Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the US was right to bomb Iran? What am I missing?

948 replies

Lastu · 22/06/2025 13:45

I am no fan of Trump. I’m very much left wing.

But am I missing something here? Why has everyone become such huge supporters of Iran? The world is a safer place as a result of removing their capability to develop nuclear weapons? Why is everyone carrying on like Iran is a victim and they were truly just trying to implement peaceful nuclear capabilities? Has everyone lost the plot?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:18

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 19:13

Economic sanctions.
Money makes the world go around.

There are already heavy economic sanctions in place. Nearly all trade and financial transactions between the US and Iran is restricted. What then?

Stepintomyshoes · 22/06/2025 19:18

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 18:35

Weaponizing anti semitism to shut down legitimate conversation is so detrimental to all Jewish people who have and are still suffering from anti semitic actions.

Who is doing this?

I am pretty willing to bet that you are not Jewish.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:19

rainingsnoring · 22/06/2025 19:13

They aren't just trying to take the hostages back though are they. I'm sure you know this.
They are committing genocide in Gaza, deliberately starving the population and committing countless, well documented atrocities. Were they trying to get the hostages back by bombing the Iranian embassy in Lebanon and killing their generals? What about the current attacks on Iran? Was that to try to get their hostages back too?

No. That was about stopping Iran developing nuclear weapons. How would you stop them?

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 19:19

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 19:08

I still wouldn’t be happy to live under Iran’s ‘posturing’ regime. Would you?

The point is we don't live there (at least I assume you don't). She does. She is surely a better judge than either of us. Or are you only interested in Iranian women as abstract figures to bolster your own opinions.

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 19:20

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:18

There are already heavy economic sanctions in place. Nearly all trade and financial transactions between the US and Iran is restricted. What then?

More sanctions. If the country is still functioning, then there’s still more that can be done.

rainingsnoring · 22/06/2025 19:21

MuckFusk · 22/06/2025 19:04

Yes, don't you love it when people who are spouting nonsense tell others they don't know the facts. Palestinians can't even fish beyond a limit of a few kilometres without being shot by the Israeli military. Naturally, there are no fish left within the limit.
I saw one fisherman interviewed who said he was going to go beyond the limit to get shot because he couldn't live that way any longer. 😥

It's shocking how so many people just dismiss these things and call people liars when they point them out. In some people's minds, Israel can do no wrong, it appears. Human beings have repeatedly been persuaded into committing atrocities and turning a blind eye to atrocities over time.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:22

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 19:20

More sanctions. If the country is still functioning, then there’s still more that can be done.

By the US? It has restricted all trade and financial transactions. What other sanctions can it place?

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 19:22

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 19:19

The point is we don't live there (at least I assume you don't). She does. She is surely a better judge than either of us. Or are you only interested in Iranian women as abstract figures to bolster your own opinions.

A better judge of what? Whether the Iranian regime is good for women? Do you think they are then

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 19:23

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:22

By the US? It has restricted all trade and financial transactions. What other sanctions can it place?

By all countries. If Iran has Nuclear Weapons, and that’s a threat, then clearly it’s in the best interest of all countries to unite in sanctions against Iran.

thepariscrimefiles · 22/06/2025 19:24

TheMel · 22/06/2025 18:10

I don't care about outcomes. It's actions and intent. The IDF has a legitimate aim of eradicating Hamas. They try to achieve that aim with minimal collateral damage, but a certain amount is unavoidable. Especially given the terrain and how Hamas embeds itself in the civilian population.

If Hamas works hard to put as many of their citizens in harm's way as possible, that's on them. In fact the continuation of the war - a war they started - is on them. They could stop it today by releasing the hostages and surrendering.

UNICEF have reported that over 50,000 children have been killed or injured in Gaza. That is one of the outcomes that you say that you don't care about. Obviously children are not combatants so must be what you call unavoidable 'collateral damage'.

Hamas are terrorists. They are anti-semites. Their actions are barbaric but they don't claim to be anything else. People talk about Israel as the only democracy in the region and the IDF as the 'most moral army in the world'. They have killed or maimed over 50,000 Palestinian in Gaza children and they (and you) don't give a fuck.

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 19:28

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 19:22

A better judge of what? Whether the Iranian regime is good for women? Do you think they are then

A better judge of whether bombing the crap out of her country would benefit women's rights. Honestly, do you seriously think I support the Iranian regime's attitudes to women? Why would I be sharing a statement from one of the biggest female opponents of the regime? Maybe give the statement a read

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 22/06/2025 19:30

WestwardHo1 · 22/06/2025 18:43

Iran has been developing nuclear weapons so that they can use them on Israel and wipe it off the earth. Those mullahs believe it's their duty. They don't CARE if there's retaliation. Why don't people understand this?

That's an opinion that is backed more by prejudice than facts.

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 19:30

usernamealreadytaken · 22/06/2025 19:16

It pretty much did before 7 October 2023. Gaza has received, iirc, more aid per capita than any other country recently, and yet the people are starving and angry. Perhaps they are angry at the wrong side of the border. The Jews took a desert and turned it into an oasis with little money; Hamas took a troubled state and turned it in to a hate-filled hell-hole.

