Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask what you think about Starmer’s plan to stop the boats?

1000 replies

WhereIsMyJumper · 10/07/2025 22:30

I cannot see how his ‘one in one out’ plan is going to help. I also can’t understand why France is cooperating with us. What’s the incentive?

If you don’t agree with this plan, what would your answer be?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg6x4g6gg6t

Starmer says 'one in, one out' migrant deal with France to begin within weeks

He says small boats migrants will be returned to France, in exchange for asylum seekers who have not tried to enter the UK illegally.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/ckg6x4g6gg6t

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Jennps · 11/07/2025 00:11

BoredZelda · 10/07/2025 23:48

I agree. Nobody is attempting to come here for shits and giggles. Nor for a tenner a week and soggy cheese sandwiches. When your best option is to make this journey (and the boat is only the last bit of a pretty horrific journey) what is your worst option?

The best thing the government could do is fast track the applications of those asylum seekers already here, letting the ones who have a right to remain become economically active and start paying tax, returning those who do not have a right to remain, which will cut down the ongoing bill for accommodation. Then the tiny number who come in on the boats can be quickly dealt with and it’s no longer an issue. Sadly, this will not be seen as acceptable because Reform voters just don’t want those brown people in our Country. (They were happy enough for the Ukrainians to come) They can shout about numbers and doctors and schools and being full etc, but guess what? The area I live in has very little immigration and yet we still have schools which are full and can’t get a doctor’s appointment.

The people coming over will never contribute enough to even pay for themselves or their large extended families that the join them.

You do know that are not net contributors? Not a value judgement, just factually accurate.

BoredZelda · 11/07/2025 00:12

SquishedMallow · 11/07/2025 00:03

100%

I've said it before and I'll say it again. ..

If you're fleeing persecution and your children and wives lives are in danger, you do not bypass a whole host of safe neighboring European first world civilised countries to get across a known choppy watered dangerous channel to reach the UK. It's staggeringly naïve to think otherwise.

The excuses the do gooders harm to society causers try to scrape the barrel to muster.

"Well they might prefer an English speaking country. Do they not have an agency of choice ?"

If you're literally running for your life : NO.

You're being chased by a maniac : do you run in the first safe house or do you keep running a few streets up to find one with a more appealing looking front door ?

Edited

I say again, define “safe”?

If that house has holes in the roof, is soaking wet, there’s very little food, and there are people outside who want to kick you in the teeth if you leave, how long do you stay there?

Jennps · 11/07/2025 00:13

Starmer thinks controlling your borders is racist.

He’s just done what he’s always believed in. Open borders.

genesis92 · 11/07/2025 00:16

BoredZelda · 10/07/2025 23:48

I agree. Nobody is attempting to come here for shits and giggles. Nor for a tenner a week and soggy cheese sandwiches. When your best option is to make this journey (and the boat is only the last bit of a pretty horrific journey) what is your worst option?

The best thing the government could do is fast track the applications of those asylum seekers already here, letting the ones who have a right to remain become economically active and start paying tax, returning those who do not have a right to remain, which will cut down the ongoing bill for accommodation. Then the tiny number who come in on the boats can be quickly dealt with and it’s no longer an issue. Sadly, this will not be seen as acceptable because Reform voters just don’t want those brown people in our Country. (They were happy enough for the Ukrainians to come) They can shout about numbers and doctors and schools and being full etc, but guess what? The area I live in has very little immigration and yet we still have schools which are full and can’t get a doctor’s appointment.

How shocking it is that you admit the area you live in has such little immigration, yet you seem so pro mass immigration. It really baffles the mind how you come to these conclusions despite not experiencing any negative effects from the former mentioned

BeachLife2 · 11/07/2025 00:16

I am generally pro-immigration, but I'm at a point now where I think all those coming on boats need to be removed and refused asylum.

We should not be prioritising helping people who have tens of thousands of pounds to pay criminal gangs to travel across continents (and are physically able to do so).

EggnogNoggin · 11/07/2025 00:16

BoredZelda · 11/07/2025 00:08

We can’t send them home immediately. That would be against international law.

“That money” is estimated as £9 billion. Sounds a lot for sure. But when you consider that we will spend £1200 billion in the U.K. in 2025 that’s 0.75%.

To put it in to context, if we spread that money across the 68.3 million people living in the U.K., that’s about £130 quid each. We spend £220 billion on pensions in the U.K. If we took the whole of that £9 billion and gave it just to pensioners, it would increase the pension by less than £5 a week. That isn’t solving anyone’s problems.

£9 billion will not “fix the country”, it won’t even touch the sides.

Putting it in the context of £130 each actually enrages me because it's a significant amount of money for a lot of families. Two adults paying that is equivalent to a club for a child, a good contribution to wrap around care, it covers new uniforms, healthy, non-upf food for their child.

