Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the US was right to bomb Iran? What am I missing?

948 replies

Lastu · 22/06/2025 13:45

I am no fan of Trump. I’m very much left wing.

But am I missing something here? Why has everyone become such huge supporters of Iran? The world is a safer place as a result of removing their capability to develop nuclear weapons? Why is everyone carrying on like Iran is a victim and they were truly just trying to implement peaceful nuclear capabilities? Has everyone lost the plot?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:38

kulafey · 22/06/2025 16:37

And yet Israel has not launched ONE single unprovoked attack on the "palestinians" EVER. Not one. Name one....I'll wait.

Over 70 years of constant occupation is one long unprovoked attack.

JustSawJohnny · 22/06/2025 16:38

kulafey · 22/06/2025 16:07

With the exception, maybe, of the 1956 Arab–Israeli War, which the UK and France engineered, name one war where Israel has been the aggressor? They have only ever acted in response to extreme threat.
As for the USA, since the 20th century they have certainly become involved in quite a lot of wars, but did they start them? It's debatable in many cases, but they certainly started a few in the early to mid 20th century and they certainly were the aggressors in the Iraq war. But Israel? No.
But the question is, if Iran or Iraq had the military capabilities of the USA, how much of the world would still be standing? The USA isn't more aggressive than others, it just has more capability. Sadaam Hussein openly spoke of wanting Iraq to dominate the whole middle eat by force - it just wasn't strong enough. Iran already support militant proxies across the Middle East, if it had the power of the USA it would eliminate Israel and spread their Shia Islamist ideology by military expansion through the region and into the Gulf. The same can be said of Afghanistan, Pakistan and others. America is no more or less aggressive than anywhere else, its just better at it.

If you think Israel have treated the people of Gaza well in the years prior to the terrorist attack and that Netanyahu doesn't have the goal of ethnically cleansing the area then we clearly have opposing views.

Netanyahu is a war criminal, IMO.

As for the US, are we going to conveniently forget the Iraq debacle? You know, the last time we were told there was a nuclear facility that needed to be wiped out and then is transpired that there never was one?

A lot of this is about oil. Was with Iraq - is now.

Iran currently have control of the Straight of Hormuz and that won't sit well with the US in the slightest.

Both Iran and Israel need a regime change for the greater good but the US deciding who and who should not have nuclear weapons is nothing short of jokes when they developed them and are the only country to have ever used them.

PandoraSocks · 22/06/2025 16:40

genesis92 · 22/06/2025 16:26

For anyone who doesn’t agree with the US strikes, do you believe it’s perfectly ok for Iran to have or develop nuclear weapons then?

No. I would very much prefer it not to.

Livelovebehappy · 22/06/2025 16:40

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:36

For those of you who support Israel/US action - can you explain what the long term goal is here? So, you bomb the crap out of Iran to get rid of the regime and then what? Install a friendly despot like the US did with the Shah? That worked out well in Iraq. Or do you destroy the regime and walk away leaving Iranians to rebuild their country as best they can? Maybe you can parachute in some tame exile to rule your new occupied territory?

I think the goal is to postpone Irans nuclear capabilities. Another despot regime will enter the fray afyer these bombings, and they will start to build their nuclear weapons again, which can take many years. So it's basically just kicking the can down the road. I doubt the US will have any appetite to install and police a more a acceptable regime.

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 16:41

PandoraSocks · 22/06/2025 16:40

No. I would very much prefer it not to.

How would you stop them?

greencartbluecart · 22/06/2025 16:43

yotally agree with the pps who point out that Isreal has killed Palestinians, invaded their land and stolen their homes for generations and that to me started it

the isrealis have ( until recently) killed 10 Palestinians for every isreali the Palestinians have managed to kill. That fed it.

pretending that the music festival started this is … well people who state this - it makes me disbelieve anything else they say as it’s such rubbish - incorrect

kulafey · 22/06/2025 16:44

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PandoraSocks · 22/06/2025 16:44

sunnydaysfillmewithpeace · 22/06/2025 16:30

I agree OP!

Iran has provided funding, weapons, and training to Hamas since the early 1990s, something around $350m a year. In addition it provides military assistance to Russia to help it smack Ukraine, funds
Hezbollah’s war in Lebanon, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, the Shia militias in Iraq and the Pro-Assad militias in Syria. And oh, as a side dish routinely hangs women for the crime of adultery not to mention the many who have ‘disappeared’ for refusing to cover their bodies head to toe. Iran is ruled by a religious extremist who hates you, me and anything western and would quite happily blow us all up in pursuit of Islamic extremism ruling the world.

This is a good thing.

Can you explain please how Trump's actions are going to solve any of this?

Because if it was as simple as a few bombs being dropped and suddenly Iran is no longer a threat, no longer treats its citizens appallingly and routinely murders them, why didn't anyone think of doing it before now?

YourAmplePlumPoster · 22/06/2025 16:45

Iran blocking the strait of Hormuz will affect China more than anyone else.

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 16:46

YourAmplePlumPoster · 22/06/2025 16:45

Iran blocking the strait of Hormuz will affect China more than anyone else.

Agree

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Careful, your racism is showing

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 16:51

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:36

For those of you who support Israel/US action - can you explain what the long term goal is here? So, you bomb the crap out of Iran to get rid of the regime and then what? Install a friendly despot like the US did with the Shah? That worked out well in Iraq. Or do you destroy the regime and walk away leaving Iranians to rebuild their country as best they can? Maybe you can parachute in some tame exile to rule your new occupied territory?

It was bombed to remove nuclear capability, not the regime.

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:53

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 16:51

It was bombed to remove nuclear capability, not the regime.

