Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Tried three places for lunch today and none cater for women

489 replies

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:10

I went out for lunch today with a friend.
Well, at least we tried to have lunch.
All three places, two pubs and one cafe, were not suitable for women because you needed a penis to get into them or to use the toilet.
We ended up coming back to my home instead.

AIBU to think that everywhere should offer equal service to women?
Or is it my fault for not checking in advance that I could eat there without a penis?
Should I have researched on tripadvisor?
Am I too entitled expecting businesses to ensure non penis having people can pay to eat lunch at their establishment?

Day in the life of a disabled person.

OP posts:
sosorryimnotsorry · 23/09/2025 18:44

ginasevern · 23/09/2025 14:07

@sosorryimnotsorry "A lot of things can be done in the vast majority of buildings, including listed buildings, which would be massively beneficial. But people don’t want to because it doesn’t affect them."

I think you're being harsh and judgemental. To say that "people don't want to to because it doesn't affect them" is rarely true and completely overlooks the matter of cost. A close relative runs a venue in a listed building with winding corridors and twisting staircases. They've looked into every possible option to instal accessible facilities but the lowest quote they've had is for £675,000 - plus VAT. They simply don't have anything even close to that sort of money and never will, unless they win the lottery. The building isn't even worth that much. What are they supposed to do? I guess you'd say they should just pack up, sack their loyal staff and leave behind all their hard work as well as their home.

As someone with 15+ years of working with the disabled community I don’t think I am being remotely harsh. There are a huge number of businesses that could do a hell of a lot more to make their businesses accessible. But until they are forced to or find themselves in the situation they don’t bother. There are plenty of things that can be done for far cheaper than the figure you quote. But it often takes some out of the box thinking and an open mind to work through the challenges.

LillyPJ · 23/09/2025 18:45

moresoup · 23/09/2025 16:05

I don't expect these changes to happen overnight to make everywhere accessible. But of course I expect that when things are constructed or repaired then designing them for accessibility is factored in

I have not said anything to the contrary.

Shellyash · 23/09/2025 18:47

Sounds like you infer that everyone with a penis is disabled.
Ok it's obviously a weakness but not a disability.

Ebeneser · 23/09/2025 18:54

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

Sorry, thought you were describing being on holiday as a woman in the Middle East. My bad.

dadofone24 · 23/09/2025 18:58

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:10

I went out for lunch today with a friend.
Well, at least we tried to have lunch.
All three places, two pubs and one cafe, were not suitable for women because you needed a penis to get into them or to use the toilet.
We ended up coming back to my home instead.

AIBU to think that everywhere should offer equal service to women?
Or is it my fault for not checking in advance that I could eat there without a penis?
Should I have researched on tripadvisor?
Am I too entitled expecting businesses to ensure non penis having people can pay to eat lunch at their establishment?

Day in the life of a disabled person.

Never in my life heard of a place only offering for men?

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 23/09/2025 18:58

The op was convoluted and obtuse. Purposefully so. Waffle about penises,men,and exclusion We were expected to guess the nuances and actual message.

PastaAllaNorma · 23/09/2025 19:04

MissFitss · 22/09/2025 22:14

It doesn't make sense.

She could buy lunch. She could eat lunch. She could sit there and eat all day.

The issue is that she couldn't access a toilet.

Not true - the OP hasn't mentioned toilets at all.

Often it's a couple of steps up, no one can remember where the last manager put the ramp, th doors won't open wid enough for a wheelchair, there's a step between the entrance and the tables, they've crammed so many tables I to a small spac you can't manoeuvre a wheelchair through it, the stools are bolted to the floor so you can't remove one to roll up to tt table or it's counter service and no way to carry your tray with a wheelchair or crutches, or the seats are bar stools you can't get to from your wheelchair etc etc ad nauseum.

Not Accessible is rarely about a toilet.

Idontpostmuch · 23/09/2025 19:12

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

Clear enough? Clear as mud. But yes, terrible that there was no provision for disabled access.

sosorryimnotsorry · 23/09/2025 19:17

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 23/09/2025 18:58

The op was convoluted and obtuse. Purposefully so. Waffle about penises,men,and exclusion We were expected to guess the nuances and actual message.

But it made you read it! When lots wouldn’t have bothered if it had been clear from the start. Whether you like it or not it the truth. Therefore it has indeed worked.

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 23/09/2025 19:29

No. Content remains gibberish. Would have been better to just say in OP what issue is. As opposed to a convoluted reveal and subsequent explanation and attempts at justification @sosorryimnotsorry

Muffinmam · 23/09/2025 19:30

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

Is that intellectually disabled? ….because your post was not clear - it was all over the place.

GiveDogBone · 23/09/2025 19:30

Very strange. The only places I have ever been that are awkward for disabled people - I wouldn’t even say necessarily inaccessible - are buildings that are hundreds of years old. Any modern establishment - certainly if built within the last 50 years - is wheelchair accessible, if that’s what you mean?

