Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the US was right to bomb Iran? What am I missing?

948 replies

Lastu · 22/06/2025 13:45

I am no fan of Trump. I’m very much left wing.

But am I missing something here? Why has everyone become such huge supporters of Iran? The world is a safer place as a result of removing their capability to develop nuclear weapons? Why is everyone carrying on like Iran is a victim and they were truly just trying to implement peaceful nuclear capabilities? Has everyone lost the plot?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 17:03

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:00

And what would you do about Iran's capability?

We'd all rather the weapons didn't exist but they do, so with that in mind, how would you resolve the Iran nuclear issue?

Edited

How should we resolve the Israel nuclear weapons issue? Iran isn't currently conducting a genocide and ethnic cleansing. If Iran is a threat to stability in the region, so is Israel under the current government. Let's tackle both.

Outside9 · 22/06/2025 17:03

Iran having nuclear enrichment = very bad.

Israel having nuclear weapons = fine. Or at least not as bad?

Ethnosupremacy captured succinctly.

PinkSwatch · 22/06/2025 17:03

Morningsleepin · 22/06/2025 16:57

I'm just so sad to see the UK believing that it is OK to attack another country for philosophical differences. I hate the government of El Salvador and my heart breaks for the Salvadoreans who live there. Argentina treats its people appallingly too. Should Sir Keir attack those countries too. And those are just ones that occur to me off the top of my head

Murdering women for not covering their fucking hair is a "philosophical difference" is it?

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:04

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:38

Over 70 years of constant occupation is one long unprovoked attack.

Occupation would be if you were colonizing a country that wasn't your own, whereas anyone who can read can see that we have reports of the Jews living in what is now Israel, Gaza, Judea & Samaria and also parts of Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. Added to that, Israel doesn't occupy the palestinian controlled areas of Gaza, and much of Judea & Samaria even though they are part of their ancestral lands. In fact jews are not allowed in to parts of Judea and Samaria under Palestinian Authority control, whereas Palestinians can cross into the Israeli controlled areas with a permit. So I'm not sure what you mean by 70 years of constant occupation - occupation of where exactly? I would say that the ancient Land of Israeli has in fact been colonised by Arabs and Ottomans and parts of it are currently occupied by them.

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:05

BeliesBelief · 22/06/2025 13:52

What? Wanting Iran - a hostile nation - not to get full nuclear missile capability is not the same thing as being against any country having nuclear weapons. Not sure what point you think you’re making…

The irony to call Iran a hostile nation after we bombed them. They are not hostile against our countries, they are hostile against our countries slight tendencies to colonise, steal and create chaos in the region to keep controle of the oil.

If Iran was doing to Europe and the US what we have been doing for decades, you would not have a problem seeing they are the baddies.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:06

SpidersAreShitheads · 22/06/2025 17:00

This thread is infuriating.

Really clearly for the people at the back: you can believe that Trump’s unauthorised bombing of Iran was a poor idea while simultaneously believing that Iran shouldn’t have nuclear weapons.

Both those things can be true. Wild, I know.

The US’ own intelligence said Iran wasn’t close to having a nuclear weapon. Years away. So why bomb now when Iran was showing signs of being open to negotiations?

I don’t have answers but Israel and the US are besties right now so I suspect that’s a contributory factor.

Also, I thought Trump was opposed to getting involved in conflict outside the US….?

Yes, we would all be happier if Iran’s nuclear capacity was removed but you can’t just bomb a country because you fancy it.

There was no imminent nuclear threat and no reason not to go through proper channels. Democracy matters but Trump repeatedly shows utter contempt for it.

And just to add insult to injury, it’s now looking increasingly likely that the bombs didn’t even hit Iran’s nuclear plants. Slow clap. Well done.

I hope the UK stays well out of this shit-show. This is a mess started by Trump in 2018 when he scrapped the Iran agreement and exacerbated by his decision to bomb the country last night.

The intelligence shows a range of predictions. Some of the intelligence says a weapon was weeks away, some says months. How close should we leave it?

