Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Husband has extreme right wing views

924 replies

HelpMeUnderstandPolitics · 24/08/2025 20:34

Not sure if this is the right place to post as it's not an AIBU but more of I think my husband is being and I'm not sure what to do about it.

He's getting caught up in some quite extreme right wing views in regards to migrants. Complains about how they're coming in, being housed in hotels, paid allowances etc. with no checks and how crime rates such as rape are now ten fold etc. He thinks Trump is great 😪 He's very intelligent so I'm not sure how he's managed to get caught up in this extremist view point.

WWYD?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
80smusicandavoulevant · 25/08/2025 07:47

I’m not an extremist but I’m very against the amount of young men illegally entering our country. It’s not safe and I think people are right to feel concerned. I would never stand outside a hotel or walk a march to voice my opinion, but they are being way too looked after by our government and I think it’s wrong on all levels

EsmeSusanOgg · 25/08/2025 07:48

Freud2 · 25/08/2025 07:39

So the government can be seen to be processing the asylum seekers quickly and have less people waiting.
People are getting angry about the situation as it feels out of control so the perception is that they are extremely right wing. I think the anger masks fear. The present government don't seem to have the will to be proactive- just reactive.

I mean this is a situation that has been brewing for multiple decades - so not just this government. And it is not something I would expect any government to be able to fix in just a year (without taking substantial short cuts, that could negatively impact people who are in genuine need and have already suffered quite a bit).

But I agree, there is a lot of fear that is being masked by anger. I also think that some groups are whipping this up and taking advantage of that fear for their own financial and political benefit.

Chronic past under-funding of Border Force and Home Office to ensure there are enough staff to process claims in a swift @manner is not an easy thing to fix - without increasing government spending in this area, which would probably need tax increases to fund, which are again less than popular.

sexproblems · 25/08/2025 07:55

So many softie lefties in this country. Hey, let's send 50,000 British men over the border into Iran and see what happens eh? FFS.

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 08:02

Sending in the National Guard to force the hand of states who he has said have not acted quickly enough (not right-wing in the left-right economic model, as it is a violation of state's rights)

National Guards are used in a time of crisis. When local government refuses to address a pressing national issue, then it’s perfectly acceptable to ignore them and do what they should have done all along, which is cooperate with ICE. They are doing this to jurisdictions which refuse to address crime properly as well. Good.

Locking up small children, and separating them from their parents and families when held in deportation centres

There are family detention facilities so they can be deported together. There are legal reasons why children cannot be held in detention centers long-term, so separation may be necessary if they cannot be deported in a timely manner. The answer is to just deport as quickly as possible to avoid this situation.

Mass deporting people to third countries (not necessarily where they have come from/ through) including the recent high-profile case of someone wrongly deported and sent to a notorious South American prison

Venezuela wouldn’t take them back. What do you suggest we do (and in fact, Venezuela now accepts deported individuals). Just let them stay?

Using shackles when transporting people between holding and detention centres. Regardless of appropriateness/ likely flight risk

Do you know why this happens? Because a plane load of deportees to Haiti absolutely wrecked a chartered plane and tried to hijack it. Bet you didn’t hear about it.

We are now offering $1000 for them to self-deport. Isn’t this better than risking staying in a country that now takes illegal immigration seriously, as per the wishes of the electorate?

WhereIsMyJumper · 25/08/2025 08:08

HelpMeUnderstandPolitics · 24/08/2025 21:30

I competently take on board that I have use 'extremism' incorrectly. He has firm right-wing views, but I seems that these are 'normal'(?)

He's got good work mates that aren't British. He'd be absolutely fine with our children have friendships/relationships with whoever.

I wouldn’t even class his views as right wing, more right of centre!

And all the people telling you to leave him on the first page for crying out loud. Thats how you end up in an echo chamber 🙄

BundleBoogie · 25/08/2025 08:12

MyDarlingWhatIfYouFly · 25/08/2025 02:47

You don’t think linking a “tenfold” increase in rape in the UK with asylum seekers is a far right view point? It’s a bullshit statistic and just a way to demonise asylum seekers.

You don’t think supporting a right wing felon who has openly admitted sexually assaulting women is something to worry about? Especially when he’s the leader of another country and has nothing to do with the UK - why would someone in the UK support him??

If you look at the stats provided above you’ll see that this is not a ‘far right viewpoint’ but a fact that is true across Europe with mass immigration.

