Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

For thinking that the migrant protests ...

1000 replies

Ihateboris · 23/08/2025 12:35

Should be held at the council offices, Government departments, rather than the migrant hotels? After all, it's due to the government's lack of processing that the migrants are there?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Charlthg · 23/08/2025 22:27

VaseofViolets · 23/08/2025 22:25

@Netcurtainnelly In the MN middle class bubble, yes, do nothing. The compassion that the middle class pride themselves on is reserved for everyone but their fellow countrymen of the working class. They couldn’t care less about those people suffering.

It’s a middle class trend. Like a badge that must be worn to show how much better they are than national flag waving people who they look down upon.

FinneganFois · 23/08/2025 22:27

"So where would you house them? I'm not being goady by the way"

Last December there were migrants in tents outside the Dail in Dublin.

MrsSkylerWhite · 23/08/2025 22:28

Netcurtainnelly · 23/08/2025 22:17

Should concerned people do nothing then and just sit back?

When you can't find a house to rent, or get a doctors appointment in the future because the infastructure isn't there to cope with extra people, maybe you'll.be glad people starting making a noise.

Those problems are because of terrible governance for 15 years, not immigration.

poetryandwine · 23/08/2025 22:28

Radiohat · 23/08/2025 16:12

I don't want my taxes spent on illegals.

It is entirely legal to seek asylum, as the UK is a signatory to the 1951 UN Convention on Human Rights. You must presently be inside the UK to make an asylum claim. The backlog is awful. No matter your view of asylum seekers, leaving people hanging does no one any good.

If the UK really wants to lessen numbers of irregular immigrants in hotels, etc, one good way to do it would be to permit people to apply for asylum externally to the UK. If turned down promptly, there might be legal grounds to refuse entry. No government has been interested in doing this

VaseofViolets · 23/08/2025 22:29

MrsSkylerWhite · 23/08/2025 22:28

Those problems are because of terrible governance for 15 years, not immigration.

It’s both.

Charlthg · 23/08/2025 22:29

Hollyohara · 23/08/2025 22:26

Not sure what you’re going on about. But anyway look at lovely Angela. In her second or third home. Another you couldn’t make it up. Oh. But yes you could. These lefties and their multiple homes.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15028265/Angela-Rayner-home-Labour-seaside-pad.html#

Edited

Convenient how she faced no consequences despite all the alleged dodgy goings on with the sale of her council house. The police and justice system are just so corrupt. Cannot be trusted.

Anyway doesn’t she always preach to her comrades about the evils of people owning more than one home.

Pigs and their snouts, eh?

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 23/08/2025 22:30

TopPocketFind · 23/08/2025 22:13

What disaster are we facing exactly?

And how do these protests avert it?

We’re facing long term sectarian politics and violence. An increase in population density. A reduction in GDP per capita. Increase in crime. A collapse in living standards: the education tax, pension tax, family farm tax, fiscal drag of income taxes are all just the beginning on meeting the third world half way.

And how do these protests avert it?
They won’t, it’s a separate issue but it is at least making the Government listen to people’s concerns (and stopping locking them up for voicing them),

BurntBroccoli · 23/08/2025 22:30

Nancywhiskers · 23/08/2025 22:26

You said the boats started in 2018. Whats the significance?

The Dublin III agreement meant we couldn't use our island status to avoid our responsibilities under the refugee convention which we not only signed but co-wrote.

There have always been people smugglers as there is a ready market for cheap or free labour. Backs of lorries used to be the favoured method and, here is the essential difference, those people disappeared into the black economy or to slave labour or to brothels. It is vile and it needs stopping but it didn't result in commandeered former barracks, commandeered hotels or the Bibby Stockholm to house thousands of asylum seekers.

