Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think that racism is getting a lot worse of late.

898 replies

AliceMaforethought · 20/08/2025 18:13

Just read this awful story in the Guardian. Awful and makes me feel so angry and so unsafe as a half Black woman.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/20/family-in-fear-after-tommy-robinson-shares-video-of-black-man-with-white-granddaughters

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
EmeraldShamrock000 · 21/08/2025 13:02

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 12:53

I wonder if we should introduce quotas into asylum claims (I'm sure I will be shot down), for certain numbers of makes, females, children etc. I absolutely accept that people are fleeing terrible dangerous conditions, with war, famine, persecution. But I struggle to comprehend why, if it's so dangerous that they need to leave, that men are leaving their women and children behind, whether that's their wives,sisters, nieces/nephews, own children. If it's so dangerous there, that getting in a small boat is felt to be less dangerous than staying. If we could only afford to send a couple of people, 100% my husband would send me and our daughter.

I believe it is sadly not safe for women and children to travel, many have been crushed or attacked.
Sadly, female immigrants suffer a high number of sexual assaults on their journey.
I think most people would be happy to see a balance, saving some mothers from a hellish life given a choice.
If they wanted to allow women have freedom, they would send them without men on board.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 21/08/2025 13:03

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 12:43

I lived there for 15 years, and have worked there for about 20, it really isn't a wonderful city. Yes the very centre, zone 1 has some great museums, theatre, restaurants, architecture, parks. But outside of that is is crowded, dirty, noisy, with people who act aggressively, pushing and shoving others out the way, not making eye contact.

Amazingly for such a dump it's incredibly popular and sought after as a place to live. I love living in London and take advantage of all the amenities and great infrastructure. You seem to have lived in a very run down part of the city and I'm sorry to hear that.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 13:03

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 12:53

I wonder if we should introduce quotas into asylum claims (I'm sure I will be shot down), for certain numbers of makes, females, children etc. I absolutely accept that people are fleeing terrible dangerous conditions, with war, famine, persecution. But I struggle to comprehend why, if it's so dangerous that they need to leave, that men are leaving their women and children behind, whether that's their wives,sisters, nieces/nephews, own children. If it's so dangerous there, that getting in a small boat is felt to be less dangerous than staying. If we could only afford to send a couple of people, 100% my husband would send me and our daughter.

My partner would absolutely not send me and our 8 year old to our potential deaths crossing the ocean.

He would do that journey, apply for asylum, and then apply for a family visa (for example) so we could then follow. Because that’s the sensible approach.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 21/08/2025 13:09

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 12:53

I wonder if we should introduce quotas into asylum claims (I'm sure I will be shot down), for certain numbers of makes, females, children etc. I absolutely accept that people are fleeing terrible dangerous conditions, with war, famine, persecution. But I struggle to comprehend why, if it's so dangerous that they need to leave, that men are leaving their women and children behind, whether that's their wives,sisters, nieces/nephews, own children. If it's so dangerous there, that getting in a small boat is felt to be less dangerous than staying. If we could only afford to send a couple of people, 100% my husband would send me and our daughter.

The only way a quota would work would be in a similar way to the EU who distribute refugees. Otherwise you can't refuse to process asylum seekers.

If your husband sent you and your daughters how would you get out of the country without a chaperone and what about predators including human traffickers who prey on the vulnerable?

Gladysknightjustwalkinmyshoes · 21/08/2025 13:09

BIossomtoes · 21/08/2025 10:09

Well Alf Garnett didn’t appear from nowhere, did he?

Or love thy neighbour
Mind your language.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 21/08/2025 13:10

PhilippaGeorgiou · 21/08/2025 12:18

@MiloMinderbinder925 There will always be people who don't want foreigners in the country and who want Britain white.

I am old enough to recall Norman Tebbits "cricket test" of Britishness with the implication that anyone who supported any other team than England should be deported. I immediately started supporting the West Indies. Regrettably I am still stuck with British weather...

I remember that too. Dreadful man.

