@JNicholson
You’re saying it’s circular, but you’re choosing to place the origin of the circle with the person who doesn’t automatically find people likeable (they’re the ones who are generating the negative response from others). That’s not self-evident. I’m pointing out that another way of looking at it is to place the origins of the circle with the people who behaved in such a way as to give that person the impression that a lot of people are not likeable.
But this perspective makes a lot of assumptions about the behaviour of the person who supposedly triggered this negative impression.
In my experience a lot of people struggle to interpret the behaviour of others and “over-read” behaviour as hostile or aggressive because they don’t understand it.
You see this sort of thing on the “bitchy, cliquey school mums” threads: someone has convinced themself that other school mums are out to get them on very thin evidence. It’s always something which actually has a set of other very plausible reasons: someone failed to smile at school pickup = ergo they are a “bitch”. When in fact they could have poor eyesight/be ill/depressed/hungover. Human interaction and responses are far more complex than this.
If you see every interaction in such polarised terms: (“she is hostile, he is a friend”) most people, with their complex personalities, are going to fall short at some point.
If you choose to acknowledge the ambiguity and remain pleasant and open, you have a far greater chance of turning an ambiguous situation positive rather than assuming that someone having a bad day is automatically a “bitch”.
People are rarely that black and white but if you default to the positive you’re not limiting your choices.