People that attempt to shut down conversation on this with spurious ‘far right’ accusations are now part of the problem.

Trump is a narcissistic lunatic imo but he has done some things right. He has reversed Bidens wholesale attack on women’s rights as well as attempting to achieve peace in Ukraine.

I think you need to become better informed on these issues and you won’t be so dismissive.

CallItLoneliness · 25/08/2025 08:20

smallpinecone · 24/08/2025 22:02

To have freedom in who to share a bed and life with - that’s great.

But the freedom to think and to have opinions is bad?

Her husband (and everyone else) has the freedom to think and have opinions; but that doesn't entitle them to freedom from consequences for those opinions. People might think Trump is a good leader, I can't get past the fact that he has admitted to sexual assault. That would make me concerned that they would not respect my boundaries, and therefore I would choose not to sleep with someone who felt that

Charlthg · 25/08/2025 08:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BundleBoogie · 25/08/2025 08:22

Velmy · 25/08/2025 04:57

Well yes because it's the government who are allowing this and it's their policies that people are criticising. Now even criticism isn't allowed, we have the thought police, people who don't have the 'right' opinion about what's going on need to have their thoughts fixed...

This is utter nonsense. You can hold any opinion you like in this country. If you act on one that's illegal, you'll face consequences. There is no thought police.

Criticism isn't allowed?...don't be ridiculous. Show me evidence of anyone being punished for criticizing the government. It happens all day every day.

I very much disagree that they're bordering radical, there's been 'radical' change in recent years, people want a return to that, there's nothing radical about wanting to go back to how things were a few years back. When it comes to immigration, most people actually want moderation, trying to say that that's radical is quite the reach!

I didn't say wanting moderate immigration was radical though, did I? That's something you've made up.

Believing that the number of rapes in the country has increased ten fold due to immigrants is extremely radical. It's an out and out lie designed to stoke fear and hatred. Why would someone tell such an awful lie?

Becoming more educated on it doesn't equal his mind being changed. Again this is like gaslighting, you want to tell him he's wrong even though he is right about some things

He is, demonstrably, wrong about some things. If someone forms a point of view without evidence, and isn't willing to change their mind in the face of conclusive proof that they're wrong...what would you call them? A sheep? An idiot?

He's allowed to like Trump. There's no right or wrong about that. He's allowed to think we should be tougher on immigration. I'm not sure what gave you the impression that I think he should be told he's wrong about any of his opinions. But suggesting things like rape increasing 10-fold or that there's no support for British homeless people while we prioritize immigrants is just factually incorrect.

Again, you seem to have this myopic, black and white point of view whereby challenging one belief means that you're challenging everything that person believes in. You're literally playing into the personality politics trap, hook, line and sinker.

So how many additional does and murders by immigrant men are you comfortable with?
You reject the number ‘ten fold’ - what is the number of rapes committed by foreign men coming from countries where they claim rape is not illegal?

Why do you think the government are dragging their heels in providing the criminal figures for these men? If it was lower than is claimed, surely they’d tell us and all the ‘right wing’ extremists would have to shut up as they’ve been proved wrong?

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 08:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OMG they said that? Out loud?????

Charlthg · 25/08/2025 08:30

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BundleBoogie · 25/08/2025 08:36

EsmeSusanOgg · 25/08/2025 06:30

I am very familiar with the UK data. And wealth gaps absolutely play into it. As do reporting levels.

So if it’s all about wealth gaps, do you think that bringing in men from poor countries with low levels of education is going to help or not help on rates of crime?

EsmeSusanOgg · 25/08/2025 08:43

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 08:02

Sending in the National Guard to force the hand of states who he has said have not acted quickly enough (not right-wing in the left-right economic model, as it is a violation of state's rights)

National Guards are used in a time of crisis. When local government refuses to address a pressing national issue, then it’s perfectly acceptable to ignore them and do what they should have done all along, which is cooperate with ICE. They are doing this to jurisdictions which refuse to address crime properly as well. Good.

Locking up small children, and separating them from their parents and families when held in deportation centres

There are family detention facilities so they can be deported together. There are legal reasons why children cannot be held in detention centers long-term, so separation may be necessary if they cannot be deported in a timely manner. The answer is to just deport as quickly as possible to avoid this situation.

