Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nigel Farage on abortions- slippery slope?

571 replies

Ph2028 · 28/05/2025 01:13

Following the speech, Farage was also asked about his view on abortion limits. He replied that he was pro-choice but that it was "utterly ludicrous" for abortion to be allowed up to 24 weeks, when a hospital would "move heaven and earth" to help a baby born at 22 weeks survive.

Aibu to think it may be a slippery slope to reducing the number of weeks until it is effectively banned...

Anyway it's a bit of a non issue on Nigel's part given nearly 94% of reported abortions happen before two and a half months of pregnancy.so very few abortions happen at 24 weeks.

Now i remember why I requested a tubal ligation when I was pregnant with first baby as I didn't want anymore in any circumstances. It was predictably denied so dh got a vasectomy instead.

OP posts:
OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 16:07

CurlewKate · 28/05/2025 16:02

How many women have you spoken to who feel pressured not to have an abortion? An I think if you are going to use your experience as a volunteer as evidence, you should say what organization runs the hotline.

If you are interested, The Samaritans. We do a rotation of through the night shifts, and the calls during the early hours are the ones when people really talk and are most honest. Quite an eye opener. Well worth anyone taking the time to listen, there are a lot of distressed people out there. Gives you a fuller insight into most debates.

MattCauthon · 28/05/2025 16:09

UK government data shows that just 0.1% of abortions happen after 24 weeks. 0.1%. All for medical reasons. In 2022, of the 260 abortions performed at 24 weeks and over, 256 were carried out because of serious fetal abnormalities.

And only 1% were performed at 20-24 weeks.

MattCauthon · 28/05/2025 16:10

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 16:07

If you are interested, The Samaritans. We do a rotation of through the night shifts, and the calls during the early hours are the ones when people really talk and are most honest. Quite an eye opener. Well worth anyone taking the time to listen, there are a lot of distressed people out there. Gives you a fuller insight into most debates.

what about women who want abortions but are being pressured not to have them?

DungareesTrombonesDinos · 28/05/2025 16:14

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 14:57

I think it’s wrong actually to suggest an abortion to anyone, it’s the woman alone who has to go through it.

The judgment towards teenage mothers in the UK generally is disappointing, I don’t agree with pressuring teenagers into abortions they don’t want purely because of their age, no.

A good friend of mine had a baby at 15. I was the only person she confided in at school. Thankfully her family, partner and school staff were kind and non-judgmental once she could no longer keep it a secret. He’s now a thriving young adult, she’s thriving too. His birth did not hinder her life in the slightest. Always smile when I see them together. Stacey Solomon is also a brilliant role model for young mothers.

Oh jog on with this attitude. My birth Mum had me at 15 and gave me up for adoption and it has deeply, deeply affected my life. In every single way, in every fibre of my being it has impacted on me. I'm on the waiting list for trauma therapy because the trauma of being removed from her at birth leaves me with a feeling of grief that I'm not sure I would ever get over.

Suggesting that teenage pregnancy is super smooth sailing and great and fantastic is disingenuous. Plenty of teenage Mums struggle. Plenty dont but plenty do. Their right to have an informed choice about their bodies is the most important thing. Being a Mum at any age has an enormous impact on our careers!

I had a termination and whilst it was a horrible process to go through I have zero regrets.

BloodandGlitter · 28/05/2025 16:17

99.9% of the women having late term abortions are actually incredibly brave and loving of their babies, they're having those abortions so their child doesn't have to suffer a short life on earth while crippled with pain and undergoing invasive and uncomfortable medical treatment to keep them alive for a short time of suffering.
A baby that is never born only ever knows love, warmth and safety of their mothers womb, they don't know their life was cut short, but the mother mourns for the child that wasn't compatible with life, she takes on the pain the child would have suffered and makes it her own so they never have to know it.

Restricting access to abortion will only mean the rise of back alley abortions again and more women dying. No one has the right to control another persons body. It's a dangerous road to start down.

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 16:17

MattCauthon · 28/05/2025 16:09

UK government data shows that just 0.1% of abortions happen after 24 weeks. 0.1%. All for medical reasons. In 2022, of the 260 abortions performed at 24 weeks and over, 256 were carried out because of serious fetal abnormalities.

And only 1% were performed at 20-24 weeks.

So that would imply after debate and scrutiny that the limit will stay as it is then surely?

Cherrytree86 · 28/05/2025 16:20

@OutandAboutMum1821

thing is something that you don’t seem to comprehend and/or accept is that not every woman wants to be a mother. It’s not the right thing for some women. They won’t enjoy it, they wouldn’t be happy. So they have the right to choose to not be mothers. It really is that simple.

Cherrytree86 · 28/05/2025 16:25

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 14:35

I’m neither happy nor unhappy for her. I will hold her accountable though for so publicly putting across a message to young girls and women that it’s thanks to an abortion she is there claiming her award. That’s a dangerous message. Firstly, many people would choose a baby over fame any day. Secondly, I would have found her far more inspiring if that child had been there by her side whilst claiming her award. I know a lady who fell pregnant whilst at university, still obtained the highest possible degree and has gone on to achieve very highly in her career. Now that’s far more inspiring to me.

Have a Google of celebs on abortion…Phoebe Bridgers on how ‘easy’ it was whilst on tour, like she’d popped out for a quick coffee then back to work. Beyond callous, and nothing to be proud of.

Edited

@OutandAboutMum1821

why do you think she chose fame as opposed to a fulfilling exciting career that has enabled her to travel the world and have some amazing life experiences? Because that’s what she’s had. And good for her.

CurlewKate · 28/05/2025 16:38

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 16:07

If you are interested, The Samaritans. We do a rotation of through the night shifts, and the calls during the early hours are the ones when people really talk and are most honest. Quite an eye opener. Well worth anyone taking the time to listen, there are a lot of distressed people out there. Gives you a fuller insight into most debates.

And the women who want abortions and are being pressured not to have them?

B1rthdayD1lemna · 28/05/2025 16:41

KidsDr · 28/05/2025 08:31

I've actually worked keeping babies at 22/40 weeks alive, the medicine is improving and I do think that's the right thing to do when they have parents who want to potentially provide them with life long care, and if they are medically suitable (a significant number are not, and are palliated - dying very quickly without invasive medical intervention - so it's not true that we "move heaven and earth" to aggressively resuscitate all babies born at 22/40 or even all babies born at 23 or 24 weeks).

I think 24 weeks is actually a rational abortion cut off based on the extremity of prematurity related illness, death and disability that is seen before this gestation. It's very hard work keeping babies below 24 weeks alive, for those looking after them and the babies themselves. No part of their body is mature, even their brains have gross anatomical differences (lack of folding) compared to older babies.

I don't think that we should do it in the absence of loving parents who at least indicate that they want to provide care (which many will need for a lifetime).

At the same time, I believe in women's right to access abortion. Even though babies at this gestation can and often are born with signs of life, as are occasionally babies born for a few weeks before this, birth itself is stressful to the baby. So I think how things are currently done is about right, even though it does make me sad to think about a healthy baby at 23 weeks being aborted, it's the same sadness I feel about a healthy baby at 23 weeks being exposed to alcohol and drugs - ultimately women's bodily autonomy prevails for me.

However, another possible cut off would be the gestation at which babies are not able to take any first breaths at all / go into cardiac arrest as a result of the stress of birth and therefore not able to contribute to their own transition at birth at all. I think medically that will be very difficult to overcome (ie if possible to keep babies alive then nearly 100% will have severe brain damage). It's a major factor in whether aggressive treatment is likely to be worthwhile in a 22/23/24 weeker. For example, I would counsel the parents of a 23 weeker that we will not resuscitate their baby if they are born without signs of life. Fewer and fewer babies will make any breathing effort / will survive birth the lower the gestation and I suspect there is an absolute physiological cut off somewhere, maybe around 18 weeks but I'm not sure.

Edited

@KidsDr

Thank you, this is really helpful to understand from a medical perspective. So would Drs only try aggressive interventions at 22-24 weeks if the parents are onboard? If the child would likely have severe disabilities would Drs not intervene if the parents aren’t onboard, or is there pressure on Drs to keep going with treatment?

MyUmberSeal · 28/05/2025 16:46

I’ve been a Samaritan for 11 years (A branch in Hampshire), and i have never taken a call, or a live chat, or an email, from someone who is being pressured into abortion.

sunnybeee · 28/05/2025 17:08

Cherrytree86 · 28/05/2025 16:20

@OutandAboutMum1821

thing is something that you don’t seem to comprehend and/or accept is that not every woman wants to be a mother. It’s not the right thing for some women. They won’t enjoy it, they wouldn’t be happy. So they have the right to choose to not be mothers. It really is that simple.

