Yes and it’s my hope it doesn’t come to that but if a decision was made that meant I would have to go, I have to honour and respect that. It’s kind of the deal with being an immigrant. I’m a guest and I behave as I would in any situation as guest and I hope that my good behaviour and contributions mean that I am allowed to stay but absolutely it is not a given. So yes it pisses me to fuck when immigrants come here and behave badly because ultimately it could affect me in a negative way. If they don’t like it they can get out because I want to stay and contribute and their actions put me at risk.
also, I’m absolutely fine in my home country. I have ensured that. I file a tax return there every year. Again, you would be an idiot not to think that one through… I also don’t leave a job until I’ve signed a contract with the new one - same kind or thinking.
Edited
StandFirm ·
29/08/2025 21:09
Sorry about the expat thing.
Right - so you're not a citizen, but you're still a long term immigrant who has contributed to the place in multiple ways. I know of cases where returning to a home country after a very long absence has not been straightforward at all, especially when you've never paid into the local system. My point is, you may not be a full citizen but I would never ever support a government that considers it reasonable to arbitrarily request law abiding immigrants like you leave the country. That would be beyond extreme and disgusting. In a country where the rule of law prevails, people like you have rights even if you're not a UK passport holder.
Quoting StandFirm
Sussexswain ·
29/08/2025 20:52
Because I am not British! So no I do not deserve the same rights as a British person. I do however work here and pay taxes and therefore have the right to access all public services available to me. Equally I don’t have the same rights in Germany or France as someone from there. Of course the rights of British people should be put before mine.
I have a home country. That country is the one that is ultimately responsible for me. And they would put my rights before anyone immigrant.
and please don’t insult me by calling me an expat 😂
Quoting Sussexswain
StandFirm ·
29/08/2025 20:43
I genuinely don't understand why you think that. It can only mean that you don't consider yourself to be worthy of the same rights of a native Brit just through an accident of birth.
Quoting StandFirm
Sussexswain ·
29/08/2025 20:38
Yes. I am still a guest.
i have been here since I was a child. Did my GCSE’s here, a levels, university, have built my career here. All my friends are here and some of my family. I have very little ties to my home country but if I was asked to leave I would. Of course I would.
Quoting Sussexswain
StandFirm ·
29/08/2025 20:31
Even when they have built their entire lives in a place different from their birthplace and have no ties to wherever they're from? And when their spouses/partners, friends, children, career are here and not there? The 'guest' mentality smacks of expat, not immigrant. Immigration is much more permanent and you can't destroy someone's life because you consider them just 'guests' - and just because you'd be happy to be treated that way doesn't make it right.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Sussexswain ·
29/08/2025 19:33
Absolutely!! I am a guest here and when a guest is asked to leave they should leave.
Quoting Sussexswain
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 19:29
Okay. We’ve established we agreed on that.
What if you hadn’t committed a crime, ever, and weren’t a risk. Would you be happy to leave because we don’t like your birthplace anymore?
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Sussexswain ·
29/08/2025 19:24
Umm I haven’t said anything about deporting anyone! But if you are second generation you are a British citizen. I don’t think anyone is calling for the deportation of British citizens who were born here.
I am first generation immigrant. I do not hold British citizenship. I abide by the law and pay my taxes, and if i ever broke the law and was a risk to British values I would absolutely respect any decision to ask me to leave.
Quoting Sussexswain
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 19:20
Firstly, he’s not my boss.
Secondly, he’s not an immigrant, and I didn’t say he was. He’s 3rd generation, his daughter is 4th. Never migrated anywhere.
So if we’re considering that it “lasts generations” as someone said… what generation are we stopping deporting people at.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Sussexswain ·
29/08/2025 19:17
But what you have said is ‘my boss is from Pakistan and hasn’t murdered me’ implying because you know immigrants, there is no risk and anyone who has a concern is racist.
