I honestly thought they people were being OTT here, as it's probably safest to left the child asleep (though why dad can't get a taxi I don't understand) and so I put 3 scenarios into chat gtp to analyse the risks. (1) Child walking home from school and crossing roads then spending an hour at home, but not cooking. (2)10yo left home for an hour at 4am (3) taking child with you for an hour round trip.
I'll paste it's conclusions:
"Summary and Ranking
Scenario Approximate fatality risk (rounded) Relative risk
🏠 Alone asleep at home, 4am ~1 in 4 billion Safest
🚶♂️ Walking home + alone for 1hr ~1 in 5–10 million Medium
🚗 1hr car trip at 4am ~1 in 3–5 million Riskiest
---
Conclusions
✅ Being left alone asleep at home at 4am for 1hr is by far the safest of these three scenarios, assuming the home is safe and the child knows what to do in a fire.
✅ Walking home + alone for 1hr is somewhat riskier, mainly from the road crossing — not from being home alone.
✅ The 4am car trip is the riskiest of the three, mainly because:
4am is a dangerous driving time.
UK roads at this hour have disproportionately more fatigue, alcohol, and poor conditions"
Turns out I wasn't crazy! We may feel that taking the child with us is safer, but statistically it's FAR more dangerous. 800 times greater risk of death.
If I'm in a horrific car accident, I'd much rather my child be tucked up in bed then in the seat next to me!
Also having child home alone whilst awake means they are squeezing on and off electronics, walking up and down the stairs, perhaps deciding to make themselves a snack, using a sharp knife, a whole host of everyday activities that could cause an accident or fire. That's far more likely than a spontaneous house fire at 4am