Mass deporting people to third countries (not necessarily where they have come from/ through) including the recent high-profile case of someone wrongly deported and sent to a notorious South American prison

Venezuela wouldn’t take them back. What do you suggest we do (and in fact, Venezuela now accepts deported individuals). Just let them stay?

Using shackles when transporting people between holding and detention centres. Regardless of appropriateness/ likely flight risk

Do you know why this happens? Because a plane load of deportees to Haiti absolutely wrecked a chartered plane and tried to hijack it. Bet you didn’t hear about it.

We are now offering $1000 for them to self-deport. Isn’t this better than risking staying in a country that now takes illegal immigration seriously, as per the wishes of the electorate?

Hi - so you're in the US then?

How do you feel about cases like this one reported in the BBC this morning? What approach would you like Trump to take?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg4kd385e4o

A woman in a blue-striped shirt, with her face blurred, stands next to Disney worker dressed as Princess Tiana in a yellow gown. The woman's daughter, face also blurred, stands on the other side of the princess. The daughter is wearing Mickey Mouse ear...

Ecuador: Victims of violent cartels tell BBC they now hide from US authorities

Donald Trump declared some cartels to be terrorist organisations. So why are the victims of cartels in hiding?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg4kd385e4o

OneAmberFinch · 25/08/2025 08:45

Regarding data availability: there is a serious lack of reliable official data published on various topics (crime, welfare receipts, taxes paid, etc). Government sources often use very broad buckets like "Asian" which don't show differences by specific country.

This is essential because a) different countries possibly have different base rates due to cultural norms etc, and b) the particular groups we've selected to come here skew the data, e.g. Albanian refugees usually explicitly being here because of organised crime, or Ukrainians mostly being women, Nigerian immigrants usually being Yoruba/Igbo not Hausa etc.

However since these breakdowns are usually not published in comprehensive ONS datasets, individual journalists do FOIA requests and similar to get very specific breakdowns. You can't just FOIA "all migrant crime data" you have to ask specifically only for rape crimes by London borough for 2015-2023 or whatever.

The government responds with data correct to the best of its knowledge (subject to usual data quality issues like reporting bias etc). However it is then really hard to understand why some numbers don't seem to match up, because only half the numbers are there.

Typical example (made up numbers)
ONS announces that Asians have the same shoplifting rates as white British
Telegraph announces furiously that Afghans shoplift at 10x the rate
Guardian runs a heartwarming profile about Japanese immigrants who shoplift at 0.1x the rate

Now both sides think the other side is lying and spreading misinformation.

Being able to see the full dataset would be very useful to inform policy and see patterns, not filtered through either government smokescreens or journalistic agendas.

Anyahyacinth · 25/08/2025 08:47

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 04:28

You could apply this to men in the women’s restroom! In fact you sound like an apologist. Just let them pee! They are unlikely to harm you!

Why should I compromise my safety so you can feel good?

You answered your own question, like a chil but still...its a choice to be good or bad ..you choose bad...to condemn whole groups ....to choose prejudice and harm the innocent. You choose an unjust society so you can 'feel' better

BeardofHagrid · 25/08/2025 08:48

He’s not far wrong.

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 08:49

EsmeSusanOgg · 25/08/2025 08:43

Hi - so you're in the US then?

How do you feel about cases like this one reported in the BBC this morning? What approach would you like Trump to take?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg4kd385e4o

I am American but alas have not lived in my
homeland for quite some time.

I read the story. Yes, it is awful what has happened in Venezuela since Maduro (maybe Chavez). But she has no legal basis to claim asylum. Rampant crime in your home country is not a legitimate basis for asylum, you know that, do you not?

I recommend she take the 2000 dollars and self-deport with her daughter, and live with her partner.

BundleBoogie · 25/08/2025 08:52

OneAmberFinch · 25/08/2025 08:45

Regarding data availability: there is a serious lack of reliable official data published on various topics (crime, welfare receipts, taxes paid, etc). Government sources often use very broad buckets like "Asian" which don't show differences by specific country.

This is essential because a) different countries possibly have different base rates due to cultural norms etc, and b) the particular groups we've selected to come here skew the data, e.g. Albanian refugees usually explicitly being here because of organised crime, or Ukrainians mostly being women, Nigerian immigrants usually being Yoruba/Igbo not Hausa etc.

However since these breakdowns are usually not published in comprehensive ONS datasets, individual journalists do FOIA requests and similar to get very specific breakdowns. You can't just FOIA "all migrant crime data" you have to ask specifically only for rape crimes by London borough for 2015-2023 or whatever.