I haven’t read the full thread so sorry if this isn’t an appropriate response but surely a woman would or should know before the 24 week mark if she wants the child or not.

Of course women should have a choice, banning abortion like in the US is fucking crazy and dangerous. But equally I do feel uncomfortable about abortion at such a late stage. At some point the baby stops being a cluster of cells and starts being a person who could theoretically survive outside of the mother. This is where it becomes muddied for me.

Obviously this doesn’t apply to medical issues that arise with the mother or baby and may impact their quality of life. That’s different.

I just think there has to be a cut off otherwise would we still be approving abortion the week before the due date? The day before? No because it’s clearly unethical.

Largerbreakfast · 28/05/2025 17:42

wordywitch · 28/05/2025 08:18

So what?! So what if they just don’t want another child? How does it impact you?

What an utterly bizarre reply that shows a complete comprehension fail.

Glowingup · 28/05/2025 17:44

Largerbreakfast · 28/05/2025 17:42

What an utterly bizarre reply that shows a complete comprehension fail.

But it’s a good point. Why should they need a reason other than that they don’t want another child? If someone doesn’t want a child then forcing them to have one is going to have a pretty detrimental effect on them.

PlutoCat · 28/05/2025 17:46

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 14:35

I’m neither happy nor unhappy for her. I will hold her accountable though for so publicly putting across a message to young girls and women that it’s thanks to an abortion she is there claiming her award. That’s a dangerous message. Firstly, many people would choose a baby over fame any day. Secondly, I would have found her far more inspiring if that child had been there by her side whilst claiming her award. I know a lady who fell pregnant whilst at university, still obtained the highest possible degree and has gone on to achieve very highly in her career. Now that’s far more inspiring to me.

Have a Google of celebs on abortion…Phoebe Bridgers on how ‘easy’ it was whilst on tour, like she’d popped out for a quick coffee then back to work. Beyond callous, and nothing to be proud of.

Edited

You need to be careful about misrepresenting what women have said. This is the second time.

Bridgers wrote in a post on Instagram: “I had an abortion in October of last year while I was on tour.

“I went to Planned Parenthood where they gave me the abortion pill. It was easy. Everyone deserves that kind of access.”

What is callous about stating that access to a chemical/medical (not sure of correct term) abortion was easy for her and that should be available to everyone?

JHound · 28/05/2025 17:47

sunnybeee · 28/05/2025 17:08

I haven’t read the full thread so sorry if this isn’t an appropriate response but surely a woman would or should know before the 24 week mark if she wants the child or not.

Of course women should have a choice, banning abortion like in the US is fucking crazy and dangerous. But equally I do feel uncomfortable about abortion at such a late stage. At some point the baby stops being a cluster of cells and starts being a person who could theoretically survive outside of the mother. This is where it becomes muddied for me.

Obviously this doesn’t apply to medical issues that arise with the mother or baby and may impact their quality of life. That’s different.

I just think there has to be a cut off otherwise would we still be approving abortion the week before the due date? The day before? No because it’s clearly unethical.

That’s why only 0.1% of abortions occur post 24 weeks and all for medical reasons.

MyUmberSeal · 28/05/2025 17:52

Glowingup · 28/05/2025 17:44

But it’s a good point. Why should they need a reason other than that they don’t want another child? If someone doesn’t want a child then forcing them to have one is going to have a pretty detrimental effect on them.

Voice of reason 👆. I remember reading a post on here a while ago and the poster was basically saying….not wanting a baby is reason enough, this is not the X-factor and there doesn’t need to be some sob story with Westlife playing in the background, in order for a woman to justify having an abortion. If she wants one, and it’s within the legal parameters, then she should jolly well have one. End of.

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 17:55

PlutoCat · 28/05/2025 17:46

You need to be careful about misrepresenting what women have said. This is the second time.

Bridgers wrote in a post on Instagram: “I had an abortion in October of last year while I was on tour.

“I went to Planned Parenthood where they gave me the abortion pill. It was easy. Everyone deserves that kind of access.”

What is callous about stating that access to a chemical/medical (not sure of correct term) abortion was easy for her and that should be available to everyone?

Edited

Lily Allen: ‘Most people I know, including myself, just didn’t want to have a f*ing baby’.

Sounds awful! Grow up! Do more to stop getting pregnant in the first place then. Take some responsibility, but no, we like rights these days more than taking any personal responsibility. And swearing to make your point lowers it even further in my opinion.

