Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the US was right to bomb Iran? What am I missing?

948 replies

Lastu · 22/06/2025 13:45

I am no fan of Trump. I’m very much left wing.

But am I missing something here? Why has everyone become such huge supporters of Iran? The world is a safer place as a result of removing their capability to develop nuclear weapons? Why is everyone carrying on like Iran is a victim and they were truly just trying to implement peaceful nuclear capabilities? Has everyone lost the plot?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
rainingsnoring · 22/06/2025 20:01

YourAmplePlumPoster · 22/06/2025 19:43

I am enjoying the useful idiots of the Left supporting an extreme misogynist and homophobic regime which incarcerates women for not wearing the hijab supporting this regime. They can always be counted on to support the wrong people.

So do the useful idiots on the right support the murder of tens of thousands of children?
Perhaps you should stick to what has actually been written instead of making things up.

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 20:02

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:56

The west/democratic nations already are united. The UK, US, EU, UN Security Council, Australia, India, New Zealand, Israel, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Switzerland. They’ve all got sanctions in place. Clearly they have no influence over Russia, China and the rest of Iran’s allies. So what happens? The sanctions are in place, Iran continues to stockpile uranium. What do you do?

The nations you mention do not account for the entire world. I would engage all nations.
Nuclear Weapons know no boundaries. The fall out from them does not stop at boarders. One nuclear bomb dropped is a global disaster with a lifetime of consequence for all nations.

Also, to add, I would not have the security of the world dictated by a handful of men over 70 with no vested interest in the longevity of the planet and life on it. I know the US in particular voiced concerns about being led by a woman. Mainly there was conversation about the risk she’d wake up one day on her period and drop a bomb somewhere. I guess sadly we got that anyway.

TooBigForMyBoots · 22/06/2025 20:07

YourAmplePlumPoster · 22/06/2025 19:43

I am enjoying the useful idiots of the Left supporting an extreme misogynist and homophobic regime which incarcerates women for not wearing the hijab supporting this regime. They can always be counted on to support the wrong people.

If you think the only criticism of Trump's actions is coming from the left, you're sorely mistaken.

Stop trying to turn actual war into a petty Right/Left Culture war.

ArtTheClown · 22/06/2025 20:07

It just doesn't allow people in Gaza to live and work in peace in their own country.

October 7 should have shown you exactly why Israel kept such tight control of the border. Because their neighbours were Hamas, whose raison d'etre is to kill them.

Although prior to October 7, things were improving. There were more and more entry permits being given to Gazans to cross the border and work in Israel. Some of these gathered the intelligence used by Hamas to butcher the people who lived on the kibbutzim.

I honestly think some people are so determined to believe that Israel is just bad for badness sake (and I know why they believe that). It's the same as the civilian death toll in Gaza - no, the IDF isn't deliberately taking great delight in slaughtering civilians - Hamas has deliberately chosen to put every military target in the most vulnerable civilian areas. Contrast that with their strikes on Iranian key infrastructure; surgically done with minimal collatoral casualties, because the Iranians, as nutty and awful as their leadership are, don't deliberately put their civilans in direct harm's way as a human shield/propaganda policy.

PothasProblem · 22/06/2025 20:09

TempestTost · 22/06/2025 17:57

Because there is no other reason for them to be stockpiling that much enriched uranium, and it isn't controversial they were doing so.

But also - despite the rhetoric on here, Trump has not been a warmonger. He's consistently tried to steer away from armed conflicts and has tried to negotiate with Iran until very recently. He hasn't been particularly inclined to do BN's bidding just because either. These ideas are being repeated again and again as what's going on, on this thread, but they are "truthy", rather than factual.

Something seems to have happened suddenly, big enough for him to rush away from the G7, and then we have this.

It's not direct but the fact is they won't, and can't, release any new direct information like that to the public. So not seeing it doesn't really tell us anything. If Iran is very close the public won't get a chance to see the evidence even if it exists.

I agree that the public doesn't have as much information as the US government.

Whether Trump is a warmonger or not, he's certainly willing to engage militarity in the past. Also, importantly, he likes to negotiate from a position of strength.
And one reason to stockpile enriched uranium is to use it as a massive point of leverage in any future negotiations with the West to get a better non proliferation deal than they otherwise would, and to engage in talks about removing sanctions that the US wouldn't otherwise consider entering into.
Trump's attack removed that bargaining chip

Another reason to stockpile enriched uranium is as a military deterrent in the absence of a bomb. The thinking being that if they were attacked, they could accelerate the development of a bomb. And that fear alone would prevent an attack. Clearly it didn't work, but I don't suppose they expected Trump to actually bomb their underground bunkers. He's not a conventional US president. I very much hope that their nuclear capability has been totally destroyed, it would be very dangerous if it wasn't.

