Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think that racism is getting a lot worse of late.

898 replies

AliceMaforethought · 20/08/2025 18:13

Just read this awful story in the Guardian. Awful and makes me feel so angry and so unsafe as a half Black woman.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/20/family-in-fear-after-tommy-robinson-shares-video-of-black-man-with-white-granddaughters

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
PhilippaGeorgiou · 21/08/2025 19:33

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 19:15

You think no charity ever travels to countries which aren't 100% stable to carry out humanitarian work? It's those places where it's needed most.

Yes, I'm sure Google told you that information. I have explained already that unrest was confined to remote areas at that time, we were based about 30 miles outside the capital.

More deflection. 30 miles outside Kathmandu IS fairly remote. It's remote pretty much past Bakhtapur.

Still doesn't explain the relevance of you obtaining forged papers in Nepal means that loads of people obtained forged posters that got them into the UK. Entirely different things.

And no Google didn't tell me. I know a lot of first hand information about wars and disasters around the world.

Anyway, fun though this is, I will be waiting for you to get back to the salient facts - you claimed to know several staff and patients who travelled to the UK on forged papers. That's illegal. And also amazing given how unlikely it is that anyone would know that many people who got away with it and then also got asylum after entering on illegal papers. Although they also didn't, because the arrived with visas and claimed asylum. Which of those stories was true? You told two. I'll be waiting for you to confirm threat, not deflect more.

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:33

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 19:27

Are you including refugees from Ukraine?

And what are the incentives and liberal paradigm?

Where will you detain refugees and asylum seekers?

You edited to add human rights

Which human rights would you take away from asylum seekers?

Edited

The refugees from Ukraine were invited guests from a legal route. They were mainly women and children fleeing war. I'd have no issue with opening up other legal routes for genuine asylum seekers with families prioritised at numbers we can cope with. But this madness has to stop now.

The incentives are they know they'll get put up in a hotel, get an allowance, get all their meals paid for, NHS, free dentistry, a phone, playstations and whatever else. If their claim is rejected then all the liberal lawyers, judges, legal aids and human rights brigade will just keep at it until they're granted asylum.

We need to be building bases now where they can be detained. MOD must have bases anyway or offshore.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:35

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:33

The refugees from Ukraine were invited guests from a legal route. They were mainly women and children fleeing war. I'd have no issue with opening up other legal routes for genuine asylum seekers with families prioritised at numbers we can cope with. But this madness has to stop now.

The incentives are they know they'll get put up in a hotel, get an allowance, get all their meals paid for, NHS, free dentistry, a phone, playstations and whatever else. If their claim is rejected then all the liberal lawyers, judges, legal aids and human rights brigade will just keep at it until they're granted asylum.

We need to be building bases now where they can be detained. MOD must have bases anyway or offshore.

PlayStations 😂😂😂

You’re right. Imagine being in the human rights brigade and believing in human rights. Shocking.

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 19:36

lkjhgfdsa · 21/08/2025 19:33

They did what they had to do - much like the people on small boats then?

Absolutely, they did what they needed to do to travel as a family.

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:37

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:35

PlayStations 😂😂😂

You’re right. Imagine being in the human rights brigade and believing in human rights. Shocking.

Liberals never care about the human rights of victims of crime though. Only criminals.

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 19:37

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:33

The refugees from Ukraine were invited guests from a legal route. They were mainly women and children fleeing war. I'd have no issue with opening up other legal routes for genuine asylum seekers with families prioritised at numbers we can cope with. But this madness has to stop now.

The incentives are they know they'll get put up in a hotel, get an allowance, get all their meals paid for, NHS, free dentistry, a phone, playstations and whatever else. If their claim is rejected then all the liberal lawyers, judges, legal aids and human rights brigade will just keep at it until they're granted asylum.

We need to be building bases now where they can be detained. MOD must have bases anyway or offshore.

Ukrainians indeed had access to safe routes, the majority of refugees do not. It's not illegal to claim asylum using irregular means to reach the UK.

Incentives, basic accomodatio, food and health? Those other claims are just rubbish

Offshore detention camps? Where? How much will it cost and who will staff it?

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:38

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:37

Liberals never care about the human rights of victims of crime though. Only criminals.

Edited

Kindly, what are you on about?

Because it looks like you’re claiming all asylum seekers are criminals. Which is a bold claim.

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:41

Ukrainians indeed had access to safe routes, the majority of refugees do not.

The majority simply aren't refugees. We had thousands turning up in boats from Albania. They've passed through dozens of safe countries.

VaseofViolets · 21/08/2025 19:42

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:24

We have to take away the incentives and the liberal paradigm in Britain. How many asylum seekers are Poland accepting?

Illegal migrants need to be detained, not put up in hotels or houses and allowed to roam around town. Even Macron has told us we're nuts.

I think we need to announce an emergency freeze on all asylum applications while we can deal with a backlog. It's one big racket. But nobody has the guts to do anything that would actually be a deterrent anyway. Starmer was a human rights lawyer - he's the exact sort of liberal that has helped create the madness.

Edited

Even Macron thinks we’re crazy, and why does France have any incentive to stop these boats? They’re never going to stop them. The UK is France’s Rwanda.

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 19:43

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:41

Ukrainians indeed had access to safe routes, the majority of refugees do not.