What would you do to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons?

crumblingschools · 22/06/2025 17:07

@PinkSwatch US didn’t bomb Iran because women have to cover their hair.

US left Afghanistan in the hands of the Taliban who treat women and girls appallingly

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:08

Morningsleepin · 22/06/2025 16:57

I'm just so sad to see the UK believing that it is OK to attack another country for philosophical differences. I hate the government of El Salvador and my heart breaks for the Salvadoreans who live there. Argentina treats its people appallingly too. Should Sir Keir attack those countries too. And those are just ones that occur to me off the top of my head

Argentina? WTF are you talking about? Argentina has free healthcare, free education, progressive social rights. Its a modern, progressive country. For sure they have economic problems, but to liken them to Iran is insane.

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:08

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:04

Occupation would be if you were colonizing a country that wasn't your own, whereas anyone who can read can see that we have reports of the Jews living in what is now Israel, Gaza, Judea & Samaria and also parts of Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. Added to that, Israel doesn't occupy the palestinian controlled areas of Gaza, and much of Judea & Samaria even though they are part of their ancestral lands. In fact jews are not allowed in to parts of Judea and Samaria under Palestinian Authority control, whereas Palestinians can cross into the Israeli controlled areas with a permit. So I'm not sure what you mean by 70 years of constant occupation - occupation of where exactly? I would say that the ancient Land of Israeli has in fact been colonised by Arabs and Ottomans and parts of it are currently occupied by them.

Some Jews used to live in the region a few thousand years ago is different than current days Jews own the region

"Added to that, Israel doesn't occupy the palestinian controlled areas of Gaza, and much of Judea & Samaria".

Yes, they are

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:10

Outside9 · 22/06/2025 17:03

Iran having nuclear enrichment = very bad.

Israel having nuclear weapons = fine. Or at least not as bad?

Ethnosupremacy captured succinctly.

Israel is a democracy and an ally. Iran is a hostile state. Can you really not see the difference?

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 17:10

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:04

Occupation would be if you were colonizing a country that wasn't your own, whereas anyone who can read can see that we have reports of the Jews living in what is now Israel, Gaza, Judea & Samaria and also parts of Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. Added to that, Israel doesn't occupy the palestinian controlled areas of Gaza, and much of Judea & Samaria even though they are part of their ancestral lands. In fact jews are not allowed in to parts of Judea and Samaria under Palestinian Authority control, whereas Palestinians can cross into the Israeli controlled areas with a permit. So I'm not sure what you mean by 70 years of constant occupation - occupation of where exactly? I would say that the ancient Land of Israeli has in fact been colonised by Arabs and Ottomans and parts of it are currently occupied by them.

Arabs have been on the land there for just as long. You can try to persuade people that its not an occupation but we can see it for what it is. Israel controls the borders at sea an air, it controls what is allowed in and out. You can try to keep people from seeing what is happening to Palestinians every day but the world can see.

PickyBits · 22/06/2025 17:12

florasl · 22/06/2025 17:01

Iran fund a number of terrorist organisations including Hamas and Hezzbolah, surely people aren’t supporting a country that fund proxy terror organisations around the world having nuclear weapons.

I read somewhere there was concern that Iran was rushing through acquiring nuclear weapons to give them to the Houthis or Hezbollah. Not a particularly outlandish idea considering Israel’s success in eliminating Hamas leaders.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:14

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:05

The irony to call Iran a hostile nation after we bombed them. They are not hostile against our countries, they are hostile against our countries slight tendencies to colonise, steal and create chaos in the region to keep controle of the oil.

If Iran was doing to Europe and the US what we have been doing for decades, you would not have a problem seeing they are the baddies.

They are hostile to western way of life. Hostile to democracy and freedom. Why are you so keen to defend a country which wants to kill you and all of your fellow citizens?

https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2020/01/12/Iran-s-Basij-protests-to-demand-closure-of-UK-embassy-in-Tehran-Iranian-media

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:14

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:06

The intelligence shows a range of predictions. Some of the intelligence says a weapon was weeks away, some says months. How close should we leave it?

What would you do to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons?

The intelligence has shown that Iran was weeks away from building a nuclear bomb for decades.