And yes, they other most obvious reason to stockpile enriched uranium is they might have been actively intending to develop a bomb. But enriched uranium is not a bomb. And they were years away from making a bomb and being able to make it land where they wanted it to.

BonnuitMy · 22/06/2025 20:09

You’re not losing the plot OP. Nobody can fathom the thinking of modern day identity politics. I saw someone dressed up in a fake suicide bomber outfit and a pride cap a few weeks ago near a march!?!. I guess the thinking is that Iran's nuclear bombs would be inequality bombs as well as conveniently being blessed by a deity to wipe ‘Isreal off the map’,

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 20:12

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:00

No, it doesn’t.

A useful idiot or useful fool is a pejorative description of a person, suggesting that the person thinks they are fighting for a cause without fully comprehending the consequences of their actions, and who does not realize they are being manipulated by the cause's leaders or by other political players.

Sounds right to me.

So all those taken in by Hasbara too good to know

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 20:13

TooBigForMyBoots · 22/06/2025 20:07

If you think the only criticism of Trump's actions is coming from the left, you're sorely mistaken.

Stop trying to turn actual war into a petty Right/Left Culture war.

Marjorie Taylor Green not knows for her leftist views has been extremely outspoken on the bombing of Iran.

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 20:14

ArtTheClown · 22/06/2025 20:07

It just doesn't allow people in Gaza to live and work in peace in their own country.

October 7 should have shown you exactly why Israel kept such tight control of the border. Because their neighbours were Hamas, whose raison d'etre is to kill them.

Although prior to October 7, things were improving. There were more and more entry permits being given to Gazans to cross the border and work in Israel. Some of these gathered the intelligence used by Hamas to butcher the people who lived on the kibbutzim.

I honestly think some people are so determined to believe that Israel is just bad for badness sake (and I know why they believe that). It's the same as the civilian death toll in Gaza - no, the IDF isn't deliberately taking great delight in slaughtering civilians - Hamas has deliberately chosen to put every military target in the most vulnerable civilian areas. Contrast that with their strikes on Iranian key infrastructure; surgically done with minimal collatoral casualties, because the Iranians, as nutty and awful as their leadership are, don't deliberately put their civilans in direct harm's way as a human shield/propaganda policy.

Gaza is (or should we say was after Israel's genocidal campaign) one of the most densely populated places on earth. Conducting the kind of warfare Israel is practically guarantees civilian casualties. How are starving people queuing for food legitimate targets? And yet the IDF keeps killing them. Either its deliberate or they are incompetent.

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 20:16

"no, the IDF isn't deliberately taking great delight in slaughtering civilians"

Again have you read about the 72 Virgins Uncensored account.
That' is exactly what is happening there.

usernamealreadytaken · 22/06/2025 20:18

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 19:04

Negotiate an agreement which ensures that uranium levels are maintained sufficiently to produce nuclear power to ensure the country could thrive with cleaner energy sources, and not so much they could produce weapons. I’d audit it, and I’d hold them accountable to it, and I’d operate with transparency, mutual respect and create shared goals focused on safety.

The NPT agreement was already negotiated and Iran signed it. What would you do next?

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:20

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 20:02

The nations you mention do not account for the entire world. I would engage all nations.
Nuclear Weapons know no boundaries. The fall out from them does not stop at boarders. One nuclear bomb dropped is a global disaster with a lifetime of consequence for all nations.

Also, to add, I would not have the security of the world dictated by a handful of men over 70 with no vested interest in the longevity of the planet and life on it. I know the US in particular voiced concerns about being led by a woman. Mainly there was conversation about the risk she’d wake up one day on her period and drop a bomb somewhere. I guess sadly we got that anyway.

How would you engage China, the UAE, Russia, Lebanon, Yemen and Pakistan? The nuclear weapons won’t be aimed at them. You might engage Trinidad, but there £20k of export to Iran probably won’t affect anything.

Donald Trump is a racist, misogynistic idiot. But what choice did he have. He could allow Iran to stockpile uranium, or he could stop it. Iran with a nuclear weapon would be disastrous.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:25

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 20:16

"no, the IDF isn't deliberately taking great delight in slaughtering civilians"

Again have you read about the 72 Virgins Uncensored account.
That' is exactly what is happening there.

Have you read the name of the source of information you’re taking as gospel?

Rosie8880 · 22/06/2025 20:25

Lastu · 22/06/2025 13:45

I am no fan of Trump. I’m very much left wing.