The majority simply aren't refugees. We had thousands turning up in boats from Albania. They've passed through dozens of safe countries.

The majority have their claim granted.

Refugees do not have to claim asylum in the first safe country.

Where are you building detention camps?

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:43

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:38

Kindly, what are you on about?

Because it looks like you’re claiming all asylum seekers are criminals. Which is a bold claim.

They've paid human traffickers money to break into our country. They could be classed as criminals for doing that.

And i'd support the opening up of more safe routes (for numbers we can sustain) in exchange for stopping this unsustainable madness.

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 19:44

PhilippaGeorgiou · 21/08/2025 19:33

More deflection. 30 miles outside Kathmandu IS fairly remote. It's remote pretty much past Bakhtapur.

Still doesn't explain the relevance of you obtaining forged papers in Nepal means that loads of people obtained forged posters that got them into the UK. Entirely different things.

And no Google didn't tell me. I know a lot of first hand information about wars and disasters around the world.

Anyway, fun though this is, I will be waiting for you to get back to the salient facts - you claimed to know several staff and patients who travelled to the UK on forged papers. That's illegal. And also amazing given how unlikely it is that anyone would know that many people who got away with it and then also got asylum after entering on illegal papers. Although they also didn't, because the arrived with visas and claimed asylum. Which of those stories was true? You told two. I'll be waiting for you to confirm threat, not deflect more.

I was sharing a lived experience of exiting an unstable country using false papers.
Depends on your definition of remote, my definition is an area where a standard vehicle cannot access.

Not suprising at all, seeing as I work close to Heathrow. And as I work with disabled children, whose parents were desperate to get out of their country of origin as they couldn't access the medication and treatment their child desperately needed.

But this back and forth has derailed what is a useful discussion, so I think we should leave this here and agree to disagree, people are probably pretty fed up of this back and forth about a minor detail.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:45

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:41

Ukrainians indeed had access to safe routes, the majority of refugees do not.

The majority simply aren't refugees. We had thousands turning up in boats from Albania. They've passed through dozens of safe countries.

If they’re a refugee, their asylum has been granted.

Which means they’re allowed to be here, and that’s been recognised by the relevant legal channel.

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:45

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 19:43

The majority have their claim granted.

Refugees do not have to claim asylum in the first safe country.

Where are you building detention camps?

Even if they get refused they'll just keep appealing till we let them stay. If they've chucked their passport in the sea there's no point trying to return them so again they just get granted.

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 19:47

VaseofViolets · 21/08/2025 19:42

Even Macron thinks we’re crazy, and why does France have any incentive to stop these boats? They’re never going to stop them. The UK is France’s Rwanda.

France accommodates more asylum seekers than the UK

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:47

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:45

Even if they get refused they'll just keep appealing till we let them stay. If they've chucked their passport in the sea there's no point trying to return them so again they just get granted.

Because their nation of origin won’t let them in without their passport? Stop it, please 😂

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 19:48

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:45

Even if they get refused they'll just keep appealing till we let them stay. If they've chucked their passport in the sea there's no point trying to return them so again they just get granted.

And you have data to back up your claims?

MumOfManyAliases · 21/08/2025 19:49

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 19:47

France accommodates more asylum seekers than the UK

France is more than double the size of the UK.

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:49

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:47

Because their nation of origin won’t let them in without their passport? Stop it, please 😂

If we've no idea who they are or where they're from, how can we return them?

MumOfManyAliases · 21/08/2025 19:50

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 17:11

I thought we took back control of our borders with Brexit.

The Bournemouth hospitality sector for example relies on immigration, just that the migrant workers now come from outside of the EU.

We didn’t really get Brexit though, did we.

TopPocketFind · 21/08/2025 19:51

MumOfManyAliases · 21/08/2025 19:49

France is more than double the size of the UK.

Asylum seekers per capita

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:52

MumOfManyAliases · 21/08/2025 19:50

We didn’t really get Brexit though, did we.

The NHS certainly didn’t get their alleged money out of it, no.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 19:53

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:49

If we've no idea who they are or where they're from, how can we return them?

You’re right. We’ll have to keep them all and house them in our gardens.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 21/08/2025 19:53

User32459 · 21/08/2025 19:10

I think a lot of the public have snapped over immigration because of highly irresponsible immigration and open border policies and sheer cowardice from politicians to deal with the invasion from the small boats.

Within that, tensions are high and racism in society is sadly increasing.

IMO excessive liberalism has destroyed Britain, whether it's immigration, law and order, some of the trans stuff etc etc. Everything is liberal policy. We know we'll get that from Labour but for 14 years of the Tories governing as liberals on top and now we've got Labour back in and the public have finally snapped. Migrants coming here knowing here know they'll be treated like kings, and our liberal society will never remove them, so more and more are turning up.

Edited

We don't have an 'open border policy' and there's no 'invasion' happening.

If you think Tory austerity was 14 years of liberalism, you're grossly misinformed. Asylum seekers get £50 a week and Charles is a billionaire with several palaces. Can you spot the difference?

cardibach · 21/08/2025 19:53

MumOfManyAliases · 21/08/2025 19:50

We didn’t really get Brexit though, did we.

What do you mean? We left the EU. Of course we got Brexit.
Oh - you mean you didn’t get the promised unicorns? Nope. They were lies.