Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To go on holiday with DD’s, but not DS?

886 replies

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 12:28

DS(14) is from a previous relationship and spends approximately 1/3rd of his time with his dad. I also have 2 DD’s (9 and 4) with DP.

The 5 of us went on an amazing long haul holiday for 3 weeks over the Easter holidays.

I would love to book a week away over the school summer holidays - but a cheaper, last minute sort of thing as the other holiday was an expensive one (and the main holiday of the year). however the price for all 5 of us is too much; but we could afford the cost for 2 adults and 2 DD’s.

As well as his usual days each week, DS is spending a full week with his dad over one of the school holiday weeks. His dad had previously told me that he was looking to take him abroad, but I don’t think that is now materialising. There’s still the possibility that they may have a UK break instead.

Would I be unreasonable to book a holiday abroad for myself, DP and 2 DD’s for the same week that DS is going to spend the week with his dad?

It feels slightly wrong to go without him, but I also think that he is with his dad for the week who will be taking him places/potentially going away so he’s still going to be having a good time/having experiences etc.

We can’t afford to go away a different week and take him with us. So it’s the difference between going without him whilst he’s with his dad, and not going at all.

Aibu to think that whilst he’s with his dad, it’s his dads responsibility to take him away/plan things to do with him for the week and to not feel guilty if we take DD’s away?

OP posts:
Starlight1984 · 08/07/2025 14:33

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:30

He would be going (IF he goes) abroad with his dad and family at the same time.

And so what? You're going to wait for your ex to decide on what he's doing before you book your holiday?

Everyone keeps saying it @Suncloudstars but why don't you just let him have his week with his dad (on holiday or not) and then have a week away in the UK (or a cheaper European holiday) with all 3 of your children?

Or is it your DH who doesn't want him to come on this trip?

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:33

diterictur · 08/07/2025 13:52

So if it's not about affordability, what is it about that one week which makes it the best choice for your family holiday?

I think this update has made it worse not better. As if it's not about not being able to afford to take him, it's presumably that you don't want to take him, just take your perfect girls.

I’ve literally just said that I’m trying to reign in the finances due to lots of big recent expenditure. In response to those who were implying that I literally couldn’t afford to have three children.

OP posts:
crumblingschools · 08/07/2025 14:34

The younger children are the reason you can't afford a family holiday, because if you didn't have them you could, your costs go up the more children you have. But it is the older child who can't go on the holiday!

Haemagoblin · 08/07/2025 14:34

angelita8 · 08/07/2025 14:12

So why should her daughters have fewer holidays than her son? Given that both sides of DS’s family can afford multiple holidays.

Because it's not his fault he has two families and shouldn't be left out of either one.

Youremylobster86 · 08/07/2025 14:34

I dont think it matters if he went on 10 holidays with his Dad this year, its spiteful of you to exclude him from your family holiday.

It's not about how many times he's been abroad this year, its about missing spending time on holiday with his mothers side of the family. Im from a blended family, and if my mother did this when I was that age I would be really hurt.

Starlight1984 · 08/07/2025 14:34

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:33

I’ve literally just said that I’m trying to reign in the finances due to lots of big recent expenditure. In response to those who were implying that I literally couldn’t afford to have three children.

So why go on another abroad holiday if you're so strapped for cash? Why not just go in the UK where you can perhaps afford to squeeze your son in?

angelita8 · 08/07/2025 14:34

Moonnstars · 08/07/2025 14:32

Those are smaller events and I would hope if it was a big trip to a theme park rather than just a play park he wouldn't be excluded from that either.
A holiday is usually 5-7 days, has trips out, maybe a water park, boat trip or site seeing, clubs and activities for children. All of these are part of a bigger thing than just a trip to the park and McDonald's.
Also in the future, do you remember when we went to X? No I don't because you didn't take me.
Awkward!

I don’t think OP’s said her contact schedule, but if it’s 50/50, does that mean her daughters are never supposed to do anything fun for 50% of their time?

