Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Immigration population up another 700k

1000 replies

Atallglassimdof · 30/07/2025 23:35

I understand that this country needs immigration but if you import 100,000s of low skilled workers, in their 30s and 40s, how are they going to fund their retirement or pay for their housing?

It just seems counterintuitive to bring loads of people into this country who will need considerable financial support ( housing benefits, pension credits) when they are no longer able to work, and don’t have the means to support themselves.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
BlueBelle7979 · 31/07/2025 08:07

Atallglassimdof · 30/07/2025 23:46

Not saying they are all low skilled workers but a fair number are… care home workers for example.

You do realise that a lot of these are highly qualified in their home countries.

EasternStandard · 31/07/2025 08:09

AgnesX · 31/07/2025 08:02

Yawn. Reform Central on the late shift?

Always on these threads, this presumably Labour take.

Quirkswork · 31/07/2025 08:10

VickyEadieofThigh · 31/07/2025 08:00

Then you should be asking why care home workers aren't paid a wage that enables them to save into a pension. Or are you suggesting we don't actually need care home workers?

Care home workers should be paid a much greater wage than they are which should hopefully attract people to the profession. Otherwise we will carry on importing people that work for low wages, like some sort of poor serving indentured underclass. It always surprises me that people use that as an argument for more immigration. Come and serve us, poor people of the World!

Izz81 · 31/07/2025 08:11

labtest57 · 31/07/2025 07:58

No they are not too lazy!! In my area 90+% of care workers are white British. You can keep defending low pay, crap hours etc, cos some poor immigrant will do it. When I worked in community care I wasnt even paid a petrol allowance so effectively was earning less than minimal wage, once transport costs were taken into account. I'd be out from 6 in the morning til gone 10 at night 6 days a week. My rota could change an hour before I was due to finish if other staff failed to turn up, so making plans was impossible. But you would rather it stayed like that than have carers paid what they're worth, and then accuse people who, for many reasons, can't accept those working conditions, of laziness.

Its disgusting people still hold on to that Blair propaganda from the late 90s as an excuse to open up to huge levels of immigration! Ive worked in the care industry and hospitality and warehouse all of which they used to say this and honestly the British are by far the hardest workers in them AND find it the most difficult to get the jobs anyway as a lot of these agencies are now run by foreign nationals who recruit their own or run by people who would rather recruit foreign nationals cheaply and on awful contracts.

Quirkswork · 31/07/2025 08:11

BlueBelle7979 · 31/07/2025 08:07

You do realise that a lot of these are highly qualified in their home countries.

It's a shame we take them here to work for us rather than benefiting their own country.

Kelticgold · 31/07/2025 08:13

Atallglassimdof · 30/07/2025 23:59

They should be recruiting from the UK workforce. There are loads of people seeking work but won’t work in a care home because it’s low paid.

Then we need to accept that we need to pay more tax (to pay for the wage rise)

The alternative would be looking after our own parents at home.

We can not have it all.

Alexandra2001 · 31/07/2025 08:14

labtest57 · 31/07/2025 07:31

By paying better and improving conditions. Not by allowing it to remain as it is because there will always be people with no choice but to accept current conditions.

...but its a tax payer funded service, albeit in the private sector, you want higher wages, then that means a combination of higher taxes or cuts elsewhere and greater contributions from those with assets, so scrap the 23k threshold.

Reeves put up taxes, to a huge outcry of horror, so which taxes should she put up to pay for higher wages?

Quirkswork · 31/07/2025 08:16

Alexandra2001 · 31/07/2025 08:14

...but its a tax payer funded service, albeit in the private sector, you want higher wages, then that means a combination of higher taxes or cuts elsewhere and greater contributions from those with assets, so scrap the 23k threshold.

Reeves put up taxes, to a huge outcry of horror, so which taxes should she put up to pay for higher wages?

Pay train drivers less (it should all be automated anyway).

Pay careworkers more

The problem is Labour is run by t'unions so they can't.

