Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that not speaking to your own son is not a good look for the King ?

536 replies

Marmaladelover · 02/05/2025 21:08

Don’t get me wrong I think Harry has been a bit of an entitled burk but even so I was shocked that there has not been a reconciliation between Harry and Megan and the King and Queen at least to be civil to each other .
Refusing to even speak just seems like sulking to me !
That said I don’t think Harry telling the world and washing yet more dirty laundry in public is going to help matters .

Maybe some folk will think this comment belongs in the Royal Family thread rather than AIBU but it’s more about mumsnet standards ( sulking is not good ) and whether they should apply to those in high office .

Even JFK and Krushev had a hotline after the Cuban Crisis !

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
midlandsmummy123 · 02/05/2025 22:33

He only gets security if he is invited on a Royal visit, much like Princess Anne only gets security on official duties. However the threat level is did not go down when his full time armed security was removed. Anyway I think its difficult for Charles to be head of the CofE and not follow their teachings around forgiveness.

DreamTheMoors · 02/05/2025 22:35

The hatred on these four pages is disappointing.
And perhaps Charles and William are not angry that Harry wrote a book, because Charles wrote a scathing book about his own parents. Elizabeth II and Phillip were quite forgiving.
Perhaps they’re angry because Harry told the truth. Why else would they be so angry and upset? The truth makes people incensed.
Just a thought.
Not my family.
Not my business.

Titasaducksarse · 02/05/2025 22:35

Boo hoo cry me a river as his septuagenarian father has been dealing with cancer.....whilst Harry's been fannying about in USA with his media hungry wife.

RobinStrike · 02/05/2025 22:36

I believe Charles probably loves Harry dearly but he can’t run the risk of recorded phone calls, divulging information to the press about his illness and his plans etc. He probably also worries what talking to Harry and them him blabbing to the press/book/Netflix would do not only to the public’s view of him but how it reflects on the monarchy and William, and whether William would forgive him if he gave Harry more fodder for his interviews.
I think Charles has very little choice but to be NC beyond the vaguest of pleasantries, and I wonder if he’d find it harder to do that than to not speak at all.

Showerflowers · 02/05/2025 22:37

I just watched the interview. It’s not that Charles doesn’t want to speak to him, Charles cannot speak to him while this was going through court? Am I wrong?

Sortofdontwantto · 02/05/2025 22:39

A complete prick. Imagine nearing the end of your life and not speaking to your son because of some pointless shit about security.

Get rid of the royals

Showerflowers · 02/05/2025 22:40

SamDeanCas · 02/05/2025 22:32

I find it very hard to believe that the king has simply cut off Harry, essentially going NC with him. Harry is very good at twisting the narrative into something that suits him at the time. I still remember him saying that they didn’t insinuate that the RF were racist following his OW interview. He very cleverly pushed it onto the media, but you can clearly hear M telling OW that someone in the RF was asking what colour Archie’s skin would be. That alone makes me question if he’s telling the whole truth.

I agree

having just watched the interview Harry did a lot of insinuating about who was behind the decision to remove his security protection. Never naming names, but making sure we know it was someone in the royal household.

RobinStrike · 02/05/2025 22:42

Last time Harry was over he was offered a place to stay at Buckingham Palace, but he said he couldn’t because it didn’t have a back entrance /exit so wasn’t secure enough for the press to not know where he was going. None of the other royals have ever had this problem. He would have been in a secure guarded property. I don’t for a second believe that there isn’t a back entrance. The fruit and veg don’t go through the main doors.

maltravers · 02/05/2025 22:42

One minute Harry says he wants to reconcile and in the next breath he’s complaining that the royal family is behind the security decision, it’s all an attempt to manipulate him and make him do stuff, blah, blah, blah. You can see why the RF doesn’t engage.

slashlover · 02/05/2025 22:43

GeorgianaM · 02/05/2025 21:50

He knows anything he says to Harry will be repeated in another book or interview with the sole purpose of lining Harry's pockets.

All of it has been orchestrated by his wife, she who must be obeyed who has cut off her own father.

Ah the misogynistic "must be the woman's fault" as if Harry was perfectly happy before he met her.

Not one of Thomas Markle's grandchildren speaks to him.

imfae · 02/05/2025 22:44

I was amazed that this interview was the lead story on both bbc news and sky at 10pm . Sky even interrupted the coverage of the local elections to report it as breaking news earlier . Probably no bad thing as the fillers whilst they wait for results to come in is usually dire ….

I have only heard a few bits but the part that struck me was him saying he is willing to forgive them . There was no mention of him accepting that he had perhaps made mistakes ( Oprah , Spare , netflix etc ) and would also ask for forgiveness from them . Obviously he didn’t need to spell out these but could be a bit vague and accept that he too had made mistakes .

Surely for any reconcilation to happen both parties have to accept that they made mistakes .

I do agree with what others have said that it would be really difficult for the RF to trust him going forward and that he wouldn’t report what was said ( or his interpretation of it ) to the press .
One of the major sticking points for H& M is they can bleat on about the press but their ( financial ) survival rests upon being current and newsworthy .

That is tellingly the very expensive lifestyle that they have chosen . They didn’t go away and lead a quiet and more modest lifestyle and keep out of the press .

The personalities of H& M make it very difficult for them to shut up and they are constantly trying to establish that they are the wronged ones and the victims in all of this . I do accept that they were no doubt thrown under the bus at various points when the RF sought to deflect from other stories .

I do accept that H & M were vilified in the press ( especially ) the tabloids and there may have been an element of racism for this as it was clear that K & M did not get the same treatment.
.
I really can’t see a way forward here , H & M are so deeply entrenched in their version of events . It is noteworthy that M seems at least not to be keen on doing joint interviews / events as the default, as she is obviously trying to establish her lifestyle site .