Palestine was a desert?
Way to belittle the Palestinians once again.
https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-palestine-life-historical-1948-1948-2023-10

Historical photos show life in Palestine before the withdrawal of British troops in 1948

Tensions in the region reached their boiling point after British withdrawal from Palestine in 1948 and the Arab-Israeli War began.

https://www.businessinsider.com/photos-palestine-life-historical-1948-1948-2023-10

MuckFusk · 22/06/2025 19:31

TooBigForMyBoots · 22/06/2025 19:14

Anyone who thinks Iranian women are safer, Israelis are safer, anyone is safer because Trump bombed Iran needs their head read. They're indulging in wishful thinking on a ridiculous level.

What Trump did last night was a very stupid, very costly mistake.

Indeed. Now they are waging both economic and actual war, all thanks to voting for the kook.

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 19:32

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:14

It’s not fact at all.

Do you get as worked up about war crimes being committed in Ethiopia? Or is it just reserved for Israel?

Do you always change the subject when you are wrong?
Do you always use whataboutery when you don't want to discuss something?

WestwardHo1 · 22/06/2025 19:32

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 22/06/2025 19:30

That's an opinion that is backed more by prejudice than facts.

You should read Matthew Syed's recent column about it. It's quite illuminating.

PothasProblem · 22/06/2025 19:42

genesis92 · 22/06/2025 19:12

I know it’s Trump, and this may be overly simplistic, but do you think the US would do air strikes if they didn’t genuinely believe they were building nuclear weapons? I just don’t see it

Yes-ish

Ok, let's assume it's true, as has been reported, that US intelegence (up to the point where Israel started bombing Iran) was that Iran was not currently developing a bomb and were 3 years away from having one.

So not an immediate threat which required a milatry intervention as of 10 days ago. There was likely time for more diplomacy.

However the past 9 days of attacks on Iran would be likely to push them towards developing a bomb at greater speed to defend their population/country. Because they're now under actual attack, they're motivated in a way they weren't previously. Israel's strikes targeted nuclear scientists and military personnel. They destroy the physical infrastructure where they could. But they lack the big bombs that the US has which can destroy underground infrastructure.

Israel PM likely told Trump he had to help now because the job Israel started needed to be finished, or else Iran's top priority would now be developing the bomb. Was trump backed into a corner here. Manipulated? Would a better man/team found a way out of this immediate situation brought to a head by Israeli's PM?

YourAmplePlumPoster · 22/06/2025 19:43

I am enjoying the useful idiots of the Left supporting an extreme misogynist and homophobic regime which incarcerates women for not wearing the hijab supporting this regime. They can always be counted on to support the wrong people.

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 19:49

YourAmplePlumPoster · 22/06/2025 19:43

I am enjoying the useful idiots of the Left supporting an extreme misogynist and homophobic regime which incarcerates women for not wearing the hijab supporting this regime. They can always be counted on to support the wrong people.

Is disagreeing with the escalated military action instead of continuing with the talks that were actually scheduled disagreeing with the regime?

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 19:49

YourAmplePlumPoster · 22/06/2025 19:43

I am enjoying the useful idiots of the Left supporting an extreme misogynist and homophobic regime which incarcerates women for not wearing the hijab supporting this regime. They can always be counted on to support the wrong people.

So, by your reasoning, the useful idiots on the Right are supporting a genocidal, war-mongering regime?

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 19:50

I think at this stage we can all agree that the phrase "useful idiots" says a lot more about the poster that uses it than the people they are describing.

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 19:50

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 19:28

A better judge of whether bombing the crap out of her country would benefit women's rights. Honestly, do you seriously think I support the Iranian regime's attitudes to women? Why would I be sharing a statement from one of the biggest female opponents of the regime? Maybe give the statement a read

That wasn’t the focus of the post. The pp preferred Iran’s posturing. I definitely don’t. A decision between here and Iran is an easy one as a woman with a dd or dc even.

I don’t think anyone wants to suffer bombing, that’s understandable. Since neither of us prefer the Iranian regime there’s not much disagreement on that.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:56

JustMyView13 · 22/06/2025 19:23

By all countries. If Iran has Nuclear Weapons, and that’s a threat, then clearly it’s in the best interest of all countries to unite in sanctions against Iran.

The west/democratic nations already are united. The UK, US, EU, UN Security Council, Australia, India, New Zealand, Israel, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Switzerland. They’ve all got sanctions in place. Clearly they have no influence over Russia, China and the rest of Iran’s allies. So what happens? The sanctions are in place, Iran continues to stockpile uranium. What do you do?

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 19:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 20:00

Martymcfly24 · 22/06/2025 19:50

I think at this stage we can all agree that the phrase "useful idiots" says a lot more about the poster that uses it than the people they are describing.

No, it doesn’t.

A useful idiot or useful fool is a pejorative description of a person, suggesting that the person thinks they are fighting for a cause without fully comprehending the consequences of their actions, and who does not realize they are being manipulated by the cause's leaders or by other political players.

Sounds right to me.