Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To absolutely not want closer ties to Europe

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:07

What is the matter with Stammer toadying up to the EU. We voted Out. Has he forgotten. I switched the TV off when I heard the word contribution and free movement. Here we go again. Shafted and ripped off at every turn and following their dumb rules. It's groundhog day. I'm furious.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
PetuniaT · 20/05/2025 21:34

What was unreasonable about Brexit was the refusal to accept the result of the Referendum. Remomaners delayed and delayed the exit to the extent they ruined it.

theworldsacrazycrazymess · 20/05/2025 21:36

@Bundleflower

My apologies, I did join this thread before 19:12, and ui have already commented on your post.

Your right I was being mean and I'm sorry!

caringcarer · 20/05/2025 21:37

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:13

I just object to being governed by EU laws and the fact they could overturn decisions made in our courts. I don't want that.

Yes this, and the fishermen being screwed over again. Housing is dire in UK. Where are all of thes Europeans under 35 going to be living? In houses we need to home our own young people and families. They are the ones who will miss out.

06230villefrancesurmer · 20/05/2025 21:37

CillaBlackSmith · 19/05/2025 14:09

King Nigel will sort this out!

Really. Prey tell how ?
Will he stop the " boats" coming ?
Cause that's all bangs on about, that and his undying love for the orange twat.
By the way there were no "boats" coming when we were in the EU. Strange that . Not.
Now I guess you were being sarcastic with your post ( I hope) but had to said because I don't think the op understands.

Perplexed20 · 20/05/2025 21:42

PetuniaT · 20/05/2025 21:34

What was unreasonable about Brexit was the refusal to accept the result of the Referendum. Remomaners delayed and delayed the exit to the extent they ruined it.

If it was a robust idea it couldn't possibly be ruined by a delay.
That's such a weak argument.

StandFirm · 20/05/2025 21:42

PetuniaT · 20/05/2025 21:34

What was unreasonable about Brexit was the refusal to accept the result of the Referendum. Remomaners delayed and delayed the exit to the extent they ruined it.

Ruined what exactly? What was the ACTUAL vision for Brexit? Isolationism and protectionism? Empire 2.0? What? There is no more vision in Brexit than there is in MAGA.

Thefsm · 20/05/2025 21:44

If they’ve managed to piss off a muppet like you then finally they must be doing something right. Aren’t their some kids outside you can moan at for being near your lawn?

ohthatmissmith · 20/05/2025 21:53

Lockdownsceptic · 19/05/2025 14:55

Starmer and others like him never accepted the Brexit vote. They don’t really believe in democracy. In their minds we are not bright enough to decide for ourselves, we have to be told what is best for us.

The idea that "Starmer and others like him never accepted the Brexit vote"... because "we are not bright enough to decide ourselves" is I am sorry to tell you fucking true. And for very good reasons, because some people seriously aren't bright enough to know when they have been conned. We have lost £32 billion a year as a result of Brexit. £32 billion a year, that sink in. And you know those boats which every Farage fan bleats on about that need to be stopped. Well, in the two years before Brexit guess how many people arrived in UK to claim asylum on boats: 9. That's people not boats. Just 9 people in two years. Nobody talked about stopping boats until after Brexit. What to know why? Since we left the EU we no longer have access to data bases which tell us important info about refugees. One being we don't know if they have been refused asylum elsewhere or indeed where they might be from. We used to, we don't now. And every failed asylum seeker heads our way because they know our system is overwhelmed and we have to start the whole process of discovery from scratch. That's Brexit. And you know what, clever people knew this would happen and tried to warn others that this would happen. But they decided they knew best. Well you didn't.

brunettemic · 20/05/2025 21:55

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:36

The EU started off as a trade deal only. The EEC. Most folk forget that.

I take it if you have children you didn’t claim maternity pay?

Clavinova · 20/05/2025 21:58

mutinyonthetwix · 20/05/2025 21:34

Oh bless you are still trying.

OK let's start with your first point. Budgetary, foreign and security matters weren't dealt with through QMV. So NGL my instinct is to assume you've just gone and read something else you don't understand but I'm looking forward to you proving me wrong with some original thoughts rather than just quoting something else you don't understand.

Your second quote literally demonstrates the exact point I was making so maybe you again don't understand.

Your third quote, I am not going to lie I have no idea what it is supposed to demonstrate on the subject of whether the UK had the ability to influence UK legislation but I am certainly looking forward to your explanation.

No need to be so condescending.

My mistake - I did actually know we had a veto in a limited number of specific policy areas including foreign and security policy. I copied in haste rather than not understanding.

Your second quote literally demonstrates the exact point I was making so maybe you again don't understand

My second quote was to demonstrate that the UK saw the bonus cap as a threat to the UK's finance industry - an important part of our economy.

Your third quote, I am not going to lie I have no idea what it is supposed to demonstrate on the subject of whether the UK had the ability to influence UK legislation but I am certainly looking forward to your explanation

My third quote was self explanatory;

Ah, yes, Gordon Brown - the European Commission helped him lose the 2010 election.

Donsyb · 20/05/2025 22:03

Viviennemary · 20/05/2025 14:50

We give Europe our fish and lots of money. What did they give us. Absolutely nothing except a headache.

Did you miss the bit where they’re our biggest trade partner? As in we sell more things to them than anyone else?

I’m going out in a limb to assume you don’t run a business, especially one that exports anything.

Nora19 · 20/05/2025 22:10

The thing i strongly disagree with is that Starmer doesn’t have to go to parliament for a vote on it I can’t understand why he is the only one that makes the decision.
MPs should take guidance from there constituents and then vote on it.

mutinyonthetwix · 20/05/2025 22:16

Clavinova · 20/05/2025 21:58

No need to be so condescending.