Whatafustercluck · 22/06/2025 17:15

PickyBits · 22/06/2025 16:59

How do you do ‘diplomacy’ with a fundamentalist death cult that has a martyrdom ideology. keeps it’s own people prisoner and has slogans such as ‘Death to America, Death to England, Death to Israel’, and trains and funds terrorists around the world.

Iran has already plotted multiple terrorist attacks against the UK.

I don’t think Trump and Israel expect anything from the UK quite frankly, although we should be very grateful if regime collapse happens.

The US last used nuclear weapons 80 years ago in a World War. Not really relevant to today’s geopolitical landscape, especially with regard to international terrorism.

I wouldn’t call a real risk of nuclear weapons being used as ‘willy waving’. Should that risk have been ignored until the nukes were actually fired?

Edited

The point about the US is that it's massively hypocritical to pontificate to others about the evils of nuclear weapons without even a trace of self-awareness.

As others have said, we were led by the US into an illegal war with Iraq on spurious 'intelligence'. What's to say that's not also the case here?

The world is currently full of unhinged megalomaniac leaders who seem to need to overcompensate for their inadequacies with weapons and crazy talk. I suppose it was ever thus, but it's the actions of Trump, Putin and Kim Jong-un who most scare me in terms of world conflict at this point in time, not Iran.

shuggles · 22/06/2025 17:15

LlttledrummergirI · 22/06/2025 16:29

The comment was made in response to pp saying only Islamic countries have fundamentalism. I posted an example of how this was wrong.

That doesn't mean that I agree with Irans regime, I don't. But the pot shouldn't call the kettle black in this case.

I'm not aware of anyone saying that religious fundamentalism doesn't exist in the west, but it is correct to say that the mostly-secular west does not have the same level of religious fundamentalism as Islamic regimes in the middle east (including Iran).

It's fine for the pot to call the kettle black when the pot is grey and the kettle is an intense shade of black.

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:16

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:14

They are hostile to western way of life. Hostile to democracy and freedom. Why are you so keen to defend a country which wants to kill you and all of your fellow citizens?

https://english.alarabiya.net/News/middle-east/2020/01/12/Iran-s-Basij-protests-to-demand-closure-of-UK-embassy-in-Tehran-Iranian-media

They can reject whatever they want in their own country and close whatever embassy they want, I don't care

PothasProblem · 22/06/2025 17:17

genesis92 · 22/06/2025 16:26

For anyone who doesn’t agree with the US strikes, do you believe it’s perfectly ok for Iran to have or develop nuclear weapons then?

No.

Was there another choice Trump could have made instead of the strikes?

Was Iran (prior to recent Israeli strikes) priotrising development of a bomb? US officials said no in March and no again last week.

The step up in enriched uranium could be used for developing a weapon. It could also be used as a bargaining chip in the diplomatic talks to get Iran a better deal and have some economic sanctions lifted.

I don't have much confidence in Trump or his government as creative or psychological thinkers. They don't seem dynamic, wiley, perceptive or really that bright. Was there the need to attack now? Was there a need to directly attack at all? What else could they have done? I don't have any answers, and I accept they're privy to more information than I am. I just think better people might have seen other solutions and made better choices.

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:18

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:16

They can reject whatever they want in their own country and close whatever embassy they want, I don't care

Edited

@BigBillyButterBollocks do you think Iran should go on to develop nuclear weapons?

SpidersAreShitheads · 22/06/2025 17:19

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:06

The intelligence shows a range of predictions. Some of the intelligence says a weapon was weeks away, some says months. How close should we leave it?

What would you do to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons?

I’d be genuinely interested in reports that said Iran was about to produce a nuclear weapon. I know it’s hard to read tone on here but if there are properly authoritative reports/intelligence, I would be really interested to read them. I think we should all be open to learning facts, not just cherry-picking information that suits our narrative.

Everything I’ve read though, including from the US, said Iran were carrying out concerning activities but weren’t able to produce a nuclear bomb any time soon.