NattyTurtle59 · 02/05/2025 22:46

Personally I wouldn't blame him for not speaking to his idiot son. However, are you really so naive that you believe everything that comes out of his stupid mouth?

Totallymessed · 02/05/2025 22:48

So PPs who think KC is a terrible person for not welcoming Harry back into the family: if your family member wrote a book about (supposed) very personal things that had happened, how would you feel? Do you think you would feel able to speak openly with them ever again?

I can't see how any of his family could ever trust him again, tbh

bluesinthenight · 02/05/2025 22:50

CraftyNavySeal · 02/05/2025 22:33

Blows the lid on what though? This is hardly wikileaks here.

If Harry and Meghan came out and said the royal family were an archaic institution that reinforces deep inequality in our society, that it’s abhorrent that they own palaces whilst veterans are homeless, I would respect that.

Except it’s all “this elderly relative is a bit racist and this one has affairs and this one favoured William over me”. Boo fucking hoo, who cares about any of this?

Such a tell-all book would sell like hot cakes. I remember what it was like when the Morton book on Diana came out. And what about when the papers leaked Charles's conversation about how jealous he was of Camilla's tampon because it was in her nunni instead of him? We couldn't get enough of it.

EsmaCannonball · 02/05/2025 22:51

Well, the Corleones learned not to say anything in front of Fredo and that was a good move too.

slashlover · 02/05/2025 22:51

Totallymessed · 02/05/2025 22:48

So PPs who think KC is a terrible person for not welcoming Harry back into the family: if your family member wrote a book about (supposed) very personal things that had happened, how would you feel? Do you think you would feel able to speak openly with them ever again?

I can't see how any of his family could ever trust him again, tbh

Well his own parents welcomed him after he wrote a book saying they were terrible parents.

I'd say that leaking things to journalists (as several journalists have admitted) is worse than writing it yourself.

HRTQueen · 02/05/2025 22:52

Totallymessed · 02/05/2025 22:48

So PPs who think KC is a terrible person for not welcoming Harry back into the family: if your family member wrote a book about (supposed) very personal things that had happened, how would you feel? Do you think you would feel able to speak openly with them ever again?

I can't see how any of his family could ever trust him again, tbh

You do realise the royal family’s pr machine is constantly feeding the press personal information

do you really think Charles has absolutely no say ever in what the press is informed of

bluesinthenight · 02/05/2025 22:53

Totallymessed · 02/05/2025 22:48

So PPs who think KC is a terrible person for not welcoming Harry back into the family: if your family member wrote a book about (supposed) very personal things that had happened, how would you feel? Do you think you would feel able to speak openly with them ever again?

I can't see how any of his family could ever trust him again, tbh

Most of us aren't worried about relatives revealing our "secret" indiscretions because we don't have anything much to either conceal or reveal.

ThedaBara · 02/05/2025 22:55

TheOriginalEmu · 02/05/2025 22:05

or maybe he knows his family better than you do, and it might well be true they’d like to see her gone like Diana? Why are they immune to suspicion that they might be awful people? Because they’re rich and in the public eye?

I'm sure he does know his family better than I do, they're all awful as far as I'm concerned, but if his own family want him and his wife dead why on earth does he want to reconcile with them?? Why go on TV to stir the shit? He's inviting me to have an opinion by airing his dirty washing tbh

Needspaceforlego · 02/05/2025 22:55

Lesina · 02/05/2025 21:21

This 100%. What ‘ the firm’ did to those children to satisfy the ghoulish demands of ‘the people’ was barbaric. He was 13 years old and expected to display his grief like an entertainment show. Horrific

Harry and William were both given the choice.

Prince Philip encouraged them but he had walked behind his sister and her three children & newborn baby when he himself was only 16

It's not like wasn't something he hadn't done himself when he was also very young.

Harry had been at boarding school for 4 years by the time Diana died. It wasn't something new to them.

MightAsWellBeGretel · 02/05/2025 22:56

MrsCravensworth · 02/05/2025 21:30

Absolute prick of a man.

He has also been a victim of 'the firm', but he recognises that responsibility and sacrifice is the flip side to the huge amount of privilege they have.

The whole institution is so far removed from modern life and most people's reality, it's cruel all round.

Harry has committed the ultimate betrayal in that sphere, it's difficult for us normals to understand.

Letstheriveranswer · 02/05/2025 22:58

Createausername1970 · 02/05/2025 22:09

Facially, if you concentrate on the eyes, Charles and Harry are very similar.

Yes, on passports the recognition goes on the eyes /nose / mouth triangle. Harry looks very much like Charles.

Nsky62 · 02/05/2025 22:58

HRTQueen · 02/05/2025 21:14

He allowed his sons to walk behind their mothers coffin at her funeral while the world watch all for the royal image

he packed them back off to boarding school when their were grieving

he had no intentions of ever being faithful and choose a bride that suited his needs and watched her mental health spiral and did nothing

what makes you think Charles is a nice guy he has never had a reputation of being nice

He did,, maybe he has regrets now, folk can and do change

Portakalkedi · 02/05/2025 23:01

Firstly, whatever this whinging tw*t says cannot be relied on as truth, and secondly, would you speak to a family member who cashed in by selling whatever you said? Perhaps they do speak and exchange greetings, we don't know, but neither the King nor any other of the RF are going to do more than that. I find it amazing that Harry and Meghan seem unable to comprehend this (along with many other things).

that

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/05/2025 23:01

blubberyboo · 02/05/2025 21:17

The King has a duty to protect the country. Why would he trust 2 people who sell everything to Netflix?

Besides we don't even know how much they do or don't speak

This.

You can't trust a word Harry says as he'll just use it for publicity/financial gain.