Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Rayner Has Resigned

1000 replies

usernamealreadytaken · 05/09/2025 12:02

AIBU to say it isn't unexpected, or a surprise?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
PandoraSocks · 07/09/2025 09:18

usernamealreadytaken · 07/09/2025 08:41

Perhaps he just wanted to protect his partner from the media, you know, like the reason Rayner lied? Because at the end of the day, it was nobody else’s business, until tax evasion comes in to play.

I think the Clacton property is the electorate's business.

He lied about buying the property to portray the image that good old Nige, man of the people, would be living amongst those who voted for him.

We all know that in reality Farage gives not a shiny shit about the people who voted him in.

He got very nasty with Rigby when she questioned him. The mask really slipped there.

Mum2EmLuJa · 07/09/2025 09:19

Bunny65 · 07/09/2025 03:39

He becomes very aggressive when anyone tries to question him about anything dodgy he might have done, it’s his modus operandi. Beth Rigby asked him about this very thing on Sky News on Saturday and he was all “How dare you?” and talking over her with a very menacing manner. I don’t believe for a second that he hasn’t practised tax avoidance over the years. No I’m not a fan, I think he’s as likely to stop the boats and send off 5 planes of migrants a day as Trump was to end the Ukraine and Gaza wars in 48 hours. I’m actually horrified at the idea of him becoming prime minister with his motley crew.

This! All so true, he was barefaced lying when being questioned in America this week over media being refused to press events. How anyone trusts this despicable man is beyond me when practically every sentence out of his mouth just a lie!

KhakiTiger · 07/09/2025 09:28

cardibach · 07/09/2025 09:11

No, I wanted a respectful exploration of our views, not to be constantly put down with no argument. Fine, you don’t want that. Let’s leave it.

Translated as ‘I have no salient points to make, so I’ll say you don’t want an argument’.

You haven’t attempted a single point that falls into the category of respectful or exploration of anything. You just keep claiming that I don’t want a debate. And I keep saying make a point that constitutes a debate. Is this like when people try and discredit others by calling them names so that they don’t have address the issue.

cardibach · 07/09/2025 09:30

KhakiTiger · 07/09/2025 09:28

Translated as ‘I have no salient points to make, so I’ll say you don’t want an argument’.

You haven’t attempted a single point that falls into the category of respectful or exploration of anything. You just keep claiming that I don’t want a debate. And I keep saying make a point that constitutes a debate. Is this like when people try and discredit others by calling them names so that they don’t have address the issue.

Everyone can read what I’ve written and what you’ve written. They can make their own minds up. Have a good Sunday.

KhakiTiger · 07/09/2025 09:32

cardibach · 07/09/2025 09:30

Everyone can read what I’ve written and what you’ve written. They can make their own minds up. Have a good Sunday.

Edited

Still no points to debate then.

At least we have ascertained your intentions then. Given many opportunities, you have only resorted to insults rather than debating. So we know it’s not a debate you wanted, you wanted a slanging match. Not very ‘be kind’, is it?

Good, now we know.

Snakebite61 · 07/09/2025 09:39

usernamealreadytaken · 05/09/2025 12:02

AIBU to say it isn't unexpected, or a surprise?

At least she resigned. A tory would have kept on defrauding the country.
Farage dodged a £44,000 fee by putting his wife down as owner.
No one is as corrupt as the right.

BIossomtoes · 07/09/2025 09:41

tommyhoundmum · 07/09/2025 09:18

Perhaps it was, but they don't advise on tax matters and to get any advice out of the tax office can take months.

To be fair I discovered yesterday that MPs are given a dedicated number to HMRC which isn’t generally available.

tommyhoundmum · 07/09/2025 09:47

BIossomtoes · 07/09/2025 09:41

To be fair I discovered yesterday that MPs are given a dedicated number to HMRC which isn’t generally available.

OK fair enough. I find it hard to believe she would deliberately try to get away with this amount of tax owing knowing her job would be on the line. She isn't a stupid woman and I am not a Labour supporter.

KhakiTiger · 07/09/2025 09:50

BIossomtoes · 07/09/2025 09:41

To be fair I discovered yesterday that MPs are given a dedicated number to HMRC which isn’t generally available.

Probably because they are more likely than the general public to be crooked.

BIossomtoes · 07/09/2025 09:53

tommyhoundmum · 07/09/2025 09:47

OK fair enough. I find it hard to believe she would deliberately try to get away with this amount of tax owing knowing her job would be on the line. She isn't a stupid woman and I am not a Labour supporter.

I agree. I think she was careless, particularly in light of the furore around CGT on the first property she purchased.

usernamealreadytaken · 07/09/2025 10:33

Snakebite61 · 07/09/2025 09:39

At least she resigned. A tory would have kept on defrauding the country.
Farage dodged a £44,000 fee by putting his wife down as owner.
No one is as corrupt as the right.

