To think that white British/ American etcmen are just as much a threat to women as migrants?

[malificent7]

I am not excusing grooming, paedophile sex rings and unmonitored immigration at all but I hate all these protests.
I know that my white male ex teacher is a sex offender. Not to mention the Epstein scandal.
Aibu to think that ALL men are a danger to women...not just men of different ethnicities/ religions etc?

The Rwanda scheme was found to be illegal due to the principle of non refoulement. You can see more here:
https://gardencourtchambers.co.uk/rwanda-judgment-supreme-court-unanimously-rules-rwanda-policy-is-unlawful/

If Starmer finds a third country, it needs to be within the law. For example, holding people indefinitely is a breach of the law.

Rwanda wasn't set up as an offshore processing location.

Refugees would have been sent there to claim asylum in Rwanda without being allowed back in the UK

Rape is ubiquitous everywhere on the planet, so more people from other countries isn't the problem, the problem is letting in more people who are male. Increasing the % of the male population will obviously lead to more rape, as well as to an increase in other violent crimes.

I don’t consider my comment as “silly” explain what other “needs” we should be providing?

We can’t even cover the basic needs for our own popu

I think there has to be more international cooperation where countries who aren't getting as big of an influx would agree to take some of the refugees. There needs to be a G7 summit where agreements can be hammered out.

That’s unfortunate. Why are we bothered about their human rights if they’ve raped for example? They should have forfeited any right to stay here once they committed the crime. Why should we be in danger from them but be forced to let them stay?

Like where? What do they get in return? How do we educate those coming here that they must abide by our laws, customs, language, culture and values. How can we ensure full integration

Apologies, I assume a certain level of understanding of English.

Basic needs are requirements for human survival. For example, food, water, shelter, medical attention.

Having all your needs met would include for example, a car, good job, stability, loving family, support network, tech, holidays.

I hope that explains things for you. Basic = necessities for survival or the bare minimum.

Unfortunately for those who don't care about human rights is that the UK sees itself as a civilised society that adheres to certain fundamental values. One of those values is the principle that human rights apply equally to everyone.

https://www.rescue.org/uk/integration-services-refugees-uk

You mean which countries? Other G7 nations which haven't had the same level of inundation of refugees. I'm in Canada and we have plenty of space to take more refugees. Unfortunately, we're in an economic war with the US right now so we probably couldn't afford it at present. But once Trump is gone we should do our part and take some refugees for our UK friends. So should the rest of the Commonwealth. We do take in a lot of refugees, but we could do more. Europe shouldn't have to shoulder this burden alone. The US should help too, but fat chance of that happening with Trump in office and so much of the population being virulently racist.
I think integration happens naturally over time, that is if the native population cooperates in making it clear that certain behaviour, which may have been tolerated in the old country, will not be tolerated in the new one. It's not something you can teach in a class or learn from a lecture, it has to be learned through personal experience.

You do know it still could go ahead?

Starmer’s running out of road. He did the you’re not staying social media blitz to emulate a country with an effective policy and everyone relying crossings saw straight through it.

He can’t up the ante from there with rhetoric. There’s no more ‘ground breaking’ or ‘game changing’ stuff to try to sell in.

British men generally hold women in contempt. Especially any woman who does not conform or does not "know her place".

A lot of British men are socially homosexual. They do not like women, many hate women.

I don’t think this is true at all. Yes some men are like this but the vast majority of British men I know are respectful to women, enjoy their company, many champion women’s rights. I have many male friends and not a single one is as you describe. I have come across the occasional one- but they’re not my friend

I respectfully disagree. Many British men are not as nice to women than a lot of other nationalities are.

I do have male friends who are respectful and kind, these sorts I believe are in the minority.

So we need to stop all male visitors and all male immigration - legal or illegal because more males = more rapes.

More rapists = more rapes.

Less punishments = more rapes.

More support for rapists = more rapes.

More victim blaming = more rapes.

Less support for victims = more rapes.

More turning a blind eye to sex crimes = more rapes.

All of the above we do as a country - we actively encourage rape as a society by supporting the perpetrators and not the victim. Rape is increasing not only because more rapists are coming into the country but how we treat rapists and victims is enabling more rape.

So your plan would be to stop the boat people but let all other rapists in and continue to support rapists and ignoring victims. Great plan!

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/lbc-presenter-fact-checks-nigel-farages-claim-small-boats-have-made-uk-more-dangerous-for-women-and-girls_uk_689c3511e4b03bdc474fe8cd

I believe James McMurdock and George Cottrell are heading Reform's next conference on VAWAG as they're quite experienced.