Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To absolutely not want closer ties to Europe

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:07

What is the matter with Stammer toadying up to the EU. We voted Out. Has he forgotten. I switched the TV off when I heard the word contribution and free movement. Here we go again. Shafted and ripped off at every turn and following their dumb rules. It's groundhog day. I'm furious.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Neverenoughbiscuits · 19/05/2025 15:04

Vaxtable · 19/05/2025 14:56

Brave post. Most on her are rabid remainers and are incredibly rude to anyone who disagrees!

How ironic!

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 19/05/2025 15:04

SpiritAdder · 19/05/2025 15:01

Nothing to do with capitalism. Trade deals have existed between rulers since ancient times.

Edited

Yes they have.

Now, in the 21st century we live in an age where there are a variety of block deals that did not exist previously for all sorts of tech and political reasons.

This cannot be undone, and no one is going to allow the UK to refuse to acknowledge the status of Europe and come away with a good deal. Why on earth would they?

Donttellempike · 19/05/2025 15:04

It’s been a while since we heard from the Brexit cultists with their long lists of Brexit benefits.

The lists are no longer 9 years on.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 19/05/2025 15:05

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:36

The EU started off as a trade deal only. The EEC. Most folk forget that.

We haven't forgotten it. But we do need to do trade with Europe as a continent and therefore we need to abide by the rules and regs of the trade deals we make with Europe. Which for a large chunk, will be the EU.

Or, we can not import or export from France, Italy, etc, or in fact any other country, because those are also trade deals, and only have food and goods produced in the UK available to us.

If you don't want closer ties with Europe you best make sure you're not eating, using or wearing anything from Europe.

AffableApple · 19/05/2025 15:05

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:13

I just object to being governed by EU laws and the fact they could overturn decisions made in our courts. I don't want that.

The European Court of Human Rights has nothing to do with the EU - being in it or not being in it.

We still have membership of the Council of Europe.

We still live in Europe.

Is the bendy 'nanas the next bit that troubles you?

LillyPJ · 19/05/2025 15:05

We need to recognize the benefits of allying ourselves with the EU. It's ridiculous to say we were shafted and ripped off when we were members; we just didn't acknowledge how much we gained by being a part of it. We were misled by false advertising, biased campaigns and media misinformation. If people had known what they were voting for, Brexit would never have happened.

Tiswa · 19/05/2025 15:05

Take the GDPR for example totally an EU regulation and one which even the US has to follow when dealing with the personal data of an EU resident. Its scope is huge to the point that actually rather than talk about data protection GDPR is used instead

WestwardHo1 · 19/05/2025 15:06

RedToothBrush · 19/05/2025 14:56

I'm just reading the BBC 'at a glance' article on the deal.

It says.

Fishing
A new deal will keep the current status quo giving EU boats continued access to UK waters until 2038

The 2020 Brexit deal, which saw the UK regain 25% EU fishing quotas, was due to run out next year

The UK will continue to agree yearly quotas with the EU and Norway and issue licences to control who fishes in its waters

A £360m "fishing and coastal growth fund" to invest in new technology and equipment

So actually we had a post Brexit deal in place, and all we are really doing here is extending it - we had to renegotiate it before next year anyway! 😂

Stop confusing them with verifiable facts

RobinStrike · 19/05/2025 15:06

Which EU law do you think we are going to be under? Currently all our food and agriculture keeps to EU rules on safety, health and additives as we sell to them plus we generally want them ourselves. All that’s done is formalise it that we will continue with this-it means that food, animals, plants and shellfish can all be sold to them EU and not held up at borders and go off and cost more for our manufacturers to sell. It’s a good deal. If we didn’t formally agree with their food regulations -which generally we also want-our food producers would lose out. Why would you want that? We can’t sell food to Australia or India in any kind of quantities, they are too far away.

Pinepeak2434 · 19/05/2025 15:06

Another reason to vote Reform.

CalleOcho · 19/05/2025 15:06

Furious?

Mr Farage, is that you?

😅

Pastlast · 19/05/2025 15:06

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:13

I just object to being governed by EU laws and the fact they could overturn decisions made in our courts. I don't want that.

Are you confusing the EU with the ECHR which is a different thing?

ExpressCheckout · 19/05/2025 15:07

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:36

The EU started off as a trade deal only. The EEC. Most folk forget that.

Hitler started off as an elected populist only. Most folk forget that.

Sirzy · 19/05/2025 15:07

Pinepeak2434 · 19/05/2025 15:06

Another reason to vote Reform.

Edited

Why so we can’t trade with other countries? To make it harder for people to travel abroad? What other brilliant things are you after?

whatisgoingonwithmycareer · 19/05/2025 15:07

I thought this bit of a recent Guardian article was interesting.

“It feels like we never left the EU to be honest,” replied Guest, 56, a lifelong native of the Essex constituency who, along with an overwhelming 72% of local voters, voted to leave the EU in 2016. Only three other districts backed Brexit to the same extent.
“I just feel that it was a missed opportunity. Yes, people were sometimes fed bullshit. But they were asked if we wanted to come out and people around here literally voted in their droves for it. We’ve never really seen the investment we were promised.”