His partner IS the owner. AML and KYC would have ensured that all monies spent were her own (or legally and fully gifted); he has no ownership rights over the property so why would he be liable for the tax, just because he stays there sometimes?

Do you similarly criticise Rayner for not only her and exDH purchasing two council houses, but each “living” in their own separate houses despite being married and registering their children at his address? Do you think she was wrong to designate her ex-marital home as her primary residence in order for taxpayers to pay the bills at AH, when she could have kept that as her primary residence as her job was literally next door? All of these were equally questionable but equally legal.

Do you criticise her for allowing the alleged over-inflating of the marital home value so she could draw more money from the trust set up for the benefit of her disabled son?

Or are these speculations in some way different to your speculation about Farage’s perfectly legal non-ownership of a property?

OP posts:
usernamealreadytaken · 07/09/2025 10:34

tommyhoundmum · 07/09/2025 09:47

OK fair enough. I find it hard to believe she would deliberately try to get away with this amount of tax owing knowing her job would be on the line. She isn't a stupid woman and I am not a Labour supporter.

She has shown spectacularly poor judgement in this case. Whether that makes her stupid is down to personal opinion.

OP posts:
WhatterySquash · 07/09/2025 10:34

broney · 06/09/2025 21:50

Good God, can you HEAR yourselves?

This is a TOTAL witch-hunt by the right-wing. She has been the subject of tory smear-campaigns ever since she appeared on the Labour front-bench. A Working-Class, Northern, WOMAN, who grew up in a council-house, has reached the highest office. And the millionaires and old-Etonians who control the conservative party cannot bear the fact.
She has a complex family setup, with a severely disabled child, and has been FORCED to "go public" with the details of the financial arrangements they have made to ensure that child is provided for in the future.

I thought this was MUMS-net? We should all be sticking up for her! After all the scrutiny she's been under for several years now, do you HONESTLY think she would do anything REMOTELY dodgy? She was given incorrect financial advice, that is ALL!

There have been other female, working class, northern ministers (some Tory) - Margaret Beckett, Sayeeda Warsi, Justine Greening - Rayner is not the first or some special unicorn who must be put on a pedestal. All politicians in high office including the male, posh and southern will have their dealings interrogated to look for dodginess as that is a weapon for the opposition to use against them and makes the public lose trust in them. Also, as leaders who make decisions that affect everyone else, they need to behave transparently and impeccably, hence the ministerial code.

Of course there’s corruption and some get away with more than others but being seen to be on the take/avoiding tax/breaking rules is one of the things that makes politicians unpopular and tends to bring them down, as has happened to loads of ministers of all parties, classes, both sexes etc.

Also are you saying someone must be above reproach or investigation just because they’re female, WC, northern etc? That’s ridiculous and a recipe for corruption. Just because I’m a woman and a feminist doesn’t mean I support all the behaviours of all females, and if you think about it you probably don’t either.

Arraminta · 07/09/2025 11:18

broney · 06/09/2025 21:50

Good God, can you HEAR yourselves?

This is a TOTAL witch-hunt by the right-wing. She has been the subject of tory smear-campaigns ever since she appeared on the Labour front-bench. A Working-Class, Northern, WOMAN, who grew up in a council-house, has reached the highest office. And the millionaires and old-Etonians who control the conservative party cannot bear the fact.
She has a complex family setup, with a severely disabled child, and has been FORCED to "go public" with the details of the financial arrangements they have made to ensure that child is provided for in the future.

I thought this was MUMS-net? We should all be sticking up for her! After all the scrutiny she's been under for several years now, do you HONESTLY think she would do anything REMOTELY dodgy? She was given incorrect financial advice, that is ALL!

Yeah, but no. Just because she's a Mum and WC doesn't not mean she has a Get Out Of Jail card for when she knowingly breaks the Ministerial Code FFS.

Millions of working class Mums manage to not defraud HMRC for tens of thousands of pounds.

mumindoghouse · 07/09/2025 11:34

What I find fascinating is in UK Labour go, in US Democrats go but in UK Tories don’t go for parties, eye test lies, fraudulent contracts, greater dishonesty etc nor will Farage with his 15% tax dodge on his GB news earnings. Or 4 properties some hidden behind a corporate shield. Same in States. Republicans brazen it out.
what is behind the lesser integrity of the right wing ? Is there less press scrutiny of them? If so time there was a regulated journalist profession which sanctioned bias.

I am terribly worried by this thread as I think a Reform government will dismantle NHS completely, and cancel state pensions. Those with pre-existing conditions won’t get health insurance and will face the bankruptcy of those in the US.

of course we should expect all our politicians to follow the rules. Key word :ALL

SeagullSam2027 · 07/09/2025 11:45

BIossomtoes · 07/09/2025 09:53

I agree. I think she was careless, particularly in light of the furore around CGT on the first property she purchased.

