Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the US was right to bomb Iran? What am I missing?

948 replies

Lastu · 22/06/2025 13:45

I am no fan of Trump. I’m very much left wing.

But am I missing something here? Why has everyone become such huge supporters of Iran? The world is a safer place as a result of removing their capability to develop nuclear weapons? Why is everyone carrying on like Iran is a victim and they were truly just trying to implement peaceful nuclear capabilities? Has everyone lost the plot?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:27

SpidersAreShitheads · 22/06/2025 17:19

I’d be genuinely interested in reports that said Iran was about to produce a nuclear weapon. I know it’s hard to read tone on here but if there are properly authoritative reports/intelligence, I would be really interested to read them. I think we should all be open to learning facts, not just cherry-picking information that suits our narrative.

Everything I’ve read though, including from the US, said Iran were carrying out concerning activities but weren’t able to produce a nuclear bomb any time soon.

The question remains - why has Trump got involved NOW? If for a moment we take the intelligence about an imminent threat at face value, why did he wait so long? Why wait until they’re allegedly on the verge of producing a bomb? It just doesn’t make sense logically.

There has to be democracy. One of the world’s most powerful countries can’t just take it upon itself to bomb another country.

What if it were China? What if China decided that a country it viewed as hostile shouldn’t have nuclear capacity - would it be ok for them to bomb them too? That country might not be hostile to us, but if it’s hostile to China and their allies, then it’s ok for China to bomb them - because after all, the US has just done that….

If a country presents a genuine and imminent threat, there are emergency procedures. Trump has ignored everything that’s in place.

Hopefully there won’t be retaliatory attacks because Iran is weak and hopefully the US did wipe out their nuclear plants - that would as least be some consolation. But this is a very powerful country that’s gone rogue which isn’t something that any of us should be applauding.

Tulsi Gabbard and the U.S. Intelligence confirmed a few weeks ago that Iran was NOT building nuclear weapons.

She changed her tune yesterday, for some reason🙄

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:27

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:23

I don't care. I genuinely don't. Enough woth that Iran boogie man fearmongering.

I don't think Israel should have nuclear weapons, let's bomb them.

I don't believe the USA should have nuclear weapons, let's bomb them. Let nomb everyone into peace!

So you are certain Iran can develop a nuclear weapon and it’ll be fine?

Most leaders are concerned, even those who’ve tried agreements in last decade or so.

Why are you so sure it would be ok for Iran to have those weapons?

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 17:29

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:26

I think they have tried to keep the people of Gaza from firing constant rockets, infiltrated their country with suicide bombers, blowing up school buses, digging tunnels underneath Israel and launching terrorist attacks. Israel took all its people out of Gaza, and left the gazans a well developed country with industry and infrastructure in place. What did the Gazans do? They destroyed most of the factories, tearing them apart so they could produce rockets, then then elected Hamas who have spent the time since building tunnels, rockets and amassing arms to attack Israel. In fact there have been around 50,000 SEPARATE incidents of terrorist attacks on Israel since 1994. So if they dont treat them particulary well, one could argue there's some justification for it.

How many Israeli deaths and how many Palestinian? How many Palestinians have the Israeli government killed? A people under occupation have the right under international law to defend themselves.

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:30

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:27

So you are certain Iran can develop a nuclear weapon and it’ll be fine?

Most leaders are concerned, even those who’ve tried agreements in last decade or so.

Why are you so sure it would be ok for Iran to have those weapons?

Which leaders? Those who really need Iran to be weakened to make sure they keep controle in the region? Those we have witnessed gaslighting us about Gaza for almost 2 years?

Those who don't do shit for their respective countries but spend every day worrying about what happened thousand miles away?

Them?

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:34

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:30

Which leaders? Those who really need Iran to be weakened to make sure they keep controle in the region? Those we have witnessed gaslighting us about Gaza for almost 2 years?

Those who don't do shit for their respective countries but spend every day worrying about what happened thousand miles away?

Them?

Edited

Nearly all leaders agree it’s a bad idea for Iran to develop nuclear capability, some on mn think it’s fine.

I’m wondering how you and others are so certain

Gloriia · 22/06/2025 17:36

'How many Palestinians have the Israeli government killed?'

Hundreds of thousands according to terrorists hamas, the gazan official spokespeople. Those bastions of telling the truth.

Any civilian casualties have been because terrorists hide among the civilians. Those intent om murdering don't tend to release warnings to vacate like the IDF did.

Toomuchheattoday · 22/06/2025 17:36

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:34

Nearly all leaders agree it’s a bad idea for Iran to develop nuclear capability, some on mn think it’s fine.

I’m wondering how you and others are so certain

WHO on MN thinks it’s fine?