Celebrities are broadcasting these views to millions of impressionable young girls. If politicians should stay out of it, then so should privileged celebrities!

LastPostISwear · 28/05/2025 17:59

Pregnancy is miserable. 99.99999% of women are not staying pregnant for over half term and then suddenly decide they don’t want the baby anymore. Most “abortions” done at that stage are because pregnancy poses a significant risk to the mother’s life (abortion in quotes there because generally the women are induced, and the babies are “delivered early” and kept alive, though this is still medically an abortion) or the baby has died (in this case, most people say that the pregnancy was aborted and the baby was “delivered” as a stillborn) or has some kind of condition that makes it incompatible with life outside of the womb.

In such cases, the babies are generally very wanted. Parent will have found out the gender, started gathering toys, clothing, supplies, etc. for baby, thought about or picked out names… It’s a tragic thing. I hate the idea that politicians anywhere are trying to impose gestational age limitations on abortions for those reasons. Why should any woman be forced to carry a dead or soon-to-be-dead-shortly-after-delivery baby for the rest of the pregnancy? She should be allowed to pass it, grieve properly, physically recover, and begin working on conceiving again as soon as she is wanting and able.

But they don’t think about such things.

ETA: for the extremely rare case where a woman does get super far into a pregnancy and suddenly decides she doesn’t want the baby… I don’t think there’s many doctors out there who would be willing to perform the abortion at that stage.

MyUmberSeal · 28/05/2025 17:59

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 17:55

Lily Allen: ‘Most people I know, including myself, just didn’t want to have a f*ing baby’.

Sounds awful! Grow up! Do more to stop getting pregnant in the first place then. Take some responsibility, but no, we like rights these days more than taking any personal responsibility. And swearing to make your point lowers it even further in my opinion.

Celebrities are broadcasting these views to millions of impressionable young girls. If politicians should stay out of it, then so should privileged celebrities!

Lilly Allen went up in my estimation when she said that. Didn’t rate her much before.

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 18:02

MyUmberSeal · 28/05/2025 17:59

Lilly Allen went up in my estimation when she said that. Didn’t rate her much before.

Then we’ll have to agree to disagree. It sounds awful, immature, spoilt and selfish.

JHound · 28/05/2025 18:02

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 17:55

Lily Allen: ‘Most people I know, including myself, just didn’t want to have a f*ing baby’.

Sounds awful! Grow up! Do more to stop getting pregnant in the first place then. Take some responsibility, but no, we like rights these days more than taking any personal responsibility. And swearing to make your point lowers it even further in my opinion.

Celebrities are broadcasting these views to millions of impressionable young girls. If politicians should stay out of it, then so should privileged celebrities!

There is nothing wrong with these views. We need to stop reinforcing the belief that abortion is some kind of tragedy. Bodily autonomy is never tragic.

Cherrytree86 · 28/05/2025 18:04

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 17:55

Lily Allen: ‘Most people I know, including myself, just didn’t want to have a f*ing baby’.

Sounds awful! Grow up! Do more to stop getting pregnant in the first place then. Take some responsibility, but no, we like rights these days more than taking any personal responsibility. And swearing to make your point lowers it even further in my opinion.

Celebrities are broadcasting these views to millions of impressionable young girls. If politicians should stay out of it, then so should privileged celebrities!

@OutandAboutMum1821

you do realise that some women who have unwanted pregnancies will have taken every single precaution available to them? But that contraception failures can still happen? There is no infallible method of birth control. So this is one of the key reasons why abortion exists - yay! 🥳

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 18:05

JHound · 28/05/2025 18:02

There is nothing wrong with these views. We need to stop reinforcing the belief that abortion is some kind of tragedy. Bodily autonomy is never tragic.

So exercise more ‘bodily autonomy’ with your partner to prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place then 🤦🏻‍♀️ It’s free, available in multiple forms for both sexes and not frowned upon anymore.

Why should an already over-stretched NHS keep dealing with abortions which absolutely could be avoided if people were more responsible?

OutandAboutMum1821 · 28/05/2025 18:06

Cherrytree86 · 28/05/2025 18:04

@OutandAboutMum1821

you do realise that some women who have unwanted pregnancies will have taken every single precaution available to them? But that contraception failures can still happen? There is no infallible method of birth control. So this is one of the key reasons why abortion exists - yay! 🥳

And plenty don’t. People openly celebrate their lack of planning, care and responsibility. Awful.