Choosing not to seek specialist advice after twice having been advised to do so is not 'carelessness'. It was a calculated decision and an extremely serious error of judgement which caused major damage to a party already deep in crisis.

Whistonia · 07/09/2025 11:50

Fraudornot · 06/09/2025 21:54

@broneyin simple terms - why did she need three homes?
on the deeper issues she has been found to have acted unethically.
not sure why you are defending her

She hasn’t got three homes!
Her son owns her former matrimonial home. She got divorced and sold her house. In this case to her son to make sure he could stay in the house adapted for his needs.

She then brought a new home - possibly with her partner.
She had a grace and favour flat in London. All MPs living some distance from their constituency have a home there and in London.

Stop believing the right wing press.

oakashandelm · 07/09/2025 11:58

@mumindoghouse "Farage with his 15% tax dodge on his GB news earnings"

It's not a "tax dodge" it's legal Tax Avoidance.

I have an accountant that helps me "avoid" as much tax as possible in my business. That's legal.

Tax evasion is illegal and these people found that out - https://www.crunch.co.uk/knowledge/article/how-famous-tax-dodgers-came-unstuck

https://www.holbornadams.com/post/tax-evasion-sentence

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 07/09/2025 12:03

Whistonia · 07/09/2025 11:50

She hasn’t got three homes!
Her son owns her former matrimonial home. She got divorced and sold her house. In this case to her son to make sure he could stay in the house adapted for his needs.

She then brought a new home - possibly with her partner.
She had a grace and favour flat in London. All MPs living some distance from their constituency have a home there and in London.

Stop believing the right wing press.

For goodness sake, she sold her 25% in the home to her son's trust at any over-inflated price. What kind if person does tha? A trustee is required to act in tge trust's best interests, not get maximum personal money out of them. Somebody who has real integrity needs to advocate for this child

Whistonia · 07/09/2025 12:11

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 07/09/2025 12:03

For goodness sake, she sold her 25% in the home to her son's trust at any over-inflated price. What kind if person does tha? A trustee is required to act in tge trust's best interests, not get maximum personal money out of them. Somebody who has real integrity needs to advocate for this child

Edited

How do you know it was inflated? Smaller homes on her road sold for a lower price. Her home was detached and adapted. If you look further it was the correct price. Again, don’t believe the right wing press.

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 07/09/2025 12:12

tommyhoundmum · 07/09/2025 09:18

Perhaps it was, but they don't advise on tax matters and to get any advice out of the tax office can take months.

You think it takes months for the Deputy PM to get advice from HMRC? About 5 to 15 minutes would be my guess.

Bunny65 · 07/09/2025 12:17

usernamealreadytaken · 07/09/2025 08:34

So you think the ethics committee acted unethically in finding that she had actually breached the Ministerial Code? She was actually innocent and the (apparently) non-partisan independent ethics advisor, because you think its all down to the Nasty Tories? We should all blindly support her just because she gave birth? Give your head a wobble!

The final report actually said they believed she had acted in good faith but had made a mistake in not seeking further expert advice.

Whistonia · 07/09/2025 12:19

usernamealreadytaken · 07/09/2025 10:33

His partner IS the owner. AML and KYC would have ensured that all monies spent were her own (or legally and fully gifted); he has no ownership rights over the property so why would he be liable for the tax, just because he stays there sometimes?

Do you similarly criticise Rayner for not only her and exDH purchasing two council houses, but each “living” in their own separate houses despite being married and registering their children at his address? Do you think she was wrong to designate her ex-marital home as her primary residence in order for taxpayers to pay the bills at AH, when she could have kept that as her primary residence as her job was literally next door? All of these were equally questionable but equally legal.

Do you criticise her for allowing the alleged over-inflating of the marital home value so she could draw more money from the trust set up for the benefit of her disabled son?

Or are these speculations in some way different to your speculation about Farage’s perfectly legal non-ownership of a property?

Edited

The ‘alleged’ over inflated price. Only it wasn’t over inflated.

WhatterySquash · 07/09/2025 12:31

Bunny65 · 07/09/2025 12:17

The final report actually said they believed she had acted in good faith but had made a mistake in not seeking further expert advice.

And that all things considered, the code had been breached and she had not acted according to the high standards of integrity required.

She initially blamed advice given to her by the law firm for her "mistake" i.e. did not acknowledge the mistake. They had to come out and defend themselves and clear up that she was advised to take further, expert advice.

I am not closely involved, I don't know everything that went on, like most of us - but most people can see when someone is floundering around trying to absolve themselves and pass the buck, and gets caught out. I don't think being a working-class northern woman has caused this at all, and in fact if she was a posh southern bloke the criticism would be damning and he'd probably have lost everyone's confidence a lot sooner. KS was clearly trying to avoid sacking her.

Whistonia · 07/09/2025 12:47

And what kind of person makes allegations that a mother has exploited their disabled child without checking the claims (from a right wing newspaper out to destroy that mother) properly.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread