If Labour are changing their position on this, aren’t you happy?
I find the whole thing quite complex. I am very sympathetic to trans people and their struggles. I take absolutely no delight in their distress. Despite that, I am happy that the Supreme Court have clarified that sex can only mean biological sex within the meaning of the EA.
I couldn’t really give two hoots about a trans woman using the ladies while I’m in there, however, if my DH was out with our daughter without me, and he was waiting outside the toilets for her and saw a trans woman walking in he would feel uncomfortable. Not because they are trans, but because they are a biological male, and we know that overwhelmingly where a female is assaulted, the perpetrator is a biological male.
What does make me slightly uncomfortable is that the Supreme Court clarified that a biological woman could also be excluded from a women’s only space where there is reasonable objection to their masculine appearance (I.e they “pass” as a male). They could also find themselves excluded from a male space as they are a biological female. The sooner they provide third spaces the better.