I don’t buy into this big conspiracy theory that the government keeps things from us that we “should” know.
I used to share your view and also trusted the BBC to tell the truth and human rights organisations to protect the human right ms if women. I have sadly been disabused of all of that, not by any commentators with an agenda but I’ve seen it with my own eyes.
re crime stats, they’ve been asked a number of times by MPs for the stats and so far refused. I think there was some more recent agreement to produce some.
Secondly, I think they’re right to not tell us the ethnicity of every criminal, because of the fuss it causes when it is “uncovered.” I think them whipping up the already existing racist undertones of “brown man attacks woman” would be a really, really stupid thing to do.
What about the rights of women in this country not to be raped or murdered by criminals who have entered this country? If men from one particular country or region are far more likely to criminals, we should have that information and measures need to be taken to mitigate the risks.
I have assumed that many of the people who cross the sea to reach England, and seek asylum, are doing just that. Seeking asylum.
In good weather it’s not a dangerous crossing at all. The RNLI escort many boats and provide life jackets. People swim it for sport.
Of course there will be people that have other motives, and do commit crime. But “sending them all home” involves sending many of them back to persecution or death.
Even the government agrees that sending foreign criminals home is the right thing to do. While your concern for others and altruism could be applauded, it might be good to remember that the governments first responsibility is to its citizens and I feel like your support for the human rights of criminals over our human rights has gone too far. Way too far.
nb. Obviously we are not going to send home genuine asylum seekers that are not criminals.