Because I read the first bit of what he said, and thought, eh, what, it doesn't feel like we never left to me! I think it feels very obviously different (i.e. the country is poorer, outward migration is falling, roads are full of potholes, local communities don't have access to the various ESIF funds) - but then I realised he meant "it feels like we never left" because he means he thought Brexit would mean the country would have felt richer by now. Aaaaah. Shit. We must need to Brexit even harder to get that 350m a week.

ACLtrouble · 19/05/2025 15:08

AIBU to absolutely not want ties with anyone who voted Brexit?

WestwardHo1 · 19/05/2025 15:08

Pinepeak2434 · 19/05/2025 15:06

Another reason to vote Reform.

Edited

If Reform refuse to countenance trade deals with other countries then they're even stupider than I thought.

Good luck with that.

RedToothBrush · 19/05/2025 15:08

WestwardHo1 · 19/05/2025 15:06

Stop confusing them with verifiable facts

But that would ruin my amusement.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 19/05/2025 15:08

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 19/05/2025 15:01

He said that as part of an attempt to persuade the public not to vote for Brexit as @MissScarletInTheBallroom and you know full well (or at least I hope you do, assuming you were functioning adults at the time).

It’s not possible to get good deals and negotiate with all member states independently, so a block deal is where it’s at - D Cameron knew it when he said that, he just didn’t think it would happen.

The point is that those championing Brexit said that he was talking rubbish and of course we would still have access to the single market.

Whoarethoseguys · 19/05/2025 15:09

Sadcafe · 19/05/2025 14:27

The infuriating bit is we had a referendum to decide if we wanted to stay or leave, regardless of personal views on the outcome, the vote was to leave, apparently it is perfectly acceptable though for the government to decide to move towards rejoining without asking the people, maybe call another election if Labour is so certain this is what people want

I don't think you understand what the deal is, it's nothing to do with rejoining. The Labour manifesto said they would negotiate closer ties with the EU and that is just what they have done. They have a mandate to do it because they won the election and it was s Manifest committment.

We also have a deal with the USA and with India has anyone suggested we are going to be become part of the USA and India?

This is a very necessary trade and defence dealt with our closest neighbours.
And they are looking at a visa programme for young people . The same as we have with Australia I haven't heard anyone complain about that.

All the nonsense that was spouted by the leave campaign almost 10 years ago has made some people lose all sense of perspective when anyone says Europe.

SpiritAdder · 19/05/2025 15:09

theunbreakablecleopatrajones · 19/05/2025 15:04

Yes they have.

Now, in the 21st century we live in an age where there are a variety of block deals that did not exist previously for all sorts of tech and political reasons.

This cannot be undone, and no one is going to allow the UK to refuse to acknowledge the status of Europe and come away with a good deal. Why on earth would they?

Rubbish. There have been block trade deals (multiple sovereign parties) since the late Bronze Age. They reached global trade in medieval times.

Human society was making trade deals before we even invented coins.

The EU is the geographical neighbour of the UK, it would be economic suicide to not have close trading ties.

Snorlaxo · 19/05/2025 15:10

RedToothBrush · 19/05/2025 14:56

I'm just reading the BBC 'at a glance' article on the deal.

It says.

Fishing
A new deal will keep the current status quo giving EU boats continued access to UK waters until 2038

The 2020 Brexit deal, which saw the UK regain 25% EU fishing quotas, was due to run out next year

The UK will continue to agree yearly quotas with the EU and Norway and issue licences to control who fishes in its waters

A £360m "fishing and coastal growth fund" to invest in new technology and equipment

So actually we had a post Brexit deal in place, and all we are really doing here is extending it - we had to renegotiate it before next year anyway! 😂

Remember Boris talking about the “oven ready” deal which looked remarkably similar to the ones that he and his ERG mates blocked when May was PM?

AthWat · 19/05/2025 15:10

" I switched the TV off when I heard the word contribution and free movement. "

That's good, that's the best way to learn. Keeps switching it off whenever it says something you don't like and stick to following people on Facebook who say the world is flat, that way you can cast an informed vote all the time and things will carry on getting better!

Madcatdudette · 19/05/2025 15:11

I think the issue is that the ECHR and post Brexit European Law is not understood in the context of British law.
As I understand it’s only parliament that can overturn a UK Supreme Court’s ruling.
Some European laws were put into uk law in Brexit.
Law is complicated, I certainly don’t have anything beyond an extremely basic ‘understanding’.
It would be nice if posters could get off their high horses and explain the pros or cons to the OP rather than just insult them 🤷‍♀️
Try ‘Trade = Good because you will get cheaper stuff’ rather than ‘You’re a fuckwit’

Clavinova · 19/05/2025 15:11

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 19/05/2025 14:58

When David Cameron said that if we left the EU we would no longer have access to the single market this was dismissed as "project fear" by Brexiters!

We do have tariff-free access to the single market for goods - membership of the single market with freedom of movement of people is not the same thing.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.