But am I missing something here? Why has everyone become such huge supporters of Iran? The world is a safer place as a result of removing their capability to develop nuclear weapons? Why is everyone carrying on like Iran is a victim and they were truly just trying to implement peaceful nuclear capabilities? Has everyone lost the plot?

no one should be bombing anyone…. America joins Israel and bombs Iran… now Iran and other Allie’s will join force and attack Israel and its Allie’s… Russia and China have weighed in and are condemning America…We have some of the most volatile leaders in power atm… it’s a tinderbox and all the while,
innocent people right now in Palestine, Israel, Iran are being killed… we need no more attacks, we need peace.

Bloodylovecheese · 22/06/2025 20:27

Russia will now be providing nuclear weapons to Iran..
See how this escalates..

usernamealreadytaken · 22/06/2025 20:27

thepariscrimefiles · 22/06/2025 19:24

UNICEF have reported that over 50,000 children have been killed or injured in Gaza. That is one of the outcomes that you say that you don't care about. Obviously children are not combatants so must be what you call unavoidable 'collateral damage'.

Hamas are terrorists. They are anti-semites. Their actions are barbaric but they don't claim to be anything else. People talk about Israel as the only democracy in the region and the IDF as the 'most moral army in the world'. They have killed or maimed over 50,000 Palestinian in Gaza children and they (and you) don't give a fuck.

About 60k people have apparently been killed in Gaza, according to Hamas. Isnt it absolutely amazing that 50k were children, many women, and hardly any Hamas. Unless, of course, a large number of those women and “children” were actually Hamas, or put there by Hamas. What sort of monsters use humans as shields? Far worse than those trying to clear the monsters.

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 20:30

usernamealreadytaken · 22/06/2025 20:27

About 60k people have apparently been killed in Gaza, according to Hamas. Isnt it absolutely amazing that 50k were children, many women, and hardly any Hamas. Unless, of course, a large number of those women and “children” were actually Hamas, or put there by Hamas. What sort of monsters use humans as shields? Far worse than those trying to clear the monsters.

We can see the photos of what Israel has done/is doing. How many Palestinian deaths is too much for you? Whether its 1,000 or 10,000 or 50,000, its too many. Anyone who can't see that isn't a decent human being and is blinded by ideology.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:32

Bloodylovecheese · 22/06/2025 20:27

Russia will now be providing nuclear weapons to Iran..
See how this escalates..

Edited

No they will not. Don’t scaremonger.

Rosie8880 · 22/06/2025 20:33

Bloodylovecheese · 22/06/2025 20:27

Russia will now be providing nuclear weapons to Iran..
See how this escalates..

Edited

Exactly. China is not far off too… we need negotiations n diplomacy to stop this madness. It’s truly terrifying.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:34

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 20:30

We can see the photos of what Israel has done/is doing. How many Palestinian deaths is too much for you? Whether its 1,000 or 10,000 or 50,000, its too many. Anyone who can't see that isn't a decent human being and is blinded by ideology.

What should Israel do? Give up, write off the hostages, and accept that Hamas will continue to attack Israeli citizens forever?

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:34

Rosie8880 · 22/06/2025 20:33

Exactly. China is not far off too… we need negotiations n diplomacy to stop this madness. It’s truly terrifying.

There is no ‘exactly’. It’s not true.

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 20:37

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:34

What should Israel do? Give up, write off the hostages, and accept that Hamas will continue to attack Israeli citizens forever?

End the occupation. Two state solution. Stay within its own borders (wait, has it even got official borders?). Stop the illegal settlements. Just a few suggestions to get started with.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:38

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 20:37

End the occupation. Two state solution. Stay within its own borders (wait, has it even got official borders?). Stop the illegal settlements. Just a few suggestions to get started with.

And when Israel has offered a two state solution, what has Hamas said?

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 20:39

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:20

How would you engage China, the UAE, Russia, Lebanon, Yemen and Pakistan? The nuclear weapons won’t be aimed at them. You might engage Trinidad, but there £20k of export to Iran probably won’t affect anything.

Donald Trump is a racist, misogynistic idiot. But what choice did he have. He could allow Iran to stockpile uranium, or he could stop it. Iran with a nuclear weapon would be disastrous.

Exports to Africa exceed $1bn a year. You seem to entirely skip any mention of countries on the African continent. Ultimately I believe in democracy when it’s done properly.

It’s so easy for you to keep pumping out the and what / and then questions. Presumably in the hope that I concede to just dropping bombs because it’s easier? Quite frankly I’m sick of the blood shed, which is entirely because of the low quality leadership across many of the large and influential nations.

What would you do? Would you have dropped more bombs, less bombs, bigger bombs? (Maybe gone nuclear?) What’s your solution?