The government responds with data correct to the best of its knowledge (subject to usual data quality issues like reporting bias etc). However it is then really hard to understand why some numbers don't seem to match up, because only half the numbers are there.

Typical example (made up numbers)
ONS announces that Asians have the same shoplifting rates as white British
Telegraph announces furiously that Afghans shoplift at 10x the rate
Guardian runs a heartwarming profile about Japanese immigrants who shoplift at 0.1x the rate

Now both sides think the other side is lying and spreading misinformation.

Being able to see the full dataset would be very useful to inform policy and see patterns, not filtered through either government smokescreens or journalistic agendas.

Good point. The data used upthread by pp trying to prove that white men commit more crimes per head than ‘Asian’ men, lumps in all men from 49 different countries, with extremely varying levels of crime rates.

Unfortunately, the government is very aware of the impact of data in public opinion and is hiding it for exactly the reasons many are concerned about.

The data shared by @Phobiaphobic paints a damning picture across Europe of the effects of mass immigration from certain countries. People denying or excusing this are becoming part of the problem.

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 08:53

Anyahyacinth · 25/08/2025 08:47

You answered your own question, like a chil but still...its a choice to be good or bad ..you choose bad...to condemn whole groups ....to choose prejudice and harm the innocent. You choose an unjust society so you can 'feel' better

I don’t condemn whole groups. I say that men should stay out of my bathroom. I don’t hate them (most of the time, anyway).

And illegal immigrants should stay out of my country. It’s not hate—it’s not hatred to enforce boundaries.

YellowElephant89 · 25/08/2025 08:53

'What flag would you suggest be painted in a roundabout to signify dissatisfaction at the woeful charge rate for rape?'

Considering it's a crime against women comitted by men - only suffragettes'.

Somerford · 25/08/2025 08:54

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 08:23

OMG they said that? Out loud?????

They didn't quite say "small price to pay" but yes, they were of the view that rapes and sexual assaults were something we'd all have to accept for the greater good.

Boomer55 · 25/08/2025 08:56

HelpMeUnderstandPolitics · 24/08/2025 20:34

Not sure if this is the right place to post as it's not an AIBU but more of I think my husband is being and I'm not sure what to do about it.

He's getting caught up in some quite extreme right wing views in regards to migrants. Complains about how they're coming in, being housed in hotels, paid allowances etc. with no checks and how crime rates such as rape are now ten fold etc. He thinks Trump is great 😪 He's very intelligent so I'm not sure how he's managed to get caught up in this extremist view point.

WWYD?

Extreme right wing or extreme left wing isn’t good, but I’m not sure it’s worth breaking up over.

Just agree not to discuss it all - whatever anyone’s viewpoint, governments do as they do. 🤷‍♀️

Anyahyacinth · 25/08/2025 08:57

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 08:53

I don’t condemn whole groups. I say that men should stay out of my bathroom. I don’t hate them (most of the time, anyway).

And illegal immigrants should stay out of my country. It’s not hate—it’s not hatred to enforce boundaries.

It is about hate. Deciding someone is illegal BEFORE their case can be heard is absolutely unjust

RingoJuice · 25/08/2025 09:03

Anyahyacinth · 25/08/2025 08:57

It is about hate. Deciding someone is illegal BEFORE their case can be heard is absolutely unjust

Sorry, but you could just send them back without entertaining their cases. They will eventually stop coming.

The safety and integrity of your country should be enough justification. I don’t care about a piece of paper some guy signed 50 years ago. International law isn’t binding. You can safely ignore it.

whosgotthespag · 25/08/2025 09:07

Why does being concerned about the pace of migration (especially illegal migration) make you a right wing bigot?

You can sympathise with those leaving dangerous, disadvantaged countries and still worry about the risks posed by the arrival and the scale. With the small boats, these are predominantly young men arriving from France - a safe country!

This isn’t about race. Any Brit of any background, can share these concerns. People are worried about safety, integration, and the speed of change. Isn’t naïve to pretend otherwise?

The grooming gangs scandal showed what happens when fear of being called racist stops people from facing reality. Brushing aside debate on migration in the same way is just as reckless.

Too many on the left remain obsessed with the fascism of the past, while ignoring today’s challenges.

Swipe left for the next trending thread