Ad hominem attacks are infantile, intellectually lazy, and detract from - rather than support - the force of any argument you are attempting to support.
You will find that by responding, even if it's in opposition, to the specific facts that people are explaining to you, there's a much greater chance your contribution to the dialogue will be seen as having value.
@HarrietBond's comment of "I’m so pleased to see you making some efforts with facts now. Do have a good look around to see what would support your comments on the economic damage of ‘getting involved with the EU’ if you have a moment.", whilst undoubtedly amusingly snarky, is also factually accurate based on your behaviour thus far.
You began by repeatedly choosing not to engage directly with various posters - including myself - who had taken the time to carefully lay out facts before you, preferring instead to either ignore the facts that are inconveniently undeniable and/or to then post unrelated links, many of them from biased sources, that you felt proved you right.
As the thread has worn on, you've gotten a lot better at reading and understanding what's been said to you, and trying to respond to those points directly. We still think you're wrong, and can and have consistently shown you why with relevant information, but I think what @HarrietBond was suggesting is that she's happy you've now moved beyond the intellectual equivalent of shouting "lalala I'm not listening".