once they are no longer useful to you, no matter how long they've been contributing and how many roots they've put down.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:53

rwalker · 29/09/2025 13:52

Again a lot have people have no problem with professionals coming to settle work and contribute to the uk
its uncontrollabled illegal immigration’s people want to stop not sending people back

That's not an answer to the question that was asked.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:54

JaneEyre40 · 29/09/2025 13:52

Idiotic. So goodbye teachers and nurses yeah?

I've no idea who they think is going to fill the ever increasing number of vacancies in care homes.

Toastandbutterand · 29/09/2025 13:55

rwalker · 29/09/2025 13:52

Again a lot have people have no problem with professionals coming to settle work and contribute to the uk
its uncontrollabled illegal immigration’s people want to stop not sending people back

Then why vote for a party that wants to retrospectively abolish idl?

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 13:55

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:52

I think not granting someone a visa in the first place is a very different kettle of fish to requiring them to leave once they are no longer useful to you, no matter how long they've been contributing and how many roots they've put down.

Didn’t matter. If they’d decided they didn’t want me once I was no longer useful, they would have sent me packing. A nation’s first duty is to its citizens, not to those of other countries. An immigrant has the benefit of living in that country for that amount of time - it’s not a one sided relationship where the country gives nothing to the immigrant.

freshpyjamas · 29/09/2025 13:56

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 09:11

We no longer have representative democracy in this country.

It’s been steadily undermined since 1997; parliament is now just a talking shop. The real power lies elsewhere. How many quangos do we now have - it was 444, and Labour said they’ve got rid of 6. So hundreds of non-democratic bodies making decisions and spending vast amounts of taxpayers money. These people are not elected; we cannot remove them. Blair was quite open about his aims - to remove power from the public as they couldn’t be trusted to make the ‘correct’ decisions. This is what’s gone so fundamentally wrong over the last thirty years, and why, whoever we vote for, we end up with the same incompetent bunch who refuse to address the concerns of the public.

This is 100% correct.

We have a bloated and way to powerful civil service who are no longer accountable to elected officials, hence our democracy is a farce.

This country is run by permanent secretary’s that outlive each government terms and a civil service who are no longer servants, but masters.

This was all by design by Gordon Brown and Tony Blaire.

Thats why we see successive governments trying to make changes and achieving very little.

Because ministers aren’t in charge. Parliament is just a circus for the rest of us.

It will take an absolutely radical taking back of power by elected officials through multiple channels, legislation being just one of them, to restore democracy and change how our country is run. Until then we are the mercy of ideologically captured secretaries and civil service.

I wish more people knew this.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:57

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 13:55

Didn’t matter. If they’d decided they didn’t want me once I was no longer useful, they would have sent me packing. A nation’s first duty is to its citizens, not to those of other countries. An immigrant has the benefit of living in that country for that amount of time - it’s not a one sided relationship where the country gives nothing to the immigrant.

Wow. How incredibly callous.

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 13:57

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:54

I've no idea who they think is going to fill the ever increasing number of vacancies in care homes.

Perhaps British people could decide to look after their own elderly instead of bringing in people from abroad to do it for them, as if the job is somehow too good for them?

JaneEyre40 · 29/09/2025 13:57

rwalker · 29/09/2025 13:52

Again a lot have people have no problem with professionals coming to settle work and contribute to the uk
its uncontrollabled illegal immigration’s people want to stop not sending people back

And keep people like you who can't use grammar correctly? Can we do a trade? 😂

snughugs · 29/09/2025 13:58

greenwichvillage · 29/09/2025 13:20

And there's the racism with words like third world and backwards. This is what true Reform is about. There plenty of "backwards" English people in the country. The same English that the government do not want to help, that have been left behind in education, whilst the third word have soared in education. Those same English are the ones who have generations on benefits and those same third world are the ones in professional jobs like, doctors, dentists, lawyers etc.

With Reformers with views like yours then the country will go to pot as you are not interested in any of the other Reform policies which will really damage the country. But as long as those immigrants are out of the country that's all that matters to you.

When the immigrants are gone and the nhs is privatised, when your taxes go up and the cost of living increases ten fold who are you going to blame then. Will you turn on the other benefit scroungers, the disabled, the single parents.

As many in my family are Drs they can pretty much immigrate anywhere. We are importing the poor and can’t afford it, get over yourself love. These ARE third world countries and plenty Drs and professionals do come here but not on boats (as being a Dr they can use the correct channel) and not to deliver takeaways bring their large families over and do UBER for 16 hours a week whilst their wife and kids are taken care of via benefits. How dare you slag off the white working class, do you realise the disproportionate amount of Asians claiming universal credit? It’s you who’s racist! Get a reality check and stop sticking your head in the sand. No one objects to highly skilled professionals coming over. That’s a good thing. This is not and a very dangerous path as a country.

MissyB1 · 29/09/2025 13:58

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 13:57

Perhaps British people could decide to look after their own elderly instead of bringing in people from abroad to do it for them, as if the job is somehow too good for them?

How do you propose they are forced to do that?

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 13:59

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 29/09/2025 13:57

Wow. How incredibly callous.

It’s not callous - it’s reasonable. I got the benefit of living in that country, they had the perfect right to say goodbye to me if I became a burden to them. This is a transactional relationship - we both have to get something out of it.

LinedOverLatte · 29/09/2025 13:59

HedwigEliza · 29/09/2025 08:09

No, they’re not all thick and uneducated. You’re not morally or intellectually superior OP. And they may have other historical reference points than the lazy comparisons to 1930’s Germany.

First post nails it!

Thanks @HedwigEliza

@ChocolateMagnum No matter how many posts there are criticising Reform voters/potential voters many people have decided that “enough is enough”.

If another political party stepped up and said “yes, enough is enough, we’re a tiny island, economically poor and can no longer sustain such a huge influx of people, it’s detrimental to our current population…” perhaps people would vote for them instead. As yet this hasn’t happened, and therefore Reform are gaining support. The other political parties are sitting by and watching it happen, and still haven’t stepped up.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.