Toomuchheattoday · 22/06/2025 17:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:37

greencartbluecart · 22/06/2025 16:43

yotally agree with the pps who point out that Isreal has killed Palestinians, invaded their land and stolen their homes for generations and that to me started it

the isrealis have ( until recently) killed 10 Palestinians for every isreali the Palestinians have managed to kill. That fed it.

pretending that the music festival started this is … well people who state this - it makes me disbelieve anything else they say as it’s such rubbish - incorrect

"the Isrealis have ( until recently) killed 10 Palestinians for every Isreali the Palestinians have managed to kill"

The operative word here is MANAGED. If the Palestinians had the military might that Israel does, they'd have completely wiped Israel out. Not a Jew would be left standing. The fact that Palestinians still exist shows great restraint from Israel. There have been over 50,000 separate terrorist attacks from the Palestinians since the late 90s, they provoke and provoke and Israel can take no more. Maybe if Hamas had spent more of that international aid on an iron dome, rather than on weapons that they hide in schools and hospitals, not so many of them would be dead? Maybe if they stopped attacking Israel, there wouldnt be any war? The numbers are irrelevant, the intent is what matters. If Israel WANTED to kill Palestinians, they'd be dead, Israel has the military means, it controls the borders, the fact that they let thousands of tonnes of aid through every day says it all. If their aim was the eradication of gazans, there would be no Gazans. If Gaza had the miltary means that Israel has, there would be no Israel. The fact that Israel protects its citizens means fewer Israeli deaths, its a pity Hamas doesnt give a damn about its own citizens.
As Golda Meir said,
"We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us."

Swirlythingy2025 · 22/06/2025 17:37

considering how often the west gets accused of western imperialism etc, would the better option be for the west to completely pull out of the region ?

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:37

Toomuchheattoday · 22/06/2025 17:36

WHO on MN thinks it’s fine?

@Toomuchheattodayread the last few posts from the pp it was only a couple of minutes ago.

No need for caps btw

Gloriia · 22/06/2025 17:38

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:34

Nearly all leaders agree it’s a bad idea for Iran to develop nuclear capability, some on mn think it’s fine.

I’m wondering how you and others are so certain

The people on mn who think it's fine will be the same sort who carry 'LGBT support palestine' placards. Seemingly unaware that they'd be thrown from buildings in gaza.

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:38

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:34

Nearly all leaders agree it’s a bad idea for Iran to develop nuclear capability, some on mn think it’s fine.

I’m wondering how you and others are so certain

*All European and American "leaders"

As I said, they need to stay in controle of the region for theboil. The U.S. just bombed Iran. Of course theybare gonna parrot what they have been told to say.

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:38

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 17:29

How many Israeli deaths and how many Palestinian? How many Palestinians have the Israeli government killed? A people under occupation have the right under international law to defend themselves.

If the Palestinians had the military might that Israel does, they'd have completely wiped Israel out. Not a Jew would be left standing. The fact that Palestinians still exist shows great restraint from Israel. There have been over 50,000 separate terrorist attacks from the Palestinians since the late 90s, they provoke and provoke and Israel can take no more. Maybe if Hamas had spent more of that international aid on an iron dome, rather than on weapons that they hide in schools and hospitals, not so many of them would be dead? Maybe if they stopped attacking Israel, there wouldnt be any war? The numbers are irrelevant, the intent is what matters. If Israel WANTED to kill Palestinians, they'd be dead, Israel has the military means, it controls the borders, the fact that they let thousands of tonnes of aid through every day says it all. If their aim was the eradication of gazans, there would be no Gazans. If Gaza had the miltary means that Israel has, there would be no Israel. The fact that Israel protects its citizens means fewer Israeli deaths, its a pity Hamas doesnt give a damn about its own citizens.
As Golda Meir said,
"We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us."

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:40

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:38

*All European and American "leaders"

As I said, they need to stay in controle of the region for theboil. The U.S. just bombed Iran. Of course theybare gonna parrot what they have been told to say.

So you’d prefer Iran to be left alone to develop weapons? I can’t share your certainty it would be fine.

Gloriia · 22/06/2025 17:40

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:38

If the Palestinians had the military might that Israel does, they'd have completely wiped Israel out. Not a Jew would be left standing. The fact that Palestinians still exist shows great restraint from Israel. There have been over 50,000 separate terrorist attacks from the Palestinians since the late 90s, they provoke and provoke and Israel can take no more. Maybe if Hamas had spent more of that international aid on an iron dome, rather than on weapons that they hide in schools and hospitals, not so many of them would be dead? Maybe if they stopped attacking Israel, there wouldnt be any war? The numbers are irrelevant, the intent is what matters. If Israel WANTED to kill Palestinians, they'd be dead, Israel has the military means, it controls the borders, the fact that they let thousands of tonnes of aid through every day says it all. If their aim was the eradication of gazans, there would be no Gazans. If Gaza had the miltary means that Israel has, there would be no Israel. The fact that Israel protects its citizens means fewer Israeli deaths, its a pity Hamas doesnt give a damn about its own citizens.
As Golda Meir said,
"We will have peace with the Arabs when they love their children more than they hate us."

