Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AAAAGH Reform. Are people ignoring the racist?

1000 replies

Peasnbeans · 02/05/2025 23:01

And that he's no economist skills yet promising the impossible. And a racist. And mysoginist.

If Mumsnet is full of women, how is no-one talking about Reform and limiting women's rights?
I know I'll get flamed for this, but it is a boiling frog situation! Jump out!
And I didn't choose the AIBU board but I looked down all the Current Threads and this didn't feature.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
28
OneAmberFinch · 03/05/2025 16:20

It's probably fair to say that Trump and his team (particularly the younger crowd and the people around JD Vance) are more comfortable with engaging with the remigration question than Farage is, though. For example, he's stated that he supports paying for voluntary deportations of family members of illegal immigrants.

I think Trump will also mostly be able to "just" do the things I stated though, just for practical reasons.

FruityCider · 03/05/2025 16:24

Idontsweat · 03/05/2025 16:14

I do not believe Trump is for "remigration". However he is all for deporting illegal migrants and all countries should be and most countries are. But with millions of people and possibly hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants in countries like USA and UK it's difficult to find all the illegal immigrants and deport them so governments have given up and they can't be arsed. Good on Trump for trying to protect his citizens and their borders. Even third world countries deport illegal migrants, but the lefties choose to single out Trump so that they can do what they like doing best-name calling.

Guess you heard President Fart is now moving to make it legal to deport American citizens and presumably put them into his hideous concentration camps detention centres.

Good for Trump, and good for us having his puppet looming over the horizon.

Idontsweat · 03/05/2025 16:25

A lot of Reform politicians and those who elect them are hostile to all non-white, full stop.

No they are not. That's just leftist propaganda

Eskarina1 · 03/05/2025 16:38

OutandAboutMum1821 · 03/05/2025 06:40

I agree with him that there should be a debate on lowering the abortion limit, that’s a perfectly valid opinion. I think 24 weeks IS too late in the vast majority of cases, unless Mum’s life is threatened.

Have you see what a 20 week old baby looks like? I have, twice at my own scans. I was amazed at how much they were already formed, I could see their spines, their organs. They certainly look like actual babies.

How much time have you spent in the NICU? I was there round the clock with my first was rushed there born 2 weeks early with a life threatening infection. His amazing team were caring for several babies delivered before/around 24 weeks who were thriving under their care.

I worked in abortion care. Two women seeking late termination have stuck with me.

A woman who had just discovered her unborn had the same disease her five year old had died from. We couldn't get her an abortion in time. The devastation of her realising she'd have to lose a second child will live with me forever.

A woman who was just diagnosed with a genetic disease that meant she wouldn't live through her prospective child's childhood.

It's a very small % of abortions. It's hard because babies can, technically, survive at that gestation but the alternative is worse.

BundleBoogie · 03/05/2025 16:39

springbirdss · 03/05/2025 12:45

I don't quite know where to start with this.

If asylum seekers have been forced to move from 'safe' country to country it is out of desperation and necessity, because nothing has been provided for them there.

Asylum seekers do not come here with the expectation of benefits, they are fleeing from war or persecution, and often know absolutely nothing about the UK welfare system when they arrive.

Once they're here, if they are not detained, they live in poverty on £7 a day without the possibility of employment while their claim for asylum is processed (this can take years).

Where is your source for the lawyers protecting rapists.

While some are obviously going to be genuine, not all of the men on small boats (or people who enter the country in other ways) are genuine asylum seekers though. The deportations of failed asylum seekers underline that.

You may have fallen into the common trap of assuming that all people in troubled countries are backward and have no means of communicating or gaining information - on the contrary, we regularly see men getting off the small boats with their mobile phones and there are many organisations set up to give them advice on what to expect in the UK and how to get everything we offer.

Admittedly France may not put them in nice hotels but it is not a war torn country. There are organisations in France that help these people so they make a choice to come here.

They get well fed, a warm bed, new clothing and free private medical care here. That is not ‘poverty’. I am not saying we shouldn’t provide that by any means but it does act as an incentive. They’d be silly not to take us up on our generous offer.

There have been several cases of rapists not getting deported from the UK on ‘human rights’ grounds reported in the news. I haven’t got time to find the links now but that doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened.

I’m not racist or demonising anybody but I share the concerns of many that we need to get control of our borders.

This thread is a perfect example of why the Tories or Labour daren’t have a proper discussion and why Reform had such big wins.

OutandAboutMum1821 · 03/05/2025 16:43

Eskarina1 · 03/05/2025 16:38

I worked in abortion care. Two women seeking late termination have stuck with me.

A woman who had just discovered her unborn had the same disease her five year old had died from. We couldn't get her an abortion in time. The devastation of her realising she'd have to lose a second child will live with me forever.

A woman who was just diagnosed with a genetic disease that meant she wouldn't live through her prospective child's childhood.

It's a very small % of abortions. It's hard because babies can, technically, survive at that gestation but the alternative is worse.

Thank you for sharing those examples of such upsetting and incredible difficult circumstances. There are of course always very understandable exceptions.