FreezeDriedStrawberries · 21/08/2025 13:10

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 13:03

My partner would absolutely not send me and our 8 year old to our potential deaths crossing the ocean.

He would do that journey, apply for asylum, and then apply for a family visa (for example) so we could then follow. Because that’s the sensible approach.

That's exactly my thinking - thinking back to when my kids were small toddlers, would it really be a good idea to trek possibly hundreds of miles with them and then start a perilous sea journey in a little boat?! Some days just going to the corner shop seemed a mammoth expedition, can't imagine a refugees journey! Makes sense to try and get a life established somewhere else first and then move.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 21/08/2025 13:13

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 12:53

I wonder if we should introduce quotas into asylum claims (I'm sure I will be shot down), for certain numbers of makes, females, children etc. I absolutely accept that people are fleeing terrible dangerous conditions, with war, famine, persecution. But I struggle to comprehend why, if it's so dangerous that they need to leave, that men are leaving their women and children behind, whether that's their wives,sisters, nieces/nephews, own children. If it's so dangerous there, that getting in a small boat is felt to be less dangerous than staying. If we could only afford to send a couple of people, 100% my husband would send me and our daughter.

Because:
(a) Most women and children would struggle to survive the journey. It isn't just about from Calais to Kent. It won't have been a picnic getting to Calais.
(b) Women and children are at higher risk of trafficking and/or sex crimes.
(c) Women and children are unlikely to have marketable skills, and so would be unlikely to be able to meet the requirements for reuniting family.
(d) In many countries it is the men who are most at immediate risk - whilst women can and do play an active part in society, in repressive countries it is often the men who speak out or are involved in opposition. The need to flee can be very immediate too, so packing a removal van tends not to be the first thought.

You might think that your husband would send you and your daughter to safety first. From a comfortable western perspective, that's lovely. He'd no doubt put you on a plane to a nice safe place. But would he expect you and your daughter to manage a tortuous journey overland and by sea, with no possessions other than what you can carry, over thousands of miles, and organised by people who you know are only interested in the money they make from it. To be blunt - do you know what a five year goes for in places in Europe? Do you know how much you can make from a trafficked sex worker?

Is that genuinely what your husband would do then?

Gladysknightjustwalkinmyshoes · 21/08/2025 13:14

MiloMinderbinder925 · 21/08/2025 13:10

I remember that too. Dreadful man.

Just as well Scotland's part of the UK or the majority of us would have been jettisoned to some far flung corner of the Empire.🤣🤣

EmeraldShamrock000 · 21/08/2025 13:14

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 13:03

My partner would absolutely not send me and our 8 year old to our potential deaths crossing the ocean.

He would do that journey, apply for asylum, and then apply for a family visa (for example) so we could then follow. Because that’s the sensible approach.

Would he leave you both behind in a war zone to be potentially murdered and raped for a few years while he applied for asylum?
I understand that it is horrendous.
A desperate situation.

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 13:15

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 13:03

My partner would absolutely not send me and our 8 year old to our potential deaths crossing the ocean.

He would do that journey, apply for asylum, and then apply for a family visa (for example) so we could then follow. Because that’s the sensible approach.

But that could take a few years, and if the place that leaving is so terrible, the wife and child may not even survive this wait.

While both staying and the journey are both risky, staying is clearly the more risky of the 2 options, otherwise no one would leave, so why would any man chose the more risky option for his wife and child than himself. In many of the oppressed countries, women are at much higher risk, due to the inherent misogyny. If a women cannot leave the house or work, how can she support herself and her child whilst her husband is making the journey, applying for asylum, finding a job, applying for a visa...

And women and children do make the journey, I think someone above posted that 20,000 children arrived by boat, so it is possible for then to make the journey.

Livelovebehappy · 21/08/2025 13:15

Note also that the majority of the UK do not want existing settled immigrants to be made to leave the UK which is scaremongering and escalating the situation. That's not the case amongst the majority at all. It's now an issue only because of the huge numbers coming into the UK during the last decade. That's what people want addressing - bring the numbers down and find a process (which works!) to stop people arriving on boats. Our infrastructure is on its knees. I honestly struggle to see where migrants are now going to be housed following the legal challenge by councils to stop hotels being used.