My mistake - I did actually know we had a veto in a limited number of specific policy areas including foreign and security policy. I copied in haste rather than not understanding.

Your second quote literally demonstrates the exact point I was making so maybe you again don't understand

My second quote was to demonstrate that the UK saw the bonus cap as a threat to the UK's finance industry - an important part of our economy.

Your third quote, I am not going to lie I have no idea what it is supposed to demonstrate on the subject of whether the UK had the ability to influence UK legislation but I am certainly looking forward to your explanation

My third quote was self explanatory;

Ah, yes, Gordon Brown - the European Commission helped him lose the 2010 election.

I will try one more time before I give up for the night - what, in your own words instead of yet another copy and pasted and barely relevant article you have just Googled, do you think demonstrates the UK had no meaningful influence on EU law besides us losing on an extremely minor financial stability measure which was a tiny part of a much wider Directive on which the UK received many concessions?

Judecb · 20/05/2025 22:17

Why don't you want want the UK to resume trading with our closest and largest economic market? Do you understand economic agreements and future policy? Without Europe we are sunk.

Cariad10 · 20/05/2025 22:20

Hoppinggreen · 19/05/2025 14:11

Ok, thats nice for you
I think you will find a lot of people are quite happy about this - I am but I wish we could just rejoin but in the absence of that this will do for now.

Well said, Brexit has caused so much harm , I wish we had never left

mutinyonthetwix · 20/05/2025 22:22

Clavinova · 20/05/2025 21:58

No need to be so condescending.

My mistake - I did actually know we had a veto in a limited number of specific policy areas including foreign and security policy. I copied in haste rather than not understanding.

Your second quote literally demonstrates the exact point I was making so maybe you again don't understand

My second quote was to demonstrate that the UK saw the bonus cap as a threat to the UK's finance industry - an important part of our economy.

Your third quote, I am not going to lie I have no idea what it is supposed to demonstrate on the subject of whether the UK had the ability to influence UK legislation but I am certainly looking forward to your explanation

My third quote was self explanatory;

Ah, yes, Gordon Brown - the European Commission helped him lose the 2010 election.

Actually sorry one more question because this is something I worked on very closely. I would also like you to explain, in your own words, why you think the CRD IV bonus cap was specifically a "threat" to the "finance industry" as you put it as opposed to something that was merely misguided and possibly a bit damaging at the margins to a very limited subset of it.

Clavinova · 20/05/2025 22:24

ohthatmissmith
We have lost £32 billion a year as a result of Brexit

That's not an actual measurement - it will be an estimate based on a counterfactual/formula/what might have happened if we had not left the EU - and probably a long term estimate in any case.

in the two years before Brexit guess how many people arrived in UK to claim asylum on boats: 9.
Since we left the EU we no longer have access to data bases which tell us important info about refugees

We had access throughout the transition year (2020) when over 8,000 arrived by small boat. In 2019 nearly 2,000 - we had access then.

The EU have had a considerable rise in the number of asylum seekers as well;

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Asylum_statistics&oldid=558844

Clavinova · 20/05/2025 22:41

mutinyonthetwix
I will try one more time before I give up for the night

I'd give up if I were you - I'm just making tea.

Iceboy80 · 20/05/2025 22:48

This is an absolute scandel and he need to be outed NOW! This is a massive betrayal but did we expect anything less, let's be honest! You OWN children are struggling for work and he is allowing 18 to 30 year old to enter freely, MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!

Those who voted Liebour are the problems, honestly, you'd have to have issues to have voted for them.

The sooner Reform UK is in the maybe we will have a country that puts the UK first FOR ONCE!

bombastix · 20/05/2025 22:51

Bloop

CorbyTrouserPress · 20/05/2025 22:51

Iceboy80 · 20/05/2025 22:48

This is an absolute scandel and he need to be outed NOW! This is a massive betrayal but did we expect anything less, let's be honest! You OWN children are struggling for work and he is allowing 18 to 30 year old to enter freely, MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!

Those who voted Liebour are the problems, honestly, you'd have to have issues to have voted for them.

The sooner Reform UK is in the maybe we will have a country that puts the UK first FOR ONCE!

Ok Dear.

Bigwelshlamb · 20/05/2025 22:52

Yabvu. The whole thing has been a shit show with absolutely zero advantage to this country. It was a trading bloc and we lost our free movement too. It's a sad and sorry situation.

ohthatmissmith · 20/05/2025 22:52

Some estimates are that Brexit has cost us more than £32 billion a year. And there are some losses that can't be quantified in cash terms but are nonetheless significant losses. The collaboration of scientists for example.

You are right that the EU has had a rise in asylum seekers, as have most developed nations as a result of wars, and climate change. The acceptance of refugees as genuine asylum seekers has also reduced in several EU nations, particularly France. The rise of the number of people arriving by boats is partly explained by this. However, post Brexit it is true that the UK doesn't have the access they used to, to discover the routes refugees took into Europe or if they were refused access elsewhere.

Scorpiostar · 20/05/2025 22:53

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:13

I just object to being governed by EU laws and the fact they could overturn decisions made in our courts. I don't want that.

The pre-Brexit deal that the UK had as an EU member state was the very definition of having your cake and eating it. YABVVU

TropicalRain · 20/05/2025 22:58

Viviennemary · 19/05/2025 14:13

I just object to being governed by EU laws and the fact they could overturn decisions made in our courts. I don't want that.

Ah, this is not a genuine post, you are a journalist perhaps, hoping to drum up a quote through a quick mumsnet thread.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.