Bernardo1 · 23/09/2025 19:30

Wetherspoons have changed the whole pub culture. Women are welcome, no bother. I know older ladies who meet up for lunch. You don't have to buy alcoholic drinks. I now and then have a traditional breakfast and unlimited tea/coffee for less than £7

Muffinmam · 23/09/2025 19:30

sosorryimnotsorry · 23/09/2025 19:17

But it made you read it! When lots wouldn’t have bothered if it had been clear from the start. Whether you like it or not it the truth. Therefore it has indeed worked.

I’m pretty desperate and read anything. It didn’t need to draw me in.

KilkennyCats · 23/09/2025 19:31

sosorryimnotsorry · 23/09/2025 19:17

But it made you read it! When lots wouldn’t have bothered if it had been clear from the start. Whether you like it or not it the truth. Therefore it has indeed worked.

No, it wasn’t a magic bullet to ensure everyone read it. People read and respond to all sorts of guff on here!

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 23/09/2025 19:36

KilkennyCats · 23/09/2025 19:31

No, it wasn’t a magic bullet to ensure everyone read it. People read and respond to all sorts of guff on here!

lol best description mn ever

AgnesX · 23/09/2025 19:37

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:14

I honestly thought it was clear enough but replace not catering for women with not catering for disabled people.
I substituted women to try and give some insight into the injustice to a wider audience.

Edited

It would seem not. Generally most don't actually even think of disabled people.

CoffeeLipstickKeys · 23/09/2025 19:38

Bernardo1 · 23/09/2025 19:30

Wetherspoons have changed the whole pub culture. Women are welcome, no bother. I know older ladies who meet up for lunch. You don't have to buy alcoholic drinks. I now and then have a traditional breakfast and unlimited tea/coffee for less than £7

Yes my gran and her gaggle of ladies likes spoons

AgnesX · 23/09/2025 19:40

ToKittyornottoKitty · 22/09/2025 20:39

Why are we specifically having a go at women here? It’s a stupid analogy. And lots of people have to plan ahead when eating out for all sorts of reasons, it’s not that ridiculous

Yep, the "you are unreasonable for expecting parity" types are alive and kicking.

Missing the point entirely.

Cojones · 23/09/2025 19:46

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:39

No.
My point was imagine a world where women cannot routinely turn up and buy lunch where ever. This is in fact normality for many disabled people.
MN is mainly a female place so hence the men being universally accepted example.
Nothing to do with men themselves in this instance.
Christ on a bike.
Clearly I have hugely over estimated people’s understanding.
Lesson learned.

Wow, @Mrsmunchofmunchington you have wildly overestimated that we would immediately think ah yes this isn’t about men but disabled access. This is a cunning poster indeed.

I’m really sorry you’ve had a shit day and the access you needed wasn’t in place; I agree in an ideal world you wouldn’t have to phone ahead. But we live in a country where there are a lot of things that still need to be put right. Calling ahead would have been the way to go to ensure you could get inside to eat.

Lammysaurus · 23/09/2025 19:47

I really hope the Deputy Prime Minister doesn't read this! 🦖

OP, I found it confusing because there are plenty of venues in the world where you'd be denied entry for being female and on the internet no one knows where you're located. YANBU to point out the problem of lack of accessibility (and lack of transparency where there is insufficient accessibility).

Butterflyarms · 23/09/2025 19:52

It took me a bit to twig but once I got it I realised YANBU.

Jade3450 · 23/09/2025 19:54

I haven’t RTFT and I’m sorry you had access problems.

But I don’t think your analogy quite works.

Women are half the population and there would be no justifiable reason to deny them access.
People who use wheelchairs, on the other hand, while of course having the same rights as everyone else, have a unique set of needs that can’t always be catered for, especially in old buildings.

Are you suggesting old buildings should never be used as cafes or restaurants? Or that everyone not accessible should be knocked down and rebuilt?

If I went into my local town I would find many old buildings that could not cater for disabled access. It’s often not their fault.

HevenlyMeS · 23/09/2025 20:02

I'm so confused too
I didn't even know there's restaurants cafes around where just men are permitted ✨🤔🙏

Soontobe60 · 23/09/2025 20:06

Mrsmunchofmunchington · 22/09/2025 20:19

When people have posted in a straight forward manner about lack of accessibility there have been suggestions of calling ahead, maybe checking with disability organisations.
Well meant but why should we have to?
Imagine the outrage if women had to ask in advance if they could get into a pub or cafe?

Because many, many buildings that are not new were built in such a way that it’s impossible to add a disabled toilet, or their only facilities are upstairs. I can’t do stairs as my knees are knackered. If I were going somewhere new, I would check in advance the stair situation to avoid a futile journey. Similarly, my DH would check the menu for food he can eat - he’s a very fussy eater, coeliacs might check, vegans etc.
What do you suggest for such establishments?