👏

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:40

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:16

They can reject whatever they want in their own country and close whatever embassy they want, I don't care

Edited

It is quite hostile though, isn’t it?

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What would you do @Toomuchheattodayre Iran other than call people bots

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

kulafey · 22/06/2025 17:42

Outside9 · 22/06/2025 17:03

Iran having nuclear enrichment = very bad.

Israel having nuclear weapons = fine. Or at least not as bad?

Ethnosupremacy captured succinctly.

Israel hasn't vowed to obliterate another country and murder all its civilians. Israel is not run by religious nutters, it is educated, civilised and rational. It also doesnt cut off hands for petty theft, stone women to death for adultery or throw gay people off tall buildings.... so there is that...

BuffysBigSister · 22/06/2025 17:43

Gloriia · 22/06/2025 17:36

'How many Palestinians have the Israeli government killed?'

Hundreds of thousands according to terrorists hamas, the gazan official spokespeople. Those bastions of telling the truth.

Any civilian casualties have been because terrorists hide among the civilians. Those intent om murdering don't tend to release warnings to vacate like the IDF did.

Aye, right. The hasbara doesn't work anymore now we all have access to social media. Israel can ban international journalists from Gaza but we can still see the truth.

greencartbluecart · 22/06/2025 17:44

if Palestine had had the capability to build a big military it’s quite possible that very few of them would actually want to annihilate the Jewish people . we will never know but most rich and successful countries are not hot beds of hate

Isreal is the exception that proves the rule . And actually I don’t believe all isrealis want to anihilate the Palestinians and other Muslims

As it is that is speculation that has been used to justify the abuse and killing of Palestinians for decades - better kill them ans humiliate them because they hate us so much they would kill us in an instant

end up like a dog that’s been beat too much ?

Toomuchheattoday · 22/06/2025 17:46

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:41

What would you do @Toomuchheattodayre Iran other than call people bots

I would not attack and it’s already been explained many times on this thread why people don’t think this is a good plan.

Chalk111111 · 22/06/2025 17:46

SpidersAreShitheads · 22/06/2025 17:19

I’d be genuinely interested in reports that said Iran was about to produce a nuclear weapon. I know it’s hard to read tone on here but if there are properly authoritative reports/intelligence, I would be really interested to read them. I think we should all be open to learning facts, not just cherry-picking information that suits our narrative.

Everything I’ve read though, including from the US, said Iran were carrying out concerning activities but weren’t able to produce a nuclear bomb any time soon.

The question remains - why has Trump got involved NOW? If for a moment we take the intelligence about an imminent threat at face value, why did he wait so long? Why wait until they’re allegedly on the verge of producing a bomb? It just doesn’t make sense logically.

There has to be democracy. One of the world’s most powerful countries can’t just take it upon itself to bomb another country.

What if it were China? What if China decided that a country it viewed as hostile shouldn’t have nuclear capacity - would it be ok for them to bomb them too? That country might not be hostile to us, but if it’s hostile to China and their allies, then it’s ok for China to bomb them - because after all, the US has just done that….

If a country presents a genuine and imminent threat, there are emergency procedures. Trump has ignored everything that’s in place.

Hopefully there won’t be retaliatory attacks because Iran is weak and hopefully the US did wipe out their nuclear plants - that would as least be some consolation. But this is a very powerful country that’s gone rogue which isn’t something that any of us should be applauding.

And you see no difference between China and the US?

You are right. Information can be cherry picked. We can pretend that the intelligence shows whatever we want it to - so there is no point in insisting that it showed that Iran wouldn't have nuclear weapons for years.

It is happening now because of the heightened tension between Israel and Iran. Israel is the US’ ally.

BigBillyButterBollocks · 22/06/2025 17:46

EasternStandard · 22/06/2025 17:40

So you’d prefer Iran to be left alone to develop weapons? I can’t share your certainty it would be fine.

I'd prefer we stop meddling in the region. I'd prefer we focus on being self suficient and invest in ourselves instead of spending all the money advancing corporations interest in other countries. I'd prefer politicians spending as much energy speaking up for their citizens as they do for Israel.

I'd prefer we spend money putting our war criminals on trial rather than bombing Iran for something they might or might not do.