Gemmawemma9 · 08/07/2025 14:35

Awful. Why would you want to go with 2/3s of your kids anyway?
Dont even know why I’m bothering to reply because you clearly think you’re in the right and aren’t interested in opinions anyway! Why bother posting. Your poor son.

Scorpion84 · 08/07/2025 14:35

I have the same family set up as you . I wouldn't think twice if my son was going abroad with his dad same week but I wouldn't if he was just at home with his dad bored .

i would also prob still go if he was having a uk holidays with his dad especially as you have already taken him abroad .

Gemmawemma9 · 08/07/2025 14:35

angelita8 · 08/07/2025 14:34

I don’t think OP’s said her contact schedule, but if it’s 50/50, does that mean her daughters are never supposed to do anything fun for 50% of their time?

Of course not. But a trip to the park/soft play is different to a fucking all inclusive week in Portugal isn’t it!

Digdongdoo · 08/07/2025 14:35

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:33

I’ve literally just said that I’m trying to reign in the finances due to lots of big recent expenditure. In response to those who were implying that I literally couldn’t afford to have three children.

So the answer is that you go on a cheaper holiday. Not leave one of your children behind.

FormerAnywhere · 08/07/2025 14:36

Why are you asking whether you're being unreasonable, then becoming defensive when people explain why you're being unreasonable...

Perhaps you could stay home and DH and the three kids can go away together?

Haemagoblin · 08/07/2025 14:36

angelita8 · 08/07/2025 14:24

I’d go OP.

I have three SCs, and a baby with OH. SC’s mum also has a baby with her partner.

We take SC abroad 2-3 times a year and she does the same. She also takes holidays with her baby when SC are with us, and we’re saving to do the same. SC are utterly unbothered.

The cost for a couple and a baby in term-time is not comparable to the cost of taking a couple and four kids in the summer holidays. SC went on more holidays with their mum and dad when they were pre-schoolers too.

Massive difference. They have full siblings who are all in the same boat. The exclusion and isolation is not the same.

arcticpandas · 08/07/2025 14:37

Trying to convince yourself? Or he's in a minority. Most kids want to live with both their parents. Maybe he's telling you what you want to hear.

Rabbitsockpeony · 08/07/2025 14:37

Bloody hell.

aperolspritzbasicbitch · 08/07/2025 14:37

Digdongdoo · 08/07/2025 14:35

So the answer is that you go on a cheaper holiday. Not leave one of your children behind.

This.
or just pay the higher cost for him and find a way to reign in finances at another point.

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:37

Starlight1984 · 08/07/2025 13:56

With having a 3 week trip around south east Asia over Easter, and since moving to a bigger house and both myself and DP having new cars each in the past month, I’m just trying to reign in the finances.

I'm sure if you can afford a 3 week trip round SE Asia, a big house and 2 new cars in the last few months then you're not exactly living on the breadline and can probably afford the few hundred quid it would cost to take your son away with you.

But you obviously don't want to do this so go ahead and tell him that the reason you didn't invite him on your family holiday was because you were "trying to reign in the finances" 🙄

You’re making assumptions.

People live to their means.

also, I’m not sure if you’re a family of 5 with one being a teenager, but the jump in cost from 2 adults and 2 children, to 3 adults and 2 children, (also going from
one hotel room to two due to capacity) is a huge financial difference.

OP posts:
MummytoaMiracle01 · 08/07/2025 14:37

YABU ..I have 2 teenage stepsons who have never been abroad ..we also have a DD together and although alot cheaper i would never consider me, DH and DD going away without them ..we all go or no one goes

Rowen32 · 08/07/2025 14:37

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:33

I’ve literally just said that I’m trying to reign in the finances due to lots of big recent expenditure. In response to those who were implying that I literally couldn’t afford to have three children.

How could it cost so much more to take one extra child?
If you can afford to bring them to Asia, move house and buy new cars how can one child's ticket be so unaffordable?

Digdongdoo · 08/07/2025 14:39

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:37

You’re making assumptions.