Brexit and leaving the Dublin Agreement changed all that. It opened a huge new market for people traffickers and cross channel rubber boats became the norm after January 2020. Almost all of these people now hand themselves over to border control as asylum seekers. The previous government had no alternative but to house them, there was nothing else legal that they could do. They gave up assessing claims and the problem just multiplied. At least the Labour government has begun assessing claims again, accepting those successful and allowing then to become useful members of our society and, where they legally can, they have deported those who were unsuccessful.

Brexit caused the small boats crisis and the massive accommodation bill.

Charlthg · 23/08/2025 22:30

poetryandwine · 23/08/2025 22:28

It is entirely legal to seek asylum, as the UK is a signatory to the 1951 UN Convention on Human Rights. You must presently be inside the UK to make an asylum claim. The backlog is awful. No matter your view of asylum seekers, leaving people hanging does no one any good.

If the UK really wants to lessen numbers of irregular immigrants in hotels, etc, one good way to do it would be to permit people to apply for asylum externally to the UK. If turned down promptly, there might be legal grounds to refuse entry. No government has been interested in doing this

You must be so naive to think that the illegal economic migration would stop if there were other ways for asylum seekers to come in.

What a sheltered life you must lead.

Netcurtainnelly · 23/08/2025 22:30

lkjhgfdsa · 23/08/2025 15:17

I don't know about where you live, but where I live the council have a system whereby you can report a homeless person and an outreach team will scoop them up and get them into some form of accommodation. There is absolutely no need for anyone to be living on the street here and yet people still do. It is often a choice. The reasons why people make those choices are complex and not easily addressed. It is not fair or accurate to suggest that nobody cares about the homeless.

It is a false dichotomy to suggest we either care for the homeless or for the asylum seekers. They are two separate issues and it is possible to care about both.

Where does the infastructure come from to take more people in?
Doctors, Dentists, teachers. It's obvious it hasn't been thought out.
We've got enough social problems too without taking on everyone else's.
At the.migrant hotel.in.my town police are called out several times a week as they are fighting with each other.

Hollyohara · 23/08/2025 22:32

Netcurtainnelly · 23/08/2025 22:30

Where does the infastructure come from to take more people in?
Doctors, Dentists, teachers. It's obvious it hasn't been thought out.
We've got enough social problems too without taking on everyone else's.
At the.migrant hotel.in.my town police are called out several times a week as they are fighting with each other.

More to the point - who is paying for it? Oh.

Bambamhoohoo · 23/08/2025 22:33

Netcurtainnelly · 23/08/2025 22:30

Where does the infastructure come from to take more people in?
Doctors, Dentists, teachers. It's obvious it hasn't been thought out.
We've got enough social problems too without taking on everyone else's.
At the.migrant hotel.in.my town police are called out several times a week as they are fighting with each other.

Why don’t people want to train as doctors or dentists?

we have had shortages for years.. best part of a Decade to my memory. I never understand why those moaning Don’t consider retraining, or at least, encouraging their children into it. It seems like it’s always got to be someone else who actually does those jobs doesn’t it?

Charlthg · 23/08/2025 22:33

Netcurtainnelly · 23/08/2025 22:30

Where does the infastructure come from to take more people in?
Doctors, Dentists, teachers. It's obvious it hasn't been thought out.
We've got enough social problems too without taking on everyone else's.
At the.migrant hotel.in.my town police are called out several times a week as they are fighting with each other.

Sectarian violence among migrants is already becoming a problem due to mass migration and open borders. People are bringing their national feuds with them, and fighting them out in this country now. This problem is going to turn into a disaster in the very near future.

PandoraSocks · 23/08/2025 22:35

Namelessnelly · 23/08/2025 22:20

How about all those who say “all are welcome” take a few into their homes? I mean, if people are happy to allow anyone into the country, surely thay would be happy to house them? That way, the people not wanting then in hotels are happy, the migrants are happy and the people happy to have them are happy. Everybody wins.

In the words of Charlthg, Oh look, what an original comment. Never heard that one before. What a flex.