ForWittyTealOP · 21/08/2025 13:18

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 13:15

But that could take a few years, and if the place that leaving is so terrible, the wife and child may not even survive this wait.

While both staying and the journey are both risky, staying is clearly the more risky of the 2 options, otherwise no one would leave, so why would any man chose the more risky option for his wife and child than himself. In many of the oppressed countries, women are at much higher risk, due to the inherent misogyny. If a women cannot leave the house or work, how can she support herself and her child whilst her husband is making the journey, applying for asylum, finding a job, applying for a visa...

And women and children do make the journey, I think someone above posted that 20,000 children arrived by boat, so it is possible for then to make the journey.

Edited

Again, read the article I posted about the Sudanese refugee. He was kidnapped multiple times on his journey, including several times by people saying they'd organise passage across the channel on a small boat. A husband may have a chance of surviving the journey, albeit with terrible trauma, a woman and child unaccompanied would not.

Chickenbone123 · 21/08/2025 13:20

MiloMinderbinder925 · 21/08/2025 12:42

There are nearly 70m in the UK, how do you know that they're all talking about immigration?

Why are the people you know talking about immigration and only immigration? How come they're not talking about the effects of austerity and lack of investment for example? Why are they soley focused on foreigners?

Why is crime being blamed on foreigners? Why not a crumbling judicial system, failing prison service, lack of probation staff, lack of police and massive back log in cases?

Why are foreigners being blamed for domestic violence and misogyny in the UK? Women are predominantly abused and sexually assaulted by people they know and stranger attacks are rare.

Why are foreigners being blamed for lack of housing? How come all these people you know aren't discussing right to buy, deregulation of BTL and lack of investment in affordable housing?

I don’t know all obviously. But I do believe I have a very representative distribution of contacts. I have never got an election prediction wrong.

If it was tomorrow reform would win. We should all be worried about that.

And yes they are talking about all that. That’s part of the issue (besides the cultural issues). We are in scarcity mindset.

ForWittyTealOP · 21/08/2025 13:20

Livelovebehappy · 21/08/2025 13:15

Note also that the majority of the UK do not want existing settled immigrants to be made to leave the UK which is scaremongering and escalating the situation. That's not the case amongst the majority at all. It's now an issue only because of the huge numbers coming into the UK during the last decade. That's what people want addressing - bring the numbers down and find a process (which works!) to stop people arriving on boats. Our infrastructure is on its knees. I honestly struggle to see where migrants are now going to be housed following the legal challenge by councils to stop hotels being used.

I doubt the minority who are bothered about refugees being housed in hotels would be happy to see safe, legal routes opened up and refugees housed within local communities. Call me cynical but I'm not sure that's their burning desire.

GodSaveTheClean · 21/08/2025 13:20

Trying living in and working in a place like Bournemouth.

At least 3 hotels housing immigrants, with stabbings and in-fighting going unreported in the press.

The ‘women and children’ of these families are not seen.

The men however hang out in the town in groups; intimidating, leering and harassing for money. It’s unpleasant and people don’t go out at lunchtime now in certain areas now because of the jeering. It’s a complex issue but the impact on our daily life is so apparent and unfair. It’s scary. You cannot speak on in publicly as you are called a racist.

Stating facts isn’t being racist.

JHound · 21/08/2025 13:22

Hereforthecommentz · 20/08/2025 22:29

She means the white liberal middle class that like to take offence on behalf of everyone else. The ones that claim to hate racism then patronise and belittle them. Malcom x did warn of these people.

Edited

It’s hilarious how people cherry pick Malcolm X.

You should read his quote in full context.

Chickenbone123 · 21/08/2025 13:22

PhilippaGeorgiou · 21/08/2025 12:50

@Chickenbone123 EVERYONE is talking about this. And the majority are not happy with the status quo.