It's outrageous that economic migrants, many of whom, even if accepted, ajd will never be a net contributor and will likely need benefits for a number of years to establish themselves, can just rock up in a leaky boat and fast track themselves to the front of (an admittedly long) application queue or just disappear into the anonymous Labour Market.

EggnogNoggin · 11/07/2025 00:20

And tbh I think Labour have the last shot at dealing with this before people vote Reform in because people are sick of this issue now.

TempestTost · 11/07/2025 00:53

This plan looks completely dumb ass to me.

I don't know what the answer is, but unless I am missing something and this works spectacularly, I think a pp is correct, people are going to wash their hands of Labour.

ChillPills · 11/07/2025 01:02

smallglassbottle · 10/07/2025 22:56

They have no intention of stopping them. This is what they want for the country. If they didn't want it, it wouldn't be happening.

Yup, agreed. Whichever party it is, they all WANT this. you could go down the conspiracy rabbit hole of questioning exactly why, but we'd all have a completely different theory.

ChillPills · 11/07/2025 01:16

BoredZelda · 10/07/2025 23:48

I agree. Nobody is attempting to come here for shits and giggles. Nor for a tenner a week and soggy cheese sandwiches. When your best option is to make this journey (and the boat is only the last bit of a pretty horrific journey) what is your worst option?

The best thing the government could do is fast track the applications of those asylum seekers already here, letting the ones who have a right to remain become economically active and start paying tax, returning those who do not have a right to remain, which will cut down the ongoing bill for accommodation. Then the tiny number who come in on the boats can be quickly dealt with and it’s no longer an issue. Sadly, this will not be seen as acceptable because Reform voters just don’t want those brown people in our Country. (They were happy enough for the Ukrainians to come) They can shout about numbers and doctors and schools and being full etc, but guess what? The area I live in has very little immigration and yet we still have schools which are full and can’t get a doctor’s appointment.

Oh, how I'd love to live in your fluffy world of puppy dogs and rainbows

Flyhighlittlepigeon · 11/07/2025 03:52

Vitrolinsanity · 10/07/2025 23:31

I’m generally of a mind that if you’re willing to risk getting on one of those “boats” whatever is behind you must be fucking shit scary.

Ther is no incentive at all for France to stop the boats. This OIOO plan is just a sop to make British voters, by which I mean Reformers, think Something Is Being Done. It isn’t. It’s offensive to think the British public are fractionally that stupid.

Oooooh the terrifying safety of France.

xanthomelana · 11/07/2025 04:37

If they have the money to pay for the crossing I don’t see why they can’t foot the bill for wherever they end up staying once they get here. People are saying ‘they get less than £10 a week’ but forget that they obviously have money in the first place to pay the traffickers to ferry them over. We definitely need to make it less appealing to come to the UK and a good start would be zero handouts and no hotels, purpose built basic facilities which they can’t leave until they are processed because they’ll just slip away into one of the many barbers/car washes/nail bars etc. We have no idea who these people are or what crimes they have committed in their home country so until they can be checked they simply shouldn’t be allowed to roam around unsupervised. We have a high level of immigrants waiting to be processed in our area and it is very unnerving to be in certain areas after a certain time, people don’t and won’t realise this until they land up in their neighbourhoods though.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 11/07/2025 05:54

Yellowshirt · 10/07/2025 23:47

I don't want my taxes going to any hotels. Send them home immediately and start fixing the country.
That money would better spent on working class people and pensioners struggling to afford everyday life and even the most basic living standards .

Like the money saved from paying the EU was going to be pumped into the NHS.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 11/07/2025 05:56

EggnogNoggin · 11/07/2025 00:20

And tbh I think Labour have the last shot at dealing with this before people vote Reform in because people are sick of this issue now.

What exactly are Reform going to do?

JustGoClickLikeALightSwitch · 11/07/2025 06:45

It needs to be less attractive to come here and settle. (And before I say more - the hotels that migrants are put up in are absolutely dreadful and the food inadequate, so the whole “oh, we put them up in hotels” shtick doesn’t fly for me. I work in this sector.)

ID cards. It is incredibly easy to work cash in hand / undocumented in the UK.

Fast processing of arrivals, and assessment. That means money to the UKBA or whatever we term the border agency.

Effective deportation. Rwanda, France, x country - make a decision, ratify it, and let people understand that that will be the outcome if you are not genuine.

But the other side of the issue is what KS and government aren’t acknowledging right now - we have a falling birth rate and need more people. What’s being done to attract the right migrants?

Jennps · 11/07/2025 06:49

JustGoClickLikeALightSwitch · 11/07/2025 06:45

It needs to be less attractive to come here and settle. (And before I say more - the hotels that migrants are put up in are absolutely dreadful and the food inadequate, so the whole “oh, we put them up in hotels” shtick doesn’t fly for me. I work in this sector.)

