i do think there are some minority circumstances where it may be proportionate to restrict services or facilities by “birth sex”. Eg particular health services perhaps or specialist rape crisis support.
Oh how magnanimous of you to consider maybe allowing some, very specialist services and support to remain segregated by "birth sex"🙄
Maybe is a word that has cropped up a lot with you in previous threads when asked directly which of these services and supports you would consider allowing. It's a very politician answer that really means "as few as humanly possible, if not none".
HOWEVER, it’s completely unacceptable to make basic services like toilets inaccessible and unsafe for trans people by compelling them to use them in accordance with their birth sex. This is not legitimate or proportionate. It is deeply discriminatory.
No one is saying trans identified people must be excluded from basic services like toilets or that they should be compelled to use the toilets of their biological sex only. They are free to use the mixed sex toilets if they want to, just not the toilets of the opposite sex. That's against the law and morally wrong to boot.
How are the men's toilets unsafe for trans identifying males? Can you provide any actual evidence of attacks made on trans identifying males using the men's toilets? I mean you'd think it'd be huge news right? We're always being told they are the most vulnerable people so surely there's lots of news articles you can lay your hands on which support this?
due to a total lack of insight, understanding or empathy on your part.
Yeah I think I'll save my empathy for actual females, same as my feminism.