I watched it, having read the Guardian interview.
I teach some lessons on enthusiastic, sober consent and about discrimination. It's important to see what our young teens are being exposed to and many young men have been exposed to the likes of Tate and Blue. Some show misogynistic attitudes in the classroom (sexualised moans out loud), talk about sigma/simp, label on looks.
You need to know what you're dealing with.
I saw The Annabel Chong story years ago. She was the first to do this kind of stunt. Turns out she had been gang raped previously, so there was trauma there. She did gender studies and defended it as performance art then much later became a software engineer.
Tia/BB cannot have children and her husband has promoted her doing this in the past. They have now split and he'll presumably take half of what she's worth. Her family are all on the payroll. What I found bizarre/heinous was her right hand man/co-producer friend used to work with traumatised kids and has now gone into this line of work. The disconnect there...I have no words.
Tia comes across as business-savvy - the kind of woman you'd see on The Apprentice - and her USP whilst grim* was clever for that line of work.
Virgins: <STDs, <endowed compared with male performers, <overheads (weren't being paid), >quick and some would be pathetically grateful hence Tia can tell herself she's doing the world a favour/active community service.
She's now in a situation where she is pushed into treating the job as endurance/performance to justify the pain (David Blaine/Marina Abromavic)
*25/2+7= 19.5
18 year olds, giving written consent or not was always going to be nonce territory hence her being labelled predatory. Her involving other young women for more clicks is not going to help her escape that label. She's on dodgy ground.
Sadly, there are so many young women now seeking self-validation by likes. The TikTok reels and sexualisation - pouting duck face/lip sync/dancing content they are putting out there is a safeguarding concern. Many schools are aware of this social contagion.
Some young men have been fed the Tate/manosphere bs. I have hope that if enough teachers are tackling it together, they will come to realise it's all bollocks. I watched the Blue/Tate podcast, so you don't have to, and it was abysmal/beyond stupid trolling. In short, he insists society is screwed because women are no longer obedient virginal wife material, men have a biological imperative, he himself no longer puts sex as a priority as he's top of the pyramid and any man nurturing children is gay, as is any man in a gangbang because of semen cross-contamination. She thinks she's bringing down rape statistics, doing a community service by teaching virgins what women want (what, in 38 seconds?!) and that she's honest in what she does and why (using her body to make enough money to live well, although does not mention how much she'd be happy with and when she'd retire. She just said she would never recant/find religion/blame others at a later date).
It is beyond depressing and makes social media even more dangerous for our young people. Bad enough with influencers/towie/Geordie shore/love island, and trying to explain don't do selfies/nudes/share images even with consenting partners, but now young women see Only Fans as a viable job (Ooh Lily Allen's making cash out of men using her feet) or both sexes see influencing/content creating as an easy way of making quick money (Sure it can be for some but there's the ongoing pressure there of what to use next).
Jon Ronson's deep dive into August Ames's death shone a light into the murkiness and vulnerability of those in the porn industry. And Grace Qwen was a couple of decades ago. Plus ca change. Maybe AI [shudders] and sexbots will eventually replace sex workers and performers but what is missing in all of this debate is the need for authentic, real relationships and rapport. This realisation is what hopefully any young, intelligent adult will come to without viewing it as "boring". That's your problem right there: fast life, dopamine hits, the next new shiny thing, extremes becoming the norm, kinks and niches becoming vanilla.
TLDR: I am relieved one of my children is a lesbian and the other is asexual. 
Also, was it not Henry Vii who was Henry Tudor not Henry Viii? Not sure his mistresses had that much choice. And he married Catherine of Aragon at his dad's behest (Catherine was his dead brother's widow, their marriage kept our allegiance with Spain).