ElectoralControversy · 31/07/2025 08:26

GAJLY · 31/07/2025 08:03

I work in translation services and my main work is supporting immigrants with benefits. They seem to go onto and stay on benefits for life. They can hardly speak English and apply for jobs they know they cannot do, meaning they never get offered a job. They all seem to get a free house much quicker than non immigrants because of their status. No hate here, they're perfectly nice and polite to me. Just seems to be a pattern and most of the ones I support said they come here for a free house and benefits. Half of them are in the process of bringing their wife then parents over who don't ever work (because housewives and elderly don't work). I'm paid al ot of money to Interpret full time, because there's so many of them.

Uh huh

Can you talk me through the pathway by which a recent immigrant (entering on a skilled worker visa or...?) claims a free house and goes on benefits? Sounds like you're an expert.

Jennps · 31/07/2025 08:29

suburberphobe · 30/07/2025 23:37

Is that you Nigel?

Are you economically and fiscally illiterate? To have completely missed OP’s point..

Alexandra2001 · 31/07/2025 08:29

Quirkswork · 31/07/2025 08:16

Pay train drivers less (it should all be automated anyway).

Pay careworkers more

The problem is Labour is run by t'unions so they can't.

Be serious, there are 100s of 1000s of care workers and very few train drivers, slash their wages and they'll pay less tax...

Automation will cost 100s of billions, maybe we could pay MPs less to pay for it? lol!

One might ask how we got into this situation.. clue, it was a govt quite happy to let in millions of workers/dependents in over the last 14 years from 3rd world countries, even going against UN rules and taking workers from places like Nepal, a red list country, western countries barred from taking workers but that didn't stop the Tories.....

LlttledrummergirI · 31/07/2025 08:30

It always amazes me how many of these types of threads are started late at night, the sheer numbers of loud, anti immigration posts full of lies and disinformation posted about how bad it is for Britain when the majority of British people are asleep, and then how the tone changes in the morning and through the day when the majority of those who live in Britain wake up.

I'd love to do a Venn diagram one day.

TheGander · 31/07/2025 08:32

Maybe the government could build council houses available solely for care workers born in this country, who have been working in care for at least 5 years. That would ease some of the recruitment issues.

ElectoralControversy · 31/07/2025 08:33

How have we got this far on the thread without anyone pointing out that you need to earn over 41k to get a skilled worker visa?

Has noone actually applied for a mid-level job recently? They usually have in the small print THIS SALARY WILL NOT QUALIFY FOE A SKILLED WORKER VISA

So no, we're not importing all those 'skilled worker' list jobs wholesale, unless salaries in them have massively increased since I last looked

Immigration population up another 700k
Smittenkitchen · 31/07/2025 08:33

Atallglassimdof · 31/07/2025 00:24

There are a high number of kids who go into catering college or hospitality. There is a pathway at 16 for kids to go into this field.m and 1000s do.

What are you actually talking about?? You've just contradicted your previous post asking why young British people aren't being trained in those sectors. As you've just said, they are.

Quirkswork · 31/07/2025 08:33

Alexandra2001 · 31/07/2025 08:29

Be serious, there are 100s of 1000s of care workers and very few train drivers, slash their wages and they'll pay less tax...

Automation will cost 100s of billions, maybe we could pay MPs less to pay for it? lol!

One might ask how we got into this situation.. clue, it was a govt quite happy to let in millions of workers/dependents in over the last 14 years from 3rd world countries, even going against UN rules and taking workers from places like Nepal, a red list country, western countries barred from taking workers but that didn't stop the Tories.....

The Labour government gave train drivers (already extremely well paid) a huge pay rise as soon as they came in. They did not give careworkers the same pay rise. Why did they make that choice? Because they are in hock to the unions. AND because you can import cheap careworkers from the third world but not traindrivers.

TeenagersAngst · 31/07/2025 08:34

Such a shame this thread has degenerated into accusations of racism when I don’t believe I read any racist comments from OP.

A couple of excellent posts from @GeneralPeterwhich very few people have replied to on the economic impacts of our addiction to immigration. Can some of those shouting ‘but racism’ and not engaging with the original post perhaps give some thought to that?

Also, a few posts reflecting on how sad it is that we no longer see training our own homegrown school leavers and graduates as economically viable. I totally agree.

Wowwee1234 · 31/07/2025 08:34

Yep, the far right have found mums net and are sowing the seeds of division and trying to stoke the flames of hate. Have to be alert to this insidious xeonphobia.