The people who have been murdered or raped also didn’t deserve what happened to them. What would your message be to their families?
and before there is any argument about people here who are rapiats and murders. Of course there are and they are despicable but they are unfortunately our deplorables to deal with. Those from another country should not be our problem and large scale, unchecked immigration is making that an impossible task to deal with.
Edited
Quoting Sussexswain
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 19:12
Yes. Because at no state have I said that all asylum seekers are either legitimate or non criminal.
I have said that those who are legitimate or non criminal, shouldn’t be punished because others aren’t.
Quoting Sussexswain
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 19:08
No comment on the lies about the Manchester attack or 7/7 bombings being conducted by immigrants then.
Okay.
So transparent 😂😂
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Sussexswain ·
29/08/2025 19:06
Quoting OneAmberFinch
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 19:04
Is your reading okay? That’s not the first time you’ve just said something that I didn’t say.
I wasn’t claiming they were “too.” I was saying that they didn’t arrive on a boat to be sent back on. Which PP were had said they were.
@Sussexswain ‘there are many people who have come from other countries that have sought to harm individuals or large groups of people. Macnhester bombings, 7/7 bombings..”
Well that’s just not true. They didn’t come from other countries. Which 2 seconds of Googling would tell you without the need to lie.
Out of interest, how far back would you like to go - my finance manager is 3rd generation Pakistani… does he have to go? I can’t be arsed doing his job, so that would be mega inconvenient.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
OneAmberFinch ·
29/08/2025 18:58
"Second generation children of immigrants are also terrorists" is not quite the argument I think you want to make.
This is reason to be even more careful about who we invite in the first place, not less. Because the consequences last for multiple generations. How long ago was the Plantation of Ulster, remind me...?
Quoting BundleBoogie
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 18:52
Interesting you mention the Ariana Grande attacks.
Salman Abedi was born in Manchester. Where would we have sent him back to?
The London bombings, all but one of the perpetrators born here. The other, Jamaican. Were we sending Hasib Hussain back to Leeds?
@Sussexswain I see you’ve referred to both of those attacks too.
I mean. Just read the information before you post. We didn’t welcome any of those terrorists, they were born here. British citizens.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
BundleBoogie ·
29/08/2025 17:49
I suggest you read my post again and look at what I actually said because it’s not that.
I have seen actual videos made in this country by the extremists that seek to harm us. 75% of MI5s caseload is Muslim extremists. Millions have been spent on physical barriers to prevent terror attacks on events like Christmas markets (an attractive target symbolic of Christianity). At no point did I say ALL Muslims or ALL anyone else.
I think it’s disgusting that you mock and minimise this topic - have you forgotten that numerous real lives were lost in recent years from terror attacks? The Ariana Grande concert maybe?
I am advocating caution with all seeking to enter our country, action to mitigate risks and above all, our government actually getting off their arses to do their job because our current situation is unacceptable.
Quoting BundleBoogie
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 16:59
So your response would be to prevent Muslim asylum, for all, because someone told you they’re trying to kill us?
I should have a word with my colleague. 5 years I’ve worked with him, still not death happened. I actually employ upwards of 30 people, all from Iran, Pakistan or Afghanistan. Still no death. I don’t know what they’re playing at.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
BundleBoogie ·
29/08/2025 16:55
Islam is a religion so I’m not sure why you say it’s racist. There are white Muslims as well and brown or black Christians. Trying to shut down discussion by claiming it is racist is part of the problem.
It is the governments responsibility to set entry criteria such to mitigate possible risks and try and ensure our safety.
Muslim extremists have a sworn aim to destroy us. Some former Muslims are trying to raise awareness to warn us of the issue and that our democracy is being weaponised against us.
A cautious approach with everyone looking to enter our country would be sensible as unfortunately the extremists looking to kill us and the criminals looking to kill us don’t always announce themselves.
Quoting OneAmberFinch
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 14:20
I didn’t say it did.
I said we shouldn’t be assuming that all asylum seekers present risk and not welcoming any from certain countries on that basis.
The PP is yet to confirm which countries she means, but I think we can all work it out - roughly.
