That's gentle parenting - authoritative but respectful. A permissive approach would be to allow the behaviour to continue, an authoritarian approach would be to punish the 'disobedience' of the second throw
What is wrong with punishing disobedience? This is where one of the great blindness of "gentle parents" comes in. They think their child is well behaved because they can eventually be coaxed to do as you've asked. They visit my home & I think they are badly behaved because they:
- don't do as they are told first time, even great big kids of 8/9
- question instructions, wasting time & disrupting activities for others
- have to be nagged several times/don't listen when told no.
People always give example of toddlers with gentle parenting/natural consequences, but in RL what I see is ineffective toddler approaches but with a child of 6 or 7. They are still doing things a second or third time after being told not to.
Suggesting that the parenting has not prevented recurring behaviour. What do you do when it keeps recurring?
There are no real consequences of risking it, and often a child gets away with bad behaviour because older children don't always have grown ups hovering a few metres away the way toddlers do. The sorts of transgressions older children make often don't really have a natural consequence they care about either:
- Bully that kid you don't like - natural consequence, he won't play with you - you don't care, he's not one of your mates anyway. Other children don't tend to exclude the popular bully either so there's no meaningful natural consequence.
- don't do your homework - natural consequence, bad marks - you don't care until its too late to remedy.
Schools, police, society, need children to learn to obey first time, in group context where they won't get a one on one adult managing behaviour. If you don't apply real, meaningful consequences (i.e. punishments!!) for bad behaviour, in what sense are you maintaining firm boundaries?