Why is Alice Evans Gruffudd homeless?

[Englishsummerblues]

Doesn’t she have any famous friends? Where has all her money gone? Does she have to live in L.A? It just all seems bizarre, just move somewhere cheaper.

Yes but I think just a 1 bed apartment in LA costs circa 3k; so 4.5k probably isn’t enough for her to live on with a few kids.

Because she’s an idiot who won’t get a job.

So move to a different area. The eldest is apparently home schooled 😶 and the youngest has already been pulled from other schools to fit in with the mothers insistence on living in BH .
Its got to be preferable to being fake homeless & becoming a social media beggar!

Yes, it's manipulative language. Very odd and disconcerting

$4500 isn’t assumed to be the total amount she has to live on. That’s just his share. She should be contributing a reasonable amount too but seems intent on living off him.

when challenged on Insta to get a job, she says she has several but other than selling candles 🙄 I’m not sure what else she does

Nonsense - do a search online for multi-bedroom apartments in Los Angeles - there are plenty of very nice ones in decent neighbourhoods for less than $2k per month. Plus, of course, there is absolutely nothing stopping her from asking the court for permission to move to a more affordable city etc. or even back to the UK.

3k of that 4.5k is Ioans CONTRIBUTION to the upkeep of the children. Evans should also be CONTRIBUTING.
Get a fucking job, stop wasting money (headshots, fish on dry ice, used underwear from eBay) and stop drinking/drugging.

when challenged on Insta to get a job, she says she has several but other than selling candles 🙄 I’m not sure what else she does

Quality controller in the pharmaceutical industry.

I can’t get my head around that fraudulent gofundme. How can she sink so low that she’s accepting fivers from people who can ill afford it? And how must her daughters feel especially the one who appears to go to school in an affluent area? That poor child as school kids can be incredibly cruel when you are poor growing up.

She's said she's identified several suitable properties. So by her own lights, money isn't the issue. It's the lack of a co-signer apparently. Assuming she can keep her story consistent from one day to the next.

If I remember right, one of the daughters friends mother bought the youngest daughter a coat for a holiday. This is for someone who gets 4500 in maintenance every month. Unbelievable

As evidenced by this thread people literally believe made up bs. They buy into a conspiracy sob story and give cash to the feckless government

Used underwear?Wtf? What, to wear or…oh, no, no, I’m not going there😫Any anyway thought she didn’t wear underwear given the skanky cow flashed her arse or lady garden at him when he picked up his kids once. Imagine if a bloke had done that! Vile.

If a bloke did it it he probably be arrested and on the sex offenders register

The lack of a co-signer?? Presumably she thinks her ex should have to co-sign????!!
Even if she can't find one there are lots of companies that offer "rent guarantor" services (one of them is quite literally called "Rentguarantor.com" in exchange for a fee. Of course anyone who goes down that route better make damn sure they are current with their payments because those companies will take you to court if you fail to make your payments - and they really don't give a damn about whether someone feels they are "entitled" to live in Beverly Hills rent-free. Of course if you are getting $4.5k per month - plus adding your own court-expected contribution to the child support amounts - then there should be absolutely no problem making those rental payments.

Auto correct added government
I meant feckless individual eg AE

She did WHAT?!?!?! Seriously? Wow...what kind of person does something like that? Let alone near a school full of children!!! Oh dear...no wonder this whole situation is such a trainwreck - anyone who acts like that clearly is incapable of behaving like an adult. Yikes.

I gather from what was reported she DID want the ex to co-sign in the first instance.

From what she posted on her Gram the other day, she is looking for randos on the internet to offer to co-sign or provide. her with a spare room (indefinitely).

She's her own worst enemy.

And rightly so.

Another thing AE seems to completely disregard is that at some point in the next few years, maintenance for the girls will stop or at least stop going to her.

ETA

I gather from what was reported she DID want the ex to co-sign in the first instance.

That would seem a surefire way for IG to bankrupt himself.

It was stated in the court documents! What the hell was she thinking apart from maybe one flash and he’d come back to her unable to resist.

Just to clarify not near a school but when he picked them up from their home. It was outside though.

I found plenty of 3bed homes to rent in or near LA for less than $2k. She just doesn’t want to live in those places.

I really hope that somehow the girls can be got out of her clutches.

Yeah, you’d think during one of her way back when posts she’d have posted her graduation photos (unless in absentia on the day but I can’t imagine she’d have given up a photo op like that!) or at least her graduation certificate. Yes, Alice, go on, please prove it. 😊

SERIOUSLY??!!!???? I was kidding when I wrote that - there was no way I thought she would actually have suggested her ex-husband be a Guarantor on an apartment!!! If that's true then that's absolutely nuts! Wow...the whole point of no-fault divorce is so that divorces can be squared away as quickly as possible with as little cost and drama. Forcing an ex-spouse to be a guarantor on a rental agreement would be completely contrary to the public policy involved here: Courts LOATHE that kind of thing because it means that - particularly in a highly combative divorce - there's just one more thing to fight about and to have to ask the Court's help with. If it's true that she stated her ex-husband should have to be a guarantor that really does underscore how little she understands about (or how little she chooses to accept) California law and the reasons why no-fault divorces exist. The DVRO means that any Court would strongly - and reasonably - suspect that the second her ex signed on as a guarantor she would refuse to pay the rental money, meaning that the guarantor spouse would be on the hook for way more money than the Court ordered in their spousal support/child support order - and no Court is going to do that. At this rate, and in light of there being a Domestic Violence Restraining Order, there's a high likelihood that the Court will absolutely have had enough of this nonsense and start issuing sanctions. And in the divorce court setting you have to have behaved truly abysmally for a Judge to want to go down that route.