I’m sure it is possible to be both persecuted and either dangerous or a confirmed criminal. We need to establish a way to work out which is which, and then by all means let’s not welcome criminals.
But if the PP’s suggestion is that we shouldn’t welcome any migration from Muslim countries, on the basis that we “can and should assume” they’re all dangerous - that is racist, is not acceptable, and would impact the innocently persecuted.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
OneAmberFinch ·
29/08/2025 14:11
When people make comments like this I think it's really revealing that they have never actually lived in a quote-unquote third-world country. (I have.)
The logic is "this person is persecuted, therefore they are a victim, therefore they are not a safety risk, therefore we should shelter them".
This is true some of the time.
But in most cases and especially when talking about healthy young men it is a case of a complex web of different factions and power struggles that they have temporarily found themselves in the wrong end of, and by inviting them here we bring that factional ethnic/tribal conflict to our own shores.
Some of the innocent are persecuted, but being persecuted doesn't make you innocent.
Quoting RingoJuice
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 13:02
Yes. If for example we send a load of people back to the Taliban, who have previously fled the Taliban, they’ll be absolutely fine and live forever and ever.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
RingoJuice ·
29/08/2025 12:59
You’ve got quite the imagination. They are just going back to their homeland, where all the women, children and elderly are. Most of them are economic migrants and you know it
Quoting Somerford
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 12:46
Yep, and then (if they win) the racists can get on with sending innocent people back to their deaths, and ideally shut up about it.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Somerford ·
29/08/2025 12:40
It doesn't matter what you want to call it. This can be dealt with at the ballot box in 4 short years so call it whatever you like.
Quoting Somerford
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 12:21
We should assume that a group of people are inherently more dangerous based on their ethnicity and/or country of origin?
There’s a word for that…
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Somerford ·
29/08/2025 12:15
We absolutely can and we should.
Quoting Somerford
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 11:45
Fair enough, but what I asked was if you knew a way to prevent criminals without preventing those who are genuine.
The way, btw, is to open safe and legal routes that involve checks being completed before arrival. Applying for asylum, including a criminal record check, and then travelling.
What we can’t, or shouldn’t, do is assume that all men from specific countries present risk because of their background or culture, and blanket ban them all.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Somerford ·
29/08/2025 11:20
You're right, it won't stop only criminals. But I'd rather stop both criminals and valuable migrants than accept both into our country.
Quoting Somerford
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 11:09
That won’t stop only criminals.
It will stop all men from certain countries, some of which are genuine asylum seekers and valuable migrants in terms of work and contribution.
No documents, no entry, I agree with. But blanket banning all men from certain countries will prevent genuine asylum.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Somerford ·
29/08/2025 11:03
Refuse visas and asylum claims from men coming from countries with high rates of criminality. If an asylum seeking man has ditched his passport in the channel on the way here, automatic rejection.
Quoting Somerford
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 10:52
So how do you propose we stop only the criminal ones and allow in genuine asylum seekers?
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
Somerford ·
29/08/2025 10:38
The colour of their skin is not the important detail. If a would-be rapist is not currently in the country, he can't ever commit rape or sexual assault here and he poses no threat to British women or children. If you allow him into the country and he then commits rapes and sexual assaults, the state could have prevented it with data driven policy. You're throwing the victims of those crimes under the bus with your approach, their attacker should never have been in the country in the first place.
Quoting BundleBoogie
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 10:15
I am interested in the number of men who commit violent crime against women and girls.
The colour of their skin is of absolutely no consequence to me.
Quoting SleeplessInWherever
BundleBoogie ·
29/08/2025 10:10
So you are not interested in knowing the number of crimes committed by men entering this country? Those crimes that were totally preventable if these men weren’t here?
Surely though, if this number is as low as PPs are claiming (some have implied it’s zero), wouldn’t be good for everyone to know that? To put some of these discussions to bed?
Quoting BundleBoogie
SleeplessInWherever ·
29/08/2025 10:05
I don’t think the government should waste their time trying to silence the far right. I think they should ignore them, because they’re idiots, and punish them when they commit racially aggravated crimes.