The question remains - why has Trump got involved NOW? If for a moment we take the intelligence about an imminent threat at face value, why did he wait so long? Why wait until they’re allegedly on the verge of producing a bomb? It just doesn’t make sense logically.

There has to be democracy. One of the world’s most powerful countries can’t just take it upon itself to bomb another country.

What if it were China? What if China decided that a country it viewed as hostile shouldn’t have nuclear capacity - would it be ok for them to bomb them too? That country might not be hostile to us, but if it’s hostile to China and their allies, then it’s ok for China to bomb them - because after all, the US has just done that….

If a country presents a genuine and imminent threat, there are emergency procedures. Trump has ignored everything that’s in place.

Hopefully there won’t be retaliatory attacks because Iran is weak and hopefully the US did wipe out their nuclear plants - that would as least be some consolation. But this is a very powerful country that’s gone rogue which isn’t something that any of us should be applauding.

Outside9 · 22/06/2025 17:22

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:10

Israel is a democracy and an ally. Iran is a hostile state. Can you really not see the difference?

How can an apartheid state be an exemplar of democracy?

Israel has bombed all over the middle east, but is not hostile right? The West's savior.

How dare Iran get bombed repeatedly by Israel, and now the US and dare to have a reaction.

PothasProblem · 22/06/2025 17:22

sunnydaysfillmewithpeace · 22/06/2025 16:30

I agree OP!

Iran has provided funding, weapons, and training to Hamas since the early 1990s, something around $350m a year. In addition it provides military assistance to Russia to help it smack Ukraine, funds
Hezbollah’s war in Lebanon, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, the Shia militias in Iraq and the Pro-Assad militias in Syria. And oh, as a side dish routinely hangs women for the crime of adultery not to mention the many who have ‘disappeared’ for refusing to cover their bodies head to toe. Iran is ruled by a religious extremist who hates you, me and anything western and would quite happily blow us all up in pursuit of Islamic extremism ruling the world.

This is a good thing.

Ok but you're advocating here to attack them to force a regime change.

Israel and Trump attacked them to destroy their nuclear capability (ostensibly)

If you're going to go to war, you need to be very clear what the objective of that war is and at what point it can end

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:23

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:18

@BigBillyButterBollocks do you think Iran should go on to develop nuclear weapons?

I don't care. I genuinely don't. Enough woth that Iran boogie man fearmongering.

I don't think Israel should have nuclear weapons, let's bomb them.

I don't believe the USA should have nuclear weapons, let's bomb them. Let nomb everyone into peace!

TooBigForMyBoots · 22/06/2025 17:24

YourAmplePlumPoster · 22/06/2025 16:45

Iran blocking the strait of Hormuz will affect China more than anyone else.

So? That's no comfort when our bills rise.Confused

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:26

JustSawJohnny · 22/06/2025 16:38

If you think Israel have treated the people of Gaza well in the years prior to the terrorist attack and that Netanyahu doesn't have the goal of ethnically cleansing the area then we clearly have opposing views.

Netanyahu is a war criminal, IMO.

As for the US, are we going to conveniently forget the Iraq debacle? You know, the last time we were told there was a nuclear facility that needed to be wiped out and then is transpired that there never was one?

A lot of this is about oil. Was with Iraq - is now.

Iran currently have control of the Straight of Hormuz and that won't sit well with the US in the slightest.

Both Iran and Israel need a regime change for the greater good but the US deciding who and who should not have nuclear weapons is nothing short of jokes when they developed them and are the only country to have ever used them.

I think they have tried to keep the people of Gaza from firing constant rockets, infiltrated their country with suicide bombers, blowing up school buses, digging tunnels underneath Israel and launching terrorist attacks. Israel took all its people out of Gaza, and left the gazans a well developed country with industry and infrastructure in place. What did the Gazans do? They destroyed most of the factories, tearing them apart so they could produce rockets, then then elected Hamas who have spent the time since building tunnels, rockets and amassing arms to attack Israel. In fact there have been around 50,000 SEPARATE incidents of terrorist attacks on Israel since 1994. So if they dont treat them particulary well, one could argue there's some justification for it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread