I see a lot of women on here accepting flaky/unintetested father over no father because they assume that the former is better (I disagree)
I wonder if that is because it is harder to raise children on just one income and the mother may not be able to fully support alone and with the amount of men once divorced that go out of their way not to pay child maintenance, maybe it is thought better to stay where there is access to money and can build an exit strategy or they think they can make up for it by being the constant present parent vs divorcing and risking fighting for child maintenance and/or custody issues.
A friend of mine divorced her disinterested ex- husband. She begged for couples counseling for years and when she said she was done, he wanted to try it of course. He said he would be amicable and share custody and then changed his mind and decided to go for primary custody instead. He got it because he made more, had a solicitor his parents knew and paid for, and his immediate family was local, despite him having a medical condition
She worked but didn’t make enough to support her and child or hire a good solicitor , and was staying with a friend. Her cm payments were £350 which she couldn’t afford especially when she didn’t have a residence of her own so ended up having to move several hours away from her son and live with a family member, and luckily was able to transfer to another location for her work. The disinterested father’s had son taken care of by his mum.
Judge told her the only reason was she didn’t have the means alone which was true.
Friend did have son for some holidays and a few weeks in the summers but it was difficult since she lives 6 hours away with the closest family she had near her at the time.