Quoting Discombobble
BundleBoogie ·
29/08/2025 10:01
This is such an illogical point.
Just because we have homegrown criminals doesn’t mean it’s ok to bring in more.
We will hopefully soon find out the rates of crimes committed by immigrant men from each on the 49 countries in ‘Asia’ (which is the current level of detail provided apparently) from the government.
I’m sure if these numbers are so super low the government will be really keen to release them and silence the ‘far right’ - won’t they.
It’s been repeated many times on this thread that men who come from countries where abuse of women is endemic and extremely violent may not understand how to behave here.
The repeated use of “I didn’t know rape was illegal” as a defence for foreign men on rape charges gives you a little clue as to the sort of men that are coming here. Not all of them , but too many.
Quoting Sussexswain
Discombobble ·
28/08/2025 12:42
I wish all that anger would boil over a bit more frequently when women and girls are raped by people of the same colour and heritage to them. It’s nothing to do with ‘asylum seekers are all rapists’ it’s just a convenient excuse to be racist
Quoting Tigergirl80
Sussexswain ·
28/08/2025 09:24
What you have just said is that they are ALL genuine.. can you guarantee that?
this is what I see happens
- asylum seekers come in. We are told they are all genuine, they pose no threat.
- an attack happens, rape sexual assault ect because this does happen - fact!
- people question how this was allowed to happen. Those that question are called racists bigots ect ect
- some may become angry that their legitimate concerns are not being listened to… anger boils over
what I wish politicians would do is tell the truth and just say thing - asylum seekers coming in may pose a threat but most are here for legitimate reason. We will do EVERYTHING in our power to keep the threat away from the public, do background checks, deport criminals, deport those who do not integrate ect ect. Some will be be rapists and peadophiles because they exist in every walk of life. Most are not. But we acknowledge that there are bad ones and we will make every effort to weed them out. Why is that so hard to say?
Quoting HelpMeUnderstandPolitics
Tigergirl80 ·
28/08/2025 09:09
But it’s unfair to tar all male asylum seekers with the same brush because of their race/religion. Anyone that works with refugees/asylums seekers will tell you they are genuine.
41% of the far right have convictions for domestic violence. When they’re protesting for the safety of women they are hypocrites.
I remember a reporter talking to a protester when the riots were going on. Asked why he was protesting said they take all our jobs I can’t get a job. Then said I’ve got a criminal record for assault. Those that live local to him knew he was jailed for CSA. But he missed that bit out and he won’t be the only one. Don’t get me started on the so called parents who take their children to the protests.
Quoting Ymiryboo
HelpMeUnderstandPolitics ·
28/08/2025 07:21
I'm rather disgusted by some of the language used in this thread, yours included. Brininging my children into this is waaay below the belt. And even if I did leave, they'd still see their father so I cannot see anyones point on that. It's just spireful.
Youve clearly not read my updates either. I admitted that I used the wrong language.
But, I want to clarify the following:
I haven't been back for a while because, after some reflection and reading the replies from many of you, I realised my husbands views aren't that uncommon right now. I realised 'extreme' is considered to be someone hating all non-white people and being racist. My husband is not. He is fearful of allowing unregistered men into our country that have grown up in an entirely different country where their values regarding women and crime in general are worrying. And I can see why from some of the more thoughtful responders that didn't just call LTB and presented me with facts etc. It's worrying times for us all and I suppose something does need to change as we cannot continue the way things are. I still disagree with the people racially abusing others and generally are being 'extreme' in their views and actions.
Quoting HelpMeUnderstandPolitics
Ymiryboo ·
27/08/2025 08:07
Are you happy for your children to grow up to be hateful little versions of him?
I’m rather disgusted that you’d sacrifice morals for a happy peaceful life
HelpMeUnderstandPolitics ·
24/08/2025 20:41
Whilst I see everyone's point, I don't feel that it's worth throwing my marriage away for. We have children and a otherwise happy home.