This is why it is so important to keep openly debating any topic, it is always OK to fully debate around either maintaining or changing things. Your examples are extremely relevant, and exactly why wanting to debate an issue should not be shut down.

bellsanddogwhistles · 03/05/2025 16:52

JHound · 03/05/2025 14:33

Read what I wrote and you will have your answer.

I read it Muslim women overwhelmingly reject Tate and his beliefs

and I'm none the wiser.

Whammyyammy · 03/05/2025 16:58

Locutus2000 · 03/05/2025 14:42

A lot of Reform politicians and those who elect them are hostile to all non-white, full stop.

I actually disagree, some , but not the new voters during this local election. I think Reform have attracted a lot of new votes very easily, simply because the other parties just fail.
Tories had an appalling 14 years, starmer is absolutely useless and his only answer to this is "Tories/14 years".
I voted Reform, not because I'm racist or hostile to non white people, simply because I find labour and conservative rubbish.

I assume a lot of others did the same, a clear message to the 2 main parties.

BundleBoogie · 03/05/2025 16:58

Guirec Le Bras, the Boulogne-sur-mer prosecutor, told the BBC the boat had become overloaded after a number of migrants forced themselves on board just prior to departure.

It’s not the crossing that is dangerous, it’s the unscrupulous people traffickers that we are helping to create markets for that are the danger.

Whatafustercluck · 03/05/2025 17:01

Meadowfinch · 03/05/2025 05:53

@thepariscrimefiles I think we all probably did things at school that would not bear scrutiny now. I know I did. That's normal for teenagers.

It doesn't mean they still do the same things as adults.

Excellent minimising there. A bit of graffiti in the bogs, smoking a fag behind the bike sheds is one thing. I don't ever recall discriminating against a whole group of people based on the fact they had a different skin colour, or a disability, or sexual preference. I don't recall the vast majority of my friends doing so, either.

bellsanddogwhistles · 03/05/2025 17:24

Locutus2000 · 03/05/2025 14:42

A lot of Reform politicians and those who elect them are hostile to all non-white, full stop.

Nuts.

bellsanddogwhistles · 03/05/2025 17:28

BundleBoogie · 03/05/2025 16:58

Guirec Le Bras, the Boulogne-sur-mer prosecutor, told the BBC the boat had become overloaded after a number of migrants forced themselves on board just prior to departure.

It’s not the crossing that is dangerous, it’s the unscrupulous people traffickers that we are helping to create markets for that are the danger.

"we are helping to create markets for that are the danger." Whaaat ? 😮

Well that's soon fixed no more benefits for migrants.

Anyone who comes across the channel gets deported the next day.

This is France's problem not ours

jasflowers · 03/05/2025 17:51

Idontsweat · 03/05/2025 16:25

A lot of Reform politicians and those who elect them are hostile to all non-white, full stop.

No they are not. That's just leftist propaganda

They are, look at Farages "Breaking Point" poster, full of brown faces....

This was at the time of the referendum, when the concern was white europans coming here

FrivolousKitchenRollUse · 03/05/2025 17:56

As a left of centre voter I clicked YABU as this is the attitude we need to move away from.

Right = stupid/racist, Left = clever/inclusive isn't going too well across Europe right now is it. You can't just call people stupid and expect them to say "yeah you're right I'll vote a different way next time". If anything it surely makes a person dig in more to their view.

OutandAboutMum1821 · 03/05/2025 18:00

Eskarina1 · 03/05/2025 16:38

I worked in abortion care. Two women seeking late termination have stuck with me.

A woman who had just discovered her unborn had the same disease her five year old had died from. We couldn't get her an abortion in time. The devastation of her realising she'd have to lose a second child will live with me forever.

A woman who was just diagnosed with a genetic disease that meant she wouldn't live through her prospective child's childhood.

It's a very small % of abortions. It's hard because babies can, technically, survive at that gestation but the alternative is worse.

I’m genuinely really interested given your work experience - do you think the current limit is correct, or should be lessened with exceptions (balancing medical developments to support the chances of premature babies vs increased medical knowledge about serious illnesses affecting both mum and baby, etc)? Is it about right or worth re-visiting to debate on a national level?

MasterBeth · 03/05/2025 18:06

Symond · 03/05/2025 16:13

This is an entirely sensible post and debate.

It's an entirely racist post.

It literally starts with a stat about skin colour! It posits that a shift from 95% white to 75% white is inherently problematic.

That is a clearly racist position. Awful. Appalling.

MasterBeth · 03/05/2025 18:08

BundleBoogie · 03/05/2025 16:58

Guirec Le Bras, the Boulogne-sur-mer prosecutor, told the BBC the boat had become overloaded after a number of migrants forced themselves on board just prior to departure.

It’s not the crossing that is dangerous, it’s the unscrupulous people traffickers that we are helping to create markets for that are the danger.

Good grief! No, and the crossing isn't dangerous if you do it in a Brittany Ferry! But as the small boat migrants are doing it in... small boats, it is!!