People live to their means.

also, I’m not sure if you’re a family of 5 with one being a teenager, but the jump in cost from 2 adults and 2 children, to 3 adults and 2 children, (also going from
one hotel room to two due to capacity) is a huge financial difference.

Then go to a different hotel. Or a different country. Get a villa instead of a hotel. Eurocamp. Haven. There's so many options to consider before jumping to leaving DS behind.

quartile · 08/07/2025 14:39

I have 3 children and the cost goes up as its rare you can fit 5 in a hotel room. Some hotel chains like accor offer a second room half price for larger families.
If this was his only holiday this year I'd say yes definitely yabu but he may be holidayed out with all the travel and just want to chill. You could try asking him, he's 14 so likely to have an opinion. Still think you could air bnb somewhere cheaply in Europe for 5 and cut costs by driving there

PolyVagalNerve · 08/07/2025 14:40

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:09

Not at all, I’m just trying to discuss the logic that I had and work out if i truly am in the wrong for thinking that.

If you haven’t heard the resounding YABU and still trying to work it out - you never will !!!!!!!

this is the best example of a circular convo I have seen on here in along time !

…. yeah but …. ?? 😂😂

Starlight1984 · 08/07/2025 14:40

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:37

You’re making assumptions.

People live to their means.

also, I’m not sure if you’re a family of 5 with one being a teenager, but the jump in cost from 2 adults and 2 children, to 3 adults and 2 children, (also going from
one hotel room to two due to capacity) is a huge financial difference.

Fuck me.

You CHOSE to have 3 children with the age differences you've got!!!! You can't just leave one out because he's older and you can't afford him anymore!!!!!!

What would you do if all 3 were "full" siblings? Could you afford to take all 3 on holiday or not?! Or if your DSs dad wasn't in the picture? What would you do then?!

Renoonabudget · 08/07/2025 14:40

OP I think if DSS is going abroad with his other parent at the exact same time and will have had equal trips abroad this year then I think it's probably okay, but maybe you should discuss it with him first and see how he feels about it?

Maybe give him a say in it instead of blindsided him, say you understand if he doesn't want you to go without him and maybe have a budget caravan break in the UK instead.

As a teenager he may think, yeah thats fine and not be bothered, or may be devastated to miss a family trip since he loves you. But I think his opinion and feelings should be part of the decision making process.

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:41

Haemagoblin · 08/07/2025 13:58

You seem very convinced that because you are rich your child can't be disavantaged. I think there's a bit of snobbery going on here - "oh yes, we're a blended family but not like THOSE blended families on council estates with lots of different 'baby daddies' - my son has nice things and foreign holidays so he can't possibly be disadvantaged!"

It isn't about being economically disadvantaged - it's a deep seated psychological thing, about who you are, where you come from, where you belong. Being without a stable family base within which to develop your identity, your values etc is inherently disadvantaging, no matter how palatial the two homes you are dividing up your time in. Feeling like an 'add-on' to two existing family units is destabilising, no matter how much extra 'stuff' you get.

Think about when you were little and went through a clingy phase or a hard time or were ill, and just really, really wanted your mum and dad? Your son will have had to grow up knowing he can never ever have that - it's mum OR dad, never both. And yes, some children of divorce become very resilient, very independent, outwardly very easy-going - because they have had to learn to be accommodating and not to make demands that cause people issues because they feel that their place is contingent on not asking for the impossible.

You say how well he handles his situation and how unbothered he is by it. Suppose he were to come to you and tell you otherwise? Would you be receptive? Given how determined you are to insist that this is not 'a big thing' - despite lots of people telling you it is - suggests to me maybe you feel he has no right to have any issues given the quality of life you have provided him with, and wouldn't take it well if he complained tbh.

No we don't know you, or your child, or your situation. But you are not unique. It is a tale as old as time, and rich or poor, the emotional landscape is the same.

Your assumptions are incorrect and judgmental. In no way have I said “im
rich” - I’m not.

I am aware of everything you’ve said.

OP posts:

This thread prevents users from posting on it until they have been members for at least 1 day.