Quirkswork · 31/07/2025 08:35

TeenagersAngst · 31/07/2025 08:34

Such a shame this thread has degenerated into accusations of racism when I don’t believe I read any racist comments from OP.

A couple of excellent posts from @GeneralPeterwhich very few people have replied to on the economic impacts of our addiction to immigration. Can some of those shouting ‘but racism’ and not engaging with the original post perhaps give some thought to that?

Also, a few posts reflecting on how sad it is that we no longer see training our own homegrown school leavers and graduates as economically viable. I totally agree.

Good post. The post following it made me laugh.

JHound · 31/07/2025 08:36

Is there a link to the 700k figure?

MorningLarkEchoes · 31/07/2025 08:36

Kelticgold · 31/07/2025 08:13

Then we need to accept that we need to pay more tax (to pay for the wage rise)

The alternative would be looking after our own parents at home.

We can not have it all.

It would surely come from the fees that the care homes charge? Not tax.

chalkfloss · 31/07/2025 08:37

I'm from a small town where there has been a huge amount of immigration from India and Africa over the past few years. Most delivery drivers and garage shop workers appear to be Indian and care workers and security guards appear to be from Africa. My local residential area is still majority white British but much more ethnically diverse that it has ever been. Now most classrooms will have at least a few non-white kids of immigrant parents.

My initial observations is that this has been really good for my small town. In the town centre shops that have been empty for a decade have been re-opened, we have new interesting restaurants and cafes. Old unused offices have been turned into churches. More kids in general means more groups and activities opening up for them like sports clubs, dancing classes etc. A bit of life has been brough back to the town, which is a very positive thing in my view.

I suppose I worry though that issues could emerge down the line. Its one thing for the parents to make a choice to move to a different country in a different part of the world and for them to see their immediate financial situation improve when doing jobs that British people prefer not to do due to unsociable hours, low pay or perceived low status but how will their children and grandchildren feel about their prospects? The UK is a country with low social mobility and huge inequality compared to other developed countries. This means that these peoples kids will grow up with the same aspirations as British kids from low income families but face the same poverty traps.

Essentially what I am trying to say is that the real issue is inequality, poor pay, corporate welfare through in work benefits benefits which top up pay when companies should be paying fair wages and paying the tax they actually owe the government instead of huge bonuses to their board and shareholders. It will be this inequality that leads to problems down the line and that cuts across those who are recent arrivals and people whose families have been in Britain for centuries.

JHound · 31/07/2025 08:38

Quirkswork · 31/07/2025 08:33

The Labour government gave train drivers (already extremely well paid) a huge pay rise as soon as they came in. They did not give careworkers the same pay rise. Why did they make that choice? Because they are in hock to the unions. AND because you can import cheap careworkers from the third world but not traindrivers.

Why do you think you can’t import railway workers?

Although yes - unions fight for and secure benefits for their member workforces. Maybe care workers should try the same?

ElectoralControversy · 31/07/2025 08:38

GeneralPeter · 31/07/2025 01:36

A worker earning half the UK average wage and arriving at 25 costs the taxpayer a net £151,000 by the time they retire, per the OBR. Then add post-retirement costs and, some estimates get to about £500k per person. The older they are when the arrive, the greater the cost. If they have dependents that number rises too.

These mathematical chickens will come home to roost.

It’s not just care work. Many sectors have become reliant on low-paid immigrant labour.

https://www.ft.com/content/ca441a61-6feb-4d94-970a-b83b75b8dcd0

Care and healthcare work is badly paid in part because of the quasi-monopsony market, where the govt ends up footing much of the wage bill (via councils or the NHS). It suits them to hold costs in the present down. This simply disguises the costs, and passes them on to later generations.

We need to totally restructure. Those jobs need to be paid the full true market rate, so they are no longer a drain on public finances, and because the monopsony is a market distortion that keeps pay unreasonably low. It adds a lot of cost in the present and is therefore politically virtually impossible for as long as so much of the cost is state-funded.

If we can do that, then I’m relaxed about whether the jobs are chosen by British people or immigrants. The problem is not the nationalities, it’s the economics.

Edited

The UK median wage is currently £37k.

If anyone is earning half that I sincerely hope they'll report their employer for paying well under the minimum wage.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.