SmegmaCausesBV · 03/05/2025 18:12

ComeAsYouAreAsAFriend · 03/05/2025 15:55

Yes but no so hot on how they will pay for everything they want to implement, as they say the devil is in the detail

To be fair that sounds similar to Labour - we were not meant to be paying higher electricity bills or more tax. The devil was certainly in the detail they lied about there.

MasterBeth · 03/05/2025 18:13

Foostit · 03/05/2025 13:35

I am no reform voter but I can see why they have gained in popularity. Immigration is a huge issue in UK because we are seen as an easy target. Most areas have huge waiting lists for social housing. In my area there has been a massive increase in immigration and they are being housed in hotels and in purpose built accommodation whilst their applications are being processed. This is a fact and people should not be accused of racism for stating it or being concerned about it. The current and previous government have done nothing to address this so it’s certainly clear to me why people may turn to an alternative. Multiculturalism for me is an area where people from a range of different culture live together without issues. In some areas certain ethnic cultures are in the majority and this reflects on the schools etc. Then there’s the whole ridiculous gender issues which although appear to be being addressed now, this led to the parties as being a joke. It’s interesting that people are talking about women’s rights. I don’t think the previous government was considering women’s rights when it ruled that biological males could use women’s toilets, compete in women’s sports etc. There are many people who shut down anyone expressing these views as being ‘anti trans’ or ‘stupid’ I would argue that not being able to accept that others might have an opinion that differs to yours is a sign of low intelligence. I think reform would be disastrous for the U.K. but I can see why people are turning towards them. The other parties need to take this as a warning sign and address the main issues.

What "purpose built accommodation" has been built for asylum seekers in your area? And would you like to live in it?

StupidBoy · 03/05/2025 18:14

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 03/05/2025 03:49

One day, if Reform ever get in (ugh) people will find out that it isnt immigrants taking all the money, but another group in society. Except we already know this.

How exactly will we find this out? Who are these people who are 'taking' all the money then?

OneAmberFinch · 03/05/2025 18:15

MasterBeth · 03/05/2025 18:06

It's an entirely racist post.

It literally starts with a stat about skin colour! It posits that a shift from 95% white to 75% white is inherently problematic.

That is a clearly racist position. Awful. Appalling.

80% white.
75% white British.
I'm not only or even mostly talking about skin colour.

Do you want to engage with the point about rapid demographic and cultural change at all?

Or is this a "no debate" topic for you?

My home country is majority non-white for the record and I'll never be considered a native/local there despite my white ancestors being there for centuries and some of them mixing with locals.

It's really, really unusual, historically and globally speaking, to think that in 30 years you can just declare passport nationalism is the only acceptable and allowable viewpoint.

Keirawr · 03/05/2025 18:27

jasflowers · 03/05/2025 07:07

I'll try again, Do you think that brown people cannot be racist?

The fact that you think brown people should think a certain way is problematic in itself.

It’s the age old, brown people must be lefties or they are must be racist. That’s racism right there.

bellsanddogwhistles · 03/05/2025 18:32

jasflowers · 03/05/2025 17:51

They are, look at Farages "Breaking Point" poster, full of brown faces....

This was at the time of the referendum, when the concern was white europans coming here

Actually it's not.

I've seen about 5.

Have another look.

MasterBeth · 03/05/2025 18:37

OneAmberFinch · 03/05/2025 18:15

80% white.
75% white British.
I'm not only or even mostly talking about skin colour.

Do you want to engage with the point about rapid demographic and cultural change at all?

Or is this a "no debate" topic for you?

My home country is majority non-white for the record and I'll never be considered a native/local there despite my white ancestors being there for centuries and some of them mixing with locals.

It's really, really unusual, historically and globally speaking, to think that in 30 years you can just declare passport nationalism is the only acceptable and allowable viewpoint.

I don't share your racist concerns. I am white British and very comfortable living in an inner city area with... [checks figures] 57% white British and 26% Muslim population.

My neighbourhood has recently seen a large number of Hong Kong Chinese moving in, including my own next door neighbours. Suddenly, my neighbourhood is a lot more Chinese than it has ever been. I am wholly unconcerned by this.

I am not scared or concerned by rapid demographic change, no.

Why am I supposed to be concerned because the people living near me are not of the same ethnicity, religion or culture as me?

I am old enough to remember awful violent racist attacks and overwhelming racist graffiti against Commonwealth migrants from the Caribbean, Indian sub-continent and Uganda in the 1970s. These "aliens" are now the unremarkable friends and family of all of us White Britons.

Now though, it seems we (including those Black and Asian Britons and their descendents) are supposed to scared or wary of more current incomers. Why? It's racist bullshit.

thepariscrimefiles · 03/05/2025 18:41

FruityCider · 03/05/2025 16:24

Guess you heard President Fart is now moving to make it legal to deport American citizens and presumably put them into his hideous concentration camps detention centres.

Good for Trump, and good for us having his puppet looming over the horizon.

A four year old child with stage 4 cancer who is a US citizen was deported. People are defending the indefensible.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.