ID cards. It is incredibly easy to work cash in hand / undocumented in the UK.

Fast processing of arrivals, and assessment. That means money to the UKBA or whatever we term the border agency.

Effective deportation. Rwanda, France, x country - make a decision, ratify it, and let people understand that that will be the outcome if you are not genuine.

But the other side of the issue is what KS and government aren’t acknowledging right now - we have a falling birth rate and need more people. What’s being done to attract the right migrants?

None of that matters if the acceptance rate is as high as it is. The majority who claim asylum, get it. It’s almost guaranteed that once you are here, you will never leave.

And we don’t need more people, we need the ones who choose not to work and live on taxpayers dime, to be made to work. We can’t support the millions on welfare and more millions of incomers and their large families who don’t earn enough and never will earn enough to be net contributors. People get upset about this but it’s just simple math.

Alexandra2001 · 11/07/2025 06:54

SquishedMallow · 10/07/2025 23:10

I agree. I thought it was a fair suggestion. These people are not our problem. It's blunt but true. Rwanda is a neighboring country for a big proportion of these people, and will share common religions and values , heritage and culture. The UK often offers few of those things. And cultural clashes are a problem. It's just you're not allowed to voice it or the shouty people start using the "R" word. It's about time we shut all those silly silencing moves down and admitted reality.

Edited

Rwanda agreed to take 500 to 1000 per year, up to a max of 5000 over 5 years.

How would that deter the remaining 98% ?

What would happen to that 98% ?

If the plan would have worked, Sunak would have had his GE in October, shown the boats had stopped and probably won the election.

We don't know if this new plan will work but surely its worth giving it a chance and not just writing if off before its even been agreed by the EU?

CommissarySushi · 11/07/2025 06:57

Cluborange666 · 10/07/2025 22:40

There is no answer, that’s why. Mind you, France and the UK working together is a positive. Legally, anyone coming here as an asylum seeker has the right to remain until their case is heard. Labour can’t stop them, the Tories couldn’t and Reform won’t either, despite their rhetoric.

Why? I don't understand why we can't change the law? Why do we have to accept anyone who comes over here? Other countries turn them away and have stricter rules about accepting asylum seekers.

pilates · 11/07/2025 07:07

I’m not convinced this will work but they have to be seen to be doing something - record figures this year. I don’t think it’s enough of a deterrent.

Coolasfeck · 11/07/2025 07:25

EggnogNoggin · 11/07/2025 00:20

And tbh I think Labour have the last shot at dealing with this before people vote Reform in because people are sick of this issue now.

Nigel Farage’s Brexit caused this issue. We didn’t have a small boat issue when we were in the EU. When will the media start loudly pointing this out?

Yellowshirt · 11/07/2025 07:26

BoredZelda · 11/07/2025 00:08

We can’t send them home immediately. That would be against international law.

“That money” is estimated as £9 billion. Sounds a lot for sure. But when you consider that we will spend £1200 billion in the U.K. in 2025 that’s 0.75%.

To put it in to context, if we spread that money across the 68.3 million people living in the U.K., that’s about £130 quid each. We spend £220 billion on pensions in the U.K. If we took the whole of that £9 billion and gave it just to pensioners, it would increase the pension by less than £5 a week. That isn’t solving anyone’s problems.

£9 billion will not “fix the country”, it won’t even touch the sides.

Is it not breaking the law to enter a Country on a boat without any documentation?
If you support mass immigration you carry on paying towards it but people who don't shouldn't be putting a single penny towards it

Lovesstaggbeetle · 11/07/2025 07:27

Weird that so many can pay huge sums to people smugglers though ,does anyone think they are also slave masters who then trap them into work ?
Does anyone remember the macdonalds thing where slave masters took their pay ?
Nail salons ,Turkish barbers and all that stuff can be part of massive organised crime
I can't understand why such supposedly poor people can rustle up so much for this.

I also think a major reason they don't want to stay in France is because of the id cards.

They want to disappear into our black economy when here ,they may find that harder in France.

Namitynamename · 11/07/2025 07:28

CommissarySushi · 11/07/2025 06:57

Why? I don't understand why we can't change the law? Why do we have to accept anyone who comes over here? Other countries turn them away and have stricter rules about accepting asylum seekers.

Which other countries do that?

Lovesstaggbeetle · 11/07/2025 07:29

@Yellowshirt we should automatically send people straight back without documents.

Maybe the Rwanda thing

Can't provide valid documents straight to Rwanda
Australia has a policy where if you try and enter by boat you immediately invalidate any claim .

France is a stunningly beautiful country with great food and culture .

Lovesstaggbeetle · 11/07/2025 07:30

@Namitynamename cross post , Australia

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.