So, the Iranian regime just starts over with the nuclear plans? And in another 5 years we will be having this discussion again?

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 16:55

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:53

So, the Iranian regime just starts over with the nuclear plans? And in another 5 years we will be having this discussion again?

What would you do?

Morningsleepin · 22/06/2025 16:57

I'm just so sad to see the UK believing that it is OK to attack another country for philosophical differences. I hate the government of El Salvador and my heart breaks for the Salvadoreans who live there. Argentina treats its people appallingly too. Should Sir Keir attack those countries too. And those are just ones that occur to me off the top of my head

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:58

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 16:55

What would you do?

Well, as others have said I would rather no-one, including Israel, had nuclear weapons. In fact, making sure Israel's nuclear capabilities were being properly monitored by the appropriate international agencies would be a good start. I don't think random bombing campaigns like we've just seen have any long term concrete benefits. It just cements the idea that some nations are above the law.

PickyBits · 22/06/2025 16:59

Whatafustercluck · 22/06/2025 16:37

I'm no supporter of Iran's regime. At all.

But the US has shown that it will just act unilaterally, and stick two fingers up to everyone else attempting diplomacy. I hope they don't expect the UK to support military action when they've all but said they will have nothing to do with defending Ukraine, and Europe, from Putin.

Also, the only country in history to have used nuclear weapons on civilians is the US. A tad hypocritical to maintain the anti nuclear narrative when it comes to other countries, while maintaining a healthy stockpile yourself.

All this continued willy waving is doing is taking the world closer and closer to World War 3. Ironic, given that Trump accused Zelensky of gambling with it.

How do you do ‘diplomacy’ with a fundamentalist death cult that has a martyrdom ideology. keeps it’s own people prisoner and has slogans such as ‘Death to America, Death to England, Death to Israel’, and trains and funds terrorists around the world.

Iran has already plotted multiple terrorist attacks against the UK.

I don’t think Trump and Israel expect anything from the UK quite frankly, although we should be very grateful if regime collapse happens.

The US last used nuclear weapons 80 years ago in a World War. Not really relevant to today’s geopolitical landscape, especially with regard to international terrorism.

I wouldn’t call a real risk of nuclear weapons being used as ‘willy waving’. Should that risk have been ignored until the nukes were actually fired?

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:00

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:58

Well, as others have said I would rather no-one, including Israel, had nuclear weapons. In fact, making sure Israel's nuclear capabilities were being properly monitored by the appropriate international agencies would be a good start. I don't think random bombing campaigns like we've just seen have any long term concrete benefits. It just cements the idea that some nations are above the law.

And what would you do about Iran's capability?

We'd all rather the weapons didn't exist but they do, so with that in mind, how would you resolve the Iran nuclear issue?

SpidersAreShitheads · 22/06/2025 17:00

This thread is infuriating.

Really clearly for the people at the back: you can believe that Trump’s unauthorised bombing of Iran was a poor idea while simultaneously believing that Iran shouldn’t have nuclear weapons.

Both those things can be true. Wild, I know.

The US’ own intelligence said Iran wasn’t close to having a nuclear weapon. Years away. So why bomb now when Iran was showing signs of being open to negotiations?

I don’t have answers but Israel and the US are besties right now so I suspect that’s a contributory factor.

Also, I thought Trump was opposed to getting involved in conflict outside the US….?

Yes, we would all be happier if Iran’s nuclear capacity was removed but you can’t just bomb a country because you fancy it.

There was no imminent nuclear threat and no reason not to go through proper channels. Democracy matters but Trump repeatedly shows utter contempt for it.

And just to add insult to injury, it’s now looking increasingly likely that the bombs didn’t even hit Iran’s nuclear plants. Slow clap. Well done.

I hope the UK stays well out of this shit-show. This is a mess started by Trump in 2018 when he scrapped the Iran agreement and exacerbated by his decision to bomb the country last night.

florasl · 22/06/2025 17:01

Iran fund a number of terrorist organisations including Hamas and Hezzbolah, surely people aren’t supporting a country that fund proxy terror organisations around the world having nuclear weapons.

PinkSwatch · 22/06/2025 17:01

Hardlyworking · 22/06/2025 13:54

Hostile to whom? Are you saying you don't consider the USA hostile?

Between Iran and USA, only one has been in the news constantly for the last 9 months for their persistent threats to world trade and peace. Spoiler, it wasn't Iran!

Are you completely ignorant of the Iranian regime? Do you think their people live in a free democracy?

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:01

Morningsleepin · 22/06/2025 16:57

I'm just so sad to see the UK believing that it is OK to attack another country for philosophical differences. I hate the government of El Salvador and my heart breaks for the Salvadoreans who live there. Argentina treats its people appallingly too. Should Sir Keir attack those countries too. And those are just ones that occur to me off the top of my head

There’s nothing philosophical about Iran developing a nuclear weapon! What on Earth?

PinkSwatch · 22/06/2025 17:02

florasl · 22/06/2025 17:01

Iran fund a number of terrorist organisations including Hamas and Hezzbolah, surely people aren’t supporting a country that fund proxy terror organisations around the world having nuclear weapons.

The same people that support Hamas and organise ridiculous groups like "Queers for Palestine", probably.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:02

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 16:58

Well, as others have said I would rather no-one, including Israel, had nuclear weapons. In fact, making sure Israel's nuclear capabilities were being properly monitored by the appropriate international agencies would be a good start. I don't think random bombing campaigns like we've just seen have any long term concrete benefits. It just cements the idea that some nations are above the law.

So your answer to Iran developing nuclear weapons is to inspect Israel?

What would you do about Iran?