YelloDaisy · 23/08/2025 22:36

The reason they protest outside hotels is because it gets media attention -you wouldn’t know if they protested outside council offices as it wouldn’t be reported.

But the asylum seekers are in a safe country in France so they are taking the mickey

Supersimkin7 · 23/08/2025 22:36

YABU. Organized crime gets migrants into
hotels, not Kier.

TopPocketFind · 23/08/2025 22:36

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 23/08/2025 22:30

We’re facing long term sectarian politics and violence. An increase in population density. A reduction in GDP per capita. Increase in crime. A collapse in living standards: the education tax, pension tax, family farm tax, fiscal drag of income taxes are all just the beginning on meeting the third world half way.

And how do these protests avert it?
They won’t, it’s a separate issue but it is at least making the Government listen to people’s concerns (and stopping locking them up for voicing them),

Brexit caused a huge reductionreduction in GDP. There is no evidence immigration increases crime. Austerity was a major factor in the collapse in living standards

Nobody gets locked up for voicing concerns abour immigration. Mixing with the far right is not a good look to voice your concern

poetryandwine · 23/08/2025 22:36

Charlthg · 23/08/2025 22:30

You must be so naive to think that the illegal economic migration would stop if there were other ways for asylum seekers to come in.

What a sheltered life you must lead.

Hardly.

PandoraSocks · 23/08/2025 22:37

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 23/08/2025 22:30

We’re facing long term sectarian politics and violence. An increase in population density. A reduction in GDP per capita. Increase in crime. A collapse in living standards: the education tax, pension tax, family farm tax, fiscal drag of income taxes are all just the beginning on meeting the third world half way.

And how do these protests avert it?
They won’t, it’s a separate issue but it is at least making the Government listen to people’s concerns (and stopping locking them up for voicing them),

When has any one ever been locked up for voicing concern over immigration?

MrsSkylerWhite · 23/08/2025 22:38

VaseofViolets · 23/08/2025 22:29

It’s both.

Possibly legal immigration contributes, yes. The expected 300,000 people from Hong Kong who are expected to seek asylum in the UK and the approximately 250,000 Ukrainian refugees.

The number of people arriving in the UK on small boats is fairly small by comparison.

TheNuthatch · 23/08/2025 22:39

TopPocketFind · 23/08/2025 22:15

Did it reduce immigration?

To Epping, yes.

VaseofViolets · 23/08/2025 22:41

Charlthg · 23/08/2025 22:27

It’s a middle class trend. Like a badge that must be worn to show how much better they are than national flag waving people who they look down upon.

The middle class have the luxury of sneering because they don’t see the downside of mass immigration. Only the upside. They have the money to take advantage of it, and it cushions the worst effects.

Middle class people like the cheap labour - the nannies, au pairs, cooks, cleaners. Poorer people can’t afford them.

They also have an obsession with food. It makes them feel cosmopolitan and cultured to enjoy the many different restaurants and cuisines on offer. Poorer people can’t afford them.

Private schools, dentists and medical care are available. No need to use the NHS, endure long waiting lists, compete for school places. Poorer people have to.

Antisocial behaviour or criminal behaviour need not be tolerated, they can live in the leafy suburbs. No need to live in social housing or deprived areas. Poorer people have to.

So the wealthier sneer at the poorer sections of society for not enjoying the multicultural riches on offer, when it’s perfectly obvious they can’t afford to.

Namelessnelly · 23/08/2025 22:41

PandoraSocks · 23/08/2025 22:35

In the words of Charlthg, Oh look, what an original comment. Never heard that one before. What a flex.

You seem nice. 😀😀

TopPocketFind · 23/08/2025 22:41

TheNuthatch · 23/08/2025 22:39

To Epping, yes.

Unless they move to hmo's in Epping

PandoraSocks · 23/08/2025 22:44

Namelessnelly · 23/08/2025 22:41

You seem nice. 😀😀

I am very nice!

But that doesn't mean I can't point out when a rather nonsensical argument has been trotted out before😃

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.