Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dad using individual ladies loo to change baby – what’s the etiquette?

336 replies

horchatatresleches · 12/05/2025 17:36

We were at a small cafe we hadn’t visited before – just me, DH, and our baby DS. When DS needed changing, DH went to check the facilities but came back quickly saying the baby change was in the ladies so I changed him but it got me wondering about what is the etiquette.

The setup was one of those where the mens and women loos are both single-occupancy, self-contained rooms that open off the same hallway – not communal spaces with stalls. So it’s not like he’d be walking into a room with other women inside and making anyone uncomfortable. I’ve been to similar cafes where both loos are labelled gender-neutral, which seems simpler. Personally, I wouldn’t bat an eye if I saw a dad coming out of that kind of loo with a baby, but DH felt uncomfortable using the ladies even though there was no one else around. He wasn’t sure what he’d have done if I hadn’t been there to help.

Is there an etiquette about dads using the ladies in this kind of setup if that’s where the baby change is?
YANBU - he’s fine to use the baby change
YABU - he shouldn’t go in the ladies there

OP posts:
TheIceBear · 14/05/2025 07:03

Actually I agree with you op that the staff probably wouldn’t take action if this was raised with them, they’d probably look at you like you were a bit dim and point towards ladies,

oblada · 14/05/2025 07:12

This is such a non issue. It was self contained units. I read the signage as "women and baby changing" meaning women can use this unit ALONG with anyone needing to change a baby regardless of gender. My husband has always used those facilities without batting an eyelid with our children. Different if it is inside a block of women's toilet where really there is an argument that fathers are not being catered for and it's more awkward for a man to come in. But a self contained unit? Honestly get a grip people. Maybe they can just improve on the signage and be done with it. What has the world come to though...

AnSolas · 14/05/2025 07:23

RawBloomers · 14/05/2025 02:55

The petrol station design does not move a man into a woman’s space. It uses a single occupancy room for a number of different uses for people of both sexes.

And by your own discription that is a build design with a dedicated man space and no dedicated womans space.

So sexist by design

AnSolas · 14/05/2025 07:46

horchatatresleches · 14/05/2025 03:42

I didn’t notice disabled facilities as I’m lucky enough to not need them. The ladies was the first room on the corridor - but I can’t imagine there was room for a third loo there, especially not big enough to be a disabled one. The ladies could have been, but I didn’t need the loo so only looked as far as the changing table. If it was the disabled loo also, that makes the ladies sign even weirder. Even if you accept that men shouldn’t use that space to change their baby (and despite the debate here, my view is still that making them both gender neutral makes most sense), a man who needs an accessible loo doesn’t have any other options - and as not all disabilities are visible there would be good reason a seemingly able bodied man would need to used the ladies (plus baby change, plus accessible bathroom).

Are you saying that you are old enough to have a baby and never noticed that the accessable toilet is normally also allocated as the ladies loo?

Try keep track of the wheelchair sign when you are out and see how many times it womens toilet and baby change too.

Do you believe that changing the social contract and making toilets mixed sex to benefit some men will also benefit all women?

Now that your husband is a dad how many mens toilets can he list where he can go that has a baby change?

Speaking to the manager raises awareness that baby changing is not womens work.

Is shows that you support the idea of having a baby change in the mens as it shows the service provider recognises the change in the social contract as men take on their share of child care.

Maddy70 · 14/05/2025 09:38

Dotjones · 12/05/2025 17:39

He should just ask the cafe owner whether he should use the ladies toilet, and if not he should demand they provide suitable alternative facilities or he will sue them for sexual discrimination. Often they'll just back down if you kick up a fuss and threaten them with legal action.

This it utterly bonkers. Small cafes often only have one toilet. They aren't in breach of anything

RawBloomers · 14/05/2025 15:14

AnSolas · 14/05/2025 07:23

And by your own discription that is a build design with a dedicated man space and no dedicated womans space.

So sexist by design

Not if it meets women's needs for the toilet as well as it meets men's.

DrPrunesqualer · 14/05/2025 17:05

RawBloomers · 14/05/2025 15:14

Not if it meets women's needs for the toilet as well as it meets men's.

Well no technically from a building regs point of view it wouldnt conform as it’s not providing a separate space just for women but is for men.
Its a weird one
but it is a bit of a cock up tbh.

DrPrunesqualer · 14/05/2025 17:06

Maddy70 · 14/05/2025 09:38

This it utterly bonkers. Small cafes often only have one toilet. They aren't in breach of anything

Agree they aren’t.
You can have one mixed sex space

RawBloomers · 14/05/2025 17:24

DrPrunesqualer · 14/05/2025 17:05

Well no technically from a building regs point of view it wouldnt conform as it’s not providing a separate space just for women but is for men.
Its a weird one
but it is a bit of a cock up tbh.

I was responding to whether it was sexist, not whether it meets building regs. And for that, while it wouldn't meet the current regs, I can't think of which it would have breached prior to last year.

DrPrunesqualer · 14/05/2025 17:30

RawBloomers · 14/05/2025 17:24

I was responding to whether it was sexist, not whether it meets building regs. And for that, while it wouldn't meet the current regs, I can't think of which it would have breached prior to last year.

Well
They are providing a single sex space for men but not for women. So yes that is discrimination.
In which case the only way round it is to make them both mixed sex

RawBloomers · 14/05/2025 18:14

DrPrunesqualer · 14/05/2025 17:30

Well
They are providing a single sex space for men but not for women. So yes that is discrimination.
In which case the only way round it is to make them both mixed sex

It's not discrimination if it meets both men's and women's needs equally well. Discrimination is about the impact of provision, it doesn't require that provision be exactly the same if the usage is different.

Making them both mixed sex would meet women's needs less well as more men would be using the single-occupancy cubicle, making it less accessible for women, and women would me unlikely to find the communal facility suitable to use.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page