The problem being, as these threads continue to demonstrate. Talking about something and knowing what you are talking about are not remotely the same thing.
E.g.
"They aren't genuine asylum seekers" - well actually the figures show that some 70% of the are.

And to be fair, I am also not happy with the status quo. Doesn't mean I agree with you, because I don't.

How do you know what I think 😂 I haven’t given my personal view, more a collective view of what I am seeing.

You might think exactly the same as me, probably not but who knows.

ForWittyTealOP · 21/08/2025 13:23

Chickenbone123 · 21/08/2025 13:20

I don’t know all obviously. But I do believe I have a very representative distribution of contacts. I have never got an election prediction wrong.

If it was tomorrow reform would win. We should all be worried about that.

And yes they are talking about all that. That’s part of the issue (besides the cultural issues). We are in scarcity mindset.

Reform wouldn't win tomorrow, they don't have the candidates apart from anything else. Let's not make far right government a self fulfilling prophecy. We can and must resist.

nomas · 21/08/2025 13:23

Ablondiebutagoody · 20/08/2025 18:24

I think that you are right. People are getting very twitchy about illegal immigrants hanging around play areas etc. and innocent guys like this playing with family end up caught in the crossfire.

This is almost victim blaming and passing the blame on to immigrants, when the culprit (Stephen Yucky Lemon) is a white racist.

Chickenbone123 · 21/08/2025 13:25

ForWittyTealOP · 21/08/2025 13:23

Reform wouldn't win tomorrow, they don't have the candidates apart from anything else. Let's not make far right government a self fulfilling prophecy. We can and must resist.

Well that’s good news. If they had the candidates I believe they would though. Or if it was all votes count not FPTP.

I also believe for the majority of the population migration would probably rank in top 3 voter issues.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 13:26

Bushmillsbabe · 21/08/2025 13:15

But that could take a few years, and if the place that leaving is so terrible, the wife and child may not even survive this wait.

While both staying and the journey are both risky, staying is clearly the more risky of the 2 options, otherwise no one would leave, so why would any man chose the more risky option for his wife and child than himself. In many of the oppressed countries, women are at much higher risk, due to the inherent misogyny. If a women cannot leave the house or work, how can she support herself and her child whilst her husband is making the journey, applying for asylum, finding a job, applying for a visa...

And women and children do make the journey, I think someone above posted that 20,000 children arrived by boat, so it is possible for then to make the journey.

Edited

My child would have to be in imminent danger of death, and I mean literally knocking on the door within the next 5mins, for me to even contemplate that journey. Those doing it must be really truly desperate.

I can’t imagine bundling him onto a boat, and I don’t think my partner would enjoy having to leave him behind so he could do it instead.

SleeplessInWherever · 21/08/2025 13:27

ForWittyTealOP · 21/08/2025 13:20

I doubt the minority who are bothered about refugees being housed in hotels would be happy to see safe, legal routes opened up and refugees housed within local communities. Call me cynical but I'm not sure that's their burning desire.

Precisely. The hotels aren’t the problem, they don’t want them anywhere in their community.

Livelovebehappy · 21/08/2025 13:28

ForWittyTealOP · 21/08/2025 13:20

I doubt the minority who are bothered about refugees being housed in hotels would be happy to see safe, legal routes opened up and refugees housed within local communities. Call me cynical but I'm not sure that's their burning desire.

I don't yhink that's doable. There are no spare houses, or very few. We only have to look at waiting lists for social housing to realise that's not going to work I'm afraid. If someone is allowed to leap frog over someone else who is on a ten year waiting list for a home, thats going to open a whole new can of worms...

user2848502016 · 21/08/2025 13:28

I think you’re right- my friend is mixed race and her lovely mum was shouted at to “go home” a few months ago by some young lads.
This is a lady in her late 70s who’s been in the UK since the 60s and worked her whole career as an NHS nurse 🤬
Said she’s not had anything like that happen to her since the early 80s

Swipe left for the next trending thread